Difference between revisions of "DC 2010 Artist paper"

From Artist
imported>Jacques Ducloy
(Man machine interface for contributors: politicaly better)
imported>Thierry Daunois
Line 11: Line 11:
 
==Introduction==
 
==Introduction==
  
Since 1994, when Ward Cunningham launched WikiWikiWeb devoted to software development, wikis are playing an increasing role in the landscape of scientific and technical information. With Wikipedia, size reaches millions of records and the need for metadata becomes ubiquitous. The first generation of metadata is based mainly on the use of categories, which looks like a traditional indexing practice. The semantic wikis introduce a new generation of metadata that allows a knowledge modelling in a RDF framework.  
+
Since March 25, 1995, when Ward Cunningham launched WikiWikiWeb devoted to software development, wikis are playing an increasing role in the scene (field ?) of scientific and technical information. With Wikipedia, size reaches millions of records and the need for metadata becomes ubiquitous. The first generation of metadata is based mainly on the use of categories, which looks like a traditional indexing practice. Semantic wikis introduce a new generation of metadata, allowing a knowledge modelling in a RDF framework.  
  
Most of wiki applications are quite monolithic and metadata perform an internal function. What happens with an editorial collection of scientific information distributed in a network of semantic wikis? This article would like to identify several metadata issues that we met while starting the Wicri network.
+
Most of wiki <u>applications</u> are quite monolithic and metadata perform an internal function. What happens with an editorial collection of scientific information distributed in a network of semantic wikis ? This article aims at identifying several metadata issues we faced when starting the Wicri network.
  
WICRI is an acronym that stands for "WIkis for Communities in Research and Innovation". Right now, Wicri is a demonstrator, which contains only fifty wikis, in a regional level, with a few set of topics. But the knowledge architecture we must design is quite the same as would be required for several thousand wikis. Thus metadata do play a crucial role in this project.
+
WICRI is an acronym that stands for "WIkis for Communities in Research and Innovation". Right now, Wicri is a demonstrator, which contains about sixty wikis, in a regional level, with a few set of topics. But the knowledge architecture we must design is quite the same as would be required for several thousand wikis. Thus metadata do play a crucial role in this project.
  
 
In this paper, we will first introduce Wicri network; then we will review several existing solutions. Trails to explore in the future will be discussed in two views: that of a contributor who is facing the production of metadata, and that of the computer scientist who develops new services.
 
In this paper, we will first introduce Wicri network; then we will review several existing solutions. Trails to explore in the future will be discussed in two views: that of a contributor who is facing the production of metadata, and that of the computer scientist who develops new services.

Revision as of 10:34, 22 February 2010

DC 2010
This article would be submited to DC 2010 Conference
Title
Metadata for semantic wikis networks
Abstract
bla bla bla (to be done at the end of the process)
Authors
Jacques Ducloy, Thierry Daunois, Muriel Foulonneau, Alice Hermann, Jean-Charles Lamirel, Stéphane Sire and Christine Vanoirbeek.

Introduction

Since March 25, 1995, when Ward Cunningham launched WikiWikiWeb devoted to software development, wikis are playing an increasing role in the scene (field ?) of scientific and technical information. With Wikipedia, size reaches millions of records and the need for metadata becomes ubiquitous. The first generation of metadata is based mainly on the use of categories, which looks like a traditional indexing practice. Semantic wikis introduce a new generation of metadata, allowing a knowledge modelling in a RDF framework.

Most of wiki applications are quite monolithic and metadata perform an internal function. What happens with an editorial collection of scientific information distributed in a network of semantic wikis ? This article aims at identifying several metadata issues we faced when starting the Wicri network.

WICRI is an acronym that stands for "WIkis for Communities in Research and Innovation". Right now, Wicri is a demonstrator, which contains about sixty wikis, in a regional level, with a few set of topics. But the knowledge architecture we must design is quite the same as would be required for several thousand wikis. Thus metadata do play a crucial role in this project.

In this paper, we will first introduce Wicri network; then we will review several existing solutions. Trails to explore in the future will be discussed in two views: that of a contributor who is facing the production of metadata, and that of the computer scientist who develops new services.

Note
This article is written while using a collaborative practice. It will be published in two versions: traditional on the web site of the conference; and wicrified[1] on Artist wiki.

Introducing Wicri

Wicri, a network of wikis for research and innovation

Wicri network has been created in the framework of Mission Ticri (Technologies dealing with Information and Communication for Communities involved in Research and Innovation). This initiative was launched by the Lorraine representative of Ministry in charge of research. Ticri aims at disseminating main results of research communities in order to promote partnership between innovation actors, to encourage outreach, and to develop technology transfers in a multidisciplinary context.

Wikipedia has demonstrated the interest of the wiki approach to build and disseminate a common knowledge in a very large scale. Thus Wikipedia brings us a first answer (and we are using this media) but it is not sufficient to bring us a global response. A main point is that Wikipedia's contributors must produce information that is attested by references. Authors can be anonymous as far as their bibliographic references are significant and link to explicitly named people. But now, when we deal with research fields, the academic communities are making the knowledge that Wikipedia could use. In many cases, knowledge is in progress and many assumptions appear to be hypothesis. For these reasons we think that the authors must be clearly known; thus anonymous contributions are forbidden.

As a result, such a wiki infrastructure must be driven by institutional entities in order to manage registration processes. Thus the institutions must find an advantage in investing in wiki approach and visibility becomes a strong parameter. The network approach allows each partner to promote its own wiki site, and its own visibility.

In a first step, we have built a little demonstrator with several institutional wikis. The limits have appeared quite immediately: if several organizations are working on the same topic, this topic must be developped on a thematic wiki. Thus we have quickly introduced several wikis on thematic or regional design.

A little team, mainly 3 people in the same office, has operated the demonstrator. As soon as we were more than one, several coherency problems have been met and an effective carrying of metadata has been introduced.

The current Wicri network

The wiki network accepts two main types of wikis.

  • Institutional wikis An institutional wiki is handled by an organization. In this paper, we will often use a naming scheme with two parts: region then accronym. For instance, Lorraine/sge stands for the research cluster SGE (Science et Génie de l'Environnement) in Lorraine area. For wikis related with scientific working groups we use in first part a code identifying the global thematic; for instance, Ist/Artist is the wiki of Artist WG, dealing with Information Science and Technology.
  • Common wikis Common wikis are designed by the global Wicri Community. They can be managed by an organization but they fully share the common rules and would be moderated by independent and scientific committees. In this paper we use a naming scheme with Wicri as first part, like in Wicri/Lorraine or Wicri/Water.

In a multilingual approach, most wikis are really families of wikis (i.e. a set of wikis, one for each language, connected by interwiki links). In this paper, we use the notation Wicri/Water(fr) to define the French component of the family.

CRIS on wiki

A first set of common wikis are designed on a regional framework such as Wicri/Lorraine or Wicri/Alsace. A main objective is to obtain a highly detailed and understandable CRIS (Current Research Information System). This approach looks like Jeffery's [ ] or Erbach's [ ] one. They would like to merge organization releted items (CRIS) with open archives in order to produce an eScience infrastructure. Wicri adds a wiki, with its editorial facilities, for bringing a readable summary.

An other set of common wikis is devoted to thematic fields. At this time, one of them, Wicri/Ticri is related to Information Science & Technology (a DCMI portal is included). An other part deals with environment and contains 4 wiki families: Wicri/Water, Wicri/Woods, Wicri/Biomass and Wicri/UrbanSoils. They are also organized with information system items, (such as program committies) and editorial contents (scientific articles, scientific surveys).

A few wikis have been designed for a global coherency of the network. The most visible is Wicri/Wicri which gives a global view of the network: all topics must appear and link to more detailed pages or desk in other wikis.

An other, Wicri/Media is an image repository (and plays the same role than Commons in the Wipedia family). It also contains pdf documents, but we are studying a better solution, using Fedora for instance.

At least, related to metadata handling, a wiki named Wicri/Base contains templates and semantic items which can be used in all other wikis.

The current Wicri network (a subset)

Network coherency versus contenus différenciés

Most information should be developed several times on different wikis. For instance, each research project with several partners must be cited and commented in the regional wiki of each partner; and also, in all relevant thematic wikis.

Even in the initial phase of the Wicri project, we have encountered a significant number of cases. Here follow 3 cases quite strongly differentiated: a city description, a scientific paper, an author page.

  • The city of Pittsburgh, place of the DC conference, appears at least on 3 wikis. On Wicri/Ticri, Pittsburgh is directly connected to DC 2010 and the corresponding page speaks about main activities related to information science in this geographic area[2]. On Wicri/Water, we describe the confluence of Allegheny and Monongahela rivers for giving the source of Ohio[3]. On Wicri/Wicri, we talk about general facts about this city and introduced commented links on the other pages[4]. These 3 pages are related to the same topic, but are getting distinct contents.
  • Carl Lagoze has written an article which is becoming very popular in French speaking area: Qu’est-ce qu’une bibliothèque numérique, au juste ? / What Is a Digital Library anymore, anyway? []. In IST/Artist the paper is integraped in the portal of Ametist journal in which it was translated first[5]. A copy have been done in Wicri/Ticri, as it was considered as a reference paper for a wiki dealing with digital libraries[6]. Anchor and links are sometimes different that on IST/Artist. At least, the first part (on only the first part has been introduced on Wicri/Wicri[7].
  • Puis la page sur Jean-Claude Guédon dans Artist / Ticri et Wicri et/ou colloques
metadata coherency in wikis network (W1...) vs repositories (R1...)

All these pages are mainly written by human contributors, and not by computers. Computers could help in various ways but in fine pages are made by contributors. In a repository based network, using OAI-PMH for example, the coherency is done by computer protocols, which share controlled metadata. In a wiki network, a contributor can write on many wikis and interact with metadata. Thus metadata plays a crucial role not only with programming activities but also with authoring process.

Issues about networks of semantic wikis

This section introduces a discussion about the technical choices that have been done in the initial design of Wicri. The Wicri project aims at setting up an operational set of services. At the present time, it is a demonstrator which is becoming a digital infrastructure. So, even if we are close to research projets, we have implement some pragmatic solutions.

Wikis for scientists who approach the world

A first choice we met while starting Wicri project was the wiki engine. A priority issue for this project is to allow a maximum of researchers to disseminate their results to a maximum of actors potentially involved. Thus we have chosen to be fully compatible with Wikipedia, and to use MediaWiki[8] as the wiki engine of Wicri network. This CMS[9] is used by Wikipedia and is becoming very popular.

This option implies several consequences. The first one is to supplement the functionality of MediaWiki with php extensions and templates that are commonly used in Wikipedia, so that occasional contributor is not disoriented when changing application. The Wicri/base function is to manage the collection of needed templates (and also semantic items) used throughout the network.

The second consequence is the use of local language, and for example the French, to express and manipulate metadata in a given wiki.

Semantic wikis for scientific objects

Ce paragraphe doit être assez court et rappeler la complexité des objets scientifiques qui entraine des solutions technologiques avancées (XML, métatonnées complexes) et des ontologies

Some of them are very easy to install, for instance "imagemap"[10].



It supports many extensions for carrying scientific data (for instance LaTeX) and for semantic purposes.


references scientific objects using MediaWiki
  • 3D bio... Proteopedia Eran Hodis, Jaime Prilusky, Eric Martz, Israel Silman, John Moult and Joel L. Sussman: Proteopedia - a scientific 'wiki' bridging the rift between 3D structure and function of biomacromolecules, Genome Biology 2008, 9:R121 doi:10.1186/gb-2008-9-8-r121
references semantic using MediaWiki
  • BOwiki Robert Hoehndorf1, Joshua Bacher, Michael Backhaus, Sergio E Gregorio, Frank Loebe, Kay Prüfer, Alexandr Uciteli, Johann Visagie, Heinrich Herre1, and Janet Kelso / BMC Bioinformatics 2009, 10(Suppl 5):S5doi:10.1186/1471-2105-10-S5-S5
references scientific objects running with other wiki engines
  • Christoph Lange. SWiM – a semantic wiki for mathematical knowledge management. In Sean Bechhofer, Manfred Hauswirth, J¨org Hoffmann, and Manolis Koubarakis, editors, ESWC, volume 5021 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 832–837. Springer, 2008.

Networks and Distributed Wiki Applications

Ce paragraphe doit permettre de dégager 5 modes de replication :

  • niveau wiki qui peuvent être distribuées en pair à pair (exemple le pool pour des raisons de sécurité)
  • niveau pages qui sont dupliquées sur le réseau
  • niveau paragraphe qui sont dupliqués à l'identique
  • niveau paragraphe qui sont dupliqués avec transformation
  • niveau graphe de pages qui sont dupliqués avec condition

Samples :


See also: several intesting papers about SemWiki 2009 on Ticri (en)

Xml handling

  • quelques références sur le sujet - en s'appuyant notamment sur le contrôle des replications, la cohabitation d'informations structurées et non structurée, les objets scientifiques complexes

Metadata for contributors

In most content management systems designed "before blogs and wikis" a clear barrier exists between editing contents, programming and managing metadata. On a wiki, all these activities can be handled by any actors, on any page, at any time. Quite any contributor may be faced with having to create new metadata. We have to give him a strong environnement to explore, define and comment such an activity.

This section introduces the need of a new wiki for designing metadata items, its content and its organization.

Introducing Wicri/metadata

  • On précise le besoin : métadonnées à portée générique, (au moins dans un premier temps) pour permettre à un contributeur d'élaborer un nouvel élément de métadonnée
references about wikis dealing with metadata

Metadata sources

  • On donne les principales sources sur lesquelles s'appuyer

Main sources of metadata:

  • DCMI
  • CRIS: The skeleton of Wicri is a Current Research Information System
  • generic semantic systems dealing with research : for example Openresearch.org
  • bibliographic formats, mainly those that operate in a multilingual context (for instance Unimarc)
  • Text formatting????: TEI...
  • remarque: on doit introduire le multilinguisme en amont de l'article

Metadata for Wicri/metadata

  • On donne des premières informations sur l'organisation des données sur le wiki, toujours vu du contributeur
  • on fait une liaison avec la section suivante sur les aspects informatiques

Metadata for computers

On veut utiliser les métadonnées pour ouvrir de nouvelles facilités

Handling network coherency

2 points :

  • cohérence du réseau
  • étendre les fonctionnalités disponibles au niveau wiki vers le résaeu - mais je ne suis pas certain qu'il y ait beaucoup de métadonnées sur ce pointJacques Ducloy 08:55, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

Human machine interface for contributors

Un paragraphe -> EPFL

External web mining

Un paragraphe -> Loria

Discussion & conclusion

:-)les métadonnées c'est important !!!

Plus sérieusement, on peut développer quelque chose autour de plus on s'y prend tôt, mieux c'est... (alors le wiki permet de différer...)

References

Notes