Long-distance interdisciplinarity leads to higher scientific impact.
Identifieur interne : 000013 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 000012; suivant : 000014Long-distance interdisciplinarity leads to higher scientific impact.
Auteurs : Vincent Larivière ; Stefanie Haustein ; Katy BörnerSource :
- PloS one [ 1932-6203 ] ; 2015.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
- statistics & numerical data : Interdisciplinary Studies, Science.
- Cooperative Behavior, Journal Impact Factor.
Abstract
Scholarly collaborations across disparate scientific disciplines are challenging. Collaborators are likely to have their offices in another building, attend different conferences, and publish in other venues; they might speak a different scientific language and value an alien scientific culture. This paper presents a detailed analysis of success and failure of interdisciplinary papers--as manifested in the citations they receive. For 9.2 million interdisciplinary research papers published between 2000 and 2012 we show that the majority (69.9%) of co-cited interdisciplinary pairs are "win-win" relationships, i.e., papers that cite them have higher citation impact and there are as few as 3.3% "lose-lose" relationships. Papers citing references from subdisciplines positioned far apart (in the conceptual space of the UCSD map of science) attract the highest relative citation counts. The findings support the assumption that interdisciplinary research is more successful and leads to results greater than the sum of its disciplinary parts.
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122565
PubMed: 25822658
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:25822658Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Long-distance interdisciplinarity leads to higher scientific impact.</title><author><name sortKey="Lariviere, Vincent" sort="Lariviere, Vincent" uniqKey="Lariviere V" first="Vincent" last="Larivière">Vincent Larivière</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>École de bibliothéconomie et des sciences de l'information, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada; Observatoire des sciences et des technologies, Centre interuniversitaire de recherche sur la science et la technologie, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal, Canada.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Haustein, Stefanie" sort="Haustein, Stefanie" uniqKey="Haustein S" first="Stefanie" last="Haustein">Stefanie Haustein</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>École de bibliothéconomie et des sciences de l'information, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Borner, Katy" sort="Borner, Katy" uniqKey="Borner K" first="Katy" last="Börner">Katy Börner</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Cyberinfrastructure for Network Science Center, School of Informatics and Computing, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, United States of America.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2015">2015</date><idno type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0122565</idno><idno type="RBID">pubmed:25822658</idno><idno type="pmid">25822658</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000013</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Long-distance interdisciplinarity leads to higher scientific impact.</title><author><name sortKey="Lariviere, Vincent" sort="Lariviere, Vincent" uniqKey="Lariviere V" first="Vincent" last="Larivière">Vincent Larivière</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>École de bibliothéconomie et des sciences de l'information, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada; Observatoire des sciences et des technologies, Centre interuniversitaire de recherche sur la science et la technologie, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal, Canada.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Haustein, Stefanie" sort="Haustein, Stefanie" uniqKey="Haustein S" first="Stefanie" last="Haustein">Stefanie Haustein</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>École de bibliothéconomie et des sciences de l'information, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Borner, Katy" sort="Borner, Katy" uniqKey="Borner K" first="Katy" last="Börner">Katy Börner</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Cyberinfrastructure for Network Science Center, School of Informatics and Computing, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, United States of America.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j">PloS one</title><idno type="eISSN">1932-6203</idno><imprint><date when="2015" type="published">2015</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Cooperative Behavior</term><term>Interdisciplinary Studies (statistics & numerical data)</term><term>Journal Impact Factor</term><term>Science (statistics & numerical data)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="statistics & numerical data" xml:lang="en"><term>Interdisciplinary Studies</term><term>Science</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Cooperative Behavior</term><term>Journal Impact Factor</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Scholarly collaborations across disparate scientific disciplines are challenging. Collaborators are likely to have their offices in another building, attend different conferences, and publish in other venues; they might speak a different scientific language and value an alien scientific culture. This paper presents a detailed analysis of success and failure of interdisciplinary papers--as manifested in the citations they receive. For 9.2 million interdisciplinary research papers published between 2000 and 2012 we show that the majority (69.9%) of co-cited interdisciplinary pairs are "win-win" relationships, i.e., papers that cite them have higher citation impact and there are as few as 3.3% "lose-lose" relationships. Papers citing references from subdisciplines positioned far apart (in the conceptual space of the UCSD map of science) attract the highest relative citation counts. The findings support the assumption that interdisciplinary research is more successful and leads to results greater than the sum of its disciplinary parts.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Owner="NLM" Status="MEDLINE"><PMID Version="1">25822658</PMID><DateCreated><Year>2015</Year><Month>03</Month><Day>31</Day></DateCreated><DateCompleted><Year>2016</Year><Month>03</Month><Day>09</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2015</Year><Month>04</Month><Day>10</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Electronic-eCollection"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1932-6203</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>10</Volume><Issue>3</Issue><PubDate><Year>2015</Year></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>PloS one</Title><ISOAbbreviation>PLoS ONE</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Long-distance interdisciplinarity leads to higher scientific impact.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>e0122565</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1371/journal.pone.0122565</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText>Scholarly collaborations across disparate scientific disciplines are challenging. Collaborators are likely to have their offices in another building, attend different conferences, and publish in other venues; they might speak a different scientific language and value an alien scientific culture. This paper presents a detailed analysis of success and failure of interdisciplinary papers--as manifested in the citations they receive. For 9.2 million interdisciplinary research papers published between 2000 and 2012 we show that the majority (69.9%) of co-cited interdisciplinary pairs are "win-win" relationships, i.e., papers that cite them have higher citation impact and there are as few as 3.3% "lose-lose" relationships. Papers citing references from subdisciplines positioned far apart (in the conceptual space of the UCSD map of science) attract the highest relative citation counts. The findings support the assumption that interdisciplinary research is more successful and leads to results greater than the sum of its disciplinary parts.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Larivière</LastName><ForeName>Vincent</ForeName><Initials>V</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>École de bibliothéconomie et des sciences de l'information, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada; Observatoire des sciences et des technologies, Centre interuniversitaire de recherche sur la science et la technologie, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal, Canada.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Haustein</LastName><ForeName>Stefanie</ForeName><Initials>S</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>École de bibliothéconomie et des sciences de l'information, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Börner</LastName><ForeName>Katy</ForeName><Initials>K</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Cyberinfrastructure for Network Science Center, School of Informatics and Computing, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, United States of America.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><DataBankList CompleteYN="Y"><DataBank><DataBankName>figshare</DataBankName><AccessionNumberList><AccessionNumber>10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.1286974</AccessionNumber></AccessionNumberList></DataBank></DataBankList><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2015</Year><Month>03</Month><Day>30</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country><MedlineTA>PLoS One</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>101285081</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>1932-6203</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><CommentsCorrectionsList><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e39464</RefSource><PMID Version="1">22808037</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Science. 2013 Oct 25;342(6157):468-72</RefSource><PMID Version="1">24159044</PMID></CommentsCorrections></CommentsCorrectionsList><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D003299">Cooperative Behavior</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D058025">Interdisciplinary Studies</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000706">statistics & numerical data</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D055811">Journal Impact Factor</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D012586">Science</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000706">statistics & numerical data</QualifierName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList><OtherID Source="NLM">PMC4379013</OtherID></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="ecollection"><Year>2015</Year><Month></Month><Day></Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2014</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>16</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2015</Year><Month>2</Month><Day>22</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="epublish"><Year>2015</Year><Month>3</Month><Day>30</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2015</Year><Month>3</Month><Day>31</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2015</Year><Month>3</Month><Day>31</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2016</Year><Month>3</Month><Day>10</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>epublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0122565</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pii">PONE-D-14-51536</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">25822658</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC4379013</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/CyberinfraV1/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000013 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000013 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Ticri/CIDE
|area= CyberinfraV1
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:25822658
|texte= Long-distance interdisciplinarity leads to higher scientific impact.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:25822658" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a CyberinfraV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.25. |  |