Biological Versus Psychometric Intelligence
Identifieur interne : 002172 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 002171; suivant : 002173Biological Versus Psychometric Intelligence
Auteurs : Gerry Pallier ; Richard D. Roberts ; Lazar StankovSource :
- Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology [ 0887-6177 ] ; 2000.
Abstract
This article reports an investigation into the empirical status of a little understood cognitive factor—tactile-kinesthetic ability. To this end, a variety of haptic tasks, including three subtests of the Halstead-Reitan Neuropsychological Test Battery (HRB), were administered to 108 participants, along with established markers commonly employed in contemporary psychometric investigations. The results suggest that these subtests of the HRB measure cognitive abilities conceptually equivalent to fluid intelligence. Since these tests reflect efforts to operationalize Halstead's (1947) concept of “biological intelligence,” the results reported herein allow evaluation of this concept in relation to current models of human intelligence. Previous studies investigating the nature of abilities assessed by the HRB have reached contradictory conclusions. Present findings clarify the source of these anomalies. Keywords: theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence (Gf/Gc), Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scales (WAIS), Halstead-Reitan Neuropsychological Test Battery (HRB)
Url:
DOI: 10.1016/S0887-6177(99)00005-0
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:8EDB381880C0F2F8BB0AD5BB988FDF5B9FAAC180Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title>Biological Versus Psychometric Intelligence</title><author><name sortKey="Pallier, Gerry" sort="Pallier, Gerry" uniqKey="Pallier G" first="Gerry" last="Pallier">Gerry Pallier</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: gerryp@psych.usyd.edu.au</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Roberts, Richard D" sort="Roberts, Richard D" uniqKey="Roberts R" first="Richard D" last="Roberts">Richard D. Roberts</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Stankov, Lazar" sort="Stankov, Lazar" uniqKey="Stankov L" first="Lazar" last="Stankov">Lazar Stankov</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:8EDB381880C0F2F8BB0AD5BB988FDF5B9FAAC180</idno><date when="2000" year="2000">2000</date><idno type="doi">10.1016/S0887-6177(99)00005-0</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/8EDB381880C0F2F8BB0AD5BB988FDF5B9FAAC180/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">002172</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a">Biological Versus Psychometric Intelligence</title><author><name sortKey="Pallier, Gerry" sort="Pallier, Gerry" uniqKey="Pallier G" first="Gerry" last="Pallier">Gerry Pallier</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: gerryp@psych.usyd.edu.au</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Roberts, Richard D" sort="Roberts, Richard D" uniqKey="Roberts R" first="Richard D" last="Roberts">Richard D. Roberts</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Stankov, Lazar" sort="Stankov, Lazar" uniqKey="Stankov L" first="Lazar" last="Stankov">Lazar Stankov</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">ACN</title><idno type="ISSN">0887-6177</idno><imprint><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><date type="published" when="2000">2000</date><biblScope unit="volume">15</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">3</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="205">205</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="226">226</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0887-6177</idno></series><idno type="istex">8EDB381880C0F2F8BB0AD5BB988FDF5B9FAAC180</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1016/S0887-6177(99)00005-0</idno><idno type="PII">S0887-6177(99)00005-0</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0887-6177</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">This article reports an investigation into the empirical status of a little understood cognitive factor—tactile-kinesthetic ability. To this end, a variety of haptic tasks, including three subtests of the Halstead-Reitan Neuropsychological Test Battery (HRB), were administered to 108 participants, along with established markers commonly employed in contemporary psychometric investigations. The results suggest that these subtests of the HRB measure cognitive abilities conceptually equivalent to fluid intelligence. Since these tests reflect efforts to operationalize Halstead's (1947) concept of “biological intelligence,” the results reported herein allow evaluation of this concept in relation to current models of human intelligence. Previous studies investigating the nature of abilities assessed by the HRB have reached contradictory conclusions. Present findings clarify the source of these anomalies. Keywords: theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence (Gf/Gc), Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scales (WAIS), Halstead-Reitan Neuropsychological Test Battery (HRB)</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>elsevier</corpusName><author><json:item><name>Gerry Pallier</name><affiliations><json:string>E-mail: gerryp@psych.usyd.edu.au</json:string><json:string>University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Richard D Roberts</name><affiliations><json:string>University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Lazar Stankov</name><affiliations><json:string>University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><abstract>This article reports an investigation into the empirical status of a little understood cognitive factor—tactile-kinesthetic ability. To this end, a variety of haptic tasks, including three subtests of the Halstead-Reitan Neuropsychological Test Battery (HRB), were administered to 108 participants, along with established markers commonly employed in contemporary psychometric investigations. The results suggest that these subtests of the HRB measure cognitive abilities conceptually equivalent to fluid intelligence. Since these tests reflect efforts to operationalize Halstead's (1947) concept of “biological intelligence,” the results reported herein allow evaluation of this concept in relation to current models of human intelligence. Previous studies investigating the nature of abilities assessed by the HRB have reached contradictory conclusions. Present findings clarify the source of these anomalies. Keywords: theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence (Gf/Gc), Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scales (WAIS), Halstead-Reitan Neuropsychological Test Battery (HRB)</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>6.644</score><pdfVersion>1.2</pdfVersion><pdfPageSize>486 x 720 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><keywordCount>0</keywordCount><abstractCharCount>1073</abstractCharCount><pdfWordCount>10165</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>64558</pdfCharCount><pdfPageCount>22</pdfPageCount><abstractWordCount>137</abstractWordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Biological Versus Psychometric Intelligence</title><pii><json:string>S0887-6177(99)00005-0</json:string></pii><genre><json:string>research-article</json:string></genre><host><volume>15</volume><pii><json:string>S0887-6177(00)X0035-2</json:string></pii><pages><last>226</last><first>205</first></pages><issn><json:string>0887-6177</json:string></issn><issue>3</issue><genre><json:string>Journal</json:string></genre><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><title>Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology</title><publicationDate>2000</publicationDate></host><categories><wos><json:string>PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL</json:string><json:string>PSYCHOLOGY</json:string></wos></categories><publicationDate>2000</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2000</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1016/S0887-6177(99)00005-0</json:string></doi><id>8EDB381880C0F2F8BB0AD5BB988FDF5B9FAAC180</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><extension>pdf</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/8EDB381880C0F2F8BB0AD5BB988FDF5B9FAAC180/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><original>true</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><extension>txt</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/8EDB381880C0F2F8BB0AD5BB988FDF5B9FAAC180/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item><json:item><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><extension>zip</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/8EDB381880C0F2F8BB0AD5BB988FDF5B9FAAC180/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/8EDB381880C0F2F8BB0AD5BB988FDF5B9FAAC180/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a">Biological Versus Psychometric Intelligence</title><title level="a" type="sub" xml:lang="">Halstead's (1947) Distinction Revisited</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><availability><p>ELSEVIER</p></availability><date>2000</date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content">Table 1: Means and Standard Deviations of the Cognitive Ability, Mental Speed, and Tactual Performance Variables with the Test Number Allocated to Each Measure</note><note type="content">Table 2: Correlations Between Psychometric, Mental Speed, and Tactile Variables</note><note type="content">Table 3: Exploratory Factor Analytic Solution (Principal Component with Oblimin Rotation) of the Psychometric, Mental Speed, and Tactile Tasks</note><note type="content">Table 4: Factor Intercorrelation Matrix of the Solution Given in Table 3</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a">Biological Versus Psychometric Intelligence</title><title level="a" type="sub">Halstead's (1947) Distinction Revisited</title><author><persName><forename type="first">Gerry</forename><surname>Pallier</surname></persName><email>gerryp@psych.usyd.edu.au</email><affiliation>Address correspondence to: Gerry Pallier, Department of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia</affiliation><affiliation>University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia</affiliation></author><author><persName><forename type="first">Richard D</forename><surname>Roberts</surname></persName><affiliation>University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia</affiliation></author><author><persName><forename type="first">Lazar</forename><surname>Stankov</surname></persName><affiliation>University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia</affiliation></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">ACN</title><idno type="pISSN">0887-6177</idno><idno type="PII">S0887-6177(00)X0035-2</idno><imprint><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><date type="published" when="2000"></date><biblScope unit="volume">15</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">3</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="205">205</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="226">226</biblScope></imprint></monogr><idno type="istex">8EDB381880C0F2F8BB0AD5BB988FDF5B9FAAC180</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1016/S0887-6177(99)00005-0</idno><idno type="PII">S0887-6177(99)00005-0</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>2000</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>This article reports an investigation into the empirical status of a little understood cognitive factor—tactile-kinesthetic ability. To this end, a variety of haptic tasks, including three subtests of the Halstead-Reitan Neuropsychological Test Battery (HRB), were administered to 108 participants, along with established markers commonly employed in contemporary psychometric investigations. The results suggest that these subtests of the HRB measure cognitive abilities conceptually equivalent to fluid intelligence. Since these tests reflect efforts to operationalize Halstead's (1947) concept of “biological intelligence,” the results reported herein allow evaluation of this concept in relation to current models of human intelligence. Previous studies investigating the nature of abilities assessed by the HRB have reached contradictory conclusions. Present findings clarify the source of these anomalies. Keywords: theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence (Gf/Gc), Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scales (WAIS), Halstead-Reitan Neuropsychological Test Battery (HRB)</p></abstract></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="2000">Published</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Elsevier, elements deleted: ce:floats; body; tail"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:docType PUBLIC="-//ES//DTD journal article DTD version 4.5.2//EN//XML" URI="art452.dtd" name="istex:docType"></istex:docType><istex:document><converted-article version="4.5.2" docsubtype="fla"><item-info><jid>ACN</jid><aid>351</aid><ce:pii>S0887-6177(99)00005-0</ce:pii><ce:doi>10.1016/S0887-6177(99)00005-0</ce:doi><ce:copyright type="society" year="2000">National Academy of Neuropsychology</ce:copyright></item-info><head><ce:title>Biological Versus Psychometric Intelligence</ce:title><ce:subtitle>Halstead's (1947) Distinction Revisited</ce:subtitle><ce:author-group><ce:author><ce:given-name>Gerry</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Pallier</ce:surname><ce:cross-ref refid="AFF1"><ce:sup>a</ce:sup></ce:cross-ref><ce:cross-ref refid="CORR1">*</ce:cross-ref><ce:e-address>gerryp@psych.usyd.edu.au</ce:e-address></ce:author><ce:author><ce:given-name>Richard D</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Roberts</ce:surname><ce:cross-ref refid="AFF1"><ce:sup>a</ce:sup></ce:cross-ref></ce:author><ce:author><ce:given-name>Lazar</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Stankov</ce:surname><ce:cross-ref refid="AFF1"><ce:sup>a</ce:sup></ce:cross-ref></ce:author><ce:affiliation id="AFF1"><ce:label>a</ce:label><ce:textfn>University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia</ce:textfn></ce:affiliation><ce:correspondence id="CORR1"><ce:label>*</ce:label><ce:text>Address correspondence to: Gerry Pallier, Department of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia</ce:text></ce:correspondence></ce:author-group><ce:abstract><ce:section-title>Abstract</ce:section-title><ce:abstract-sec><ce:simple-para>This article reports an investigation into the empirical status of a little understood cognitive factor—tactile-kinesthetic ability. To this end, a variety of haptic tasks, including three subtests of the Halstead-Reitan Neuropsychological Test Battery (HRB), were administered to 108 participants, along with established markers commonly employed in contemporary psychometric investigations. The results suggest that these subtests of the HRB measure cognitive abilities conceptually equivalent to fluid intelligence. Since these tests reflect efforts to operationalize <ce:cross-ref refid="BIB26">Halstead's (1947)</ce:cross-ref> concept of “biological intelligence,” the results reported herein allow evaluation of this concept in relation to current models of human intelligence. Previous studies investigating the nature of abilities assessed by the HRB have reached contradictory conclusions. Present findings clarify the source of these anomalies.</ce:simple-para><ce:simple-para>Keywords: theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence (Gf/Gc), Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scales (WAIS), Halstead-Reitan Neuropsychological Test Battery (HRB)</ce:simple-para></ce:abstract-sec></ce:abstract></head></converted-article></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo><title>Biological Versus Psychometric Intelligence</title><subTitle>Halstead's (1947) Distinction Revisited</subTitle></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA"><title>Biological Versus Psychometric Intelligence</title><subTitle>Halstead's (1947) Distinction Revisited</subTitle></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Gerry</namePart><namePart type="family">Pallier</namePart><affiliation>E-mail: gerryp@psych.usyd.edu.au</affiliation><affiliation>University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia</affiliation><description>Address correspondence to: Gerry Pallier, Department of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia</description><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Richard D</namePart><namePart type="family">Roberts</namePart><affiliation>University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Lazar</namePart><namePart type="family">Stankov</namePart><affiliation>University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="research-article" displayLabel="Full-length article"></genre><originInfo><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2000</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2000</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">This article reports an investigation into the empirical status of a little understood cognitive factor—tactile-kinesthetic ability. To this end, a variety of haptic tasks, including three subtests of the Halstead-Reitan Neuropsychological Test Battery (HRB), were administered to 108 participants, along with established markers commonly employed in contemporary psychometric investigations. The results suggest that these subtests of the HRB measure cognitive abilities conceptually equivalent to fluid intelligence. Since these tests reflect efforts to operationalize Halstead's (1947) concept of “biological intelligence,” the results reported herein allow evaluation of this concept in relation to current models of human intelligence. Previous studies investigating the nature of abilities assessed by the HRB have reached contradictory conclusions. Present findings clarify the source of these anomalies. Keywords: theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence (Gf/Gc), Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scales (WAIS), Halstead-Reitan Neuropsychological Test Battery (HRB)</abstract><note type="content">Table 1: Means and Standard Deviations of the Cognitive Ability, Mental Speed, and Tactual Performance Variables with the Test Number Allocated to Each Measure</note><note type="content">Table 2: Correlations Between Psychometric, Mental Speed, and Tactile Variables</note><note type="content">Table 3: Exploratory Factor Analytic Solution (Principal Component with Oblimin Rotation) of the Psychometric, Mental Speed, and Tactile Tasks</note><note type="content">Table 4: Factor Intercorrelation Matrix of the Solution Given in Table 3</note><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>ACN</title></titleInfo><genre type="Journal">journal</genre><originInfo><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">200004</dateIssued></originInfo><identifier type="ISSN">0887-6177</identifier><identifier type="PII">S0887-6177(00)X0035-2</identifier><part><date>200004</date><detail type="volume"><number>15</number><caption>vol.</caption></detail><detail type="issue"><number>3</number><caption>no.</caption></detail><extent unit="issue pages"><start>185</start><end>280</end></extent><extent unit="pages"><start>205</start><end>226</end></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">8EDB381880C0F2F8BB0AD5BB988FDF5B9FAAC180</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1016/S0887-6177(99)00005-0</identifier><identifier type="PII">S0887-6177(99)00005-0</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="">© 2000National Academy of Neuropsychology</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource>ELSEVIER</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>National Academy of Neuropsychology, ©2000</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods></metadata><enrichments><istex:catWosTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/8EDB381880C0F2F8BB0AD5BB988FDF5B9FAAC180/enrichments/catWos"><teiHeader><profileDesc><textClass><classCode scheme="WOS">PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL</classCode><classCode scheme="WOS">PSYCHOLOGY</classCode></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:catWosTEI></enrichments><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002172 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 002172 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Ticri/CIDE
|area= HapticV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:8EDB381880C0F2F8BB0AD5BB988FDF5B9FAAC180
|texte= Biological Versus Psychometric Intelligence
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23. |  |