SrasV1, Istex, Curation, bibRecord, 000A00

SARS in Canada and China: Two Approaches to Emergency Health Policy

Identifieur interne : 000A00 ( Istex/Curation ); précédent : 000999; suivant : 000A01

SARS in Canada and China: Two Approaches to Emergency Health Policy

Auteurs : James Lawson ; Feng Xu

Source :

Governance [ 0952-1895 ] ; 2007-04.

RBID : ISTEX:3967ECE4102F210B4BD26C7CED04A8EF5562BEBD

English descriptors

Teeft :
- April, Beijing, Biopolitical techniques, Blockade management, Cambridge university press, Canada participaction, Canadian, Canadian case, Cctv april, China ministry, Chinese medicine, Colin gordon, Decision makers, Disciplinary power, Dormant legacies, Economic development, Economic reform, Emergency conditions, Emergency health policy, Emergency policy responses, Endemic problems, Environics research group, Epidemic conditions, Exclusionary, Exclusionary practices, Exclusionary screenings, Family physicians, Feng, Forensic studies, Foucault, Future research, General population, Health canada, Health care, Health professionals, Health threats, Health workers, High levels, Individual case, Infrastructure, Internal migrants, James lawson, Jurisdictional boundaries, Lawson, Local authorities, Major cities, Many institutions, Media coverage, Medical care, Medical centers, Medical services, Michael bliss, Moral panics, Multiple levels, National priorities, Ordinary lives, Other factors, Outbreak, Oxford university press, Physical barriers, Physical boundaries, Policy cycles, Policy model, Policy styles, Popular resistance, Public education, Public health, Public mobilization, Qinghua university press, Recent years, Relative levels, Robert hurley, Sars, Sars cases, Sars crisis, Sars emergency, Sars experiences, Sars identities, Sars identity, Sars outbreak, Sars patients, Sars symptoms, Sars transmissions, September, Short term, Silo effects, Smallpox epidemic, Social division, Social divisions, Social geography, State capacity, Surveillance infrastructure, Symptomatic patients, Toronto, Toronto hospitals, Toushi sars, Trans, Travel advisories, Truth claims, Vintage books, Voluntary agencies.

Abstract

China and Canada addressed the transnational 2003 SARS outbreak within a common, multilevel network of public‐health expertise. The two countries deployed distinct public‐health strategies, and faced distinct levels of resistance. This article addresses this comparison. During this epidemic “state of exception,” both countries adopted emergency policy instruments and overall policy styles. However, Chinese emergency boundary policing corresponded better to everyday experience than did hospital‐based screening in Canada, and China's policing targeted collectivities where Canada emphasized individual case tracking. While Canadian efforts were smaller in scale and faced infrastructural deficiencies, prior campaigns to address endemic health problems formed a basis for compliant popular subject positions. Power/resistance relations and their cultivation during endemic conditions must become the center of analyzing effective approaches to emergency planning.

Url:

https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/WNG-LFJK43SC-X/fulltext.pdf

DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0491.2007.00354.x

Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)

to stream Istex, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :000A00

Links to Exploration step

ISTEX:3967ECE4102F210B4BD26C7CED04A8EF5562BEBD

Curation

No country items

James Lawson

<affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Victoria</mods:affiliation>
<wicri:noCountry code="no comma">University of Victoria</wicri:noCountry>
</affiliation>

Feng Xu

<affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Victoria</mods:affiliation>
<wicri:noCountry code="no comma">University of Victoria</wicri:noCountry>
</affiliation>

Le document en format XML

<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">SARS in Canada and China: Two Approaches to Emergency Health Policy</title>
<author><name sortKey="Lawson, James" sort="Lawson, James" uniqKey="Lawson J" first="James" last="Lawson">James Lawson</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Victoria</mods:affiliation>
<wicri:noCountry code="no comma">University of Victoria</wicri:noCountry>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Xu, Feng" sort="Xu, Feng" uniqKey="Xu F" first="Feng" last="Xu">Feng Xu</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Victoria</mods:affiliation>
<wicri:noCountry code="no comma">University of Victoria</wicri:noCountry>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:3967ECE4102F210B4BD26C7CED04A8EF5562BEBD</idno>
<date when="2007" year="2007">2007</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1468-0491.2007.00354.x</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/WNG-LFJK43SC-X/fulltext.pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000A00</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000A00</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">000A00</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">SARS in Canada and China: Two Approaches to Emergency Health Policy</title>
<author><name sortKey="Lawson, James" sort="Lawson, James" uniqKey="Lawson J" first="James" last="Lawson">James Lawson</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Victoria</mods:affiliation>
<wicri:noCountry code="no comma">University of Victoria</wicri:noCountry>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Xu, Feng" sort="Xu, Feng" uniqKey="Xu F" first="Feng" last="Xu">Feng Xu</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Victoria</mods:affiliation>
<wicri:noCountry code="no comma">University of Victoria</wicri:noCountry>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Governance</title>
<title level="j" type="alt">GOVERNANCE</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0952-1895</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1468-0491</idno>
<imprint><biblScope unit="vol">20</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="209">209</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="232">232</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page-count">24</biblScope>
<publisher>Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher>
<pubPlace>Malden, USA</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2007-04">2007-04</date>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0952-1895</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0952-1895</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>April</term>
<term>Beijing</term>
<term>Biopolitical techniques</term>
<term>Blockade management</term>
<term>Cambridge university press</term>
<term>Canada participaction</term>
<term>Canadian</term>
<term>Canadian case</term>
<term>Cctv april</term>
<term>China ministry</term>
<term>Chinese medicine</term>
<term>Colin gordon</term>
<term>Decision makers</term>
<term>Disciplinary power</term>
<term>Dormant legacies</term>
<term>Economic development</term>
<term>Economic reform</term>
<term>Emergency conditions</term>
<term>Emergency health policy</term>
<term>Emergency policy responses</term>
<term>Endemic problems</term>
<term>Environics research group</term>
<term>Epidemic conditions</term>
<term>Exclusionary</term>
<term>Exclusionary practices</term>
<term>Exclusionary screenings</term>
<term>Family physicians</term>
<term>Feng</term>
<term>Forensic studies</term>
<term>Foucault</term>
<term>Future research</term>
<term>General population</term>
<term>Health canada</term>
<term>Health care</term>
<term>Health professionals</term>
<term>Health threats</term>
<term>Health workers</term>
<term>High levels</term>
<term>Individual case</term>
<term>Infrastructure</term>
<term>Internal migrants</term>
<term>James lawson</term>
<term>Jurisdictional boundaries</term>
<term>Lawson</term>
<term>Local authorities</term>
<term>Major cities</term>
<term>Many institutions</term>
<term>Media coverage</term>
<term>Medical care</term>
<term>Medical centers</term>
<term>Medical services</term>
<term>Michael bliss</term>
<term>Moral panics</term>
<term>Multiple levels</term>
<term>National priorities</term>
<term>Ordinary lives</term>
<term>Other factors</term>
<term>Outbreak</term>
<term>Oxford university press</term>
<term>Physical barriers</term>
<term>Physical boundaries</term>
<term>Policy cycles</term>
<term>Policy model</term>
<term>Policy styles</term>
<term>Popular resistance</term>
<term>Public education</term>
<term>Public health</term>
<term>Public mobilization</term>
<term>Qinghua university press</term>
<term>Recent years</term>
<term>Relative levels</term>
<term>Robert hurley</term>
<term>Sars</term>
<term>Sars cases</term>
<term>Sars crisis</term>
<term>Sars emergency</term>
<term>Sars experiences</term>
<term>Sars identities</term>
<term>Sars identity</term>
<term>Sars outbreak</term>
<term>Sars patients</term>
<term>Sars symptoms</term>
<term>Sars transmissions</term>
<term>September</term>
<term>Short term</term>
<term>Silo effects</term>
<term>Smallpox epidemic</term>
<term>Social division</term>
<term>Social divisions</term>
<term>Social geography</term>
<term>State capacity</term>
<term>Surveillance infrastructure</term>
<term>Symptomatic patients</term>
<term>Toronto</term>
<term>Toronto hospitals</term>
<term>Toushi sars</term>
<term>Trans</term>
<term>Travel advisories</term>
<term>Truth claims</term>
<term>Vintage books</term>
<term>Voluntary agencies</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">China and Canada addressed the transnational 2003 SARS outbreak within a common, multilevel network of public‐health expertise. The two countries deployed distinct public‐health strategies, and faced distinct levels of resistance. This article addresses this comparison. During this epidemic “state of exception,” both countries adopted emergency policy instruments and overall policy styles. However, Chinese emergency boundary policing corresponded better to everyday experience than did hospital‐based screening in Canada, and China's policing targeted collectivities where Canada emphasized individual case tracking. While Canadian efforts were smaller in scale and faced infrastructural deficiencies, prior campaigns to address endemic health problems formed a basis for compliant popular subject positions. Power/resistance relations and their cultivation during endemic conditions must become the center of analyzing effective approaches to emergency planning.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Sante/explor/SrasV1/Data/Istex/Curation

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000A00 | SxmlIndent | more

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 000A00 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Sante
   |area=    SrasV1
   |flux=    Istex
   |étape=   Curation
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:3967ECE4102F210B4BD26C7CED04A8EF5562BEBD
   |texte=   SARS in Canada and China: Two Approaches to Emergency Health Policy
}}

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33.
Data generation: Tue Apr 28 14:49:16 2020. Site generation: Sat Mar 27 22:06:49 2021

	Serveur d'exploration SRAS
	Attention, ce site est en cours de développement ! Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts. Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Serveur d'exploration SRAS

SARS in Canada and China: Two Approaches to Emergency Health Policy

SARS in Canada and China: Two Approaches to Emergency Health Policy

Source :

English descriptors

Abstract

Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)

Links to Exploration step

Curation

No country items

Le document en format XML

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri