SrasV1, Istex, Corpus, bibRecord, 000F24

ETHICS AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE

Identifieur interne : 000F24 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 000F23; suivant : 000F25

ETHICS AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE

Auteurs : Michael J. Selgelid

Source :

Bioethics [ 0269-9702 ] ; 2005-06.

RBID : ISTEX:D28BF61A39CD1C6D3222637EA6F081188FBF9BE0

English descriptors

Teeft :
- Academic ethicists, African government, Aids epidemic, American journal, Autonomous discipline, Bioethicists, Bioethics, Black death, Blackwell, Blackwell publishing, California press, Cambridge university press, Cell research, Central concern, Death rate, Ethical issues, Ethical question, Ethical questions, Ethicist, European population, Euthanasia, Fourth explanation, Garrett, General topic, Global, Global health, Health care, Health care situation, Human rights, Important topics, Infectious, Infectious disease, Infectious diseases, Large extent, Life expectancy, Little attention, Malaria, Margaret battin, Medical community, Medical ethicists, Medical ethics, Medical research, Medical technology, Medication, More attention, More people, Other individuals, Poor education, Poor nutrition, Potential future consequences, Public health, Public health measures, Research resources, Sars, Second reason, Selgelid, Smallpox, Travel restrictions, Tropical diseases, Vast majority, World bioethics, World health organization.

Abstract

Bioethics apparently suffers from a misdistribution of research resources analogous to the ‘10/90’ divide in medical research. Though infectious disease should be recognized as a topic of primary importance for bioethics, the general topic of infectious disease has received relatively little attention from the discipline of bioethics in comparison with things like abortion, euthanasia, genetics, cloning, stem cell research, and so on. The fact that the historical and potential future consequences of infectious diseases are almost unrivalled is one reason that the topic of infectious disease warrants more attention from bioethicists. The ‘Black Death’ eliminated one third of the European population during the 14th Century; the 1918 flu killed between 20 and 100 million people; and, in the 20th Century smallpox killed perhaps three times more people than all the wars of that period. In the contemporary world, epidemics (of AIDS, multi‐drug resistant tuberculosis, and newly emerging infectious diseases such as SARS) continue to have dramatic consequences. A second reason why the topic of infectious disease deserves further attention is that it raises difficult ethical questions of its own. While infected individuals can threaten the health of other individuals and society as a whole, for example, public health care measures such as surveillance, isolation, and quarantine can require the infringement of widely accepted basic human rights and liberties. An important and difficult ethical question asks how to strike a balance between the utilitarian aim of promoting public health, on the one hand, and libertarian aims of protecting privacy and freedom of movement, on the other, in contexts involving diseases that are – to varying degrees – contagious, deadly, or otherwise dangerous. Third, since their burden is most heavily shouldered by the poor (in developing countries), infectious diseases deeply involve issues of justice – which should be a central concern of ethics. I conclude by providing sociological and historical explanations of why the topic of infectious disease has not already received more attention from bioethicists.

Url:

https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/WNG-M9VXLJ9D-4/fulltext.pdf

DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2005.00441.x

Links to Exploration step

ISTEX:D28BF61A39CD1C6D3222637EA6F081188FBF9BE0

Le document en format XML

<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">ETHICS AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE</title>
<author><name sortKey="Selgelid, Michael J" sort="Selgelid, Michael J" uniqKey="Selgelid M" first="Michael J." last="Selgelid">Michael J. Selgelid</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>Sesqui Lecturer in BioethicsCentre for Values, Ethics and the Law in Medicine; andUnit for History and Philosophy of ScienceUniversity of Sydneyselgelid@med.usyd.edu.au</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:D28BF61A39CD1C6D3222637EA6F081188FBF9BE0</idno>
<date when="2005" year="2005">2005</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1467-8519.2005.00441.x</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/WNG-M9VXLJ9D-4/fulltext.pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000F24</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000F24</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">ETHICS AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE1</title>
<author><name sortKey="Selgelid, Michael J" sort="Selgelid, Michael J" uniqKey="Selgelid M" first="Michael J." last="Selgelid">Michael J. Selgelid</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>Sesqui Lecturer in BioethicsCentre for Values, Ethics and the Law in Medicine; andUnit for History and Philosophy of ScienceUniversity of Sydneyselgelid@med.usyd.edu.au</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Bioethics</title>
<title level="j" type="alt">BIOETHICS</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0269-9702</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1467-8519</idno>
<imprint><biblScope unit="vol">19</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">3</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="272">272</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="289">289</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page-count">18</biblScope>
<publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd.</publisher>
<pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2005-06">2005-06</date>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0269-9702</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0269-9702</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Academic ethicists</term>
<term>African government</term>
<term>Aids epidemic</term>
<term>American journal</term>
<term>Autonomous discipline</term>
<term>Bioethicists</term>
<term>Bioethics</term>
<term>Black death</term>
<term>Blackwell</term>
<term>Blackwell publishing</term>
<term>California press</term>
<term>Cambridge university press</term>
<term>Cell research</term>
<term>Central concern</term>
<term>Death rate</term>
<term>Ethical issues</term>
<term>Ethical question</term>
<term>Ethical questions</term>
<term>Ethicist</term>
<term>European population</term>
<term>Euthanasia</term>
<term>Fourth explanation</term>
<term>Garrett</term>
<term>General topic</term>
<term>Global</term>
<term>Global health</term>
<term>Health care</term>
<term>Health care situation</term>
<term>Human rights</term>
<term>Important topics</term>
<term>Infectious</term>
<term>Infectious disease</term>
<term>Infectious diseases</term>
<term>Large extent</term>
<term>Life expectancy</term>
<term>Little attention</term>
<term>Malaria</term>
<term>Margaret battin</term>
<term>Medical community</term>
<term>Medical ethicists</term>
<term>Medical ethics</term>
<term>Medical research</term>
<term>Medical technology</term>
<term>Medication</term>
<term>More attention</term>
<term>More people</term>
<term>Other individuals</term>
<term>Poor education</term>
<term>Poor nutrition</term>
<term>Potential future consequences</term>
<term>Public health</term>
<term>Public health measures</term>
<term>Research resources</term>
<term>Sars</term>
<term>Second reason</term>
<term>Selgelid</term>
<term>Smallpox</term>
<term>Travel restrictions</term>
<term>Tropical diseases</term>
<term>Vast majority</term>
<term>World bioethics</term>
<term>World health organization</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Bioethics apparently suffers from a misdistribution of research resources analogous to the ‘10/90’ divide in medical research. Though infectious disease should be recognized as a topic of primary importance for bioethics, the general topic of infectious disease has received relatively little attention from the discipline of bioethics in comparison with things like abortion, euthanasia, genetics, cloning, stem cell research, and so on. The fact that the historical and potential future consequences of infectious diseases are almost unrivalled is one reason that the topic of infectious disease warrants more attention from bioethicists. The ‘Black Death’ eliminated one third of the European population during the 14th Century; the 1918 flu killed between 20 and 100 million people; and, in the 20th Century smallpox killed perhaps three times more people than all the wars of that period. In the contemporary world, epidemics (of AIDS, multi‐drug resistant tuberculosis, and newly emerging infectious diseases such as SARS) continue to have dramatic consequences. A second reason why the topic of infectious disease deserves further attention is that it raises difficult ethical questions of its own. While infected individuals can threaten the health of other individuals and society as a whole, for example, public health care measures such as surveillance, isolation, and quarantine can require the infringement of widely accepted basic human rights and liberties. An important and difficult ethical question asks how to strike a balance between the utilitarian aim of promoting public health, on the one hand, and libertarian aims of protecting privacy and freedom of movement, on the other, in contexts involving diseases that are – to varying degrees – contagious, deadly, or otherwise dangerous. Third, since their burden is most heavily shouldered by the poor (in developing countries), infectious diseases deeply involve issues of justice – which should be a central concern of ethics. I conclude by providing sociological and historical explanations of why the topic of infectious disease has not already received more attention from bioethicists.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName>
<keywords><teeft><json:string>infectious disease</json:string>
<json:string>bioethics</json:string>
<json:string>infectious diseases</json:string>
<json:string>blackwell publishing</json:string>
<json:string>selgelid</json:string>
<json:string>medical ethics</json:string>
<json:string>sars</json:string>
<json:string>health care situation</json:string>
<json:string>bioethicists</json:string>
<json:string>euthanasia</json:string>
<json:string>world health organization</json:string>
<json:string>public health</json:string>
<json:string>ethical questions</json:string>
<json:string>medical ethicists</json:string>
<json:string>aids epidemic</json:string>
<json:string>health care</json:string>
<json:string>ethical issues</json:string>
<json:string>black death</json:string>
<json:string>cell research</json:string>
<json:string>garrett</json:string>
<json:string>smallpox</json:string>
<json:string>african government</json:string>
<json:string>little attention</json:string>
<json:string>central concern</json:string>
<json:string>more attention</json:string>
<json:string>autonomous discipline</json:string>
<json:string>academic ethicists</json:string>
<json:string>large extent</json:string>
<json:string>medical research</json:string>
<json:string>tropical diseases</json:string>
<json:string>human rights</json:string>
<json:string>other individuals</json:string>
<json:string>ethicist</json:string>
<json:string>blackwell</json:string>
<json:string>medication</json:string>
<json:string>global health</json:string>
<json:string>california press</json:string>
<json:string>medical community</json:string>
<json:string>cambridge university press</json:string>
<json:string>more people</json:string>
<json:string>ethical question</json:string>
<json:string>american journal</json:string>
<json:string>margaret battin</json:string>
<json:string>death rate</json:string>
<json:string>second reason</json:string>
<json:string>european population</json:string>
<json:string>travel restrictions</json:string>
<json:string>public health measures</json:string>
<json:string>important topics</json:string>
<json:string>life expectancy</json:string>
<json:string>poor education</json:string>
<json:string>potential future consequences</json:string>
<json:string>medical technology</json:string>
<json:string>world bioethics</json:string>
<json:string>general topic</json:string>
<json:string>vast majority</json:string>
<json:string>poor nutrition</json:string>
<json:string>research resources</json:string>
<json:string>fourth explanation</json:string>
<json:string>infectious</json:string>
<json:string>malaria</json:string>
<json:string>global</json:string>
</teeft>
</keywords>
<author><json:item><name>Michael J. Selgelid</name>
<affiliations><json:string>Sesqui Lecturer in BioethicsCentre for Values, Ethics and the Law in Medicine; andUnit for History and Philosophy of ScienceUniversity of Sydneyselgelid@med.usyd.edu.au</json:string>
</affiliations>
</json:item>
</author>
<articleId><json:string>BIOE441</json:string>
</articleId>
<arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-M9VXLJ9D-4</arkIstex>
<language><json:string>eng</json:string>
</language>
<originalGenre><json:string>shortCommunication</json:string>
</originalGenre>
<abstract>Bioethics apparently suffers from a misdistribution of research resources analogous to the ‘10/90’ divide in medical research. Though infectious disease should be recognized as a topic of primary importance for bioethics, the general topic of infectious disease has received relatively little attention from the discipline of bioethics in comparison with things like abortion, euthanasia, genetics, cloning, stem cell research, and so on. The fact that the historical and potential future consequences of infectious diseases are almost unrivalled is one reason that the topic of infectious disease warrants more attention from bioethicists. The ‘Black Death’ eliminated one third of the European population during the 14th Century; the 1918 flu killed between 20 and 100 million people; and, in the 20th Century smallpox killed perhaps three times more people than all the wars of that period. In the contemporary world, epidemics (of AIDS, multi‐drug resistant tuberculosis, and newly emerging infectious diseases such as SARS) continue to have dramatic consequences. A second reason why the topic of infectious disease deserves further attention is that it raises difficult ethical questions of its own. While infected individuals can threaten the health of other individuals and society as a whole, for example, public health care measures such as surveillance, isolation, and quarantine can require the infringement of widely accepted basic human rights and liberties. An important and difficult ethical question asks how to strike a balance between the utilitarian aim of promoting public health, on the one hand, and libertarian aims of protecting privacy and freedom of movement, on the other, in contexts involving diseases that are – to varying degrees – contagious, deadly, or otherwise dangerous. Third, since their burden is most heavily shouldered by the poor (in developing countries), infectious diseases deeply involve issues of justice – which should be a central concern of ethics. I conclude by providing sociological and historical explanations of why the topic of infectious disease has not already received more attention from bioethicists.</abstract>
<qualityIndicators><score>10</score>
<pdfWordCount>6370</pdfWordCount>
<pdfCharCount>38951</pdfCharCount>
<pdfVersion>1.4</pdfVersion>
<pdfPageCount>18</pdfPageCount>
<pdfPageSize>430.874 x 649.244 pts</pdfPageSize>
<pdfWordsPerPage>354</pdfWordsPerPage>
<pdfText>true</pdfText>
<refBibsNative>false</refBibsNative>
<abstractWordCount>324</abstractWordCount>
<abstractCharCount>2162</abstractCharCount>
<keywordCount>0</keywordCount>
</qualityIndicators>
<title>ETHICS AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE</title>
<pmid><json:string>16167406</json:string>
</pmid>
<genre><json:string>brief-communication</json:string>
</genre>
<host><title>Bioethics</title>
<language><json:string>unknown</json:string>
</language>
<doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1467-8519</json:string>
</doi>
<issn><json:string>0269-9702</json:string>
</issn>
<eissn><json:string>1467-8519</json:string>
</eissn>
<publisherId><json:string>BIOE</json:string>
</publisherId>
<volume>19</volume>
<issue>3</issue>
<pages><first>272</first>
<last>289</last>
<total>18</total>
</pages>
<genre><json:string>journal</json:string>
</genre>
</host>
<namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>2000</json:string>
<json:string>2005</json:string>
<json:string>in the 20th Century</json:string>
<json:string>21st Century</json:string>
<json:string>1990s</json:string>
<json:string>In the 20th Century</json:string>
<json:string>2001</json:string>
<json:string>1993</json:string>
<json:string>1960s</json:string>
<json:string>1918</json:string>
<json:string>2002</json:string>
<json:string>1972</json:string>
<json:string>1999</json:string>
<json:string>1961</json:string>
<json:string>during the 14th Century</json:string>
<json:string>1950</json:string>
<json:string>1955</json:string>
<json:string>1995</json:string>
<json:string>1940</json:string>
<json:string>1980</json:string>
<json:string>1967</json:string>
<json:string>2004</json:string>
<json:string>during the 20th Century</json:string>
</date>
<geogName></geogName>
<orgName><json:string>WHO</json:string>
<json:string>Medical Research Council</json:string>
<json:string>American Journal of Bioethics</json:string>
<json:string>University of Sydney</json:string>
<json:string>Science University</json:string>
<json:string>Cornell University</json:string>
<json:string>Cambridge University</json:string>
<json:string>Disease Research Unit, Medical Research Council of South Africa</json:string>
<json:string>OF RESEARCH RESOURCES The</json:string>
<json:string>American Journal of Public Health</json:string>
<json:string>World Congress</json:string>
<json:string>Vietnam War</json:string>
<json:string>Oxford University</json:string>
<json:string>International Congress</json:string>
<json:string>Blackwell Publishing Ltd.</json:string>
<json:string>University of Pretoria</json:string>
<json:string>MRC</json:string>
<json:string>University of California Press</json:string>
<json:string>World Health Organization</json:string>
</orgName>
<orgName_funder></orgName_funder>
<orgName_provider></orgName_provider>
<persName><json:string>C. Sunter</json:string>
<json:string>H. Marais</json:string>
<json:string>R. Laubscher</json:string>
<json:string>Laurie Garrett</json:string>
<json:string>H. Kuhse</json:string>
<json:string>I. Kickbusch</json:string>
<json:string>I.M. Timaeus</json:string>
<json:string>Herald Tribune</json:string>
<json:string>William Ley</json:string>
<json:string>A. Mills</json:string>
<json:string>Alfred Crosby</json:string>
<json:string>K. Altman</json:string>
<json:string>S.R. Benatar</json:string>
<json:string>Solomon Benatar</json:string>
<json:string>Paul Farmer</json:string>
<json:string>H. Joffe</json:string>
<json:string>P. Farmer</json:string>
<json:string>G.J. Annas</json:string>
<json:string>Margaret Battin</json:string>
<json:string>Philosophy</json:string>
<json:string>Schuklenk</json:string>
<json:string>L. Garrett</json:string>
<json:string>P. Ziegler</json:string>
<json:string>J.H. Tanne</json:string>
<json:string>Michael J. Selgelid</json:string>
<json:string>D. Bradshaw</json:string>
<json:string>Balance</json:string>
<json:string>D. Webb</json:string>
<json:string>D. Bourne</json:string>
<json:string>An Economic</json:string>
<json:string>B. Reichman</json:string>
<json:string>Patrice Lumumba</json:string>
<json:string>Solomon R. Benatar</json:string>
<json:string>B.A. Oldstone</json:string>
<json:string>George C. Marshall</json:string>
<json:string>D.B. Resnik</json:string>
<json:string>A. Whiteside</json:string>
<json:string>Garrett</json:string>
<json:string>Kolata</json:string>
<json:string>R. Dorrington</json:string>
<json:string>M.J. Selgelid</json:string>
<json:string>Mary Tjiattas</json:string>
<json:string>Peter Singer</json:string>
<json:string>P. Singer</json:string>
<json:string>U.S. Secretary</json:string>
<json:string>A.W. Crosby</json:string>
<json:string>U. Schuklenk</json:string>
<json:string>Ronald Bayer</json:string>
<json:string>William H. Stewart</json:string>
</persName>
<placeName><json:string>D.C.</json:string>
<json:string>United States</json:string>
<json:string>CA.</json:string>
<json:string>Brazil</json:string>
<json:string>Engelberg</json:string>
<json:string>UK</json:string>
<json:string>Milwaukee</json:string>
<json:string>Washington</json:string>
<json:string>American</json:string>
<json:string>Congo</json:string>
<json:string>Europe</json:string>
<json:string>Los Angeles</json:string>
<json:string>America</json:string>
<json:string>South Africa</json:string>
<json:string>Berkeley</json:string>
<json:string>Moellendorf</json:string>
<json:string>York</json:string>
<json:string>Democratic Republic of the Congo</json:string>
<json:string>Cambridge</json:string>
<json:string>Pretoria</json:string>
<json:string>Zaire</json:string>
<json:string>Oxford</json:string>
</placeName>
<ref_url><json:string>http://www.bioethics.net/journal/ j_articles.php</json:string>
<json:string>http://www.bmj.com/ cgi/content/full/</json:string>
<json:string>http://www.odci.gov/cia/publications/nie/report/nie</json:string>
<json:string>http://jme.bmjjournals.com/cgi/</json:string>
<json:string>http://www.nytimes.com/</json:string>
<json:string>http://www.redribbon.co.za/</json:string>
<json:string>http://www.who.int/inf-fs/en/fact</json:string>
</ref_url>
<ref_bibl><json:string>March 2005 a</json:string>
</ref_bibl>
<bibl></bibl>
</unitex>
</namedEntities>
<ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-M9VXLJ9D-4</json:string>
</ark>
<categories><wos><json:string>1 - social science</json:string>
<json:string>2 - social sciences, biomedical</json:string>
<json:string>2 - social issues</json:string>
<json:string>2 - ethics</json:string>
<json:string>1 - science</json:string>
<json:string>2 - medical ethics</json:string>
</wos>
<scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - arts & humanities</json:string>
<json:string>2 - philosophy & theology</json:string>
<json:string>3 - applied ethics</json:string>
</scienceMetrix>
<scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string>
<json:string>2 - Medicine</json:string>
<json:string>3 - Health Policy</json:string>
<json:string>1 - Social Sciences</json:string>
<json:string>2 - Arts and Humanities</json:string>
<json:string>3 - Philosophy</json:string>
<json:string>1 - Social Sciences</json:string>
<json:string>2 - Social Sciences</json:string>
<json:string>3 - Health(social science)</json:string>
</scopus>
<inist><json:string>1 - sciences humaines et sociales</json:string>
</inist>
</categories>
<publicationDate>2005</publicationDate>
<copyrightDate>2005</copyrightDate>
<doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1467-8519.2005.00441.x</json:string>
</doi>
<id>D28BF61A39CD1C6D3222637EA6F081188FBF9BE0</id>
<score>1</score>
<fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension>
<original>true</original>
<mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/WNG-M9VXLJ9D-4/fulltext.pdf</uri>
</json:item>
<json:item><extension>zip</extension>
<original>false</original>
<mimetype>application/zip</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/WNG-M9VXLJ9D-4/bundle.zip</uri>
</json:item>
<istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/WNG-M9VXLJ9D-4/fulltext.tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">ETHICS AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE1</title>
<title level="a" type="short">ETHICS AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE</title>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority>
<publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd.</publisher>
<pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2005-06"></date>
</publicationStmt>
<notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="brief-communication" source="shortCommunication" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-S9SX2MFS-0">brief-communication</note>
<note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note>
</notesStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct type="brief-communication"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">ETHICS AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE1</title>
<title level="a" type="short">ETHICS AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE</title>
<author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">Michael J.</forename>
<surname>Selgelid</surname>
</persName>
<affiliation><orgName type="division">Sesqui Lecturer in Bioethics  Centre for Values</orgName>
<orgName type="institution">Ethics and the Law in Medicine; and  Unit for History and Philosophy of Science  University of Sydney  selgelid@med.usyd.edu.au</orgName>
</affiliation>
</author>
<idno type="istex">D28BF61A39CD1C6D3222637EA6F081188FBF9BE0</idno>
<idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-M9VXLJ9D-4</idno>
<idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1467-8519.2005.00441.x</idno>
<idno type="unit">BIOE441</idno>
<idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:BIOE.BIOE441.pdf</idno>
</analytic>
<monogr><title level="j" type="main">Bioethics</title>
<title level="j" type="alt">BIOETHICS</title>
<idno type="pISSN">0269-9702</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1467-8519</idno>
<idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1467-8519</idno>
<idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/biot.2005.19.issue-3</idno>
<idno type="product">BIOE</idno>
<idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno>
<imprint><biblScope unit="vol">19</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">3</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="272">272</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="289">289</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page-count">18</biblScope>
<publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd.</publisher>
<pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2005-06"></date>
</imprint>
</monogr>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<encodingDesc><schemaRef type="ODD" url="https://xml-schema.delivery.istex.fr/tei-istex.odd"></schemaRef>
<appInfo><application ident="pub2tei" version="1.0.10" when="2019-12-20"><label>pub2TEI-ISTEX</label>
<desc>A set of style sheets for converting XML documents encoded in various scientific publisher formats into a common TEI format.
                        <ref target="http://www.tei-c.org/">We use TEI</ref>
</desc>
</application>
</appInfo>
</encodingDesc>
<profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><head>ABSTRACT</head>
<p>Bioethics apparently suffers from a misdistribution of research resources analogous to the ‘10/90’ divide in medical research. Though infectious disease should be recognized as a topic of primary importance for bioethics, the general topic of infectious disease has received relatively little attention from the discipline of bioethics in comparison with things like abortion, euthanasia, genetics, cloning, stem cell research, and so on. The fact that the historical and potential future consequences of infectious diseases are almost unrivalled is one reason that the topic of infectious disease warrants more attention from bioethicists. The ‘Black Death’ eliminated one third of the European population during the 14<hi rend="superscript">th</hi>
 Century; the 1918 flu killed between 20 and 100 million people; and, in the 20<hi rend="superscript">th</hi>
 Century smallpox killed perhaps three times more people than all the wars of that period. In the contemporary world, epidemics (of AIDS, multi‐drug resistant tuberculosis, and newly emerging infectious diseases such as SARS) continue to have dramatic consequences. A second reason why the topic of infectious disease deserves further attention is that it raises difficult ethical questions of its own. While infected individuals can threaten the health of other individuals and society as a whole, for example, public health care measures such as surveillance, isolation, and quarantine can require the infringement of widely accepted basic human rights and liberties. An important and difficult ethical question asks how to strike a balance between the utilitarian aim of promoting public health, on the one hand, and libertarian aims of protecting privacy and freedom of movement, on the other, in contexts involving diseases that are – to varying degrees – contagious, deadly, or otherwise dangerous. Third, since their burden is most heavily shouldered by the poor (in developing countries), infectious diseases deeply involve issues of justice – which should be a central concern of ethics. I conclude by providing sociological and historical explanations of why the topic of infectious disease has not already received more attention from bioethicists.</p>
</abstract>
<textClass><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Background Briefing</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
<langUsage><language ident="en"></language>
</langUsage>
</profileDesc>
<revisionDesc><change when="2019-12-20" who="#istex" xml:id="pub2tei">formatting</change>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
</istex:fulltextTEI>
<json:item><extension>txt</extension>
<original>false</original>
<mimetype>text/plain</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/WNG-M9VXLJ9D-4/fulltext.txt</uri>
</json:item>
</fulltext>
<metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration>
<istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd.</publisherName>
<publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc>
</publisherInfo>
<doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1467-8519</doi>
<issn type="print">0269-9702</issn>
<issn type="electronic">1467-8519</issn>
<idGroup><id type="product" value="BIOE"></id>
<id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id>
</idGroup>
<titleGroup><title type="main" sort="BIOETHICS">Bioethics</title>
</titleGroup>
</publicationMeta>
<publicationMeta level="part" position="06003"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/biot.2005.19.issue-3</doi>
<numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="19">19</numbering>
<numbering type="journalIssue" number="3">3</numbering>
</numberingGroup>
<coverDate startDate="2005-06">June 2005</coverDate>
</publicationMeta>
<publicationMeta level="unit" type="shortCommunication" position="7" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1467-8519.2005.00441.x</doi>
<idGroup><id type="unit" value="BIOE441"></id>
</idGroup>
<countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="18"></count>
</countGroup>
<titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Background Briefing</title>
</titleGroup>
<eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2005-06-01"></event>
<event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2005-06-01"></event>
<event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.2 mode:FullText source:HeaderRef result:HeaderRef" date="2010-03-09"></event>
<event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-07"></event>
<event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-15"></event>
</eventGroup>
<numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="272">272</numbering>
<numbering type="pageLast" number="289">289</numbering>
</numberingGroup>
<linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:BIOE.BIOE441.pdf"></link>
</linkGroup>
</publicationMeta>
<contentMeta><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="0"></count>
<count type="tableTotal" number="0"></count>
<count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count>
<count type="referenceTotal" number="6"></count>
<count type="wordTotal" number="6881"></count>
<count type="linksPubMed" number="0"></count>
<count type="linksCrossRef" number="0"></count>
</countGroup>
<titleGroup><title type="main">ETHICS AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE<link href="#fn1"><sup>1</sup>
</link>
</title>
<title type="shortAuthors">MICHAEL J. SELGELID</title>
<title type="short">ETHICS AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE</title>
</titleGroup>
<creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Michael J.</givenNames>
<familyName>Selgelid</familyName>
</personName>
</creator>
</creators>
<affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1"><unparsedAffiliation>
Sesqui Lecturer in Bioethics
 Centre for Values, Ethics and the Law in Medicine; and
 Unit for History and Philosophy of Science
 University of Sydney
 <email>selgelid@med.usyd.edu.au</email>
</unparsedAffiliation>
</affiliation>
</affiliationGroup>
<abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><title type="main">ABSTRACT</title>
<p>Bioethics apparently suffers from a misdistribution of research resources analogous to the ‘10/90’ divide in medical research. Though infectious disease should be recognized as a topic of primary importance for bioethics, the general topic of infectious disease has received relatively little attention from the discipline of bioethics in comparison with things like abortion, euthanasia, genetics, cloning, stem cell research, and so on. The fact that the historical and potential future consequences of infectious diseases are almost unrivalled is one reason that the topic of infectious disease warrants more attention from bioethicists. The ‘Black Death’ eliminated one third of the European population during the 14<sup>th</sup>
 Century; the 1918 flu killed between 20 and 100 million people; and, in the 20<sup>th</sup>
 Century smallpox killed perhaps three times more people than all the wars of that period. In the contemporary world, epidemics (of AIDS, multi‐drug resistant tuberculosis, and newly emerging infectious diseases such as SARS) continue to have dramatic consequences. A second reason why the topic of infectious disease deserves further attention is that it raises difficult ethical questions of its own. While infected individuals can threaten the health of other individuals and society as a whole, for example, public health care measures such as surveillance, isolation, and quarantine can require the infringement of widely accepted basic human rights and liberties. An important and difficult ethical question asks how to strike a balance between the utilitarian aim of promoting public health, on the one hand, and libertarian aims of protecting privacy and freedom of movement, on the other, in contexts involving diseases that are – to varying degrees – contagious, deadly, or otherwise dangerous. Third, since their burden is most heavily shouldered by the poor (in developing countries), infectious diseases deeply involve issues of justice – which should be a central concern of ethics. I conclude by providing sociological and historical explanations of why the topic of infectious disease has not already received more attention from bioethicists.</p>
</abstract>
</abstractGroup>
</contentMeta>
</header>
</component>
</istex:document>
</istex:metadataXml>
<mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>ETHICS AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE</title>
</titleInfo>
<titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>ETHICS AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE</title>
</titleInfo>
<titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>ETHICS AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE1</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Michael J.</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Selgelid</namePart>
<affiliation>Sesqui Lecturer in BioethicsCentre for Values, Ethics and the Law in Medicine; andUnit for History and Philosophy of ScienceUniversity of Sydneyselgelid@med.usyd.edu.au</affiliation>
<role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre type="brief-communication" displayLabel="shortCommunication" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-S9SX2MFS-0">brief-communication</genre>
<originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd.</publisher>
<place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm>
</place>
<dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2005-06</dateIssued>
<copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2005</copyrightDate>
</originInfo>
<language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm>
<languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<physicalDescription><extent unit="figures">0</extent>
<extent unit="tables">0</extent>
<extent unit="formulas">0</extent>
<extent unit="references">6</extent>
<extent unit="linksCrossRef">0</extent>
<extent unit="words">6881</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<abstract lang="en">Bioethics apparently suffers from a misdistribution of research resources analogous to the ‘10/90’ divide in medical research. Though infectious disease should be recognized as a topic of primary importance for bioethics, the general topic of infectious disease has received relatively little attention from the discipline of bioethics in comparison with things like abortion, euthanasia, genetics, cloning, stem cell research, and so on. The fact that the historical and potential future consequences of infectious diseases are almost unrivalled is one reason that the topic of infectious disease warrants more attention from bioethicists. The ‘Black Death’ eliminated one third of the European population during the 14th Century; the 1918 flu killed between 20 and 100 million people; and, in the 20th Century smallpox killed perhaps three times more people than all the wars of that period. In the contemporary world, epidemics (of AIDS, multi‐drug resistant tuberculosis, and newly emerging infectious diseases such as SARS) continue to have dramatic consequences. A second reason why the topic of infectious disease deserves further attention is that it raises difficult ethical questions of its own. While infected individuals can threaten the health of other individuals and society as a whole, for example, public health care measures such as surveillance, isolation, and quarantine can require the infringement of widely accepted basic human rights and liberties. An important and difficult ethical question asks how to strike a balance between the utilitarian aim of promoting public health, on the one hand, and libertarian aims of protecting privacy and freedom of movement, on the other, in contexts involving diseases that are – to varying degrees – contagious, deadly, or otherwise dangerous. Third, since their burden is most heavily shouldered by the poor (in developing countries), infectious diseases deeply involve issues of justice – which should be a central concern of ethics. I conclude by providing sociological and historical explanations of why the topic of infectious disease has not already received more attention from bioethicists.</abstract>
<note type="content">*A version of this paper was presented at the VI World Congress of Bioethics, Brasilia, Brazil, October 2002.</note>
<relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Bioethics</title>
</titleInfo>
<genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre>
<identifier type="ISSN">0269-9702</identifier>
<identifier type="eISSN">1467-8519</identifier>
<identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1467-8519</identifier>
<identifier type="PublisherID">BIOE</identifier>
<part><date>2005</date>
<detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption>
<number>19</number>
</detail>
<detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption>
<number>3</number>
</detail>
<extent unit="pages"><start>272</start>
<end>289</end>
<total>18</total>
</extent>
</part>
</relatedItem>
<identifier type="istex">D28BF61A39CD1C6D3222637EA6F081188FBF9BE0</identifier>
<identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-M9VXLJ9D-4</identifier>
<identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1467-8519.2005.00441.x</identifier>
<identifier type="ArticleID">BIOE441</identifier>
<accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">© Wiley. All rights reserved.</accessCondition>
<recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource>
<recordOrigin>Converted from  (version ) to MODS version 3.6.</recordOrigin>
<recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2019-11-13</recordCreationDate>
</recordInfo>
</mods>
<json:item><extension>json</extension>
<original>false</original>
<mimetype>application/json</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/WNG-M9VXLJ9D-4/record.json</uri>
</json:item>
</metadata>
<serie></serie>
</istex>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Sante/explor/SrasV1/Data/Istex/Corpus

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000F24 | SxmlIndent | more

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000F24 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Sante
   |area=    SrasV1
   |flux=    Istex
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:D28BF61A39CD1C6D3222637EA6F081188FBF9BE0
   |texte=   ETHICS AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE
}}

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33.
Data generation: Tue Apr 28 14:49:16 2020. Site generation: Sat Mar 27 22:06:49 2021

	Serveur d'exploration SRAS
	Attention, ce site est en cours de développement ! Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts. Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Serveur d'exploration SRAS

ETHICS AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE

ETHICS AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE

Source :

English descriptors

Abstract

Links to Exploration step

Le document en format XML

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri