Corpus
Pmc
Racine
Corpus
Checkpoint
Pmc
Racine
Pmc
Exploration
Accueil
Racine
Racine

Serveur d'exploration SRAS

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Facing SARS: psychological impacts on SARS team nurses and psychiatric services in a Taiwan general hospital

Identifieur interne : 001016 ( Pmc/Corpus ); précédent : 001015; suivant : 001017

Facing SARS: psychological impacts on SARS team nurses and psychiatric services in a Taiwan general hospital

Auteurs : Shwu-Hua Lee ; Yeong-Yuh Juang ; Yi-Jen Su ; Hsiu-Lan Lee ; Yi-Hui Lin ; Chia-Chen Chao

Source :

RBID : PMC:7132375

Abstract

Objective

The outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in 2003 resulted in 346 probable SARS cases and 37 deaths in Taiwan. This descriptive study, which was conducted from May to June 2003, intended to identify staff stress and coping strategies among a SARS team of nursing staff during the outbreak.

Method

Twenty-six female nurses of the SARS team completed a questionnaire about their experiences serving in the SARS team.

Results

SARS had both positive and negative psychological impacts on the nurses. While worrying about infecting their families and colleagues, nurses were able to cope with the situation through various means. Additional findings include the need for more psychiatric staff to provide flexible and continuous service, the importance of meetings to improve teamwork and reduce conflict between doctors and nurses and the useful discovery that video cell phones provided needed reassurance from afar to the worried families of the nurses.

Conclusion

This study reinforces the importance and benefits of psychiatric services for SARS team members in reducing their secondary traumatization. It is hoped that the results will enhance our knowledge on the needs of frontline health care workers and support the planning of better psychiatric services in future epidemics.


Url:
DOI: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2005.04.007
PubMed: 16168796
PubMed Central: 7132375

Links to Exploration step

PMC:7132375

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI>
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Facing SARS: psychological impacts on SARS team nurses and psychiatric services in a Taiwan general hospital</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Lee, Shwu Hua" sort="Lee, Shwu Hua" uniqKey="Lee S" first="Shwu-Hua" last="Lee">Shwu-Hua Lee</name>
<affiliation>
<nlm:aff id="aff1">Department of Psychiatry, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kweisan, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan</nlm:aff>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Juang, Yeong Yuh" sort="Juang, Yeong Yuh" uniqKey="Juang Y" first="Yeong-Yuh" last="Juang">Yeong-Yuh Juang</name>
<affiliation>
<nlm:aff id="aff1">Department of Psychiatry, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kweisan, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan</nlm:aff>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Su, Yi Jen" sort="Su, Yi Jen" uniqKey="Su Y" first="Yi-Jen" last="Su">Yi-Jen Su</name>
<affiliation>
<nlm:aff id="aff1">Department of Psychiatry, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kweisan, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan</nlm:aff>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Lee, Hsiu Lan" sort="Lee, Hsiu Lan" uniqKey="Lee H" first="Hsiu-Lan" last="Lee">Hsiu-Lan Lee</name>
<affiliation>
<nlm:aff id="aff2">Department of Emergency, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kweisan, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan</nlm:aff>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Lin, Yi Hui" sort="Lin, Yi Hui" uniqKey="Lin Y" first="Yi-Hui" last="Lin">Yi-Hui Lin</name>
<affiliation>
<nlm:aff id="aff1">Department of Psychiatry, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kweisan, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan</nlm:aff>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Chao, Chia Chen" sort="Chao, Chia Chen" uniqKey="Chao C" first="Chia-Chen" last="Chao">Chia-Chen Chao</name>
<affiliation>
<nlm:aff id="aff3">Graduate Institute of Clinical Behavioral Science, Chang Gung University, Kweisan, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan</nlm:aff>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">PMC</idno>
<idno type="pmid">16168796</idno>
<idno type="pmc">7132375</idno>
<idno type="url">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7132375</idno>
<idno type="RBID">PMC:7132375</idno>
<idno type="doi">10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2005.04.007</idno>
<date when="2005">2005</date>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Corpus">001016</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PMC">001016</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en" level="a" type="main">Facing SARS: psychological impacts on SARS team nurses and psychiatric services in a Taiwan general hospital</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Lee, Shwu Hua" sort="Lee, Shwu Hua" uniqKey="Lee S" first="Shwu-Hua" last="Lee">Shwu-Hua Lee</name>
<affiliation>
<nlm:aff id="aff1">Department of Psychiatry, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kweisan, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan</nlm:aff>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Juang, Yeong Yuh" sort="Juang, Yeong Yuh" uniqKey="Juang Y" first="Yeong-Yuh" last="Juang">Yeong-Yuh Juang</name>
<affiliation>
<nlm:aff id="aff1">Department of Psychiatry, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kweisan, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan</nlm:aff>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Su, Yi Jen" sort="Su, Yi Jen" uniqKey="Su Y" first="Yi-Jen" last="Su">Yi-Jen Su</name>
<affiliation>
<nlm:aff id="aff1">Department of Psychiatry, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kweisan, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan</nlm:aff>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Lee, Hsiu Lan" sort="Lee, Hsiu Lan" uniqKey="Lee H" first="Hsiu-Lan" last="Lee">Hsiu-Lan Lee</name>
<affiliation>
<nlm:aff id="aff2">Department of Emergency, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kweisan, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan</nlm:aff>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Lin, Yi Hui" sort="Lin, Yi Hui" uniqKey="Lin Y" first="Yi-Hui" last="Lin">Yi-Hui Lin</name>
<affiliation>
<nlm:aff id="aff1">Department of Psychiatry, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kweisan, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan</nlm:aff>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Chao, Chia Chen" sort="Chao, Chia Chen" uniqKey="Chao C" first="Chia-Chen" last="Chao">Chia-Chen Chao</name>
<affiliation>
<nlm:aff id="aff3">Graduate Institute of Clinical Behavioral Science, Chang Gung University, Kweisan, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan</nlm:aff>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series>
<title level="j">General Hospital Psychiatry</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0163-8343</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1873-7714</idno>
<imprint>
<date when="2005">2005</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass></textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">
<sec>
<title>Objective</title>
<p>The outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in 2003 resulted in 346 probable SARS cases and 37 deaths in Taiwan. This descriptive study, which was conducted from May to June 2003, intended to identify staff stress and coping strategies among a SARS team of nursing staff during the outbreak.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Method</title>
<p>Twenty-six female nurses of the SARS team completed a questionnaire about their experiences serving in the SARS team.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Results</title>
<p>SARS had both positive and negative psychological impacts on the nurses. While worrying about infecting their families and colleagues, nurses were able to cope with the situation through various means. Additional findings include the need for more psychiatric staff to provide flexible and continuous service, the importance of meetings to improve teamwork and reduce conflict between doctors and nurses and the useful discovery that video cell phones provided needed reassurance from afar to the worried families of the nurses.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>This study reinforces the importance and benefits of psychiatric services for SARS team members in reducing their secondary traumatization. It is hoped that the results will enhance our knowledge on the needs of frontline health care workers and support the planning of better psychiatric services in future epidemics.</p>
</sec>
</div>
</front>
<back>
<div1 type="bibliography">
<listBibl>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="World Health Organization" uniqKey="World Health Organization">World Health Organization</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Department Of Health" uniqKey="Department Of Health">Department of Health</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="China Times" uniqKey="China Times">China Times</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Riley, S" uniqKey="Riley S">S. Riley</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Fraser, C" uniqKey="Fraser C">C. Fraser</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Donnelly, C A" uniqKey="Donnelly C">C.A. Donnelly</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Yank, G R" uniqKey="Yank G">G.R. Yank</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Barber, J W" uniqKey="Barber J">J.W. Barber</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Hargrove, D S" uniqKey="Hargrove D">D.S. Hargrove</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Maunder, R" uniqKey="Maunder R">R. Maunder</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Hunter, J" uniqKey="Hunter J">J. Hunter</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Vincent, L" uniqKey="Vincent L">L. Vincent</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Mitchell, A" uniqKey="Mitchell A">A. Mitchell</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Cummins, T" uniqKey="Cummins T">T. Cummins</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Spearing, N" uniqKey="Spearing N">N. Spearing</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Sibbald, B" uniqKey="Sibbald B">B. Sibbald</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Taylor, S" uniqKey="Taylor S">S. Taylor</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="White, B" uniqKey="White B">B. White</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Muncer, S" uniqKey="Muncer S">S. Muncer</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Farquharson, C" uniqKey="Farquharson C">C. Farquharson</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Baguley, K" uniqKey="Baguley K">K. Baguley</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Schabas, R" uniqKey="Schabas R">R. Schabas</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Drazen, J M" uniqKey="Drazen J">J.M. Drazen</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Raphael, B" uniqKey="Raphael B">B. Raphael</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Singh, B" uniqKey="Singh B">B. Singh</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Bradbury, L" uniqKey="Bradbury L">L. Bradbury</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Chang, C M" uniqKey="Chang C">C.M. Chang</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Lee, L C" uniqKey="Lee L">L.C. Lee</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Connor, K M" uniqKey="Connor K">K.M. Connor</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
</listBibl>
</div1>
</back>
</TEI>
<pmc article-type="research-article">
<pmc-dir>properties open_access</pmc-dir>
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">Gen Hosp Psychiatry</journal-id>
<journal-id journal-id-type="iso-abbrev">Gen Hosp Psychiatry</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>General Hospital Psychiatry</journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="ppub">0163-8343</issn>
<issn pub-type="epub">1873-7714</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Elsevier Inc.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="pmid">16168796</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="pmc">7132375</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">S0163-8343(05)00063-0</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2005.04.007</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Article</subject>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Facing SARS: psychological impacts on SARS team nurses and psychiatric services in a Taiwan general hospital</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lee</surname>
<given-names>Shwu-Hua</given-names>
</name>
<degrees>M.D.</degrees>
<xref rid="aff1" ref-type="aff">a</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Juang</surname>
<given-names>Yeong-Yuh</given-names>
</name>
<degrees>M.D.</degrees>
<xref rid="aff1" ref-type="aff">a</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Su</surname>
<given-names>Yi-Jen</given-names>
</name>
<degrees>M.S.</degrees>
<xref rid="aff1" ref-type="aff">a</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lee</surname>
<given-names>Hsiu-Lan</given-names>
</name>
<xref rid="aff2" ref-type="aff">b</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lin,</surname>
<given-names>Yi-Hui</given-names>
</name>
<degrees>M.S.</degrees>
<xref rid="aff1" ref-type="aff">a</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chao</surname>
<given-names>Chia-Chen</given-names>
</name>
<degrees>Ph.D.</degrees>
<email>ccchao54@yahoo.com.tw</email>
<email>ccchao@mail.cgu.edu.tw</email>
<xref rid="aff3" ref-type="aff">c</xref>
<xref rid="cor1" ref-type="corresp">⁎</xref>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">
<label>a</label>
Department of Psychiatry, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kweisan, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<label>b</label>
Department of Emergency, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kweisan, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan</aff>
<aff id="aff3">
<label>c</label>
Graduate Institute of Clinical Behavioral Science, Chang Gung University, Kweisan, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan</aff>
<author-notes>
<corresp id="cor1">
<label>⁎</label>
Corresponding author. Tel.: +886 3 3289270; fax: +886 3 3289270.
<email>ccchao54@yahoo.com.tw</email>
<email>ccchao@mail.cgu.edu.tw</email>
</corresp>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="pmc-release">
<day>15</day>
<month>9</month>
<year>2005</year>
</pub-date>
<pmc-comment> PMC Release delay is 0 months and 0 days and was based on .</pmc-comment>
<pub-date pub-type="ppub" iso-8601-date="2005-10-01">
<season>September-October</season>
<year>2005</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>15</day>
<month>9</month>
<year>2005</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>27</volume>
<issue>5</issue>
<fpage>352</fpage>
<lpage>358</lpage>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>28</day>
<month>6</month>
<year>2004</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>5</day>
<month>4</month>
<year>2005</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2005</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Elsevier Inc.</copyright-holder>
<license>
<license-p>Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.</license-p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<sec>
<title>Objective</title>
<p>The outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in 2003 resulted in 346 probable SARS cases and 37 deaths in Taiwan. This descriptive study, which was conducted from May to June 2003, intended to identify staff stress and coping strategies among a SARS team of nursing staff during the outbreak.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Method</title>
<p>Twenty-six female nurses of the SARS team completed a questionnaire about their experiences serving in the SARS team.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Results</title>
<p>SARS had both positive and negative psychological impacts on the nurses. While worrying about infecting their families and colleagues, nurses were able to cope with the situation through various means. Additional findings include the need for more psychiatric staff to provide flexible and continuous service, the importance of meetings to improve teamwork and reduce conflict between doctors and nurses and the useful discovery that video cell phones provided needed reassurance from afar to the worried families of the nurses.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>This study reinforces the importance and benefits of psychiatric services for SARS team members in reducing their secondary traumatization. It is hoped that the results will enhance our knowledge on the needs of frontline health care workers and support the planning of better psychiatric services in future epidemics.</p>
</sec>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<title>Keywords</title>
<kwd>Emergency department</kwd>
<kwd>Psychiatric services</kwd>
<kwd>SARS</kwd>
<kwd>Staff stress</kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec>
<label>1</label>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>The outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in 2003 resulted in 8096 probable cases and 774 deaths worldwide from November 1, 2002, to July 31, 2003
<xref rid="bib1" ref-type="bibr">[1]</xref>
. During the same period, there were 346 reported probable SARS cases in Taiwan, resulting in 37 deaths directly due to SARS and 36 related to SARS
<xref rid="bib1" ref-type="bibr">[1]</xref>
,
<xref rid="bib2" ref-type="bibr">[2]</xref>
. Among the 346 cases, 105 were medical staff, including 12 doctors, 56 nurses and 37 allied workers; 7 died of the epidemic. SARS was an unknown and dangerous disease that our country had not previously faced. The epidemic began in northern Taiwan and soon spread to southern areas. An ad hoc committee was immediately set up by the central government to coordinate and oversee the prevention and control of the disease. In an effort to control the outbreak, two hospitals, two department stores and two hotels were temporarily shut down. Other four hospitals had to partially close their emergency departments or certain floors and one neighborhood in Taipei was placed under quarantine.</p>
<p>Health care workers were on the front lines in the fight to contain this unknown disease. Before the public knew of the SARS epidemic, some nurses had already begun to care for patients having pneumonia-like symptoms without taking self-protective measures. On May 1, 2003, a head nurse from one of the closed hospitals died of SARS in our hospital and became the first nurse who lost her life in caring for SARS patients. This tragedy raised public concern about the safety of health care workers. Intense media coverage of the outbreak and its effects was everywhere. For example, media statements included “Hospital masks are in short supply,” “Nurses tried to escape from quarantined hospital,” “Patients committed suicide in quarantined hospital” and “Disciplinary actions upon the hospitals failing to report SARS cases,” among others
<xref rid="bib3" ref-type="bibr">[3]</xref>
.</p>
<p>Our hospital, a tertiary medical center in northern Taiwan, was one of the hospitals that were designated to provide care for SARS patients during the outbreak. In response to the situation, the hospital immediately established a command center, directed by an executive and several medical heads. The command center's duty was to organize teamwork, update the infection control procedures and communicate with the Department of Health of Taiwan. In the emergency department, a SARS team of nursing staff was created to care for incoming SARS patients. A psychiatric team including two senior psychiatrists and two psychologists was also organized to provide assistance to all hospital staff and patients. This team offered various psychiatric services including psychoeducation, debriefing groups, a counseling hotline and individual psychotherapy, among others.</p>
<p>The SARS team of nursing staff was under extreme stress and experienced significant psychological conflict between their duties as nurses and their concern for their own safety. They were especially affected by the death of a head nurse who was transferred to our hospital for intensive treatment of her SARS-like symptoms and died thereafter. At the time of her admission to our emergency department, she was in stable condition and confident about her recovery. She encouraged the nurses on duty and even urged them to care for other patients first.</p>
<p>Recognizing this conflict, the leader of the SARS nursing team immediately enlisted psychiatric help from the mental health team. Along with the interventions, a survey was conducted to investigate staff stress and coping strategies used by the SARS team members at the emergency department during the SARS outbreak. The purpose of this study is to understand the needs and experiences of frontline female nurses in order to provide better psychiatric services in future epidemics.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<label>2</label>
<title>Methods</title>
<sec>
<label>2.1</label>
<title>Subjects</title>
<p>This retrospective study was conducted from May to June 2003 when a SARS team of nursing staff was organized and cared for SARS patients in the emergency department of a medical center in northern Taiwan. Thirty female senior nurses from the emergency department were selected to form the SARS team. Team selection was made by both the director of the nursing department and the head nurse of the emergency department based on the nurses' clinical performance, physical conditions, adaptability, willingness and their family's considerations.</p>
<p>A total of 26 female nurses from the SARS team consented to participate in a survey at the end of their mission. The age range of these 26 respondents was 23 to 37 years, with a mean age of 29.6 years (S.D.=4.34). The lengths of their professional work experience range from 5 to 12 years (mean=6.5, S.D.=1.98). Of the 26 respondents, 10 (38.5%) are married and 13 (50%) have some religious beliefs. Most of the respondents (
<italic>n</italic>
=19, 73%) reported being assigned to the team, whereas 6 (23%) volunteered for the mission
<italic>.</italic>
Compared with the assigned members, volunteers tended to be older in age (
<italic>t</italic>
=−3.43,
<italic>P</italic>
<.01) and senior in work experience (χ
<sup>2</sup>
=5.26,
<italic>P</italic>
<.05). There was no significant difference in marital status and religious beliefs between the volunteers and the assigned members.
<xref rid="tbl1" ref-type="table">Table 1</xref>
shows the demographic data of this sample.
<table-wrap position="float" id="tbl1">
<label>Table 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Demographic characteristics of the respondents (
<italic>N</italic>
=26)</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top">Variable</th>
<th valign="top">Mean (S.D.)</th>
<th valign="top">
<italic>f</italic>
</th>
<th valign="top">Percentage (%)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top">Age (years)</td>
<td align="char" valign="top">29.6 (4.34)</td>
<td valign="top"></td>
<td valign="top"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="4" valign="top">Sex</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"> Male</td>
<td valign="top"></td>
<td align="char" valign="top">0</td>
<td align="char" valign="top">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"> Female</td>
<td valign="top"></td>
<td align="char" valign="top">26</td>
<td align="char" valign="top">100.0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">Work experience (years)</td>
<td align="char" valign="top">6.5 (1.98)</td>
<td valign="top"></td>
<td valign="top"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="4" valign="top">Marital status</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"> Married</td>
<td valign="top"></td>
<td align="char" valign="top">10</td>
<td align="char" valign="top">38.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"> Not married</td>
<td valign="top"></td>
<td align="char" valign="top">16</td>
<td align="char" valign="top">61.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="4" valign="top">Religion</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"> Yes</td>
<td valign="top"></td>
<td align="char" valign="top">13</td>
<td align="char" valign="top">50.0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"> No</td>
<td valign="top"></td>
<td align="char" valign="top">13</td>
<td align="char" valign="top">50.0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="4" valign="top">SARS team membership</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"> Assigned duty</td>
<td valign="top"></td>
<td align="char" valign="top">19</td>
<td align="char" valign="top">73.0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"> Volunteer</td>
<td valign="top"></td>
<td align="char" valign="top">6</td>
<td align="char" valign="top">23.0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"> Not specified</td>
<td valign="top"></td>
<td align="char" valign="top">1</td>
<td align="char" valign="top">4.0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<label>2.2</label>
<title>Procedure</title>
<p>On a voluntary basis, the SARS team members were invited to participate in two debriefing groups provided by the psychiatric team during the period of their mission. Ten nurses participated in the first group, which lasted 50 min, during the early phase of their mission and 22 participated in the second, lasting 90 min, during the middle phase.</p>
<p>Topics related to their SARS experiences were discussed in these two groups, such as the psychological conflicts and stresses experienced in this mission, coping strategies and possible preventive or intervening measures for staff. Permissions from all the group respondents were granted to the researchers to use the group notes in formulating several significant issues (i.e., immediate reactions, major stressors, effective measures, coping strategies, motivators to join future missions).</p>
<p>At the closing phase of the mission, 21 (81%) nurses were interviewed in small groups of 4 to 6. The interviews followed a semistructured schedule derived from previously identified issues. Based on the analysis of the interview protocols, the SARS Team Questionnaire was developed. Twenty-six (87%) female nurses who gave informed consent to participate in the survey then completed this questionnaire.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<label>2.3</label>
<title>Measure</title>
<p>Due to the difficulty of conducting research during a crisis in which clinical responsibilities precluded careful research planning and systematic data collection, the psychiatric team used whatever materials were available at hand to design the SARS Team Questionnaire in an effort to understand the experiences of the SARS team members. Preliminary analysis showed that some scales in this questionnaire have satisfactory internal consistency while further examination of reliability and validity is not available.</p>
<p>The SARS Team Questionnaire consists of 72 items that assess six areas: (a) immediate reactions to the mission; (b) major stressors inherent in caring for SARS patients; (c) effective measures to reduce stress; (d) coping strategies; (e) motivators to join future missions; and (f) evaluation of psychiatric services. The “immediate reactions to the mission” subscale consists of 18 items that measure the cognitive and emotional reactions of the respondents immediately after learning about their mission of taking care of SARS patients — for example, “I felt it was unfair,” “I felt nervous and worried” and “I took it as a call of duty.” All respondents were asked to rate the degree to which they had various psychological reactions toward their duty of caring for SARS patients on a four-point scale (0=
<italic>not at all</italic>
; 1=
<italic>slightly</italic>
; 2=
<italic>moderately</italic>
; 3=
<italic>very much</italic>
). The internal consistency coefficient was .86 (Cronbach's
<italic>α</italic>
) for the immediate reaction subscale.</p>
<p>The “major stressors inherent in caring for SARS patients” subscale consists of 23 items that assess stresses related to the nurses' mission. All respondents were asked first to indicate if they had experienced each of the stressors (
<italic>yes</italic>
/
<italic>no</italic>
) and then to rate the severity of their experienced stress on a four-point scale (0=
<italic>not at all</italic>
; 1=
<italic>slightly</italic>
; 2=
<italic>moderately</italic>
; 3=
<italic>very much</italic>
). Sample items are listed in
<xref rid="tbl2" ref-type="table">Table 2</xref>
. The internal consistency coefficients were .86 (Kuder-Richardson Formula 20) for the number of stressors and .86 (Cronbach's
<italic>α</italic>
) for the stress severity.
<table-wrap position="float" id="tbl2">
<label>Table 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Major stressors and stress severity while caring for SARS patients (
<italic>N</italic>
=26)</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top">Item</th>
<th valign="top">
<italic>f</italic>
<xref rid="tblfn1" ref-type="table-fn">a</xref>
</th>
<th valign="top">Percentage (%)</th>
<th valign="top">Severity
<xref rid="tblfn2" ref-type="table-fn">b</xref>
[mean (S.D.)]</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top">1. Worry about being negligent and endangering coworkers</td>
<td align="char" valign="top">24</td>
<td valign="top">92.3</td>
<td valign="top">2.00 (0.91)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">2. Frequent modification of infection control procedures</td>
<td align="char" valign="top">24</td>
<td valign="top">92.3</td>
<td valign="top">1.88 (0.73)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">3. Uncertainty about when the epidemic will be under control</td>
<td align="char" valign="top">24</td>
<td valign="top">92.3</td>
<td valign="top">1.76 (0.88)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">4. Worry about inflicting SARS on family</td>
<td align="char" valign="top">23</td>
<td valign="top">88.5</td>
<td valign="top">2.00 (0.96)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">5. Worry about being negligent and endangering patients</td>
<td align="char" valign="top">23</td>
<td valign="top">88.5</td>
<td valign="top">1.84 (0.99)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">6. Protective gears cause physical discomfort</td>
<td align="char" valign="top">23</td>
<td valign="top">88.5</td>
<td valign="top">1.44 (0.82)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">7. Worry about nosocomial spread</td>
<td align="char" valign="top">21</td>
<td valign="top">80.8</td>
<td valign="top">1.64 (0.95)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">8. Documentation and reporting procedures unclear</td>
<td align="char" valign="top">21</td>
<td valign="top">80.8</td>
<td valign="top">1.60 (0.82)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">9. Worry about lack of proper knowledge and equipment</td>
<td align="char" valign="top">21</td>
<td valign="top">80.8</td>
<td valign="top">1.52 (0.96)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">10. Being without properly fitted environment</td>
<td align="char" valign="top">21</td>
<td valign="top">80.8</td>
<td valign="top">1.46 (0.88)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">11. Death of the head nurse</td>
<td align="char" valign="top">20</td>
<td valign="top">76.9</td>
<td valign="top">1.56 (1.04)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">12. Worry about getting infected</td>
<td align="char" valign="top">19</td>
<td valign="top">73.1</td>
<td valign="top">1.48 (1.12)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">13. Protective gears being a drag in providing quality care</td>
<td align="char" valign="top">19</td>
<td valign="top">73.1</td>
<td valign="top">1.30 (1.02)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">14. Patients' emotional reaction</td>
<td align="char" valign="top">19</td>
<td valign="top">73.1</td>
<td valign="top">0.92 (0.70)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">15. Equivocal definition of the responsibility between doctors and nurses</td>
<td align="char" valign="top">18</td>
<td valign="top">69.2</td>
<td valign="top">1.28 (1.02)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">16. Conflict between duty and safety</td>
<td align="char" valign="top">17</td>
<td valign="top">65.4</td>
<td valign="top">1.20 (1.04)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">17. Patient families' emotional reaction</td>
<td align="char" valign="top">17</td>
<td valign="top">65.4</td>
<td valign="top">0.88 (0.78)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">18. Worry about lack of manpower</td>
<td align="char" valign="top">16</td>
<td valign="top">61.5</td>
<td valign="top">0.96 (0.84)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">19. Coworkers being emotionally unstable</td>
<td align="char" valign="top">15</td>
<td valign="top">57.7</td>
<td valign="top">0.84 (0.85)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">20. Deterioration of patients' condition</td>
<td align="char" valign="top">14</td>
<td valign="top">53.8</td>
<td valign="top">0.92 (1.00)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">21. Blaming from commanding officers</td>
<td align="char" valign="top">9</td>
<td valign="top">34.6</td>
<td valign="top">0.54 (0.88)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">22. Coworkers displaying SARS-like symptoms</td>
<td align="char" valign="top">9</td>
<td valign="top">34.6</td>
<td valign="top">0.40 (0.76)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">23. Yourself displaying SARS-like symptoms</td>
<td align="char" valign="top">7</td>
<td valign="top">26.9</td>
<td valign="top">0.38 (0.92)</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="tblfn1">
<label>a</label>
<p>Frequency represents the number of subjects who responded
<italic>yes</italic>
to a specific item on the list of stressors.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="tblfn2">
<label>b</label>
<p>Severity was rated on a four-point scale (0=
<italic>not at all</italic>
; 1=
<italic>slightly</italic>
; 2=
<italic>moderately</italic>
; 3=
<italic>very much</italic>
).</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</p>
<p>The “effective measures to reduce stress” subscale consists of 15 items enumerating actions/resources that were taken or provided to meet the respondents' needs during the SARS crisis and their perception of the effectiveness of these measures. All the respondents were asked first to indicate if they had used each of the measures (
<italic>yes</italic>
/
<italic>no</italic>
) and then to rate the effectiveness of the measures on a four-point scale (0=
<italic>not effective</italic>
; 1=
<italic>mildly effective</italic>
; 2=
<italic>moderately effective</italic>
; 3=
<italic>very effective</italic>
). Sample items are listed in
<xref rid="tbl3" ref-type="table">Table 3</xref>
. The internal consistency coefficients were .47 (Kuder-Richardson Formula 20) for the number of measures and .85 (Cronbach's
<italic>α</italic>
) for the degree of effectiveness.
<table-wrap position="float" id="tbl3">
<label>Table 3</label>
<caption>
<p>Effective measures to reduce stress of the SARS team nurses (
<italic>N</italic>
=26)</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top">Item</th>
<th valign="top">
<italic>f</italic>
</th>
<th valign="top">Percentage (%)</th>
<th valign="top">Effectiveness
<xref rid="tblfn3" ref-type="table-fn">a</xref>
[mean (S.D.)]</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top">1. Psychiatric services</td>
<td valign="top">26</td>
<td align="char" valign="top">100.0</td>
<td valign="top">2.54 (0.71)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">2. Encouragement among coworkers</td>
<td valign="top">26</td>
<td align="char" valign="top">100.0</td>
<td valign="top">2.54 (0.71)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">3. Hospital providing nutriments</td>
<td valign="top">26</td>
<td align="char" valign="top">100.0</td>
<td valign="top">1.77 (0.95)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">4. Sufficient rest or time off</td>
<td valign="top">25</td>
<td align="char" valign="top">96.2</td>
<td valign="top">2.50 (0.76)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">5. Appropriate work shift</td>
<td valign="top">25</td>
<td align="char" valign="top">96.2</td>
<td valign="top">2.35 (0.85)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">6. Hospital enforcing stringent infection control procedure</td>
<td valign="top">25</td>
<td align="char" valign="top">96.2</td>
<td valign="top">2.35 (0.80)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">7. Sharing jokes and humor among coworkers</td>
<td valign="top">25</td>
<td align="char" valign="top">96.2</td>
<td valign="top">2.35 (0.80)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">8. Sufficient equipment provided by hospital</td>
<td valign="top">24</td>
<td align="char" valign="top">92.3</td>
<td valign="top">2.31 (1.01)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">9. Senior staffs sharing their experience</td>
<td valign="top">24</td>
<td align="char" valign="top">92.3</td>
<td valign="top">2.31 (0.93)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">10. Support from commanding officers</td>
<td valign="top">24</td>
<td align="char" valign="top">92.3</td>
<td valign="top">2.15 (0.97)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">11. Government offering allowance</td>
<td valign="top">23</td>
<td align="char" valign="top">88.5</td>
<td valign="top">2.08 (1.06)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">12. Hospital providing regular education program</td>
<td valign="top">22</td>
<td align="char" valign="top">84.6</td>
<td valign="top">2.27 (1.00)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">13. Clarification of the transmission pathway</td>
<td valign="top">22</td>
<td align="char" valign="top">84.6</td>
<td valign="top">2.12 (1.11)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">14. Clear guidelines for medical procedures</td>
<td valign="top">17</td>
<td align="char" valign="top">65.4</td>
<td valign="top">1.65 (1.32)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">15. Improvement in patients' condition</td>
<td valign="top">13</td>
<td align="char" valign="top">50.0</td>
<td valign="top">1.38 (1.42)</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="tblfn3">
<label>a</label>
<p>The effectiveness of measures was rated on a four-point scale (0=
<italic>not effective</italic>
; 1=
<italic>mildly effective</italic>
; 2=
<italic>moderately effective</italic>
; 3=
<italic>very effective</italic>
).</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</p>
<p>The “coping strategies” subscale includes 12 behaviors that the respondents might have employed in coping with the stresses related to their mission. All respondents were asked to rate the frequency of various coping strategies used on a four-point scale (0=
<italic>almost never</italic>
; 1=
<italic>sometimes</italic>
; 2=
<italic>often</italic>
; 3=
<italic>almost always</italic>
). Sample items are listed in
<xref rid="tbl4" ref-type="table">Table 4</xref>
. The internal consistency was .27 (Cronbach's
<italic>α</italic>
) for the rating of coping strategies.
<table-wrap position="float" id="tbl4">
<label>Table 4</label>
<caption>
<p>Coping strategies of the SARS team members (
<italic>N</italic>
=26)</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top">Item</th>
<th valign="top">
<italic>f</italic>
</th>
<th align="char" valign="top">Percentage (%)</th>
<th valign="top">Mean (S.D.)
<xref rid="tblfn4" ref-type="table-fn">a</xref>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top">1. Taking protective measures (washing hands, wearing mask, taking own temperature, etc.)</td>
<td align="char" valign="top">26</td>
<td align="char" valign="top">100.0</td>
<td align="char" valign="top">2.62 (0.50)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">2. Actively acquiring more knowledge about SARS (symptoms, transmission pathway, etc.)</td>
<td align="char" valign="top">25</td>
<td align="char" valign="top">96.2</td>
<td align="char" valign="top">2.19 (0.80)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">3. Engaging in health-promoting behaviors (more rest, exercise, balanced diet, etc.)</td>
<td align="char" valign="top">23</td>
<td align="char" valign="top">88.5</td>
<td align="char" valign="top">1.62 (0.90)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">4. Switching thoughts and facing the situation with positive attitude</td>
<td align="char" valign="top">22</td>
<td align="char" valign="top">84.6</td>
<td align="char" valign="top">1.58 (1.06)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">5. Engaging in recreational activities (shopping, going to movies, outdoor exercises, internet surfing)</td>
<td align="char" valign="top">22</td>
<td align="char" valign="top">84.6</td>
<td align="char" valign="top">1.38 (0.90)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">6. Chatting with family and friends by phone to share concerns and support</td>
<td align="char" valign="top">21</td>
<td align="char" valign="top">80.8</td>
<td align="char" valign="top">1.19 (0.85)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">7. Limiting self from watching too much news about SARS</td>
<td align="char" valign="top">16</td>
<td align="char" valign="top">61.5</td>
<td align="char" valign="top">0.81 (0.85)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">8. Distracting oneself from thinking about SARS issues by suppression or keeping busy</td>
<td align="char" valign="top">13</td>
<td align="char" valign="top">50.0</td>
<td align="char" valign="top">0.73 (0.83)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">9. Acquiring mental health knowledge and information</td>
<td align="char" valign="top">10</td>
<td align="char" valign="top">38.4</td>
<td align="char" valign="top">0.62 (0.82)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">10. Practicing relaxation methods (meditation, yoga, tai chi, etc.)</td>
<td align="char" valign="top">10</td>
<td align="char" valign="top">38.4</td>
<td align="char" valign="top">0.50 (0.71)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">11. Venting emotions by crying, screaming, smashing things, and so on</td>
<td align="char" valign="top">7</td>
<td align="char" valign="top">26.9</td>
<td align="char" valign="top">0.31 (0.55)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">12. Using alcohol or drugs</td>
<td align="char" valign="top">3</td>
<td align="char" valign="top">11.5</td>
<td align="char" valign="top">0.15 (0.46)</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="tblfn4">
<label>a</label>
<p>Frequency of use of various coping strategies was rated on a four-point scale (0=
<italic>almost never</italic>
; 1=
<italic>sometimes</italic>
; 2=
<italic>often</italic>
; 3=
<italic>almost always</italic>
).</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</p>
<p>The “motivators to join future missions” subscale consists of five possible considerations that may enhance respondents' willingness to join the SARS team in the future. These items are family support, adequate and sufficient protective equipment, clear information about the disease, bonus pay for dangerous work and reasonable staffing/shift. Respondents were asked to rank their preference for these considerations.</p>
<p>Finally, the “evaluation of psychiatric services” subscale was conducted by asking the respondents to rate their experience of the debriefing groups on a five-point scale (0=
<italic>not helpful</italic>
; 1=
<italic>slightly helpful</italic>
; 2=
<italic>fairly helpful</italic>
; 3=
<italic>moderately helpful</italic>
; 4=
<italic>very helpful</italic>
). They were also invited to write down their suggestions for future services to be provided by the psychiatric team.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<label>2.4</label>
<title>Data analysis</title>
<p>Descriptive statistics were employed to organize the data collected from the survey. Correlational analysis was performed to evaluate the internal consistency of the SARS Team Questionnaire.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec>
<label>3</label>
<title>Results</title>
<sec>
<label>3.1</label>
<title>Immediate reactions to the mission</title>
<p>Upon knowing their assignments to the SARS team, 17 to 18 members (65–69%) held a positive attitude (e.g., “I took it as call of duty,” “I took it for granted,” “I took it as challenge.”). However, 3 to 8 nurses (12–31%) reported experiencing a mixture of various negative feelings such as anxiety, fear, depression and loss of control. They stated that it was too much to expect of them to risk their own lives and to jeopardize their well-being to be “heroines.” In addition, excessive and overly critical media coverage had imposed considerable pressure on them.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<label>3.2</label>
<title>Major stressors inherent in caring for SARS patients</title>
<p>As the epidemic waxed and waned, some situations were additionally stressful.
<xref rid="tbl2" ref-type="table">Table 2</xref>
shows that a majority of respondents suffered from stresses related to worries about colleagues (
<italic>n</italic>
=24, 92%), patients (
<italic>n</italic>
=23, 89%) and family members (
<italic>n</italic>
=23, 89%). The frequent changes in infection control measures (
<italic>n</italic>
=24, 92%) and documentation process (
<italic>n</italic>
=21, 81%) as well as the increase in casualties had caused further stresses of uncertainty (
<italic>n</italic>
=24, 92%). They were also concerned about their lack of knowledge of the virus (
<italic>n</italic>
=21, 81%), which was becoming increasingly rampant. Not armored with adequate protective equipment (
<italic>n</italic>
=21, 81%), they felt that their well-being was threatened. On the other hand, wearing protective equipment hindered their work, causing discomfort (
<italic>n</italic>
=23, 89%) and impairing the quality of care (
<italic>n</italic>
=19, 73%).</p>
<p>Furthermore, the potential threat of the nosocomial spread of SARS (
<italic>n</italic>
=21, 81%) added an extra burden to the SARS team members. Twenty respondents (77%) reported the tragic death of the head nurse as a major stressor for them. The conflict between their duty and their own safety in the workplace (
<italic>n</italic>
=17, 65%) made them reconsider the expectations of their profession (i.e., putting their patients' well-being first). One of the SARS team members, who had cared for the deceased nurse, reported that caring for a colleague as a patient was emotionally difficult. However, none of the SARS team members had actually left the profession of nursing due to the stress of the SARS epidemic.</p>
<p>Eighteen (69%) respondents reported conflicts with doctors over “who should be accountable for explaining patients' physical condition to the concerned parties” or “who should handle the hassles with the patients and their families regarding the limited availability of negative-pressure rooms and isolation beds,” among others. Some respondents complained that some doctors interacted with SARS patients and their families in a negative manner that caused tension between the patients and the medical staff, adding an extra burden to the team members, hurting the cooperative relationship between doctors and nurses and leading the latter to sometimes feel powerless and helpless.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<label>3.3</label>
<title>Effective measures to reduce stress</title>
<p>During the outbreak, our hospital responded rapidly to help the team in many ways.
<xref rid="tbl3" ref-type="table">Table 3</xref>
lists all the effective actions/resources mentioned by the respondents. Although psychiatric services were not included in the very early stage of the hospital's action, the nurses all agreed that the psychiatric services (
<italic>n</italic>
=26, 100%) were significantly effective in helping them manage their stress. Encouragement among peers (
<italic>n</italic>
=26, 100%), enough rest and time off (
<italic>n</italic>
=25, 96%) and appropriate work shifts (
<italic>n</italic>
=25, 96%) were all helpful in reducing their stress and restoring their energy.</p>
<p>Enforcement of stringent infection control procedures (
<italic>n</italic>
=25, 96%), supplies of adequate protective equipment (
<italic>n</italic>
=24, 92%) and the regular education program (
<italic>n</italic>
=22, 85%) were taken as strong, committed support from the hospital administration and therefore beneficial to morale, as was the senior nurses' mentoring of the junior nurses (
<italic>n</italic>
=24, 92%).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<label>3.4</label>
<title>Coping strategies</title>
<p>The SARS team members also reported strategies for relieving tension during the epidemic (see
<xref rid="tbl4" ref-type="table">Table 4</xref>
). For examples, they adopted more active personal protective measures (
<italic>n</italic>
=26, 100%; e.g., taking their own temperature, wearing masks, washing their hands), learned more about the disease (
<italic>n</italic>
=25, 96%; e.g., symptoms, mode of transmission) and engaged in health-promoting behaviors (e.g., more rest, exercise, balanced diet).</p>
<p>Instead of feeling frustrated, some changed their attitudes and started facing their work more positively (
<italic>n</italic>
=22, 85%). Team members frequently met after work for a debriefing session, keeping themselves posted on problems that they were faced with at the time and exchanging information with the head nurse. These informal small group gatherings made them feel confident rather than confused.</p>
<p>Some (
<italic>n</italic>
=22, 85%) engaged in recreational activities such as telling jokes, shopping, going to movies, internet surfing and participating in outdoors activities to reduce stress. Twenty-one (81%) nurses reported feeling comforted in chatting with their families and friends over the phone. In particular, photos showing nurses in protective gear sent by video cell phones to family members were a great source of reassurance.</p>
<p>Sixteen (62%) respondents avoided watching much news about SARS on TV, which had been disturbing and unfair, imposing unnecessary pressure on them. In general, they seemed to cope well with this extremely stressful situation.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<label>3.5</label>
<title>Motivators to join future missions</title>
<p>Among motivating factors that could make the nurses more willing to join the team in the future, the most crucial was having adequate and sufficient protective equipment, followed by clear information about the disease, bonus pay for dangerous work, reasonable staffing/shift and family support.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<label>3.6</label>
<title>Evaluation of psychiatric services</title>
<p>Respondents' feedback about the psychiatric services provided was solicited to help improve the delivery of psychiatric services in the future. This is especially helpful and important since interdisciplinary cooperation is required in such a situation. Twenty-three (89%) respondents agreed that the psychiatric services were a great form of support, with the debriefing group being the most commended.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<label>3.7</label>
<title>Suggestions for psychiatric services</title>
<p>In general, the SARS team nurses suggested that (a) the psychiatric services be more flexible, informal and relaxing since they found it difficult to match their work schedule with the group time; (b) more individual counseling be provided on some personal issues (e.g., anger) that are difficult to mention publicly; (c) debriefing groups be downsized to fewer than nine members and the duration shortened to 50 min or less as they felt appropriate; and (d) continuous psychiatric services be provided because the secondary traumatization still haunted some.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec>
<label>4</label>
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>The SARS epidemic of 2002–2003 was one of the most virulent that ever threatened health care workers in Taiwan. Searching through the epidemiological literature on disease outbreaks, we found a paucity of studies regarding psychiatric services in similar situations
<xref rid="bib4" ref-type="bibr">[4]</xref>
. In exploring the unknown, this study represents a needed effort to set up a task force to address the needs of health care workers on the front line.</p>
<p>This study showed that the leader of the SARS team played an important role in coordinating services
<xref rid="bib5" ref-type="bibr">[5]</xref>
. Being in the leader's position, she had to bridge the gap between the hospital command center and the nurses. As a consequence, she sustained much stress. She had to be sensitive to members' emotional status and respond accordingly to maintain high morale. Prior to this event, the team leader (H.-L.L.) and the psychiatrist (S.-H.L.) had worked collaboratively on another occasion. Because of this past partnership, the team leader was able to call for psychiatric help immediately when she noticed the increased irritability, inattention and withdrawal of some team members. On the other hand, the psychiatric team's anxiety about volunteering to provide face-to-face services to the SARS team members was greatly reduced with the help of the SARS team leader. She arranged an independent, safe and quiet meeting place for the debriefing groups and took proper protective measures to make all the participants, including the psychiatrists and psychologists, feel secure and relaxed. This experience is consistent with the observation of Maunder et al.
<xref rid="bib6" ref-type="bibr">[6]</xref>
that a preexisting relationship is essential in establishing a collaborative partnership that works efficiently and responsively during a crisis.</p>
<p>The results of this study also echo, for SARS, the finding of Mitchell et al.
<xref rid="bib7" ref-type="bibr">[7]</xref>
that the nursing staff sustained severe stress while fighting an outbreak of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE). Therefore, it is recommended that the possibility that such psychological reactions to extreme stress may be common among nurses caring for victims during a highly infectious epidemic be considered.</p>
<p>In agreement with the prior findings of others, this study identified several major stressors in the work environment. These stressors include worrying about infecting family members
<xref rid="bib8" ref-type="bibr">[8]</xref>
, feelings of uncertainty, inadequate staffing level
<xref rid="bib9" ref-type="bibr">[9]</xref>
, the virulence of the disease and inappropriate equipment
<xref rid="bib10" ref-type="bibr">[10]</xref>
, nosocomial spread
<xref rid="bib11" ref-type="bibr">[11]</xref>
and personal danger
<xref rid="bib12" ref-type="bibr">[12]</xref>
. This highlights the importance of providing timely, clear and updated information to nursing staff with regard to new handling procedures, patient numbers, and the like. In addition, tension between doctors and nurses interfered with teamwork. To address this, meetings of doctors and nurses should be held frequently so that their shared tasks can be identified, conflicts reduced and teamwork strengthened. Psychiatric consultation may be, as it was here, an effective measure to reduce stress and enhance teamwork. For this reason, from the beginning, the integration of consultation psychiatrists into a task force for a crisis is strongly recommended.</p>
<p>It is encouraging to find that nurses cope well with challenging situations
<xref rid="bib7" ref-type="bibr">[7]</xref>
. Most of the SARS team staff became more confident and optimistic while the epidemic was developing. Contrarily, some team members found it difficult to resume their normal lives even long afterward. They suffered from secondary traumatization in response to the stress of their work as nurses, with the patients suffering the primary trauma. Raphael et al.
<xref rid="bib13" ref-type="bibr">[13]</xref>
and Chang et al.
<xref rid="bib14" ref-type="bibr">[14]</xref>
documented that rescue workers often suffer from psychiatric and posttraumatic distress. The situation in this disease outbreak, however, is different from other rescue work. Therefore, it is extremely important to note that, as learned from this study, these secondarily traumatized team members should be further observed, educated and properly treated.</p>
<p>Will another SARS epidemic ever occur in the future? It is essential to prepare for the possibility of another epidemic. We recommend that the Department of Health and the Center for Disease Control in Taiwan should, while emphasizing hygiene, temperature monitoring and fever management, also include psychiatric preparedness and stress monitoring for health care teams in their planning to fight another epidemic. That is, the psychiatry department should be included in the hospital command structure at the preparation stage for the next epidemic. Based on the SARS team's recommendations, psychiatric services optimally should be more flexible, active and continuous. This means that more psychiatric staff are required if mental health services are to be able to meet the need for services during a highly stressful epidemic.</p>
<p>This study is limited by the small number of respondents and the self-selection of the sample, which reduce the generalizability and validity of the findings, especially the 100% approval rating for the psychiatric services. However, there were additional anecdotal evidence to support both the issues raised and the positive evaluation of the psychiatric services. For example, one of the authors (S.-H.L.) was later invited by the nursing staff at the emergency department to teach the nursing staff psychological methods to enhance their ability to cope with occupational and psychological challenges. A request for more debriefing groups was also received.</p>
<p>In addition, although it might be interesting to examine potential differences in the nurses' responses to the rating scales between the volunteers and those assigned or between those who were married and lived with their families and those who did not, the smaller number of the subgroups limits our ability to make such comparisons.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<label>5</label>
<title>Conclusions</title>
<p>This study reports successful interventions over time, in response to the SARS epidemic, by a psychiatric team that helped health care workers, particularly frontline female nurses, provide better nursing care during this health care crisis. The results, based on the nurses' own reports, support the importance and benefits of psychiatric consultation services for the emergency department nursing staff in order to reduce their secondary traumatization. Additional findings include the need for more trained psychiatric staff to provide more flexible and continuous services, the importance of meetings to improve teamwork and reduce conflict between doctors and nurses and the interesting discovery that video cell phones provided needed reassurance from afar to the worried families of the nurses. These findings enhance our knowledge on the needs of frontline nurses and health care workers and support the planning of better psychiatric services in future epidemics, which should, in turn, improve patient care.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="bib1">
<label>1</label>
<element-citation publication-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>World Health Organization</surname>
</name>
</person-group>
<chapter-title>Summary of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) cases: international</chapter-title>
<comment>[Web page]</comment>
<year>2003</year>
<publisher-name>World Health Organization</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Geneva</publisher-loc>
<comment>Available:</comment>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http:www.who.int/csr/sars/country/table2004_04_21/en/">www.who.int/csr/sars/country/table2004_04_21/en/</ext-link>
<comment>[accessed 2005 Mar 8]</comment>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="bib2">
<label>2</label>
<element-citation publication-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Department of Health</surname>
</name>
</person-group>
<chapter-title>Classification of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) cases in Taiwan</chapter-title>
<comment>[Web page]</comment>
<year>2003</year>
<publisher-name>Department of Health</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Taipei (Taiwan)</publisher-loc>
<comment>Available:</comment>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http:www.doh.gov.tw/ufile/doc/Renew-0917-2.ppt">www.doh.gov.tw/ufile/doc/Renew-0917-2.ppt</ext-link>
<comment>[accessed 2005 Mar 8]</comment>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="bib3">
<label>3</label>
<element-citation publication-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>China Times</surname>
</name>
</person-group>
<chapter-title>War against SARS: on the frontline</chapter-title>
<comment>[Web page]</comment>
<year>2003</year>
<publisher-name>China Times</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Taipei (Taiwan)</publisher-loc>
<comment>Available:</comment>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http:www.forums.chinatimes.com/report/SARS/main.htm">www.forums.chinatimes.com/report/SARS/main.htm</ext-link>
<comment>[accessed 2005 Mar 2]</comment>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="bib4">
<label>4</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Riley</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fraser</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Donnelly</surname>
<given-names>C.A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Transmission dynamics of the etiological agent of SARS in Hong Kong: impact of public health interventions</article-title>
<source>Science</source>
<volume>300</volume>
<year>2003</year>
<fpage>1961</fpage>
<lpage>1966</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12766206</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="bib5">
<label>5</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yank</surname>
<given-names>G.R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Barber</surname>
<given-names>J.W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hargrove</surname>
<given-names>D.S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>The mental health treatment team as a work group: team dynamics and the role of the leader</article-title>
<source>Psychiatry</source>
<volume>55</volume>
<year>1992</year>
<fpage>250</fpage>
<lpage>264</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">1509012</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="bib6">
<label>6</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Maunder</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hunter</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vincent</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>The immediate psychological and occupational impact of the 2003 SARS outbreak in a teaching hospital</article-title>
<source>CMAJ</source>
<volume>168</volume>
<year>2003</year>
<fpage>1245</fpage>
<lpage>1251</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12743065</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="bib7">
<label>7</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mitchell</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cummins</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Spearing</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Nurses' experience with vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE)</article-title>
<source>J Clin Nurs</source>
<volume>11</volume>
<year>2002</year>
<fpage>126</fpage>
<lpage>133</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11845749</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="bib8">
<label>8</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sibbald</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Right to refuse work becomes another SARS issue</article-title>
<source>CMAJ</source>
<volume>169</volume>
<year>2003</year>
<fpage>141</fpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12874171</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="bib9">
<label>9</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Taylor</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>White</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Muncer</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Nurses' cognitive structural models of work-based stress</article-title>
<source>J Adv Nurs</source>
<volume>29</volume>
<year>1999</year>
<fpage>974</fpage>
<lpage>983</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10215991</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="bib10">
<label>10</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Farquharson</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Baguley</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Responding to the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) outbreak: lessons learned in a Toronto emergency department</article-title>
<source>J Emerg Nurs</source>
<volume>29</volume>
<year>2003</year>
<fpage>222</fpage>
<lpage>228</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12776077</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="bib11">
<label>11</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Schabas</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>SARS: prudence, not panic</article-title>
<source>CMAJ</source>
<volume>168</volume>
<year>2003</year>
<fpage>1432</fpage>
<lpage>1434</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12771074</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="bib12">
<label>12</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Drazen</surname>
<given-names>J.M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>SARS: looking back over the first 100 days</article-title>
<source>N Engl J Med</source>
<volume>349</volume>
<year>2003</year>
<fpage>319</fpage>
<lpage>320</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12878735</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="bib13">
<label>13</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Raphael</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Singh</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bradbury</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Disaster: the helper's perspective</article-title>
<source>Med J Aust</source>
<volume>2</volume>
<year>1980</year>
<fpage>445</fpage>
<lpage>447</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">7207324</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="bib14">
<label>14</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chang</surname>
<given-names>C.M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lee</surname>
<given-names>L.C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Connor</surname>
<given-names>K.M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Posttraumatic distress and coping strategies among rescue workers after an earthquake</article-title>
<source>J Nerv Ment Dis</source>
<volume>19</volume>
<year>2003</year>
<fpage>391</fpage>
<lpage>398</lpage>
</element-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
<ack>
<title>Acknowledgments</title>
<p>We dedicate this article to the late head nurse, Ms. Chin-Chiu Chen, who was an inspiration to all who knew her. We are grateful to the staff of the departments of psychiatry and emergency for their support and contribution to this study. We would also like to thank Mr. Frank Sharp and Dr. Paul Kretchmer for their assistance in editing this manuscript. Deepest gratitude goes to all the members of the SARS team who have shared their experiences with us and made this work possible.</p>
</ack>
</back>
</pmc>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Sante/explor/SrasV1/Data/Pmc/Corpus

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001016 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001016 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Sante
   |area=    SrasV1
   |flux=    Pmc
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     PMC:7132375
   |texte=   Facing SARS: psychological impacts on SARS team nurses and psychiatric services in a Taiwan general hospital
}}

Pour générer des pages wiki

HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Corpus/RBID.i   -Sk "pubmed:16168796" \
       | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Corpus/biblio.hfd   \
       | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a SrasV1
Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33.
Data generation: Tue Apr 28 14:49:16 2020. Site generation: Sat Mar 27 22:06:49 2021