Biological Versus Psychometric Intelligence: Halstead's (1947) Distinction Revisited
Identifieur interne : 002685 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 002684; suivant : 002686Biological Versus Psychometric Intelligence: Halstead's (1947) Distinction Revisited
Auteurs : Gerry Pallier ; Richard D. Roberts ; Lazar StankovSource :
- Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology [ 0887-6177 ] ; 2000-04.
Abstract
This article reports an investigation into the empirical status of a little understood cognitive factor—tactile-kinesthetic ability. To this end, a variety of haptic tasks, including three subtests of the Halstead-Reitan Neuropsychological Test Battery (HRB), were administered to 108 participants, along with established markers commonly employed in contemporary psychometric investigations. The results suggest that these subtests of the HRB measure cognitive abilities conceptually equivalent to fluid intelligence. Since these tests reflect efforts to operationalize Halstead's (1947) concept of “biological intelligence,” the results reported herein allow evaluation of this concept in relation to current models of human intelligence. Previous studies investigating the nature of abilities assessed by the HRB have reached contradictory conclusions. Present findings clarify the source of these anomalies.
Url:
DOI: 10.1093/arclin/15.3.205
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:B5A4E268DE21BAF66C3C9BC14C781A32E0CB244FLe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title>Biological Versus Psychometric Intelligence: Halstead's (1947) Distinction Revisited</title><author><name sortKey="Pallier, Gerry" sort="Pallier, Gerry" uniqKey="Pallier G" first="Gerry" last="Pallier">Gerry Pallier</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Sydney</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Roberts, Richard D" sort="Roberts, Richard D" uniqKey="Roberts R" first="Richard D." last="Roberts">Richard D. Roberts</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Sydney</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Stankov, Lazar" sort="Stankov, Lazar" uniqKey="Stankov L" first="Lazar" last="Stankov">Lazar Stankov</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Sydney</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:B5A4E268DE21BAF66C3C9BC14C781A32E0CB244F</idno><date when="2000" year="2000">2000</date><idno type="doi">10.1093/arclin/15.3.205</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/B5A4E268DE21BAF66C3C9BC14C781A32E0CB244F/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">002685</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a">Biological Versus Psychometric Intelligence: Halstead's (1947) Distinction Revisited</title><author><name sortKey="Pallier, Gerry" sort="Pallier, Gerry" uniqKey="Pallier G" first="Gerry" last="Pallier">Gerry Pallier</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Sydney</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Roberts, Richard D" sort="Roberts, Richard D" uniqKey="Roberts R" first="Richard D." last="Roberts">Richard D. Roberts</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Sydney</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Stankov, Lazar" sort="Stankov, Lazar" uniqKey="Stankov L" first="Lazar" last="Stankov">Lazar Stankov</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Sydney</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology</title><idno type="ISSN">0887-6177</idno><idno type="eISSN">1873-5843</idno><imprint><publisher>Elsevier</publisher><date type="published" when="2000-04">2000-04</date><biblScope unit="volume">15</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">3</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="205">205</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="226">226</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0887-6177</idno></series><idno type="istex">B5A4E268DE21BAF66C3C9BC14C781A32E0CB244F</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1093/arclin/15.3.205</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0887-6177</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">This article reports an investigation into the empirical status of a little understood cognitive factor—tactile-kinesthetic ability. To this end, a variety of haptic tasks, including three subtests of the Halstead-Reitan Neuropsychological Test Battery (HRB), were administered to 108 participants, along with established markers commonly employed in contemporary psychometric investigations. The results suggest that these subtests of the HRB measure cognitive abilities conceptually equivalent to fluid intelligence. Since these tests reflect efforts to operationalize Halstead's (1947) concept of “biological intelligence,” the results reported herein allow evaluation of this concept in relation to current models of human intelligence. Previous studies investigating the nature of abilities assessed by the HRB have reached contradictory conclusions. Present findings clarify the source of these anomalies.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>oup</corpusName><author><json:item><name>Gerry Pallier</name><affiliations><json:string>University of Sydney</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Richard D. Roberts</name><affiliations><json:string>University of Sydney</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Lazar Stankov</name><affiliations><json:string>University of Sydney</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Articles</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence (Gf/Gc)</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scales (WAIS)</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Halstead-Reitan Neuropsychological Test Battery (HRB)</value></json:item></subject><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><abstract>This article reports an investigation into the empirical status of a little understood cognitive factor—tactile-kinesthetic ability. To this end, a variety of haptic tasks, including three subtests of the Halstead-Reitan Neuropsychological Test Battery (HRB), were administered to 108 participants, along with established markers commonly employed in contemporary psychometric investigations. The results suggest that these subtests of the HRB measure cognitive abilities conceptually equivalent to fluid intelligence. Since these tests reflect efforts to operationalize Halstead's (1947) concept of “biological intelligence,” the results reported herein allow evaluation of this concept in relation to current models of human intelligence. Previous studies investigating the nature of abilities assessed by the HRB have reached contradictory conclusions. Present findings clarify the source of these anomalies.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>6.428</score><pdfVersion>1.2</pdfVersion><pdfPageSize>486 x 720 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>false</refBibsNative><keywordCount>4</keywordCount><abstractCharCount>911</abstractCharCount><pdfWordCount>10165</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>64558</pdfCharCount><pdfPageCount>22</pdfPageCount><abstractWordCount>119</abstractWordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Biological Versus Psychometric Intelligence: Halstead's (1947) Distinction Revisited</title><genre.original><json:string>research-article</json:string></genre.original><genre><json:string>research-article</json:string></genre><host><volume>15</volume><publisherId><json:string>acn</json:string></publisherId><pages><last>226</last><first>205</first></pages><issn><json:string>0887-6177</json:string></issn><issue>3</issue><genre><json:string>Journal</json:string></genre><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><eissn><json:string>1873-5843</json:string></eissn><title>Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology</title></host><categories><wos><json:string>PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL</json:string><json:string>PSYCHOLOGY</json:string></wos></categories><publicationDate>2000</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2000</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1093/arclin/15.3.205</json:string></doi><id>B5A4E268DE21BAF66C3C9BC14C781A32E0CB244F</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><extension>pdf</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/B5A4E268DE21BAF66C3C9BC14C781A32E0CB244F/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><extension>zip</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/B5A4E268DE21BAF66C3C9BC14C781A32E0CB244F/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/B5A4E268DE21BAF66C3C9BC14C781A32E0CB244F/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a">Biological Versus Psychometric Intelligence: Halstead's (1947) Distinction Revisited</title><respStmt xml:id="ISTEX-API" resp="Références bibliographiques récupérées via GROBID" name="ISTEX-API (INIST-CNRS)"></respStmt><respStmt xml:id="ISTEX-API" resp="Références bibliographiques récupérées via GROBID" name="ISTEX-API (INIST-CNRS)"></respStmt></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Elsevier</publisher><availability><p>OUP</p></availability><date>2000</date></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a">Biological Versus Psychometric Intelligence: Halstead's (1947) Distinction Revisited</title><author><persName><forename type="first">Gerry</forename><surname>Pallier</surname></persName><affiliation>University of Sydney</affiliation></author><author><persName><forename type="first">Richard D.</forename><surname>Roberts</surname></persName><affiliation>University of Sydney</affiliation></author><author><persName><forename type="first">Lazar</forename><surname>Stankov</surname></persName><affiliation>University of Sydney</affiliation></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology</title><idno type="pISSN">0887-6177</idno><idno type="eISSN">1873-5843</idno><imprint><publisher>Elsevier</publisher><date type="published" when="2000-04"></date><biblScope unit="volume">15</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">3</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="205">205</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="226">226</biblScope></imprint></monogr><idno type="istex">B5A4E268DE21BAF66C3C9BC14C781A32E0CB244F</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1093/arclin/15.3.205</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>2000</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract><p>This article reports an investigation into the empirical status of a little understood cognitive factor—tactile-kinesthetic ability. To this end, a variety of haptic tasks, including three subtests of the Halstead-Reitan Neuropsychological Test Battery (HRB), were administered to 108 participants, along with established markers commonly employed in contemporary psychometric investigations. The results suggest that these subtests of the HRB measure cognitive abilities conceptually equivalent to fluid intelligence. Since these tests reflect efforts to operationalize Halstead's (1947) concept of “biological intelligence,” the results reported herein allow evaluation of this concept in relation to current models of human intelligence. Previous studies investigating the nature of abilities assessed by the HRB have reached contradictory conclusions. Present findings clarify the source of these anomalies.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords scheme="keyword"><list><item><term>Articles</term></item></list></keywords></textClass><textClass><keywords scheme="keyword"><list><head>Keywords</head><item><term>theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence (Gf/Gc)</term></item><item><term>Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scales (WAIS)</term></item><item><term>Halstead-Reitan Neuropsychological Test Battery (HRB)</term></item></list></keywords></textClass></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="2000-04">Published</change><change xml:id="refBibs-istex" who="#ISTEX-API" when="2016-3-15">References added</change><change xml:id="refBibs-istex" who="#ISTEX-API" when="2016-3-21">References added</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><extension>txt</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/B5A4E268DE21BAF66C3C9BC14C781A32E0CB244F/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="corpus oup" wicri:toSee="no header"><istex:docType PUBLIC="-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" URI="journalpublishing.dtd" name="istex:docType"></istex:docType><istex:document><article article-type="research-article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="hwp">acn</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">acn</journal-id><journal-title>Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology</journal-title><issn pub-type="ppub">0887-6177</issn><issn pub-type="epub">1873-5843</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Elsevier</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/arclin/15.3.205</article-id><article-categories><subj-group><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Biological Versus Psychometric Intelligence: Halstead's (1947) Distinction Revisited</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Pallier</surname><given-names>Gerry</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="au1"></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Roberts</surname><given-names>Richard D.</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="au1"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Stankov</surname><given-names>Lazar</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="au1"></xref></contrib><aff id="au1"><institution>University of Sydney</institution></aff></contrib-group><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">Address correspondence to: Gerry Pallier, Department of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; E-mail: <email>gerryp@psych.usyd.edu.au</email></corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="ppub"><month>4</month><year>2000</year></pub-date><volume>15</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>205</fpage><lpage>226</lpage><copyright-statement>© 2000 National Academy of Neuropsychologists</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2000</copyright-year><abstract><title>Abstract</title><p>This article reports an investigation into the empirical status of a little understood cognitive factor—tactile-kinesthetic ability. To this end, a variety of haptic tasks, including three subtests of the Halstead-Reitan Neuropsychological Test Battery (HRB), were administered to 108 participants, along with established markers commonly employed in contemporary psychometric investigations. The results suggest that these subtests of the HRB measure cognitive abilities conceptually equivalent to fluid intelligence. Since these tests reflect efforts to operationalize Halstead's (1947) concept of “biological intelligence,” the results reported herein allow evaluation of this concept in relation to current models of human intelligence. Previous studies investigating the nature of abilities assessed by the HRB have reached contradictory conclusions. Present findings clarify the source of these anomalies.</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence (Gf/Gc)</kwd><kwd>Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scales (WAIS)</kwd><kwd>Halstead-Reitan Neuropsychological Test Battery (HRB)</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front></article></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo><title>Biological Versus Psychometric Intelligence: Halstead's (1947) Distinction Revisited</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA"><title>Biological Versus Psychometric Intelligence: Halstead's (1947) Distinction Revisited</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Gerry</namePart><namePart type="family">Pallier</namePart><affiliation>University of Sydney</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Richard D.</namePart><namePart type="family">Roberts</namePart><affiliation>University of Sydney</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Lazar</namePart><namePart type="family">Stankov</namePart><affiliation>University of Sydney</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="research-article" displayLabel="research-article"></genre><subject><topic>Articles</topic></subject><originInfo><publisher>Elsevier</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2000-04</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2000</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType></physicalDescription><abstract>This article reports an investigation into the empirical status of a little understood cognitive factor—tactile-kinesthetic ability. To this end, a variety of haptic tasks, including three subtests of the Halstead-Reitan Neuropsychological Test Battery (HRB), were administered to 108 participants, along with established markers commonly employed in contemporary psychometric investigations. The results suggest that these subtests of the HRB measure cognitive abilities conceptually equivalent to fluid intelligence. Since these tests reflect efforts to operationalize Halstead's (1947) concept of “biological intelligence,” the results reported herein allow evaluation of this concept in relation to current models of human intelligence. Previous studies investigating the nature of abilities assessed by the HRB have reached contradictory conclusions. Present findings clarify the source of these anomalies.</abstract><subject><genre>Keywords</genre><topic>theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence (Gf/Gc)</topic><topic>Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scales (WAIS)</topic><topic>Halstead-Reitan Neuropsychological Test Battery (HRB)</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology</title></titleInfo><genre type="Journal">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">0887-6177</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1873-5843</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">acn</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID-hwp">acn</identifier><part><date>2000</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>15</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>3</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>205</start><end>226</end></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">B5A4E268DE21BAF66C3C9BC14C781A32E0CB244F</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1093/arclin/15.3.205</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">© 2000 National Academy of Neuropsychologists</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource>OUP</recordContentSource></recordInfo></mods></metadata><enrichments><istex:catWosTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/B5A4E268DE21BAF66C3C9BC14C781A32E0CB244F/enrichments/catWos"><teiHeader><profileDesc><textClass><classCode scheme="WOS">PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL</classCode><classCode scheme="WOS">PSYCHOLOGY</classCode></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:catWosTEI></enrichments><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002685 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 002685 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Ticri/CIDE
|area= HapticV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:B5A4E268DE21BAF66C3C9BC14C781A32E0CB244F
|texte= Biological Versus Psychometric Intelligence: Halstead's (1947) Distinction Revisited
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23. |  |