Curation
Ncbi
Racine
Curation
Checkpoint
Ncbi
Racine
Ncbi
Exploration
Accueil
Racine
Racine

Serveur d'exploration SRAS

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Universal health insurance coverage for 1.3 billion people: What accounts for China's success?

Identifieur interne : 002B06 ( Ncbi/Curation ); précédent : 002B05; suivant : 002B07

Universal health insurance coverage for 1.3 billion people: What accounts for China's success?

Auteurs : Hao Yu [États-Unis]

Source :

RBID : pubmed:26251322

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

China successfully achieved universal health insurance coverage in 2011, representing the largest expansion of insurance coverage in human history. While the achievement is widely recognized, it is still largely unexplored why China was able to attain it within a short period. This study aims to fill the gap. Through a systematic political and socio-economic analysis, it identifies seven major drivers for China's success, including (1) the SARS outbreak as a wake-up call, (2) strong public support for government intervention in health care, (3) renewed political commitment from top leaders, (4) heavy government subsidies, (5) fiscal capacity backed by China's economic power, (6) financial and political responsibilities delegated to local governments and (7) programmatic implementation strategy. Three of the factors seem to be unique to China (i.e., the SARS outbreak, the delegation, and the programmatic strategy.) while the other factors are commonly found in other countries' insurance expansion experiences. This study also discusses challenges and recommendations for China's health financing, such as reducing financial risk as an immediate task, equalizing benefit across insurance programs as a long-term goal, improving quality by tying provider payment to performance, and controlling costs through coordinated reform initiatives. Finally, it draws lessons for other developing countries.

DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2015.07.008
PubMed: 26251322

Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)

Links to Exploration step

pubmed:26251322

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI>
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Universal health insurance coverage for 1.3 billion people: What accounts for China's success?</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Yu, Hao" sort="Yu, Hao" uniqKey="Yu H" first="Hao" last="Yu">Hao Yu</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<nlm:affiliation>RAND Corporation, USA. Electronic address: hao_yu@rand.org.</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>RAND Corporation</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno>
<date when="2015">2015</date>
<idno type="RBID">pubmed:26251322</idno>
<idno type="pmid">26251322</idno>
<idno type="doi">10.1016/j.healthpol.2015.07.008</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000D88</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000D88</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">000D88</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Curation">000D88</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Checkpoint">000D23</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Checkpoint" wicri:step="PubMed">000D23</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Merge">002B06</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Curation">002B06</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en">Universal health insurance coverage for 1.3 billion people: What accounts for China's success?</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Yu, Hao" sort="Yu, Hao" uniqKey="Yu H" first="Hao" last="Yu">Hao Yu</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<nlm:affiliation>RAND Corporation, USA. Electronic address: hao_yu@rand.org.</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>RAND Corporation</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series>
<title level="j">Health policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands)</title>
<idno type="eISSN">1872-6054</idno>
<imprint>
<date when="2015" type="published">2015</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>China</term>
<term>Cost Control (organization & administration)</term>
<term>Disease Outbreaks</term>
<term>Financing, Government (organization & administration)</term>
<term>Financing, Government (statistics & numerical data)</term>
<term>Health Care Reform (organization & administration)</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Insurance, Health (organization & administration)</term>
<term>Insurance, Health (statistics & numerical data)</term>
<term>Politics</term>
<term>Program Evaluation</term>
<term>Reimbursement, Incentive (organization & administration)</term>
<term>SARS Virus</term>
<term>Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (epidemiology)</term>
<term>Universal Health Insurance (organization & administration)</term>
<term>Universal Health Insurance (statistics & numerical data)</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Assurance maladie ()</term>
<term>Assurance maladie (organisation et administration)</term>
<term>Chine</term>
<term>Financement du gouvernement ()</term>
<term>Financement du gouvernement (organisation et administration)</term>
<term>Flambées de maladies</term>
<term>Humains</term>
<term>Maîtrise des coûts (organisation et administration)</term>
<term>Politique</term>
<term>Remboursement incitatif (organisation et administration)</term>
<term>Réforme des soins de santé (organisation et administration)</term>
<term>Syndrome respiratoire aigu sévère (épidémiologie)</term>
<term>Virus du SRAS</term>
<term>Évaluation de programme</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="epidemiology" xml:lang="en">
<term>Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="organisation et administration" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Assurance maladie</term>
<term>Financement du gouvernement</term>
<term>Maîtrise des coûts</term>
<term>Remboursement incitatif</term>
<term>Réforme des soins de santé</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="organization & administration" xml:lang="en">
<term>Cost Control</term>
<term>Financing, Government</term>
<term>Health Care Reform</term>
<term>Insurance, Health</term>
<term>Reimbursement, Incentive</term>
<term>Universal Health Insurance</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="statistics & numerical data" xml:lang="en">
<term>Financing, Government</term>
<term>Insurance, Health</term>
<term>Universal Health Insurance</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="épidémiologie" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Syndrome respiratoire aigu sévère</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en">
<term>China</term>
<term>Disease Outbreaks</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Politics</term>
<term>Program Evaluation</term>
<term>SARS Virus</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Assurance maladie</term>
<term>Chine</term>
<term>Financement du gouvernement</term>
<term>Flambées de maladies</term>
<term>Humains</term>
<term>Politique</term>
<term>Virus du SRAS</term>
<term>Évaluation de programme</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">China successfully achieved universal health insurance coverage in 2011, representing the largest expansion of insurance coverage in human history. While the achievement is widely recognized, it is still largely unexplored why China was able to attain it within a short period. This study aims to fill the gap. Through a systematic political and socio-economic analysis, it identifies seven major drivers for China's success, including (1) the SARS outbreak as a wake-up call, (2) strong public support for government intervention in health care, (3) renewed political commitment from top leaders, (4) heavy government subsidies, (5) fiscal capacity backed by China's economic power, (6) financial and political responsibilities delegated to local governments and (7) programmatic implementation strategy. Three of the factors seem to be unique to China (i.e., the SARS outbreak, the delegation, and the programmatic strategy.) while the other factors are commonly found in other countries' insurance expansion experiences. This study also discusses challenges and recommendations for China's health financing, such as reducing financial risk as an immediate task, equalizing benefit across insurance programs as a long-term goal, improving quality by tying provider payment to performance, and controlling costs through coordinated reform initiatives. Finally, it draws lessons for other developing countries. </div>
</front>
</TEI>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Sante/explor/SrasV1/Data/Ncbi/Curation

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002B06 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Ncbi/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 002B06 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Sante
   |area=    SrasV1
   |flux=    Ncbi
   |étape=   Curation
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     pubmed:26251322
   |texte=   Universal health insurance coverage for 1.3 billion people: What accounts for China's success?
}}

Pour générer des pages wiki

HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Ncbi/Curation/RBID.i   -Sk "pubmed:26251322" \
       | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Ncbi/Curation/biblio.hfd   \
       | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a SrasV1
Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33.
Data generation: Tue Apr 28 14:49:16 2020. Site generation: Sat Mar 27 22:06:49 2021