Why does the brain predict sensory consequences of oculomotor commands? Optimal integration of the predicted and the actual sensory feedback
Identifieur interne : 005B10 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 005B09; suivant : 005B11Why does the brain predict sensory consequences of oculomotor commands? Optimal integration of the predicted and the actual sensory feedback
Auteurs : Siavash Vaziri ; Jörn Diedrichsen ; Reza ShadmehrSource :
- The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience [ 0270-6474 ] ; 2006.
Abstract
When the brain initiates a saccade, it uses a copy of the oculomotor commands to predict the visual consequences: For example, if one fixates a reach target, a peripheral saccade will produce an internal estimate of the new retinal location of the target, a process called remapping. In natural settings, the target likely remains visible after the saccade. So why should the brain predict the sensory consequence of the saccade when after its completion, the image of the target remains visible? We hypothesized that in the post-saccadic period, the brain integrates target position information from two sources: one based on remapping, and another based on the peripheral view of the target. The integration of information from these two sources could produce a less variable target estimate than is possible from either source alone. Here we show that reaching towards targets that were initially foveated and then remapped had significantly less variance than reaches relying on peripheral target information. Furthermore, in a more natural setting where both sources of information were available simultaneously, variance of the reaches was further reduced as predicted by integration. This integration occurred in a statistically optimal manner, as demonstrated by the change in integration weights when we manipulated the uncertainty of the post-saccadic target estimate by varying exposure time. Therefore, the brain predicts the sensory consequences of motor commands because it integrates its prediction with the actual sensory information to produce an estimate of sensory space that is better than possible from either source alone.
Url:
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4747-05.2006
PubMed: 16624939
PubMed Central: 1473981
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Pmc, to step Corpus: 000724
- to stream Pmc, to step Curation: 000724
- to stream Pmc, to step Checkpoint: 002497
- to stream Ncbi, to step Merge: 000916
- to stream Ncbi, to step Curation: 000916
- to stream Ncbi, to step Checkpoint: 000916
- to stream Main, to step Merge: 005D11
- to stream Main, to step Curation: 005B10
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Why does the brain predict sensory consequences of oculomotor commands? Optimal integration of the predicted and the actual sensory feedback</title>
<author><name sortKey="Vaziri, Siavash" sort="Vaziri, Siavash" uniqKey="Vaziri S" first="Siavash" last="Vaziri">Siavash Vaziri</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Diedrichsen, Jorn" sort="Diedrichsen, Jorn" uniqKey="Diedrichsen J" first="Jörn" last="Diedrichsen">Jörn Diedrichsen</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Shadmehr, Reza" sort="Shadmehr, Reza" uniqKey="Shadmehr R" first="Reza" last="Shadmehr">Reza Shadmehr</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PMC</idno>
<idno type="pmid">16624939</idno>
<idno type="pmc">1473981</idno>
<idno type="url">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1473981</idno>
<idno type="RBID">PMC:1473981</idno>
<idno type="doi">10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4747-05.2006</idno>
<date when="2006">2006</date>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Corpus">000724</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Curation">000724</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Checkpoint">002497</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Merge">000916</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Curation">000916</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Checkpoint">000916</idno>
<idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0270-6474:2006:Vaziri S:why:does:the</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">005D11</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">005B10</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">005B10</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a" type="main">Why does the brain predict sensory consequences of oculomotor commands? Optimal integration of the predicted and the actual sensory feedback</title>
<author><name sortKey="Vaziri, Siavash" sort="Vaziri, Siavash" uniqKey="Vaziri S" first="Siavash" last="Vaziri">Siavash Vaziri</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Diedrichsen, Jorn" sort="Diedrichsen, Jorn" uniqKey="Diedrichsen J" first="Jörn" last="Diedrichsen">Jörn Diedrichsen</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Shadmehr, Reza" sort="Shadmehr, Reza" uniqKey="Shadmehr R" first="Reza" last="Shadmehr">Reza Shadmehr</name>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j">The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0270-6474</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1529-2401</idno>
<imprint><date when="2006">2006</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass></textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p id="P1">When the brain initiates a saccade, it uses a copy of the oculomotor commands to predict the visual consequences: For example, if one fixates a reach target, a peripheral saccade will produce an internal estimate of the new retinal location of the target, a process called remapping. In natural settings, the target likely remains visible after the saccade. So why should the brain predict the sensory consequence of the saccade when after its completion, the image of the target remains visible? We hypothesized that in the post-saccadic period, the brain integrates target position information from two sources: one based on remapping, and another based on the peripheral view of the target. The integration of information from these two sources could produce a less variable target estimate than is possible from either source alone. Here we show that reaching towards targets that were initially foveated and then remapped had significantly less variance than reaches relying on peripheral target information. Furthermore, in a more natural setting where both sources of information were available simultaneously, variance of the reaches was further reduced as predicted by integration. This integration occurred in a statistically optimal manner, as demonstrated by the change in integration weights when we manipulated the uncertainty of the post-saccadic target estimate by varying exposure time. Therefore, the brain predicts the sensory consequences of motor commands because it integrates its prediction with the actual sensory information to produce an estimate of sensory space that is better than possible from either source alone.</p>
</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<affiliations><list></list>
<tree><noCountry><name sortKey="Diedrichsen, Jorn" sort="Diedrichsen, Jorn" uniqKey="Diedrichsen J" first="Jörn" last="Diedrichsen">Jörn Diedrichsen</name>
<name sortKey="Shadmehr, Reza" sort="Shadmehr, Reza" uniqKey="Shadmehr R" first="Reza" last="Shadmehr">Reza Shadmehr</name>
<name sortKey="Vaziri, Siavash" sort="Vaziri, Siavash" uniqKey="Vaziri S" first="Siavash" last="Vaziri">Siavash Vaziri</name>
</noCountry>
</tree>
</affiliations>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 005B10 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 005B10 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Ticri/CIDE |area= HapticV1 |flux= Main |étape= Exploration |type= RBID |clé= PMC:1473981 |texte= Why does the brain predict sensory consequences of oculomotor commands? Optimal integration of the predicted and the actual sensory feedback }}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:16624939" \ | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd \ | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a HapticV1
![]() | This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23. | ![]() |