Outcome of phacoemulsification in 71 cats: A multicenter retrospective study (2006‐2017)
Identifieur interne : 000840 ( Pmc/Curation ); précédent : 000839; suivant : 000841Outcome of phacoemulsification in 71 cats: A multicenter retrospective study (2006‐2017)
Auteurs : Elena Fenollosa-Romero ; Emily Jeanes ; Ines Freitas ; Andra-Elena Enache ; Rachel Lockhart ; Lorraine Fleming ; Timothy N. L. Knott ; Charlotte Dawson ; Kerry Smith ; Claudia BusseSource :
- Veterinary Ophthalmology [ 1463-5216 ] ; 2019.
Abstract
To assess outcome of phacoemulsification in cats.
Records of 71 cats (82 eyes) from five referral centers were reviewed. Groups were divided by cause of cataract (congenital/juvenile [n = 32], traumatic [n = 33], and secondary to uveitis [n = 6]), and group comparisons were performed for the most common complications: postoperative ocular hypertension (POH), uveitis, corneal ulceration, synechia/dyscoria, and posterior capsular opacity (PCO) in three different time periods: immediately postoperatively, at 1‐90 days, and at >90 days.
Median follow‐up was 198 days (interquartile range 64‐518 days). The overall visual success rate of the cats with a 12‐month follow‐up was 92.6% (25/27 eyes). POH occurred in 35/82 (42.6%) eyes. Immediately postoperatively, uveitis was the most common complication in 28/82 eyes (34.1%) followed by corneal ulceration in 22/82 eyes (26.8%). At 1‐90 days, uveitis in 41/81 eyes (50.6%) remained the most common complication, followed by synechia/dyscoria in 21/81 eyes (25.9%), corneal ulceration in 16/81 eyes (19.7%), and PCO in 15/81 eyes (18.5%). At >90 days, PCO in 17/47 eyes (36.1%), followed by synechia/dyscoria in 16/47 eyes (34%), was the most common complications. The number of eyes with synechia/dyscoria in the trauma group was higher (13/33 [39.3%]) than in the congenital/juvenile group (5/31 [16.1%]) at 1‐90 days (
Uveitis in the short‐term and PCO and synechia/dyscoria in the long‐term were the most common complications following phacoemulsification in cats.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/vop.12699
PubMed: 31328856
PubMed Central: 7169341
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Pmc, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :000840
Links to Exploration step
PMC:7169341Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Outcome of phacoemulsification in 71 cats: A multicenter retrospective study (2006‐2017)</title><author><name sortKey="Fenollosa Omero, Elena" sort="Fenollosa Omero, Elena" uniqKey="Fenollosa Omero E" first="Elena" last="Fenollosa-Romero">Elena Fenollosa-Romero</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="vop12699-aff-0001"></nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Jeanes, Emily" sort="Jeanes, Emily" uniqKey="Jeanes E" first="Emily" last="Jeanes">Emily Jeanes</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="vop12699-aff-0002"></nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Freitas, Ines" sort="Freitas, Ines" uniqKey="Freitas I" first="Ines" last="Freitas">Ines Freitas</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="vop12699-aff-0003"></nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Enache, Andra Lena" sort="Enache, Andra Lena" uniqKey="Enache A" first="Andra-Elena" last="Enache">Andra-Elena Enache</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="vop12699-aff-0004"></nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Lockhart, Rachel" sort="Lockhart, Rachel" uniqKey="Lockhart R" first="Rachel" last="Lockhart">Rachel Lockhart</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="vop12699-aff-0005"></nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Fleming, Lorraine" sort="Fleming, Lorraine" uniqKey="Fleming L" first="Lorraine" last="Fleming">Lorraine Fleming</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="vop12699-aff-0002"></nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Knott, Timothy N L" sort="Knott, Timothy N L" uniqKey="Knott T" first="Timothy N. L." last="Knott">Timothy N. L. Knott</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="vop12699-aff-0003"></nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Dawson, Charlotte" sort="Dawson, Charlotte" uniqKey="Dawson C" first="Charlotte" last="Dawson">Charlotte Dawson</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="vop12699-aff-0004"></nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Smith, Kerry" sort="Smith, Kerry" uniqKey="Smith K" first="Kerry" last="Smith">Kerry Smith</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="vop12699-aff-0005"></nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Busse, Claudia" sort="Busse, Claudia" uniqKey="Busse C" first="Claudia" last="Busse">Claudia Busse</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="vop12699-aff-0001"></nlm:aff></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PMC</idno><idno type="pmid">31328856</idno><idno type="pmc">7169341</idno><idno type="url">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7169341</idno><idno type="RBID">PMC:7169341</idno><idno type="doi">10.1111/vop.12699</idno><date when="2019">2019</date><idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Corpus">000840</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PMC">000840</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Curation">000840</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Curation">000840</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a" type="main">Outcome of phacoemulsification in 71 cats: A multicenter retrospective study (2006‐2017)</title><author><name sortKey="Fenollosa Omero, Elena" sort="Fenollosa Omero, Elena" uniqKey="Fenollosa Omero E" first="Elena" last="Fenollosa-Romero">Elena Fenollosa-Romero</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="vop12699-aff-0001"></nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Jeanes, Emily" sort="Jeanes, Emily" uniqKey="Jeanes E" first="Emily" last="Jeanes">Emily Jeanes</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="vop12699-aff-0002"></nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Freitas, Ines" sort="Freitas, Ines" uniqKey="Freitas I" first="Ines" last="Freitas">Ines Freitas</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="vop12699-aff-0003"></nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Enache, Andra Lena" sort="Enache, Andra Lena" uniqKey="Enache A" first="Andra-Elena" last="Enache">Andra-Elena Enache</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="vop12699-aff-0004"></nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Lockhart, Rachel" sort="Lockhart, Rachel" uniqKey="Lockhart R" first="Rachel" last="Lockhart">Rachel Lockhart</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="vop12699-aff-0005"></nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Fleming, Lorraine" sort="Fleming, Lorraine" uniqKey="Fleming L" first="Lorraine" last="Fleming">Lorraine Fleming</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="vop12699-aff-0002"></nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Knott, Timothy N L" sort="Knott, Timothy N L" uniqKey="Knott T" first="Timothy N. L." last="Knott">Timothy N. L. Knott</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="vop12699-aff-0003"></nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Dawson, Charlotte" sort="Dawson, Charlotte" uniqKey="Dawson C" first="Charlotte" last="Dawson">Charlotte Dawson</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="vop12699-aff-0004"></nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Smith, Kerry" sort="Smith, Kerry" uniqKey="Smith K" first="Kerry" last="Smith">Kerry Smith</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="vop12699-aff-0005"></nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Busse, Claudia" sort="Busse, Claudia" uniqKey="Busse C" first="Claudia" last="Busse">Claudia Busse</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="vop12699-aff-0001"></nlm:aff></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Veterinary Ophthalmology</title><idno type="ISSN">1463-5216</idno><idno type="eISSN">1463-5224</idno><imprint><date when="2019">2019</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><title>Abstract</title><sec id="vop12699-sec-0001"><title>Purpose</title><p>To assess outcome of phacoemulsification in cats.</p></sec><sec id="vop12699-sec-0002"><title>Methods</title><p>Records of 71 cats (82 eyes) from five referral centers were reviewed. Groups were divided by cause of cataract (congenital/juvenile [n = 32], traumatic [n = 33], and secondary to uveitis [n = 6]), and group comparisons were performed for the most common complications: postoperative ocular hypertension (POH), uveitis, corneal ulceration, synechia/dyscoria, and posterior capsular opacity (PCO) in three different time periods: immediately postoperatively, at 1‐90 days, and at >90 days.</p></sec><sec id="vop12699-sec-0003"><title>Results</title><p>Median follow‐up was 198 days (interquartile range 64‐518 days). The overall visual success rate of the cats with a 12‐month follow‐up was 92.6% (25/27 eyes). POH occurred in 35/82 (42.6%) eyes. Immediately postoperatively, uveitis was the most common complication in 28/82 eyes (34.1%) followed by corneal ulceration in 22/82 eyes (26.8%). At 1‐90 days, uveitis in 41/81 eyes (50.6%) remained the most common complication, followed by synechia/dyscoria in 21/81 eyes (25.9%), corneal ulceration in 16/81 eyes (19.7%), and PCO in 15/81 eyes (18.5%). At >90 days, PCO in 17/47 eyes (36.1%), followed by synechia/dyscoria in 16/47 eyes (34%), was the most common complications. The number of eyes with synechia/dyscoria in the trauma group was higher (13/33 [39.3%]) than in the congenital/juvenile group (5/31 [16.1%]) at 1‐90 days (<italic>P</italic> = .039). No statistical difference was found for the other group comparisons. Three eyes in total were enucleated owing to endophthalmitis, post‐traumatic ocular sarcoma, and secondary glaucoma.</p></sec><sec id="vop12699-sec-0004"><title>Conclusion</title><p>Uveitis in the short‐term and PCO and synechia/dyscoria in the long‐term were the most common complications following phacoemulsification in cats.</p></sec></div></front><back><div1 type="bibliography"><listBibl><biblStruct></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Gelatt, Kn" uniqKey="Gelatt K">KN Gelatt</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct></biblStruct><biblStruct></biblStruct><biblStruct></biblStruct><biblStruct></biblStruct><biblStruct></biblStruct><biblStruct></biblStruct><biblStruct></biblStruct><biblStruct></biblStruct><biblStruct></biblStruct><biblStruct></biblStruct><biblStruct></biblStruct><biblStruct></biblStruct><biblStruct></biblStruct><biblStruct></biblStruct><biblStruct></biblStruct><biblStruct></biblStruct><biblStruct></biblStruct><biblStruct></biblStruct><biblStruct></biblStruct><biblStruct></biblStruct><biblStruct></biblStruct><biblStruct></biblStruct><biblStruct></biblStruct><biblStruct></biblStruct><biblStruct></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Maggs, Dj" uniqKey="Maggs D">DJ Maggs</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct></biblStruct><biblStruct></biblStruct><biblStruct></biblStruct><biblStruct></biblStruct></listBibl></div1></back></TEI><pmc article-type="research-article"><pmc-dir>properties open_access</pmc-dir>
<front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">Vet Ophthalmol</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="iso-abbrev">Vet Ophthalmol</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="doi">10.1111/(ISSN)1463-5224</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">VOP</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Veterinary Ophthalmology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">1463-5216</issn><issn pub-type="epub">1463-5224</issn><publisher><publisher-name>John Wiley and Sons Inc.</publisher-name><publisher-loc>Hoboken</publisher-loc></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="pmid">31328856</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="pmc">7169341</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/vop.12699</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">VOP12699</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="overline"><subject>Original Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Original Articles</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Outcome of phacoemulsification in 71 cats: A multicenter retrospective study (2006‐2017)</article-title><alt-title alt-title-type="left-running-head">FENOLLOSA‐ROMERO et al.</alt-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib id="vop12699-cr-0001" contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name><surname>Fenollosa‐Romero</surname><given-names>Elena</given-names></name><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid" authenticated="false">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1971-5984</contrib-id><xref ref-type="aff" rid="vop12699-aff-0001"><sup>1</sup></xref><address><email>efr@dwr.co.uk</email></address></contrib><contrib id="vop12699-cr-0002" contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Jeanes</surname><given-names>Emily</given-names></name><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid" authenticated="false">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0806-5442</contrib-id><xref ref-type="aff" rid="vop12699-aff-0002"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib id="vop12699-cr-0003" contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Freitas</surname><given-names>Ines</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="vop12699-aff-0003"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib id="vop12699-cr-0004" contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Enache</surname><given-names>Andra‐Elena</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="vop12699-aff-0004"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib><contrib id="vop12699-cr-0005" contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Lockhart</surname><given-names>Rachel</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="vop12699-aff-0005"><sup>5</sup></xref></contrib><contrib id="vop12699-cr-0006" contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Fleming</surname><given-names>Lorraine</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="vop12699-aff-0002"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib id="vop12699-cr-0007" contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Knott</surname><given-names>Timothy N. L.</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="vop12699-aff-0003"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib id="vop12699-cr-0008" contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Dawson</surname><given-names>Charlotte</given-names></name><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid" authenticated="false">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9974-1244</contrib-id><xref ref-type="aff" rid="vop12699-aff-0004"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib><contrib id="vop12699-cr-0009" contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Smith</surname><given-names>Kerry</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="vop12699-aff-0005"><sup>5</sup></xref></contrib><contrib id="vop12699-cr-0010" contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Busse</surname><given-names>Claudia</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="vop12699-aff-0001"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="vop12699-aff-0001"><label><sup>1</sup></label><institution>Dick White Referrals</institution><city>Six Mile Bottom</city><country country="GB">UK</country></aff><aff id="vop12699-aff-0002"><label><sup>2</sup></label><institution>Animal Health Trust</institution><city>Newmarket</city><country country="GB">UK</country></aff><aff id="vop12699-aff-0003"><label><sup>3</sup></label><institution>Rowe Eye Clinic</institution><city>Bristol</city><country country="GB">UK</country></aff><aff id="vop12699-aff-0004"><label><sup>4</sup></label><institution>Royal Veterinary College Queen Mother Hospital for Animals</institution><city>London</city><country country="GB">UK</country></aff><aff id="vop12699-aff-0005"><label><sup>5</sup></label><institution>Davies Veterinary Specialists</institution><city>Hitchin</city><country country="GB">UK</country></aff><author-notes><corresp id="correspondenceTo"><label>*</label><bold>Correspondence</bold><break></break>Elena Fenollosa‐Romero, Dick White Referrals, Cambridgeshire, UK.<break></break>Email: <email>efenollosaromero@gmail.com</email><break></break></corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>22</day><month>7</month><year>2019</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="ppub"><month>1</month><year>2020</year></pub-date><volume>23</volume><issue>1</issue><issue-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/vop.v23.1</issue-id><fpage>141</fpage><lpage>147</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>23</day><month>1</month><year>2019</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>22</day><month>6</month><year>2019</year></date><date date-type="accepted"><day>27</day><month>6</month><year>2019</year></date></history><permissions><pmc-comment> © 2020 American College of Veterinary Ophthalmologists </pmc-comment>
<copyright-statement content-type="article-copyright">© 2019 American College of Veterinary Ophthalmologists</copyright-statement><license><license-p>This article is being made freely available through PubMed Central as part of the COVID-19 public health emergency response. It can be used for unrestricted research re-use and analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source, for the duration of the public health emergency.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="file:VOP-23-141.pdf"></self-uri><abstract id="vop12699-abs-0001"><title>Abstract</title><sec id="vop12699-sec-0001"><title>Purpose</title><p>To assess outcome of phacoemulsification in cats.</p></sec><sec id="vop12699-sec-0002"><title>Methods</title><p>Records of 71 cats (82 eyes) from five referral centers were reviewed. Groups were divided by cause of cataract (congenital/juvenile [n = 32], traumatic [n = 33], and secondary to uveitis [n = 6]), and group comparisons were performed for the most common complications: postoperative ocular hypertension (POH), uveitis, corneal ulceration, synechia/dyscoria, and posterior capsular opacity (PCO) in three different time periods: immediately postoperatively, at 1‐90 days, and at >90 days.</p></sec><sec id="vop12699-sec-0003"><title>Results</title><p>Median follow‐up was 198 days (interquartile range 64‐518 days). The overall visual success rate of the cats with a 12‐month follow‐up was 92.6% (25/27 eyes). POH occurred in 35/82 (42.6%) eyes. Immediately postoperatively, uveitis was the most common complication in 28/82 eyes (34.1%) followed by corneal ulceration in 22/82 eyes (26.8%). At 1‐90 days, uveitis in 41/81 eyes (50.6%) remained the most common complication, followed by synechia/dyscoria in 21/81 eyes (25.9%), corneal ulceration in 16/81 eyes (19.7%), and PCO in 15/81 eyes (18.5%). At >90 days, PCO in 17/47 eyes (36.1%), followed by synechia/dyscoria in 16/47 eyes (34%), was the most common complications. The number of eyes with synechia/dyscoria in the trauma group was higher (13/33 [39.3%]) than in the congenital/juvenile group (5/31 [16.1%]) at 1‐90 days (<italic>P</italic> = .039). No statistical difference was found for the other group comparisons. Three eyes in total were enucleated owing to endophthalmitis, post‐traumatic ocular sarcoma, and secondary glaucoma.</p></sec><sec id="vop12699-sec-0004"><title>Conclusion</title><p>Uveitis in the short‐term and PCO and synechia/dyscoria in the long‐term were the most common complications following phacoemulsification in cats.</p></sec></abstract><kwd-group kwd-group-type="author-generated"><kwd id="vop12699-kwd-0001">carbachol</kwd><kwd id="vop12699-kwd-0002">cataract</kwd><kwd id="vop12699-kwd-0003">cats</kwd><kwd id="vop12699-kwd-0004">phacoemulsification</kwd><kwd id="vop12699-kwd-0005">sarcoma</kwd><kwd id="vop12699-kwd-0006">trauma</kwd><kwd id="vop12699-kwd-0007">uveitis</kwd></kwd-group><counts><fig-count count="0"></fig-count><table-count count="1"></table-count><page-count count="7"></page-count><word-count count="5378"></word-count></counts><custom-meta-group><custom-meta><meta-name>source-schema-version-number</meta-name><meta-value>2.0</meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta><meta-name>cover-date</meta-name><meta-value>January 2020</meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta><meta-name>details-of-publishers-convertor</meta-name><meta-value>Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:5.8.0 mode:remove_FC converted:15.04.2020</meta-value></custom-meta></custom-meta-group></article-meta><notes><p content-type="self-citation"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" id="vop12699-cit-1001"><string-name><surname>Fenollosa‐Romero</surname><given-names>E</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Jeanes</surname><given-names>E</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Freitas</surname><given-names>I</given-names></string-name>, et al. <article-title>Outcome of phacoemulsification in 71 cats: A multicenter retrospective study (2006‐2017)</article-title>. <source xml:lang="en">Vet Ophthalmol</source>. <year>2020</year>;<volume>23</volume>:<fpage>141</fpage>–<lpage>147</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/vop.12699</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31328856</pub-id></mixed-citation></p></notes></front></pmc></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Sante/explor/StressCovidV1/Data/Pmc/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000840 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 000840 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Sante
|area= StressCovidV1
|flux= Pmc
|étape= Curation
|type= RBID
|clé= PMC:7169341
|texte= Outcome of phacoemulsification in 71 cats: A multicenter retrospective study (2006‐2017)
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Curation/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:31328856" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Curation/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a StressCovidV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33. |  |