Compensating for the ‘Authoritarian Advantage’ in Crisis Response: A Comparative Case Study of SARS Pandemic Responses in China and Taiwan
Identifieur interne : 003989 ( Ncbi/Merge ); précédent : 003988; suivant : 003990Compensating for the ‘Authoritarian Advantage’ in Crisis Response: A Comparative Case Study of SARS Pandemic Responses in China and Taiwan
Auteurs : Jonathan SchwartzSource :
- Journal of Chinese Political Science [ 1080-6954 ] ; 2012.
Abstract
Why do some countries more effectively respond to crises than others? This paper compares China’s relatively effective response to the 2002–3 SARS outbreak with Taiwan’s relatively ineffective response, focusing on three variables that constitute China’s ‘authoritarian advantage’ - centralized decision making powers; public support; and, relations with the mass media. The paper rejects a fourth explanatory variable specific to the Taiwan case – membership in international organizations. Drawing heavily on the Taiwan example, the paper concludes by suggesting options for overcoming the authoritarian advantage in pandemic response.
Url:
DOI: 10.1007/s11366-012-9204-4
PubMed: 32288475
PubMed Central: 7111788
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Pmc, to step Corpus: 000412
- to stream Pmc, to step Curation: 000412
- to stream Pmc, to step Checkpoint: 000A81
Links to Exploration step
PMC:7111788Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Compensating for the ‘Authoritarian Advantage’ in Crisis Response: A Comparative Case Study of SARS Pandemic Responses in China and Taiwan</title><author><name sortKey="Schwartz, Jonathan" sort="Schwartz, Jonathan" uniqKey="Schwartz J" first="Jonathan" last="Schwartz">Jonathan Schwartz</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="Aff1"></nlm:aff></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PMC</idno><idno type="pmid">32288475</idno><idno type="pmc">7111788</idno><idno type="url">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7111788</idno><idno type="RBID">PMC:7111788</idno><idno type="doi">10.1007/s11366-012-9204-4</idno><date when="2012">2012</date><idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Corpus">000412</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PMC">000412</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Curation">000412</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Curation">000412</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Checkpoint">000A81</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Checkpoint">000A81</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Merge">003989</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a" type="main">Compensating for the ‘Authoritarian Advantage’ in Crisis Response: A Comparative Case Study of SARS Pandemic Responses in China and Taiwan</title><author><name sortKey="Schwartz, Jonathan" sort="Schwartz, Jonathan" uniqKey="Schwartz J" first="Jonathan" last="Schwartz">Jonathan Schwartz</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="Aff1"></nlm:aff></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Journal of Chinese Political Science</title><idno type="ISSN">1080-6954</idno><idno type="eISSN">1874-6357</idno><imprint><date when="2012">2012</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p>Why do some countries more effectively respond to crises than others? This paper compares China’s relatively effective response to the 2002–3 SARS outbreak with Taiwan’s relatively ineffective response, focusing on three variables that constitute China’s ‘authoritarian advantage’ - centralized decision making powers; public support; and, relations with the mass media. The paper rejects a fourth explanatory variable specific to the Taiwan case – membership in international organizations. Drawing heavily on the Taiwan example, the paper concludes by suggesting options for overcoming the authoritarian advantage in pandemic response.</p></div></front><back><div1 type="bibliography"><listBibl><biblStruct></biblStruct><biblStruct></biblStruct><biblStruct></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Homer Dixon, T" uniqKey="Homer Dixon T">T Homer-Dixon</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Mill, Js" uniqKey="Mill J">JS Mill</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Schwartz, J" uniqKey="Schwartz J">J Schwartz</name></author><author><name sortKey="Evans, Rg" uniqKey="Evans R">RG Evans</name></author><author><name sortKey="Greenberg, S" uniqKey="Greenberg S">S Greenberg</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Kaydos Daniels, Sc" uniqKey="Kaydos Daniels S">SC Kaydos-Daniels</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Ku, As" uniqKey="Ku A">AS Ku</name></author><author><name sortKey="Wang, H" uniqKey="Wang H">H Wang</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Derleth, J" uniqKey="Derleth J">J Derleth</name></author><author><name sortKey="Koldyk, D" uniqKey="Koldyk D">D Koldyk</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="O Rien, Kj" uniqKey="O Rien K">KJ O’Brien</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Read, Bl" uniqKey="Read B">BL Read</name></author><author><name sortKey="Pekkanen, R" uniqKey="Pekkanen R">R Pekkanen</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Ku, As" uniqKey="Ku A">AS Ku</name></author><author><name sortKey="Wang, H" uniqKey="Wang H">H- Wang</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct></biblStruct></listBibl></div1></back></TEI><pmc article-type="research-article"><pmc-dir>properties open_access</pmc-dir>
<front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">J Chin Polit Sci</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="iso-abbrev">J Chin Polit Sci</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Chinese Political Science</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">1080-6954</issn><issn pub-type="epub">1874-6357</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Springer Netherlands</publisher-name><publisher-loc>Dordrecht</publisher-loc></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="pmid">32288475</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="pmc">7111788</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">9204</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11366-012-9204-4</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Compensating for the ‘Authoritarian Advantage’ in Crisis Response: A Comparative Case Study of SARS Pandemic Responses in China and Taiwan</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name><surname>Schwartz</surname><given-names>Jonathan</given-names></name><address><phone>+1-845-2572627</phone><fax>+1-845-2572627</fax><email>schwartj@newpaltz.edu</email></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff1"></xref><bio><sec id="d29e128"><title>Jonathan Schwartz</title><p>Associate Professor of Political Science at the State University of New York at New Paltz, writes on policy enforcement in China. Recent publications include, with Rachel Schwartz, “Confronting Global Pandemics: Lessons from China and the United States,” Global Health Governance (2010), and “Pandemic Responses in the Asia-Pacific: Risk and Opportunity in PRC’s International Relations,” in Guoguang Wu (ed.) China’s Challenges to Human Security: Foreign Relations and Global Implications (London: Routledge, forthcoming 2012). His most recently edited volume with Shawn Shieh is State and Society Responses to Social Welfare Needs in China: Serving the People (Routledge, paperback 2010).</p></sec></bio></contrib><aff id="Aff1"><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="GRID">grid.189747.4</institution-id><institution-id institution-id-type="ISNI">0000000095542494</institution-id><institution>Department of Political Science,</institution><institution>State University of New York,</institution></institution-wrap>New Paltz, NY USA</aff></contrib-group><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>19</day><month>7</month><year>2012</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="ppub"><year>2012</year></pub-date><volume>17</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>313</fpage><lpage>331</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>© Journal of Chinese Political Science/Association of Chinese Political Studies 2012</copyright-statement><license><license-p>This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.</license-p></license></permissions><abstract id="Abs1"><p>Why do some countries more effectively respond to crises than others? This paper compares China’s relatively effective response to the 2002–3 SARS outbreak with Taiwan’s relatively ineffective response, focusing on three variables that constitute China’s ‘authoritarian advantage’ - centralized decision making powers; public support; and, relations with the mass media. The paper rejects a fourth explanatory variable specific to the Taiwan case – membership in international organizations. Drawing heavily on the Taiwan example, the paper concludes by suggesting options for overcoming the authoritarian advantage in pandemic response.</p></abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><title>Keywords</title><kwd>Taiwan</kwd><kwd>China</kwd><kwd>SARS</kwd><kwd>Pandemic Response</kwd><kwd>Authoritarian Advantage</kwd></kwd-group><custom-meta-group><custom-meta><meta-name>issue-copyright-statement</meta-name><meta-value>© Journal of Chinese Political Science/Association of Chinese Political Studies 2012</meta-value></custom-meta></custom-meta-group></article-meta></front></pmc><affiliations><list></list><tree><noCountry><name sortKey="Schwartz, Jonathan" sort="Schwartz, Jonathan" uniqKey="Schwartz J" first="Jonathan" last="Schwartz">Jonathan Schwartz</name></noCountry></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Sante/explor/SrasV1/Data/Ncbi/Merge
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 003989 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Ncbi/Merge/biblio.hfd -nk 003989 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Sante
|area= SrasV1
|flux= Ncbi
|étape= Merge
|type= RBID
|clé= PMC:7111788
|texte= Compensating for the ‘Authoritarian Advantage’ in Crisis Response: A Comparative Case Study of SARS Pandemic Responses in China and Taiwan
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Ncbi/Merge/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:32288475" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Ncbi/Merge/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a SrasV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33. |  |