Comparison of viscoelastic substances used in phacoemulsification
Identifieur interne : 001364 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 001363; suivant : 001365Comparison of viscoelastic substances used in phacoemulsification
Auteurs : Werner W. Hütz ; H. Berthold Eckhardt ; Thomas KohnenSource :
- Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery [ 0886-3350 ] ; 1996.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the usefulness of four viscoelastic agents during phacoemulsification: 2% hydroxypropylmethylcellulose (HPMC) (Methocel®), 3% sodium hyaluronate with 4% chondroitin sulfate (Viscoat®), 1 % sodium hyaluronate (Healon®), 1.4% sodium hyaluronate (Healon® GA).Setting: Eye Clinic, Kreiskrankenhaus Bad Hersfeld, Germany.Methods: Two hundred patients, divided into four groups of 50 patients, received one of the viscoelastic substances during phacoemulsification and posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation. Patients were followed for 1 month. Visual acuity and intraocular pressure (IOP) were measured. The following were subjectively evaluated for each viscoelastic: corneal findings, anterior chamber reaction, visibility of intraocular structures and retention time during phacoemulsification, space maintaining ability, and removability and ease of injection.Results: Postoperative IOP and visual acuity were comparable among the four groups. Viscoat tended to trap nuclear fragments and air bubbles during the phacoemulsification procedure, which decreased visibility during surgery. Space maintenance and injection ease were significantly better with Healon and Healon GV.Conclusion: The high molecular weight viscoelastics (Healon and Healon GA performed better as viscosurgical tools during cataract surgery using phacoemulsification.
Url:
DOI: 10.1016/S0886-3350(96)80198-2
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:89B0F107A342845581F9944DB93935788A2D29D9Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Comparison of viscoelastic substances used in phacoemulsification</title><author><name sortKey="Hutz, Werner W" sort="Hutz, Werner W" uniqKey="Hutz W" first="Werner W." last="Hütz">Werner W. Hütz</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Eye Clinic Kreiskrankenhaus Bad Hersfeld, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Reprint requests to W. W. Hütz, MD, Kreiskrankenhaus Bad Hersfeld, Eye Clinic, Seilerweg 29, D36251 Bad Hersfeld, Germany.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Berthold Eckhardt, H" sort="Berthold Eckhardt, H" uniqKey="Berthold Eckhardt H" first="H." last="Berthold Eckhardt">H. Berthold Eckhardt</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Eye Clinic Kreiskrankenhaus Bad Hersfeld, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Kohnen, Thomas" sort="Kohnen, Thomas" uniqKey="Kohnen T" first="Thomas" last="Kohnen">Thomas Kohnen</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Cullen Eye Institute, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:89B0F107A342845581F9944DB93935788A2D29D9</idno><date when="1996" year="1996">1996</date><idno type="doi">10.1016/S0886-3350(96)80198-2</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/89B0F107A342845581F9944DB93935788A2D29D9/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001364</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Comparison of viscoelastic substances used in phacoemulsification</title><author><name sortKey="Hutz, Werner W" sort="Hutz, Werner W" uniqKey="Hutz W" first="Werner W." last="Hütz">Werner W. Hütz</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Eye Clinic Kreiskrankenhaus Bad Hersfeld, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Reprint requests to W. W. Hütz, MD, Kreiskrankenhaus Bad Hersfeld, Eye Clinic, Seilerweg 29, D36251 Bad Hersfeld, Germany.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Berthold Eckhardt, H" sort="Berthold Eckhardt, H" uniqKey="Berthold Eckhardt H" first="H." last="Berthold Eckhardt">H. Berthold Eckhardt</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Eye Clinic Kreiskrankenhaus Bad Hersfeld, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Kohnen, Thomas" sort="Kohnen, Thomas" uniqKey="Kohnen T" first="Thomas" last="Kohnen">Thomas Kohnen</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Cullen Eye Institute, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">JCRS</title><idno type="ISSN">0886-3350</idno><imprint><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><date type="published" when="1996">1996</date><biblScope unit="volume">22</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">7</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="955">955</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="959">959</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0886-3350</idno></series><idno type="istex">89B0F107A342845581F9944DB93935788A2D29D9</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1016/S0886-3350(96)80198-2</idno><idno type="PII">S0886-3350(96)80198-2</idno><idno type="ArticleID">80198</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0886-3350</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Purpose: To evaluate the usefulness of four viscoelastic agents during phacoemulsification: 2% hydroxypropylmethylcellulose (HPMC) (Methocel®), 3% sodium hyaluronate with 4% chondroitin sulfate (Viscoat®), 1 % sodium hyaluronate (Healon®), 1.4% sodium hyaluronate (Healon® GA).Setting: Eye Clinic, Kreiskrankenhaus Bad Hersfeld, Germany.Methods: Two hundred patients, divided into four groups of 50 patients, received one of the viscoelastic substances during phacoemulsification and posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation. Patients were followed for 1 month. Visual acuity and intraocular pressure (IOP) were measured. The following were subjectively evaluated for each viscoelastic: corneal findings, anterior chamber reaction, visibility of intraocular structures and retention time during phacoemulsification, space maintaining ability, and removability and ease of injection.Results: Postoperative IOP and visual acuity were comparable among the four groups. Viscoat tended to trap nuclear fragments and air bubbles during the phacoemulsification procedure, which decreased visibility during surgery. Space maintenance and injection ease were significantly better with Healon and Healon GV.Conclusion: The high molecular weight viscoelastics (Healon and Healon GA performed better as viscosurgical tools during cataract surgery using phacoemulsification.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>elsevier</corpusName><author><json:item><name>Werner W. Hütz MD</name><affiliations><json:string>Eye Clinic Kreiskrankenhaus Bad Hersfeld, Germany</json:string><json:string>Reprint requests to W. W. Hütz, MD, Kreiskrankenhaus Bad Hersfeld, Eye Clinic, Seilerweg 29, D36251 Bad Hersfeld, Germany.</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>H. Berthold Eckhardt MD</name><affiliations><json:string>Eye Clinic Kreiskrankenhaus Bad Hersfeld, Germany</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Thomas Kohnen MD</name><affiliations><json:string>Cullen Eye Institute, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><articleId><json:string>80198</json:string></articleId><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><abstract>Purpose: To evaluate the usefulness of four viscoelastic agents during phacoemulsification: 2% hydroxypropylmethylcellulose (HPMC) (Methocel®), 3% sodium hyaluronate with 4% chondroitin sulfate (Viscoat®), 1 % sodium hyaluronate (Healon®), 1.4% sodium hyaluronate (Healon® GA).Setting: Eye Clinic, Kreiskrankenhaus Bad Hersfeld, Germany.Methods: Two hundred patients, divided into four groups of 50 patients, received one of the viscoelastic substances during phacoemulsification and posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation. Patients were followed for 1 month. Visual acuity and intraocular pressure (IOP) were measured. The following were subjectively evaluated for each viscoelastic: corneal findings, anterior chamber reaction, visibility of intraocular structures and retention time during phacoemulsification, space maintaining ability, and removability and ease of injection.Results: Postoperative IOP and visual acuity were comparable among the four groups. Viscoat tended to trap nuclear fragments and air bubbles during the phacoemulsification procedure, which decreased visibility during surgery. Space maintenance and injection ease were significantly better with Healon and Healon GV.Conclusion: The high molecular weight viscoelastics (Healon and Healon GA performed better as viscosurgical tools during cataract surgery using phacoemulsification.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>6.521</score><pdfVersion>1.7</pdfVersion><pdfPageSize>583.92 x 804.96 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><keywordCount>0</keywordCount><abstractCharCount>1368</abstractCharCount><pdfWordCount>2493</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>16515</pdfCharCount><pdfPageCount>5</pdfPageCount><abstractWordCount>169</abstractWordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Comparison of viscoelastic substances used in phacoemulsification</title><pii><json:string>S0886-3350(96)80198-2</json:string></pii><genre><json:string>research-article</json:string></genre><host><volume>22</volume><pii><json:string>S0886-3350(96)X8177-X</json:string></pii><pages><last>959</last><first>955</first></pages><issn><json:string>0886-3350</json:string></issn><issue>7</issue><genre><json:string>Journal</json:string></genre><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><title>Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery</title><publicationDate>1996</publicationDate></host><categories><wos><json:string>OPHTHALMOLOGY</json:string><json:string>SURGERY</json:string></wos></categories><publicationDate>1996</publicationDate><copyrightDate>1996</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1016/S0886-3350(96)80198-2</json:string></doi><id>89B0F107A342845581F9944DB93935788A2D29D9</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><extension>pdf</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/89B0F107A342845581F9944DB93935788A2D29D9/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><original>true</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><extension>txt</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/89B0F107A342845581F9944DB93935788A2D29D9/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item><json:item><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><extension>zip</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/89B0F107A342845581F9944DB93935788A2D29D9/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/89B0F107A342845581F9944DB93935788A2D29D9/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Comparison of viscoelastic substances used in phacoemulsification</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><availability><p>ELSEVIER</p></availability><date>1996</date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note>None of the authors has a financial or proprietary interest in the products discussed.</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Comparison of viscoelastic substances used in phacoemulsification</title><author><persName><forename type="first">Werner W.</forename><surname>Hütz</surname></persName><roleName type="degree">MD</roleName><affiliation>Eye Clinic Kreiskrankenhaus Bad Hersfeld, Germany</affiliation><affiliation>Reprint requests to W. W. Hütz, MD, Kreiskrankenhaus Bad Hersfeld, Eye Clinic, Seilerweg 29, D36251 Bad Hersfeld, Germany.</affiliation></author><author><persName><forename type="first">H.</forename><surname>Berthold Eckhardt</surname></persName><roleName type="degree">MD</roleName><affiliation>Eye Clinic Kreiskrankenhaus Bad Hersfeld, Germany</affiliation></author><author><persName><forename type="first">Thomas</forename><surname>Kohnen</surname></persName><roleName type="degree">MD</roleName><affiliation>Cullen Eye Institute, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas</affiliation></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">JCRS</title><idno type="pISSN">0886-3350</idno><idno type="PII">S0886-3350(96)X8177-X</idno><imprint><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><date type="published" when="1996"></date><biblScope unit="volume">22</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">7</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="955">955</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="959">959</biblScope></imprint></monogr><idno type="istex">89B0F107A342845581F9944DB93935788A2D29D9</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1016/S0886-3350(96)80198-2</idno><idno type="PII">S0886-3350(96)80198-2</idno><idno type="ArticleID">80198</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>1996</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Purpose: To evaluate the usefulness of four viscoelastic agents during phacoemulsification: 2% hydroxypropylmethylcellulose (HPMC) (Methocel®), 3% sodium hyaluronate with 4% chondroitin sulfate (Viscoat®), 1 % sodium hyaluronate (Healon®), 1.4% sodium hyaluronate (Healon® GA).Setting: Eye Clinic, Kreiskrankenhaus Bad Hersfeld, Germany.Methods: Two hundred patients, divided into four groups of 50 patients, received one of the viscoelastic substances during phacoemulsification and posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation. Patients were followed for 1 month. Visual acuity and intraocular pressure (IOP) were measured. The following were subjectively evaluated for each viscoelastic: corneal findings, anterior chamber reaction, visibility of intraocular structures and retention time during phacoemulsification, space maintaining ability, and removability and ease of injection.Results: Postoperative IOP and visual acuity were comparable among the four groups. Viscoat tended to trap nuclear fragments and air bubbles during the phacoemulsification procedure, which decreased visibility during surgery. Space maintenance and injection ease were significantly better with Healon and Healon GV.Conclusion: The high molecular weight viscoelastics (Healon and Healon GA performed better as viscosurgical tools during cataract surgery using phacoemulsification.</p></abstract></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="1996">Published</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Elsevier doc found" wicri:toSee="Elsevier, no converted or simple article"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" </istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:docType PUBLIC="-//ES//DTD journal article DTD version 5.2.0//EN//XML" URI="art520.dtd" name="istex:docType"></istex:docType><istex:document><article version="5.2" xml:lang="en" docsubtype="fla"><item-info><jid>JCRS</jid><aid>80198</aid><ce:pii>S0886-3350(96)80198-2</ce:pii><ce:doi>10.1016/S0886-3350(96)80198-2</ce:doi><ce:copyright type="society" year="1996">American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery and European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons. All rights reserved</ce:copyright><ce:copyright-line>Copyright 1996 American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery and European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons. All rights reserved</ce:copyright-line></item-info><head><ce:article-footnote><ce:note-para id="ntp005">None of the authors has a financial or proprietary interest in the products discussed.</ce:note-para></ce:article-footnote><ce:title id="ttl005">Comparison of viscoelastic substances used in phacoemulsification</ce:title><ce:author-group id="AUG005"><ce:author id="AUT005"><ce:given-name>Werner W.</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Hütz</ce:surname><ce:degrees>MD</ce:degrees><ce:cross-ref id="crr005" refid="aff1"><ce:sup>a</ce:sup></ce:cross-ref><ce:cross-ref id="crr010" refid="cor1"><ce:sup>c</ce:sup></ce:cross-ref></ce:author><ce:author id="AUT010"><ce:given-name>H.</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Berthold Eckhardt</ce:surname><ce:degrees>MD</ce:degrees><ce:cross-ref id="crr015" refid="aff1"><ce:sup>a</ce:sup></ce:cross-ref></ce:author><ce:author id="AUT015"><ce:given-name>Thomas</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Kohnen</ce:surname><ce:degrees>MD</ce:degrees><ce:cross-ref id="crr020" refid="aff2"><ce:sup>b</ce:sup></ce:cross-ref></ce:author><ce:affiliation id="aff1"><ce:label>a</ce:label><ce:textfn>Eye Clinic Kreiskrankenhaus Bad Hersfeld, Germany</ce:textfn><sa:affiliation><sa:organization>Eye Clinic Kreiskrankenhaus Bad Hersfeld</sa:organization><sa:country>Germany</sa:country></sa:affiliation></ce:affiliation><ce:affiliation id="aff2"><ce:label>b</ce:label><ce:textfn>Cullen Eye Institute, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas</ce:textfn><sa:affiliation><sa:organization>Cullen Eye Institute, Baylor College of Medicine</sa:organization><sa:city>Houston</sa:city><sa:state>Texas</sa:state></sa:affiliation></ce:affiliation><ce:correspondence id="cor1"><ce:label>c</ce:label><ce:text>Reprint requests to W. W. Hütz, MD, Kreiskrankenhaus Bad Hersfeld, Eye Clinic, Seilerweg 29, D36251 Bad Hersfeld, Germany.</ce:text></ce:correspondence></ce:author-group><ce:abstract id="ab1"><ce:section-title id="SET005">Abstract</ce:section-title><ce:abstract-sec id="abs005"><ce:simple-para id="SP0005"><ce:bold>Purpose:</ce:bold> To evaluate the usefulness of four viscoelastic agents during phacoemulsification: 2% hydroxypropylmethylcellulose (HPMC) (Methocel®), 3% sodium hyaluronate with 4% chondroitin sulfate (Viscoat®), 1 % sodium hyaluronate (Healon®), 1.4% sodium hyaluronate (Healon® GA).</ce:simple-para><ce:simple-para id="SP0010"><ce:bold>Setting:</ce:bold> Eye Clinic, Kreiskrankenhaus Bad Hersfeld, Germany.</ce:simple-para><ce:simple-para id="SP0015"><ce:bold>Methods:</ce:bold> Two hundred patients, divided into four groups of 50 patients, received one of the viscoelastic substances during phacoemulsification and posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation. Patients were followed for 1 month. Visual acuity and intraocular pressure (IOP) were measured. The following were subjectively evaluated for each viscoelastic: corneal findings, anterior chamber reaction, visibility of intraocular structures and retention time during phacoemulsification, space maintaining ability, and removability and ease of injection.</ce:simple-para><ce:simple-para id="SP0020"><ce:bold>Results:</ce:bold> Postoperative IOP and visual acuity were comparable among the four groups. Viscoat tended to trap nuclear fragments and air bubbles during the phacoemulsification procedure, which decreased visibility during surgery. Space maintenance and injection ease were significantly better with Healon and Healon GV.</ce:simple-para><ce:simple-para id="SP0025"><ce:bold>Conclusion:</ce:bold> The high molecular weight viscoelastics (Healon and Healon GA performed better as viscosurgical tools during cataract surgery using phacoemulsification.</ce:simple-para></ce:abstract-sec></ce:abstract></head><tail><ce:bibliography id="R0005"><ce:section-title id="SET010">References</ce:section-title><ce:bibliography-sec id="RS0005"><ce:bib-reference id="bib1"><ce:label>1.</ce:label><sb:reference id="SB0005"><sb:contribution><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:given-name>S</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Arshinoff</ce:surname></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>The physical properties of ophthalmic viscoelastics in cataract surgery</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:book><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Proceedings National Ophthalmic Speakers Program</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:date>1992</sb:date><sb:publisher><sb:name>Medicopea</sb:name><sb:location>Montreal, Canada</sb:location></sb:publisher></sb:book></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib2"><ce:label>2.</ce:label><sb:reference id="SB0010"><sb:contribution><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:given-name>A</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Gaskell</ce:surname></sb:author><sb:author><ce:given-name>WM</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Haining</ce:surname></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>A double blind randomized multicentre clinical trial of “Healon G.V. ” compared with “Healon” in ECCE with IOL implantation</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:issue><sb:series><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Eur J Implant Refract Surg</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:volume-nr>3</sb:volume-nr></sb:series><sb:date>1991</sb:date></sb:issue><sb:pages><sb:first-page>241</sb:first-page><sb:last-page>244</sb:last-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib3"><ce:label>3.</ce:label><sb:reference id="SB0015"><sb:contribution><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:given-name>LL</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Fry</ce:surname></sb:author><sb:author><ce:given-name>RW</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Yee</ce:surname></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Healon GV in extracapsular cataract extraction with intraocular lens implantation</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:issue><sb:series><sb:title><sb:maintitle>J Cataract Refract Surg</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:volume-nr>19</sb:volume-nr></sb:series><sb:date>1993</sb:date></sb:issue><sb:pages><sb:first-page>409</sb:first-page><sb:last-page>412</sb:last-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib4"><ce:label>4.</ce:label><sb:reference id="SB0020"><sb:contribution><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:given-name>G</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Eisner</ce:surname></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Use of viscosurgical tools in ophthalmic surgery</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:edited-book><sb:editors><sb:editor><ce:given-name>G</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Eisner</ce:surname></sb:editor></sb:editors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Ophthalmic Viscosurgery. A Review of Standards, Techniques and Applications</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:date>1986</sb:date><sb:publisher><sb:name>Medicopea</sb:name><sb:location>Montreal, Canada</sb:location></sb:publisher></sb:edited-book></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib5"><ce:label>5.</ce:label><sb:reference id="SB0025"><sb:contribution><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:given-name>G</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Eisner</ce:surname></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Rheology of viscoelastic tools. The basis for understanding new developments in viscosurgery</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:issue><sb:series><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Eur J Implant Refract Surg</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:volume-nr>1</sb:volume-nr></sb:series><sb:date>1989</sb:date></sb:issue><sb:pages><sb:first-page>221</sb:first-page><sb:last-page>224</sb:last-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib6"><ce:label>6.</ce:label><sb:reference id="SB0030"><sb:contribution><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:given-name>K</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Madsen</ce:surname></sb:author><sb:author><ce:given-name>M</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Schenholm</ce:surname></sb:author><sb:author><ce:given-name>G</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Jahnke</ce:surname></sb:author><sb:author><ce:given-name>A</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Tengblad</ce:surname></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Hyaluronate binding to intact corneas and cultured endothelial cells</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:issue><sb:series><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:volume-nr>30</sb:volume-nr></sb:series><sb:date>1989</sb:date></sb:issue><sb:pages><sb:first-page>2132</sb:first-page><sb:last-page>2137</sb:last-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib7"><ce:label>7.</ce:label><sb:reference id="SB0035"><sb:contribution><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:given-name>U</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Stenevi</ce:surname></sb:author><sb:author><ce:given-name>T</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Gwin</ce:surname></sb:author><sb:author><ce:given-name>A</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Harfstrand</ce:surname></sb:author><sb:author><ce:given-name>D</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Apple</ce:surname></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Demonstration of hyaluronic acid binding to corneal endothelial cells in human eye-bank eyes</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:issue><sb:series><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Eur J Implant Refract Surg</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:volume-nr>5</sb:volume-nr></sb:series><sb:date>1993</sb:date></sb:issue><sb:pages><sb:first-page>228</sb:first-page><sb:last-page>232</sb:last-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib8"><ce:label>8.</ce:label><sb:reference id="SB0040"><sb:contribution><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:given-name>K</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Madsen</ce:surname></sb:author><sb:author><ce:given-name>U</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Stenevi</ce:surname></sb:author><sb:author><ce:given-name>DJ</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Apple</ce:surname></sb:author><sb:author><ce:given-name>A</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Harfstrand</ce:surname></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Histochemical and receptor binding studies of hyaluronic acid and hyaluronic acid binding sites on corneal endothelium</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:issue><sb:series><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Ophthalmic Pract</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:volume-nr>7</sb:volume-nr></sb:series><sb:date>1989</sb:date></sb:issue><sb:pages><sb:first-page>92</sb:first-page><sb:last-page>97</sb:last-page></sb:pages></sb:host><sb:comment>119-120</sb:comment></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib9"><ce:label>9.</ce:label><sb:reference id="SB0045"><sb:contribution><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:given-name>A</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Harfstrand</ce:surname></sb:author><sb:author><ce:given-name>N</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Molander</ce:surname></sb:author><sb:author><ce:given-name>U</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Stenevi</ce:surname></sb:author><sb:et-al></sb:et-al></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Evidence of hyaluronic acid and hyaluronic acid binding sites on human corneal endothelium</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:issue><sb:series><sb:title><sb:maintitle>J Cataract Refract Surg</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:volume-nr>18</sb:volume-nr></sb:series><sb:date>1992</sb:date></sb:issue><sb:pages><sb:first-page>265</sb:first-page><sb:last-page>269</sb:last-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib10"><ce:label>10.</ce:label><sb:reference id="SB0050"><sb:contribution><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:given-name>S</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Arshinoff</ce:surname></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Mechanics of capsulorhexis</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:issue><sb:series><sb:title><sb:maintitle>J Cataract Refract Surg</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:volume-nr>18</sb:volume-nr></sb:series><sb:date>1992</sb:date></sb:issue><sb:pages><sb:first-page>623</sb:first-page><sb:last-page>628</sb:last-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib11"><ce:label>11.</ce:label><sb:reference id="SB0055"><sb:contribution><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:given-name>EI</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Assia</ce:surname></sb:author><sb:author><ce:given-name>DJ</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Apple</ce:surname></sb:author><sb:author><ce:given-name>ES</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Lim</ce:surname></sb:author><sb:et-al></sb:et-al></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Removal of viscoelastic materials after experimental cataract surgery in vitro</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:issue><sb:series><sb:title><sb:maintitle>J Cataract Refract Surg</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:volume-nr>18</sb:volume-nr></sb:series><sb:date>1992</sb:date></sb:issue><sb:pages><sb:first-page>3</sb:first-page><sb:last-page>6</sb:last-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib12"><ce:label>12.</ce:label><sb:reference id="SB0060"><sb:contribution><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:given-name>GOH</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Naumann</ce:surname></sb:author></sb:authors></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:edited-book><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Pathologie des Auges</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:date>1980</sb:date><sb:publisher><sb:name>Springer Verlag</sb:name><sb:location>Berlin, Heidelberg, New York</sb:location></sb:publisher></sb:edited-book><sb:pages><sb:first-page>770</sb:first-page><sb:last-page>771</sb:last-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib13"><ce:label>13.</ce:label><sb:reference id="SB0065"><sb:contribution><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:given-name>T</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Kohnen</ce:surname></sb:author><sb:author><ce:given-name>M</ce:given-name><ce:surname>von Ehr</ce:surname></sb:author><sb:author><ce:given-name>E</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Schutte</ce:surname></sb:author><sb:author><ce:given-name>DD</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Koch</ce:surname></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Evaluation of intraocular pressure with Healon and Healon GV in sutureless cataract surgery with foldable lens implantation</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:issue><sb:series><sb:title><sb:maintitle>J Cataract Refract Surg</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:volume-nr>22</sb:volume-nr></sb:series><sb:date>1996</sb:date></sb:issue><sb:pages><sb:first-page>238</sb:first-page><sb:last-page>242</sb:last-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference></ce:bibliography-sec></ce:bibliography></tail></article></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Comparison of viscoelastic substances used in phacoemulsification</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" lang="en" contentType="CDATA"><title>Comparison of viscoelastic substances used in phacoemulsification</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Werner W.</namePart><namePart type="family">Hütz</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">MD</namePart><affiliation>Eye Clinic Kreiskrankenhaus Bad Hersfeld, Germany</affiliation><affiliation>Reprint requests to W. W. Hütz, MD, Kreiskrankenhaus Bad Hersfeld, Eye Clinic, Seilerweg 29, D36251 Bad Hersfeld, Germany.</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">H.</namePart><namePart type="family">Berthold Eckhardt</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">MD</namePart><affiliation>Eye Clinic Kreiskrankenhaus Bad Hersfeld, Germany</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Thomas</namePart><namePart type="family">Kohnen</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">MD</namePart><affiliation>Cullen Eye Institute, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="research-article" displayLabel="Full-length article"></genre><originInfo><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1996</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">1996</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">Purpose: To evaluate the usefulness of four viscoelastic agents during phacoemulsification: 2% hydroxypropylmethylcellulose (HPMC) (Methocel®), 3% sodium hyaluronate with 4% chondroitin sulfate (Viscoat®), 1 % sodium hyaluronate (Healon®), 1.4% sodium hyaluronate (Healon® GA).Setting: Eye Clinic, Kreiskrankenhaus Bad Hersfeld, Germany.Methods: Two hundred patients, divided into four groups of 50 patients, received one of the viscoelastic substances during phacoemulsification and posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation. Patients were followed for 1 month. Visual acuity and intraocular pressure (IOP) were measured. The following were subjectively evaluated for each viscoelastic: corneal findings, anterior chamber reaction, visibility of intraocular structures and retention time during phacoemulsification, space maintaining ability, and removability and ease of injection.Results: Postoperative IOP and visual acuity were comparable among the four groups. Viscoat tended to trap nuclear fragments and air bubbles during the phacoemulsification procedure, which decreased visibility during surgery. Space maintenance and injection ease were significantly better with Healon and Healon GV.Conclusion: The high molecular weight viscoelastics (Healon and Healon GA performed better as viscosurgical tools during cataract surgery using phacoemulsification.</abstract><note>None of the authors has a financial or proprietary interest in the products discussed.</note><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>JCRS</title></titleInfo><genre type="Journal">journal</genre><originInfo><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">199609</dateIssued></originInfo><identifier type="ISSN">0886-3350</identifier><identifier type="PII">S0886-3350(96)X8177-X</identifier><part><detail type="volume"><number>22</number><caption>vol.</caption></detail><detail type="issue"><number>7</number><caption>no.</caption></detail><extent unit="issue pages"><start>869</start><end>996</end></extent><extent unit="pages"><start>955</start><end>959</end></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">89B0F107A342845581F9944DB93935788A2D29D9</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1016/S0886-3350(96)80198-2</identifier><identifier type="PII">S0886-3350(96)80198-2</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">80198</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="">© 1996American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery and European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons. All rights reserved</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource>ELSEVIER</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery and European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons. All rights reserved, ©1996</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods></metadata><enrichments><istex:catWosTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/89B0F107A342845581F9944DB93935788A2D29D9/enrichments/catWos"><teiHeader><profileDesc><textClass><classCode scheme="WOS">OPHTHALMOLOGY</classCode><classCode scheme="WOS">SURGERY</classCode></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:catWosTEI></enrichments><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001364 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001364 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Ticri/CIDE
|area= HapticV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:89B0F107A342845581F9944DB93935788A2D29D9
|texte= Comparison of viscoelastic substances used in phacoemulsification
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23. |  |