Testing manual dexterity using a virtual reality simulator: reliability and validity.
Identifieur interne : 001816 ( Main/Curation ); précédent : 001815; suivant : 001817Testing manual dexterity using a virtual reality simulator: reliability and validity.
Auteurs : G. Ben-Gal [Israël] ; E I Weiss ; N. Gafni ; A. ZivSource :
- European journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe [ 1600-0579 ] ; 2013.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Analysis of Variance, Clinical Competence, Computer Simulation, Computer-Assisted Instruction (methods), Education, Dental (methods), Educational Technology (instrumentation), Female, Humans, Male, Motor Skills (physiology), Reproducibility of Results, Students, Dental, Task Performance and Analysis, User-Computer Interface.
- MESH :
- instrumentation : Educational Technology.
- methods : Computer-Assisted Instruction, Education, Dental.
- physiology : Motor Skills.
- Analysis of Variance, Clinical Competence, Computer Simulation, Female, Humans, Male, Reproducibility of Results, Students, Dental, Task Performance and Analysis, User-Computer Interface.
Abstract
Virtual reality dental training simulators, unlike traditional human-based assessment, have the potential to enable consistent and reliable assessment. The purpose of this study was to determine whether a haptic simulator (IDEA Dental(®) ) could provide a reliable and valid assessment of manual dexterity. A total of 106 participants were divided into three groups differing in dental manual dexterity experience: (i) 63 dental students, (ii) 28 dentists, (iii) 14 non-dentists. The groups, which were expected to display various performance levels, were required to perform virtual drilling tasks in different geometric shapes. The following task parameters were registered: (i) Time to completion (ii) accuracy (iii) number of trials to successful completion and (iv) score provided by the simulator. The reliability of the tasks was calculated for each parameter. The simulator and its scoring algorithm showed high reliability in all the parameters measured. The simulator was able to differentiate between non-professionals and dental students or non-professionals and dentists. Our study suggests that for improved construct validity, shorter working times and more difficult tasks should be introduced. The device should also be designed to provide greater sensitivity in measuring the accuracy of the task.
DOI: 10.1111/eje.12023
PubMed: 23815690
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream PubMed, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :000925
- to stream PubMed, to step Curation: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :000925
- to stream PubMed, to step Checkpoint: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :000787
- to stream Ncbi, to step Merge: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :002773
- to stream Ncbi, to step Curation: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :002773
- to stream Ncbi, to step Checkpoint: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :002773
- to stream Main, to step Merge: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :001830
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:23815690Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Testing manual dexterity using a virtual reality simulator: reliability and validity.</title><author><name sortKey="Ben Gal, G" sort="Ben Gal, G" uniqKey="Ben Gal G" first="G" last="Ben-Gal">G. Ben-Gal</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Hebrew University-Hadassah, Jerusalem, Israel. gilad.bengal@mail.huji.ac.il</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Israël</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Hebrew University-Hadassah, Jerusalem</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Jerusalem</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Weiss, E I" sort="Weiss, E I" uniqKey="Weiss E" first="E I" last="Weiss">E I Weiss</name></author><author><name sortKey="Gafni, N" sort="Gafni, N" uniqKey="Gafni N" first="N" last="Gafni">N. Gafni</name></author><author><name sortKey="Ziv, A" sort="Ziv, A" uniqKey="Ziv A" first="A" last="Ziv">A. Ziv</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2013">2013</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/eje.12023</idno><idno type="RBID">pubmed:23815690</idno><idno type="pmid">23815690</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000925</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">000925</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Checkpoint">000787</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Merge">002773</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Curation">002773</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Checkpoint">002773</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">001830</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">001816</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Testing manual dexterity using a virtual reality simulator: reliability and validity.</title><author><name sortKey="Ben Gal, G" sort="Ben Gal, G" uniqKey="Ben Gal G" first="G" last="Ben-Gal">G. Ben-Gal</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Hebrew University-Hadassah, Jerusalem, Israel. gilad.bengal@mail.huji.ac.il</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Israël</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Hebrew University-Hadassah, Jerusalem</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Jerusalem</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Weiss, E I" sort="Weiss, E I" uniqKey="Weiss E" first="E I" last="Weiss">E I Weiss</name></author><author><name sortKey="Gafni, N" sort="Gafni, N" uniqKey="Gafni N" first="N" last="Gafni">N. Gafni</name></author><author><name sortKey="Ziv, A" sort="Ziv, A" uniqKey="Ziv A" first="A" last="Ziv">A. Ziv</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">European journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe</title><idno type="eISSN">1600-0579</idno><imprint><date when="2013" type="published">2013</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Analysis of Variance</term><term>Clinical Competence</term><term>Computer Simulation</term><term>Computer-Assisted Instruction (methods)</term><term>Education, Dental (methods)</term><term>Educational Technology (instrumentation)</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Male</term><term>Motor Skills (physiology)</term><term>Reproducibility of Results</term><term>Students, Dental</term><term>Task Performance and Analysis</term><term>User-Computer Interface</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="instrumentation" xml:lang="en"><term>Educational Technology</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Computer-Assisted Instruction</term><term>Education, Dental</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="physiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Motor Skills</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Analysis of Variance</term><term>Clinical Competence</term><term>Computer Simulation</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Male</term><term>Reproducibility of Results</term><term>Students, Dental</term><term>Task Performance and Analysis</term><term>User-Computer Interface</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Virtual reality dental training simulators, unlike traditional human-based assessment, have the potential to enable consistent and reliable assessment. The purpose of this study was to determine whether a haptic simulator (IDEA Dental(®) ) could provide a reliable and valid assessment of manual dexterity. A total of 106 participants were divided into three groups differing in dental manual dexterity experience: (i) 63 dental students, (ii) 28 dentists, (iii) 14 non-dentists. The groups, which were expected to display various performance levels, were required to perform virtual drilling tasks in different geometric shapes. The following task parameters were registered: (i) Time to completion (ii) accuracy (iii) number of trials to successful completion and (iv) score provided by the simulator. The reliability of the tasks was calculated for each parameter. The simulator and its scoring algorithm showed high reliability in all the parameters measured. The simulator was able to differentiate between non-professionals and dental students or non-professionals and dentists. Our study suggests that for improved construct validity, shorter working times and more difficult tasks should be introduced. The device should also be designed to provide greater sensitivity in measuring the accuracy of the task.</div></front></TEI></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/Main/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001816 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 001816 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Ticri/CIDE
|area= HapticV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Curation
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:23815690
|texte= Testing manual dexterity using a virtual reality simulator: reliability and validity.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Curation/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:23815690" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Curation/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a HapticV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23. |  |