The New Zealand cataract and refractive surgery survey 2001
Identifieur interne : 002F75 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 002F74; suivant : 002F76The New Zealand cataract and refractive surgery survey 2001
Auteurs : Mark Elder ; David LeamingSource :
- Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology [ 1442-6404 ] ; 2003-04.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
Abstract
Background: This study documents the current practice for cataract and refractive surgery in New Zealand. Methods: A postal questionnaire was distributed late in 2000 to all consultant ophthalmologists in New Zealand. Most questions were identical to the 2000 survey of the American Society of Cataract and Refraction Surgeons (ASCRS) enabling a comparison. Results: There was an 84% return rate from the 103 surveys distributed. In regards to cataract surgery, topical anaesthesia was used by 12% of respondents, clear corneal incisions by 64%, no suture was used by 94%, diamond blades were used by 33%, disposable blades were reused by 64%, preoperative antibiotics were used by 28%, antibiotic was used in the irrigant by 10%, postoperative injections of steroid/antibiotics were used by 63% and 41% of patients had three postoperative visits after cataract surgery. In regards to refractive surgery, 51% of respondents had access to an excimer laser and clear lens extraction was performed by 13 ophthalmologists. Advice to a 30‐year‐old −7.00 myope wanting refractive surgery was to have LASIK (88%), wait (8%) or have no surgery (4%). Discussion: In broad terms, New Zealand ophthalmologists’ cataract and refractive practice is similar to that of the members of ASCRS with the exception of the use of topical anaesthetic (NZ 12%vs USA 49%) and the higher use of postoperative injections of steroid and antibiotic at the end of surgery (NZ 63%vs USA 20%).
Url:
DOI: 10.1046/j.1442-9071.2003.00616.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:F4175779CBA38A12FD52AB8DDD67379610E9AC2BLe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">The New Zealand cataract and refractive surgery survey 2001</title><author><name sortKey="Elder, Mark" sort="Elder, Mark" uniqKey="Elder M" first="Mark" last="Elder">Mark Elder</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Ophthalmology, Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand and</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Leaming, David" sort="Leaming, David" uniqKey="Leaming D" first="David" last="Leaming">David Leaming</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Private Practice, Palm Springs, California, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:F4175779CBA38A12FD52AB8DDD67379610E9AC2B</idno><date when="2003" year="2003">2003</date><idno type="doi">10.1046/j.1442-9071.2003.00616.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/F4175779CBA38A12FD52AB8DDD67379610E9AC2B/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">002F75</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">The New Zealand cataract and refractive surgery survey 2001</title><author><name sortKey="Elder, Mark" sort="Elder, Mark" uniqKey="Elder M" first="Mark" last="Elder">Mark Elder</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Ophthalmology, Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand and</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Leaming, David" sort="Leaming, David" uniqKey="Leaming D" first="David" last="Leaming">David Leaming</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Private Practice, Palm Springs, California, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology</title><idno type="ISSN">1442-6404</idno><idno type="eISSN">1442-9071</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Science Pty</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2003-04">2003-04</date><biblScope unit="volume">31</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="114">114</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="120">120</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">1442-6404</idno></series><idno type="istex">F4175779CBA38A12FD52AB8DDD67379610E9AC2B</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1046/j.1442-9071.2003.00616.x</idno><idno type="ArticleID">CEO616</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1442-6404</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>New Zealand</term><term>cataract</term><term>excimer laser</term><term>phacoemulsification</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Background: This study documents the current practice for cataract and refractive surgery in New Zealand. Methods: A postal questionnaire was distributed late in 2000 to all consultant ophthalmologists in New Zealand. Most questions were identical to the 2000 survey of the American Society of Cataract and Refraction Surgeons (ASCRS) enabling a comparison. Results: There was an 84% return rate from the 103 surveys distributed. In regards to cataract surgery, topical anaesthesia was used by 12% of respondents, clear corneal incisions by 64%, no suture was used by 94%, diamond blades were used by 33%, disposable blades were reused by 64%, preoperative antibiotics were used by 28%, antibiotic was used in the irrigant by 10%, postoperative injections of steroid/antibiotics were used by 63% and 41% of patients had three postoperative visits after cataract surgery. In regards to refractive surgery, 51% of respondents had access to an excimer laser and clear lens extraction was performed by 13 ophthalmologists. Advice to a 30‐year‐old −7.00 myope wanting refractive surgery was to have LASIK (88%), wait (8%) or have no surgery (4%). Discussion: In broad terms, New Zealand ophthalmologists’ cataract and refractive practice is similar to that of the members of ASCRS with the exception of the use of topical anaesthetic (NZ 12%vs USA 49%) and the higher use of postoperative injections of steroid and antibiotic at the end of surgery (NZ 63%vs USA 20%).</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><author><json:item><name>Mark Elder MD FRANZCO</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Ophthalmology, Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand and</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>David Leaming MD</name><affiliations><json:string>Private Practice, Palm Springs, California, USA</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>cataract</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>excimer laser</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>New Zealand</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>phacoemulsification</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>CEO616</json:string></articleId><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><abstract>Background: This study documents the current practice for cataract and refractive surgery in New Zealand. Methods: A postal questionnaire was distributed late in 2000 to all consultant ophthalmologists in New Zealand. Most questions were identical to the 2000 survey of the American Society of Cataract and Refraction Surgeons (ASCRS) enabling a comparison. Results: There was an 84% return rate from the 103 surveys distributed. In regards to cataract surgery, topical anaesthesia was used by 12% of respondents, clear corneal incisions by 64%, no suture was used by 94%, diamond blades were used by 33%, disposable blades were reused by 64%, preoperative antibiotics were used by 28%, antibiotic was used in the irrigant by 10%, postoperative injections of steroid/antibiotics were used by 63% and 41% of patients had three postoperative visits after cataract surgery. In regards to refractive surgery, 51% of respondents had access to an excimer laser and clear lens extraction was performed by 13 ophthalmologists. Advice to a 30‐year‐old −7.00 myope wanting refractive surgery was to have LASIK (88%), wait (8%) or have no surgery (4%). Discussion: In broad terms, New Zealand ophthalmologists’ cataract and refractive practice is similar to that of the members of ASCRS with the exception of the use of topical anaesthetic (NZ 12%vs USA 49%) and the higher use of postoperative injections of steroid and antibiotic at the end of surgery (NZ 63%vs USA 20%).</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>4.505</score><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageSize>595 x 780 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><keywordCount>4</keywordCount><abstractCharCount>1463</abstractCharCount><pdfWordCount>1793</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>13601</pdfCharCount><pdfPageCount>7</pdfPageCount><abstractWordCount>226</abstractWordCount></qualityIndicators><title>The New Zealand cataract and refractive surgery survey 2001</title><genre.original><json:string>article</json:string></genre.original><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><volume>31</volume><publisherId><json:string>CEO</json:string></publisherId><pages><total>7</total><last>120</last><first>114</first></pages><issn><json:string>1442-6404</json:string></issn><issue>2</issue><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><eissn><json:string>1442-9071</json:string></eissn><title>Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology</title><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1442-9071</json:string></doi></host><publicationDate>2003</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2003</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1046/j.1442-9071.2003.00616.x</json:string></doi><id>F4175779CBA38A12FD52AB8DDD67379610E9AC2B</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><extension>pdf</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/F4175779CBA38A12FD52AB8DDD67379610E9AC2B/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><extension>zip</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/F4175779CBA38A12FD52AB8DDD67379610E9AC2B/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/F4175779CBA38A12FD52AB8DDD67379610E9AC2B/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">The New Zealand cataract and refractive surgery survey 2001</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Science Pty</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><availability><p>WILEY</p></availability><date>2003</date></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">The New Zealand cataract and refractive surgery survey 2001</title><author><persName><forename type="first">Mark</forename><surname>Elder</surname></persName><roleName type="degree">MD FRANZCO</roleName><affiliation>Department of Ophthalmology, Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand and</affiliation></author><author><persName><forename type="first">David</forename><surname>Leaming</surname></persName><roleName type="degree">MD</roleName><affiliation>Private Practice, Palm Springs, California, USA</affiliation></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology</title><idno type="pISSN">1442-6404</idno><idno type="eISSN">1442-9071</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1442-9071</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Science Pty</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2003-04"></date><biblScope unit="volume">31</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="114">114</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="120">120</biblScope></imprint></monogr><idno type="istex">F4175779CBA38A12FD52AB8DDD67379610E9AC2B</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1046/j.1442-9071.2003.00616.x</idno><idno type="ArticleID">CEO616</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>2003</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Background: This study documents the current practice for cataract and refractive surgery in New Zealand. Methods: A postal questionnaire was distributed late in 2000 to all consultant ophthalmologists in New Zealand. Most questions were identical to the 2000 survey of the American Society of Cataract and Refraction Surgeons (ASCRS) enabling a comparison. Results: There was an 84% return rate from the 103 surveys distributed. In regards to cataract surgery, topical anaesthesia was used by 12% of respondents, clear corneal incisions by 64%, no suture was used by 94%, diamond blades were used by 33%, disposable blades were reused by 64%, preoperative antibiotics were used by 28%, antibiotic was used in the irrigant by 10%, postoperative injections of steroid/antibiotics were used by 63% and 41% of patients had three postoperative visits after cataract surgery. In regards to refractive surgery, 51% of respondents had access to an excimer laser and clear lens extraction was performed by 13 ophthalmologists. Advice to a 30‐year‐old −7.00 myope wanting refractive surgery was to have LASIK (88%), wait (8%) or have no surgery (4%). Discussion: In broad terms, New Zealand ophthalmologists’ cataract and refractive practice is similar to that of the members of ASCRS with the exception of the use of topical anaesthetic (NZ 12%vs USA 49%) and the higher use of postoperative injections of steroid and antibiotic at the end of surgery (NZ 63%vs USA 20%).</p></abstract><textClass xml:lang="en"><keywords scheme="keyword"><list><head>keywords</head><item><term>cataract</term></item><item><term>excimer laser</term></item><item><term>New Zealand</term></item><item><term>phacoemulsification</term></item></list></keywords></textClass></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="2003-04">Published</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><extension>txt</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/F4175779CBA38A12FD52AB8DDD67379610E9AC2B/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Science Pty</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1442-9071</doi><issn type="print">1442-6404</issn><issn type="electronic">1442-9071</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="CEO"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="CLINICAL EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY">Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="04002"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/ceo.2003.31.issue-2</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="31">31</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="2">2</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2003-04">April 2003</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="0011400" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1046/j.1442-9071.2003.00616.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="CEO616"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="7"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Original Articles</title></titleGroup><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2003-03-28"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2003-03-28"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.4 mode:FullText source:FullText result:FullText" date="2010-03-30"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-09"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-16"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="114">114</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="120">120</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo> Associate Professor Mark Elder, Department of Ophthalmology, Christchurch Hospital, PO Box 4710, Christchurch, New Zealand. Email: <email>mark.elder@cdhb.govt.nz</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:CEO.CEO616.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="0"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="17"></count><count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="7"></count><count type="wordTotal" number="3017"></count><count type="linksPubMed" number="3"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="0"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">The New Zealand cataract and refractive surgery survey 2001</title><title type="shortAuthors">Elder and Leaming</title><title type="short">Cataract and refractive surgery survey 2001</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Mark</givenNames><familyName>Elder</familyName><degrees>MD FRANZCO</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>David</givenNames><familyName>Leaming</familyName><degrees>MD</degrees></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="NZ"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Ophthalmology, Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand and</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2" countryCode="US"><unparsedAffiliation>Private Practice, Palm Springs, California, USA</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">cataract</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">excimer laser</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">New Zealand</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">phacoemulsification</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><title type="main">Abstract</title><p> <b>Background:</b> This study documents the current practice for cataract and refractive surgery in New Zealand.</p><p> <b>Methods:</b> A postal questionnaire was distributed late in 2000 to all consultant ophthalmologists in New Zealand. Most questions were identical to the 2000 survey of the American Society of Cataract and Refraction Surgeons (ASCRS) enabling a comparison.</p><p> <b>Results:</b> There was an 84% return rate from the 103 surveys distributed. In regards to cataract surgery, topical anaesthesia was used by 12% of respondents, clear corneal incisions by 64%, no suture was used by 94%, diamond blades were used by 33%, disposable blades were reused by 64%, preoperative antibiotics were used by 28%, antibiotic was used in the irrigant by 10%, postoperative injections of steroid/antibiotics were used by 63% and 41% of patients had three postoperative visits after cataract surgery. In regards to refractive surgery, 51% of respondents had access to an excimer laser and clear lens extraction was performed by 13 ophthalmologists. Advice to a 30‐year‐old −7.00 myope wanting refractive surgery was to have LASIK (88%), wait (8%) or have no surgery (4%).</p><p> <b>Discussion:</b> In broad terms, New Zealand ophthalmologists’ cataract and refractive practice is similar to that of the members of ASCRS with the exception of the use of topical anaesthetic (NZ 12%<i>vs</i> USA 49%) and the higher use of postoperative injections of steroid and antibiotic at the end of surgery (NZ 63%<i>vs</i> USA 20%).</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>The New Zealand cataract and refractive surgery survey 2001</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>Cataract and refractive surgery survey 2001</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>The New Zealand cataract and refractive surgery survey 2001</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Mark</namePart><namePart type="family">Elder</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">MD FRANZCO</namePart><affiliation>Department of Ophthalmology, Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand and</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">David</namePart><namePart type="family">Leaming</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">MD</namePart><affiliation>Private Practice, Palm Springs, California, USA</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article"></genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Science Pty</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2003-04</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2003</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType><extent unit="tables">17</extent><extent unit="references">7</extent><extent unit="words">3017</extent></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">Background: This study documents the current practice for cataract and refractive surgery in New Zealand. Methods: A postal questionnaire was distributed late in 2000 to all consultant ophthalmologists in New Zealand. Most questions were identical to the 2000 survey of the American Society of Cataract and Refraction Surgeons (ASCRS) enabling a comparison. Results: There was an 84% return rate from the 103 surveys distributed. In regards to cataract surgery, topical anaesthesia was used by 12% of respondents, clear corneal incisions by 64%, no suture was used by 94%, diamond blades were used by 33%, disposable blades were reused by 64%, preoperative antibiotics were used by 28%, antibiotic was used in the irrigant by 10%, postoperative injections of steroid/antibiotics were used by 63% and 41% of patients had three postoperative visits after cataract surgery. In regards to refractive surgery, 51% of respondents had access to an excimer laser and clear lens extraction was performed by 13 ophthalmologists. Advice to a 30‐year‐old −7.00 myope wanting refractive surgery was to have LASIK (88%), wait (8%) or have no surgery (4%). Discussion: In broad terms, New Zealand ophthalmologists’ cataract and refractive practice is similar to that of the members of ASCRS with the exception of the use of topical anaesthetic (NZ 12%vs USA 49%) and the higher use of postoperative injections of steroid and antibiotic at the end of surgery (NZ 63%vs USA 20%).</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>cataract</topic><topic>excimer laser</topic><topic>New Zealand</topic><topic>phacoemulsification</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">1442-6404</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1442-9071</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1442-9071</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">CEO</identifier><part><date>2003</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>31</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>2</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>114</start><end>120</end><total>7</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">F4175779CBA38A12FD52AB8DDD67379610E9AC2B</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1046/j.1442-9071.2003.00616.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">CEO616</identifier><recordInfo><recordContentSource>WILEY</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Science Pty</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002F75 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 002F75 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Ticri/CIDE
|area= HapticV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:F4175779CBA38A12FD52AB8DDD67379610E9AC2B
|texte= The New Zealand cataract and refractive surgery survey 2001
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23. |  |