Reference frame preferences in haptics differ for the blind and sighted in the horizontal but not in the vertical plane.
Identifieur interne : 002995 ( Main/Curation ); précédent : 002994; suivant : 002996Reference frame preferences in haptics differ for the blind and sighted in the horizontal but not in the vertical plane.
Auteurs : Marijn E. Struiksma [Pays-Bas] ; Matthijs L. Noordzij ; Albert PostmaSource :
- Perception [ 0301-0066 ] ; 2011.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
- psychology : Blindness, Vision, Low.
- Adult, Aged, Cues, Depth Perception, Discrimination (Psychology), Female, Humans, Judgment, Male, Middle Aged, Orientation, Pattern Recognition, Physiological, Stereognosis, Touch.
Abstract
We investigated which reference frames are preferred when matching spatial language to the haptic domain. Sighted, low-vision, and blind participants were tested on a haptic-sentence-verification task where participants had to haptically explore different configurations of a ball and a shoe and judge the relation between them. Results from the spatial relation "above", in the vertical plane, showed that various reference frames are available after haptic inspection of a configuration. Moreover, the pattern of results was similar for all three groups and resembled patterns found for the sighted on visual sentence-verification tasks. In contrast, when judging the spatial relation "in front", in the horizontal plane, the blind showed a markedly different response pattern. The sighted and low-vision participants did not show a clear preference for either the absolute/relative or the intrinsic reference frame when these frames were dissociated. The blind, on the other hand, showed a clear preference for the intrinsic reference frame. In the absence of a dominant cue, such as gravity in the vertical plane, the blind might emphasise the functional relationship between the objects owing to enhanced experience with haptic exploration of objects.
PubMed: 21936300
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream PubMed, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :000E11
- to stream PubMed, to step Curation: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :000E11
- to stream PubMed, to step Checkpoint: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :000C71
- to stream Ncbi, to step Merge: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :001B92
- to stream Ncbi, to step Curation: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :001B92
- to stream Ncbi, to step Checkpoint: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :001B92
- to stream Main, to step Merge: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :002A27
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:21936300Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Reference frame preferences in haptics differ for the blind and sighted in the horizontal but not in the vertical plane.</title><author><name sortKey="Struiksma, Marijn E" sort="Struiksma, Marijn E" uniqKey="Struiksma M" first="Marijn E" last="Struiksma">Marijn E. Struiksma</name><affiliation wicri:level="4"><nlm:affiliation>Experimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, (Utrecht Institute of Linguistics OTS), Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 8, 3508 TC Utrecht, The Netherlands. m.struiksma@uu.nl</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Pays-Bas</country><wicri:regionArea>Experimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, (Utrecht Institute of Linguistics OTS), Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 8, 3508 TC Utrecht</wicri:regionArea><orgName type="university">Université d'Utrecht</orgName><placeName><settlement type="city">Utrecht</settlement><region nuts="2">Utrecht (province)</region></placeName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Noordzij, Matthijs L" sort="Noordzij, Matthijs L" uniqKey="Noordzij M" first="Matthijs L" last="Noordzij">Matthijs L. Noordzij</name></author><author><name sortKey="Postma, Albert" sort="Postma, Albert" uniqKey="Postma A" first="Albert" last="Postma">Albert Postma</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2011">2011</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:21936300</idno><idno type="pmid">21936300</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000E11</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">000E11</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Checkpoint">000C71</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Merge">001B92</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Curation">001B92</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Checkpoint">001B92</idno><idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0301-0066:2011:Struiksma M:reference:frame:preferences</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">002A27</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">002995</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Reference frame preferences in haptics differ for the blind and sighted in the horizontal but not in the vertical plane.</title><author><name sortKey="Struiksma, Marijn E" sort="Struiksma, Marijn E" uniqKey="Struiksma M" first="Marijn E" last="Struiksma">Marijn E. Struiksma</name><affiliation wicri:level="4"><nlm:affiliation>Experimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, (Utrecht Institute of Linguistics OTS), Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 8, 3508 TC Utrecht, The Netherlands. m.struiksma@uu.nl</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Pays-Bas</country><wicri:regionArea>Experimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, (Utrecht Institute of Linguistics OTS), Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 8, 3508 TC Utrecht</wicri:regionArea><orgName type="university">Université d'Utrecht</orgName><placeName><settlement type="city">Utrecht</settlement><region nuts="2">Utrecht (province)</region></placeName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Noordzij, Matthijs L" sort="Noordzij, Matthijs L" uniqKey="Noordzij M" first="Matthijs L" last="Noordzij">Matthijs L. Noordzij</name></author><author><name sortKey="Postma, Albert" sort="Postma, Albert" uniqKey="Postma A" first="Albert" last="Postma">Albert Postma</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Perception</title><idno type="ISSN">0301-0066</idno><imprint><date when="2011" type="published">2011</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Aged</term><term>Blindness (psychology)</term><term>Cues</term><term>Depth Perception</term><term>Discrimination (Psychology)</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Judgment</term><term>Male</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Orientation</term><term>Pattern Recognition, Physiological</term><term>Stereognosis</term><term>Touch</term><term>Vision, Low (psychology)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="psychology" xml:lang="en"><term>Blindness</term><term>Vision, Low</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Aged</term><term>Cues</term><term>Depth Perception</term><term>Discrimination (Psychology)</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Judgment</term><term>Male</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Orientation</term><term>Pattern Recognition, Physiological</term><term>Stereognosis</term><term>Touch</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">We investigated which reference frames are preferred when matching spatial language to the haptic domain. Sighted, low-vision, and blind participants were tested on a haptic-sentence-verification task where participants had to haptically explore different configurations of a ball and a shoe and judge the relation between them. Results from the spatial relation "above", in the vertical plane, showed that various reference frames are available after haptic inspection of a configuration. Moreover, the pattern of results was similar for all three groups and resembled patterns found for the sighted on visual sentence-verification tasks. In contrast, when judging the spatial relation "in front", in the horizontal plane, the blind showed a markedly different response pattern. The sighted and low-vision participants did not show a clear preference for either the absolute/relative or the intrinsic reference frame when these frames were dissociated. The blind, on the other hand, showed a clear preference for the intrinsic reference frame. In the absence of a dominant cue, such as gravity in the vertical plane, the blind might emphasise the functional relationship between the objects owing to enhanced experience with haptic exploration of objects.</div></front></TEI></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/Main/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002995 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 002995 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Ticri/CIDE
|area= HapticV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Curation
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:21936300
|texte= Reference frame preferences in haptics differ for the blind and sighted in the horizontal but not in the vertical plane.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Curation/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:21936300" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Curation/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a HapticV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23. |  |