Serveur d'exploration sur les dispositifs haptiques

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Ergonomic Factors Related to Drop-Off Detection With the Long Cane: Effects of Cane Tips and Techniques

Identifieur interne : 001761 ( Ncbi/Checkpoint ); précédent : 001760; suivant : 001762

Ergonomic Factors Related to Drop-Off Detection With the Long Cane: Effects of Cane Tips and Techniques

Auteurs : Dae Shik Kim ; Robert S. Wall Emerson ; Amy B. Curtis

Source :

RBID : PMC:3013374

Abstract

Objective

This study examined the effect of cane tips and cane techniques on drop-off detection with the long cane.

Background

Blind pedestrians depend on a long cane to detect drop-offs. Missing a drop-off may result in falls or collision with moving vehicles in the street. Although cane tips appear to affect a cane user’s ability to detect drop-offs, few experimental studies have examined such effect.

Method

A repeated-measures design with block randomization was used for the study. Participants were 17 adults who were legally blind and had no other disabilities. Participants attempted to detect the drop-offs of varied depths using different cane tips and cane techniques.

Results

Drop-off detection rates were similar between the marshmallow tip (77.0%) and the marshmallow roller tip (79.4%) when both tips were used with the constant contact technique, p = .294. However, participants detected drop-offs at a significantly higher percentage when they used the constant contact technique with the marshmallow roller tip (79.4%) than when they used the two-point touch technique with the marshmallow tip (63.2%), p < .001.

Conclusion

The constant contact technique used with a marshmallow roller tip (perceived as a less advantageous tip) was more effective than the two-point touch technique used with a marshmallow tip (perceived as a more advantageous tip) in detecting drop-offs.

Application

The findings of the study may help cane users and orientation and mobility specialists select appropriate cane techniques and cane tips in accordance with the cane user’s characteristics and the nature of the travel environment.


Url:
PubMed: 21077566
PubMed Central: 3013374


Affiliations:


Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Links to Exploration step

PMC:3013374

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI>
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Ergonomic Factors Related to Drop-Off Detection With the Long Cane: Effects of Cane Tips and Techniques</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Kim, Dae Shik" sort="Kim, Dae Shik" uniqKey="Kim D" first="Dae Shik" last="Kim">Dae Shik Kim</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Wall Emerson, Robert S" sort="Wall Emerson, Robert S" uniqKey="Wall Emerson R" first="Robert S." last="Wall Emerson">Robert S. Wall Emerson</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Curtis, Amy B" sort="Curtis, Amy B" uniqKey="Curtis A" first="Amy B." last="Curtis">Amy B. Curtis</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">PMC</idno>
<idno type="pmid">21077566</idno>
<idno type="pmc">3013374</idno>
<idno type="url">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3013374</idno>
<idno type="RBID">PMC:3013374</idno>
<date when="2010">2010</date>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Corpus">000E66</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Curation">000E66</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Checkpoint">001E98</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Merge">001761</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Curation">001761</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Checkpoint">001761</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en" level="a" type="main">Ergonomic Factors Related to Drop-Off Detection With the Long Cane: Effects of Cane Tips and Techniques</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Kim, Dae Shik" sort="Kim, Dae Shik" uniqKey="Kim D" first="Dae Shik" last="Kim">Dae Shik Kim</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Wall Emerson, Robert S" sort="Wall Emerson, Robert S" uniqKey="Wall Emerson R" first="Robert S." last="Wall Emerson">Robert S. Wall Emerson</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Curtis, Amy B" sort="Curtis, Amy B" uniqKey="Curtis A" first="Amy B." last="Curtis">Amy B. Curtis</name>
</author>
</analytic>
<series>
<title level="j">Human factors</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0018-7208</idno>
<imprint>
<date when="2010">2010</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass></textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">
<sec id="S1">
<title>Objective</title>
<p id="P1">This study examined the effect of cane tips and cane techniques on drop-off detection with the long cane.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2">
<title>Background</title>
<p id="P2">Blind pedestrians depend on a long cane to detect drop-offs. Missing a drop-off may result in falls or collision with moving vehicles in the street. Although cane tips appear to affect a cane user’s ability to detect drop-offs, few experimental studies have examined such effect.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="methods" id="S3">
<title>Method</title>
<p id="P3">A repeated-measures design with block randomization was used for the study. Participants were 17 adults who were legally blind and had no other disabilities. Participants attempted to detect the drop-offs of varied depths using different cane tips and cane techniques.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S4">
<title>Results</title>
<p id="P4">Drop-off detection rates were similar between the marshmallow tip (77.0%) and the marshmallow roller tip (79.4%) when both tips were used with the constant contact technique,
<italic>p</italic>
= .294. However, participants detected drop-offs at a significantly higher percentage when they used the constant contact technique with the marshmallow roller tip (79.4%) than when they used the two-point touch technique with the marshmallow tip (63.2%),
<italic>p</italic>
< .001.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S5">
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p id="P5">The constant contact technique used with a marshmallow roller tip (perceived as a less advantageous tip) was more effective than the two-point touch technique used with a marshmallow tip (perceived as a more advantageous tip) in detecting drop-offs.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S6">
<title>Application</title>
<p id="P6">The findings of the study may help cane users and orientation and mobility specialists select appropriate cane techniques and cane tips in accordance with the cane user’s characteristics and the nature of the travel environment.</p>
</sec>
</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<affiliations>
<list></list>
<tree>
<noCountry>
<name sortKey="Curtis, Amy B" sort="Curtis, Amy B" uniqKey="Curtis A" first="Amy B." last="Curtis">Amy B. Curtis</name>
<name sortKey="Kim, Dae Shik" sort="Kim, Dae Shik" uniqKey="Kim D" first="Dae Shik" last="Kim">Dae Shik Kim</name>
<name sortKey="Wall Emerson, Robert S" sort="Wall Emerson, Robert S" uniqKey="Wall Emerson R" first="Robert S." last="Wall Emerson">Robert S. Wall Emerson</name>
</noCountry>
</tree>
</affiliations>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/Ncbi/Checkpoint
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001761 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Ncbi/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd -nk 001761 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Ticri/CIDE
   |area=    HapticV1
   |flux=    Ncbi
   |étape=   Checkpoint
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     PMC:3013374
   |texte=   Ergonomic Factors Related to Drop-Off Detection With the Long Cane: Effects of Cane Tips and Techniques
}}

Pour générer des pages wiki

HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Ncbi/Checkpoint/RBID.i   -Sk "pubmed:21077566" \
       | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Ncbi/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd   \
       | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a HapticV1 

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23.
Data generation: Mon Jun 13 01:09:46 2016. Site generation: Wed Mar 6 09:54:07 2024