REFLECTING ON ETHICAL AND LEGAL ISSUES IN WILDLIFE DISEASE
Identifieur interne : 000A12 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 000A11; suivant : 000A13REFLECTING ON ETHICAL AND LEGAL ISSUES IN WILDLIFE DISEASE
Auteurs : Hamish Mccallum ; Barbara Ann HockingSource :
- Bioethics [ 0269-9702 ] ; 2005-08.
English descriptors
- Teeft :
- Animal ecology, Animal populations, Animal welfare, Animal welfare issues, Asylum seekers, Bioethics literature, Biological conservation, Biological control, Biological control agent, Biological diversity, Biological sciences, Blackwell, Blackwell publishing, Bovine tuberculosis, Cartagena protocol, Conservation biology, Control disease, Domestic animals, Domestic stock, Ecological ethics, Ecological systems, Ecology, Environmental ethics, Ethical issues, Ethical questions, Fertility control, Gene technology regulator, Great apes, Hamish, Hamish mccallum, House mice, Human health, Human population, Human populations, Human welfare, Infection rate, Infectious disease, Infectious diseases, Large scale, Legal framework, Legal issues, Lycaon pictus, Mccallum, Mouth disease, Oral vaccine, Pathogen, Philosophical transactions, Population dynamics, Quarantinable disease, Quarantinable pest, Rabies, Reproduction fertility, Royal society, Such agents, Tasmanian devils, Tilba tilba stud, Time infection, Wild animals, Wildlife disease, Wildlife diseases, Wildlife population, Wildlife populations, Ying foxes, Zoonotic disease.
Abstract
Disease in wildlife raises a number of issues that have not been widely considered in the bioethical literature. However, wildlife disease has major implications for human welfare. The majority of emerging human infectious diseases are zoonotic: that is, they occur in humans by cross‐species transmission from animal hosts. Managing these diseases often involves balancing concerns with human health against animal welfare and conservation concerns. Many infectious diseases of domestic animals are shared with wild animals, although it is often unclear whether the infection spills over from wild animals to domestic animals or vice versa. Culling is the standard means of managing such diseases, bringing economic considerations, animal welfare and conservation into conflict. Infectious diseases are also major threatening processes in conservation biology and their appropriate management by culling, vaccination or treatment raises substantial animal ethics issues. One particular issue of great significance in Australia is an ongoing research program to develop genetically modified pathogens to control vertebrate pests including rabbits, foxes and house mice. Release of any self‐replicating GMO vertebrate pathogen gives rise to a whole series of ethical questions. We briefly review current Australian legal responses to these problems. Finally, we present two unresolved problems of general importance that are exemplified by wildlife disease. First, to what extent can or should ‘bioethics’ be broadened beyond direct concerns with human welfare to animal welfare and environmental welfare? Second, how should the irreducible uncertainty of ecological systems be accounted for in ethical decision making?
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2005.00447.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:24555D5EE801A779900D0F4565628CBD7EBEC47DLe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">REFLECTING ON ETHICAL AND LEGAL ISSUES IN WILDLIFE DISEASE</title><author><name sortKey="Mccallum, Hamish" sort="Mccallum, Hamish" uniqKey="Mccallum H" first="Hamish" last="Mccallum">Hamish Mccallum</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>School of Integrative BiologyThe University of QueenslandBrisbane 4072Australiah.mccallum@uq.edu.au</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Hocking, Barbara Ann" sort="Hocking, Barbara Ann" uniqKey="Hocking B" first="Barbara Ann" last="Hocking">Barbara Ann Hocking</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>School of Justice StudiesFaculty of LawQueensland University of TechnologyBrisbane, 4059Australiab.hocking@qut.edu.au</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:24555D5EE801A779900D0F4565628CBD7EBEC47D</idno><date when="2005" year="2005">2005</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1467-8519.2005.00447.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/WNG-SWHS8TDS-R/fulltext.pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000A12</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000A12</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">REFLECTING ON ETHICAL AND LEGAL ISSUES IN WILDLIFE DISEASE</title><author><name sortKey="Mccallum, Hamish" sort="Mccallum, Hamish" uniqKey="Mccallum H" first="Hamish" last="Mccallum">Hamish Mccallum</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>School of Integrative BiologyThe University of QueenslandBrisbane 4072Australiah.mccallum@uq.edu.au</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Hocking, Barbara Ann" sort="Hocking, Barbara Ann" uniqKey="Hocking B" first="Barbara Ann" last="Hocking">Barbara Ann Hocking</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>School of Justice StudiesFaculty of LawQueensland University of TechnologyBrisbane, 4059Australiab.hocking@qut.edu.au</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Bioethics</title><title level="j" type="alt">BIOETHICS</title><idno type="ISSN">0269-9702</idno><idno type="eISSN">1467-8519</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">19</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="336">336</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="347">347</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">12</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd.</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2005-08">2005-08</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0269-9702</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0269-9702</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Animal ecology</term><term>Animal populations</term><term>Animal welfare</term><term>Animal welfare issues</term><term>Asylum seekers</term><term>Bioethics literature</term><term>Biological conservation</term><term>Biological control</term><term>Biological control agent</term><term>Biological diversity</term><term>Biological sciences</term><term>Blackwell</term><term>Blackwell publishing</term><term>Bovine tuberculosis</term><term>Cartagena protocol</term><term>Conservation biology</term><term>Control disease</term><term>Domestic animals</term><term>Domestic stock</term><term>Ecological ethics</term><term>Ecological systems</term><term>Ecology</term><term>Environmental ethics</term><term>Ethical issues</term><term>Ethical questions</term><term>Fertility control</term><term>Gene technology regulator</term><term>Great apes</term><term>Hamish</term><term>Hamish mccallum</term><term>House mice</term><term>Human health</term><term>Human population</term><term>Human populations</term><term>Human welfare</term><term>Infection rate</term><term>Infectious disease</term><term>Infectious diseases</term><term>Large scale</term><term>Legal framework</term><term>Legal issues</term><term>Lycaon pictus</term><term>Mccallum</term><term>Mouth disease</term><term>Oral vaccine</term><term>Pathogen</term><term>Philosophical transactions</term><term>Population dynamics</term><term>Quarantinable disease</term><term>Quarantinable pest</term><term>Rabies</term><term>Reproduction fertility</term><term>Royal society</term><term>Such agents</term><term>Tasmanian devils</term><term>Tilba tilba stud</term><term>Time infection</term><term>Wild animals</term><term>Wildlife disease</term><term>Wildlife diseases</term><term>Wildlife population</term><term>Wildlife populations</term><term>Ying foxes</term><term>Zoonotic disease</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Disease in wildlife raises a number of issues that have not been widely considered in the bioethical literature. However, wildlife disease has major implications for human welfare. The majority of emerging human infectious diseases are zoonotic: that is, they occur in humans by cross‐species transmission from animal hosts. Managing these diseases often involves balancing concerns with human health against animal welfare and conservation concerns. Many infectious diseases of domestic animals are shared with wild animals, although it is often unclear whether the infection spills over from wild animals to domestic animals or vice versa. Culling is the standard means of managing such diseases, bringing economic considerations, animal welfare and conservation into conflict. Infectious diseases are also major threatening processes in conservation biology and their appropriate management by culling, vaccination or treatment raises substantial animal ethics issues. One particular issue of great significance in Australia is an ongoing research program to develop genetically modified pathogens to control vertebrate pests including rabbits, foxes and house mice. Release of any self‐replicating GMO vertebrate pathogen gives rise to a whole series of ethical questions. We briefly review current Australian legal responses to these problems. Finally, we present two unresolved problems of general importance that are exemplified by wildlife disease. First, to what extent can or should ‘bioethics’ be broadened beyond direct concerns with human welfare to animal welfare and environmental welfare? Second, how should the irreducible uncertainty of ecological systems be accounted for in ethical decision making?</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>wildlife disease</json:string><json:string>blackwell publishing</json:string><json:string>pathogen</json:string><json:string>mccallum</json:string><json:string>infectious disease</json:string><json:string>domestic animals</json:string><json:string>ecology</json:string><json:string>legal issues</json:string><json:string>hamish</json:string><json:string>domestic stock</json:string><json:string>animal welfare</json:string><json:string>reproduction fertility</json:string><json:string>human health</json:string><json:string>hamish mccallum</json:string><json:string>infectious diseases</json:string><json:string>ethical issues</json:string><json:string>rabies</json:string><json:string>wild animals</json:string><json:string>human welfare</json:string><json:string>royal society</json:string><json:string>wildlife populations</json:string><json:string>ethical questions</json:string><json:string>bovine tuberculosis</json:string><json:string>human populations</json:string><json:string>such agents</json:string><json:string>control disease</json:string><json:string>biological diversity</json:string><json:string>biological sciences</json:string><json:string>mouth disease</json:string><json:string>tasmanian devils</json:string><json:string>philosophical transactions</json:string><json:string>population dynamics</json:string><json:string>ecological ethics</json:string><json:string>great apes</json:string><json:string>infection rate</json:string><json:string>time infection</json:string><json:string>animal populations</json:string><json:string>zoonotic disease</json:string><json:string>oral vaccine</json:string><json:string>large scale</json:string><json:string>wildlife diseases</json:string><json:string>animal welfare issues</json:string><json:string>wildlife population</json:string><json:string>biological conservation</json:string><json:string>human population</json:string><json:string>ying foxes</json:string><json:string>animal ecology</json:string><json:string>biological control agent</json:string><json:string>ecological systems</json:string><json:string>lycaon pictus</json:string><json:string>biological control</json:string><json:string>house mice</json:string><json:string>legal framework</json:string><json:string>bioethics literature</json:string><json:string>fertility control</json:string><json:string>gene technology regulator</json:string><json:string>quarantinable disease</json:string><json:string>quarantinable pest</json:string><json:string>conservation biology</json:string><json:string>cartagena protocol</json:string><json:string>tilba tilba stud</json:string><json:string>asylum seekers</json:string><json:string>environmental ethics</json:string><json:string>blackwell</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>HAMISH MCCALLUM</name><affiliations><json:string>School of Integrative BiologyThe University of QueenslandBrisbane 4072Australiah.mccallum@uq.edu.au</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>BARBARA ANN HOCKING</name><affiliations><json:string>School of Justice StudiesFaculty of LawQueensland University of TechnologyBrisbane, 4059Australiab.hocking@qut.edu.au</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><articleId><json:string>BIOE447</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-SWHS8TDS-R</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Disease in wildlife raises a number of issues that have not been widely considered in the bioethical literature. However, wildlife disease has major implications for human welfare. The majority of emerging human infectious diseases are zoonotic: that is, they occur in humans by cross‐species transmission from animal hosts. Managing these diseases often involves balancing concerns with human health against animal welfare and conservation concerns. Many infectious diseases of domestic animals are shared with wild animals, although it is often unclear whether the infection spills over from wild animals to domestic animals or vice versa. Culling is the standard means of managing such diseases, bringing economic considerations, animal welfare and conservation into conflict. Infectious diseases are also major threatening processes in conservation biology and their appropriate management by culling, vaccination or treatment raises substantial animal ethics issues. One particular issue of great significance in Australia is an ongoing research program to develop genetically modified pathogens to control vertebrate pests including rabbits, foxes and house mice. Release of any self‐replicating GMO vertebrate pathogen gives rise to a whole series of ethical questions. We briefly review current Australian legal responses to these problems. Finally, we present two unresolved problems of general importance that are exemplified by wildlife disease. First, to what extent can or should ‘bioethics’ be broadened beyond direct concerns with human welfare to animal welfare and environmental welfare? Second, how should the irreducible uncertainty of ecological systems be accounted for in ethical decision making?</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>9.117</score><pdfWordCount>4201</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>26432</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.4</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>12</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>430.867 x 649.135 pts</pdfPageSize><pdfWordsPerPage>350</pdfWordsPerPage><pdfText>true</pdfText><refBibsNative>false</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>243</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>1718</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>0</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>REFLECTING ON ETHICAL AND LEGAL ISSUES IN WILDLIFE DISEASE</title><pmid><json:string>16222841</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Bioethics</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1467-8519</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>0269-9702</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1467-8519</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>BIOE</json:string></publisherId><volume>19</volume><issue>4</issue><pages><first>336</first><last>347</last><total>12</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>2005</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>Western Australian Department of Agriculture</json:string><json:string>Australia, New Zealand and Europe</json:string><json:string>Princeton University</json:string><json:string>University of Chicago Press</json:string><json:string>Integrative Biology The University</json:string><json:string>Serengeti National Park</json:string><json:string>Environmental Ethics</json:string><json:string>Australia and South East Asia</json:string><json:string>Oxford University</json:string><json:string>International Congress</json:string><json:string>Law Queensland University</json:string><json:string>Blackwell Publishing Ltd.</json:string><json:string>UK and Malden</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>R. Antia</json:string><json:string>Ian Duncanson</json:string><json:string>D. Cowan</json:string><json:string>S. Lelo</json:string><json:string>A.A. Cunningham</json:string><json:string>H. Hofer</json:string><json:string>B. Haddad</json:string><json:string>I. Duncanson</json:string><json:string>S.C. Gascoyne</json:string><json:string>R.M. May</json:string><json:string>J. Selgelid</json:string><json:string>P.L. Young</json:string><json:string>L.J. Gleeson</json:string><json:string>A.R. McLean</json:string><json:string>M.K. Laurenson</json:string><json:string>M. Mangel</json:string><json:string>K. Handeland</json:string><json:string>K. Halpin</json:string><json:string>J. Webby</json:string><json:string>J.E. Nelson</json:string><json:string>T. Hemachudha</json:string><json:string>B. Levin</json:string><json:string>J. Harwood</json:string><json:string>H. McCallum</json:string><json:string>F. Fenner</json:string><json:string>B. Fantini</json:string><json:string>G. Roberts</json:string><json:string>G.R. Wilson</json:string><json:string>D. Ludwig</json:string><json:string>M. Anderson</json:string><json:string>Faculty</json:string><json:string>M. Borner</json:string><json:string>J.P. Collins</json:string><json:string>S.D. Bradshaw</json:string><json:string>R. Speare</json:string><json:string>K. Williams</json:string><json:string>R.I.T. Prince</json:string><json:string>R. Burrows</json:string><json:string>J.S. Mackenzie</json:string><json:string>Michael Selgelid</json:string><json:string>A. Minteer</json:string><json:string>Bernadette McSherry</json:string><json:string>H. Kruse</json:string><json:string>Barbara Ann</json:string><json:string>R.M. Anderson</json:string><json:string>R. Tidemann</json:string><json:string>M.J. Vardon</json:string><json:string>Justice Studies</json:string><json:string>D. Barlow</json:string><json:string>C.A. Hanlon</json:string><json:string>C. Jeffrey</json:string><json:string>Journal</json:string><json:string>A. Weiss</json:string><json:string>M. Kirkemo</json:string><json:string>C.H. Tyndale-Biscoe</json:string><json:string>C.A. Donnelly</json:string><json:string>M. Flood</json:string><json:string>A.D. Hyatt</json:string><json:string>E. Rupprecht</json:string><json:string>P. Singer</json:string><json:string>P.W. Taylor</json:string><json:string>P.C.L. White</json:string><json:string>S. Harris</json:string><json:string>R.G. Webster</json:string><json:string>A. Williams</json:string><json:string>J. Giles</json:string><json:string>A.P. Dobson</json:string><json:string>D. Cooke</json:string><json:string>S. Cleaveland</json:string><json:string>H. Field</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>Brisbane</json:string><json:string>United States</json:string><json:string>Santa Barbara</json:string><json:string>NY</json:string><json:string>Australia</json:string><json:string>UK</json:string><json:string>Montreal</json:string><json:string>Canada</json:string><json:string>China</json:string><json:string>Toronto</json:string><json:string>Europe</json:string><json:string>USA</json:string><json:string>New Zealand</json:string><json:string>Chicago</json:string><json:string>Britain</json:string><json:string>United Kingdom</json:string><json:string>York</json:string><json:string>Tanzania</json:string></placeName><ref_url><json:string>http://www.biodiv.org/biosafety/ signinglist.aspx</json:string><json:string>http://www.dpiwe.tas.gov.au/ inter.nsf/WebPages/LBUN</json:string></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>Medicine and Hygiene 1998</json:string><json:string>Ecology and Evolution 1996</json:string><json:string>Fertility and Development 1994</json:string><json:string>Ecology and Evolution 1995</json:string><json:string>May 2000</json:string><json:string>October 1999</json:string><json:string>Law and Critique 2003</json:string><json:string>E.M. Leroy et al.</json:string><json:string>News and Information 2005</json:string><json:string>C.A. Donnelly et al.</json:string><json:string>Ecology and Evolution 1005</json:string><json:string>L.O. Gostin et al.</json:string><json:string>Fertility and Development 1997</json:string><json:string>J.R. Ginsberg et al.</json:string><json:string>C. Packer et al.</json:string><json:string>Netherlands Conference, Midelburg, 2005</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-SWHS8TDS-R</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - social science</json:string><json:string>2 - social sciences, biomedical</json:string><json:string>2 - social issues</json:string><json:string>2 - ethics</json:string><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - medical ethics</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - arts & humanities</json:string><json:string>2 - philosophy & theology</json:string><json:string>3 - applied ethics</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - Health Policy</json:string><json:string>1 - Social Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Arts and Humanities</json:string><json:string>3 - Philosophy</json:string><json:string>1 - Social Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Social Sciences</json:string><json:string>3 - Health(social science)</json:string></scopus><inist><json:string>1 - sciences appliquees, technologies et medecines</json:string><json:string>2 - sciences biologiques et medicales</json:string><json:string>3 - sciences biologiques fondamentales et appliquees. psychologie</json:string></inist></categories><publicationDate>2005</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2005</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1467-8519.2005.00447.x</json:string></doi><id>24555D5EE801A779900D0F4565628CBD7EBEC47D</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/WNG-SWHS8TDS-R/fulltext.pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/WNG-SWHS8TDS-R/bundle.zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/WNG-SWHS8TDS-R/fulltext.tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">REFLECTING ON ETHICAL AND LEGAL ISSUES IN WILDLIFE DISEASE</title><title level="a" type="short">ETHICAL AND LEGAL ISSUES IN WILDLIFE DISEASE</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd.</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2005-08"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">REFLECTING ON ETHICAL AND LEGAL ISSUES IN WILDLIFE DISEASE</title><title level="a" type="short">ETHICAL AND LEGAL ISSUES IN WILDLIFE DISEASE</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">HAMISH</forename><surname>MCCALLUM</surname></persName><affiliation><orgName type="institution">School of Integrative Biology
The University of Queensland
Brisbane 4072
Australia
h.mccallum@uq.edu.au</orgName></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">BARBARA ANN</forename><surname>HOCKING</surname></persName><affiliation><orgName type="institution">School of Justice Studies
Faculty of Law
Queensland University of Technology
Brisbane</orgName><address><addrLine>4059
Australia
b.hocking@qut.edu.au</addrLine><country key="AU" xml:lang="en">AUSTRALIA</country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">24555D5EE801A779900D0F4565628CBD7EBEC47D</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-SWHS8TDS-R</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1467-8519.2005.00447.x</idno><idno type="unit">BIOE447</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:BIOE.BIOE447.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Bioethics</title><title level="j" type="alt">BIOETHICS</title><idno type="pISSN">0269-9702</idno><idno type="eISSN">1467-8519</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1467-8519</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/biot.2005.19.issue-4</idno><idno type="product">BIOE</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">19</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="336">336</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="347">347</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">12</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd.</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2005-08"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><encodingDesc><schemaRef type="ODD" url="https://xml-schema.delivery.istex.fr/tei-istex.odd"></schemaRef><appInfo><application ident="pub2tei" version="1.0.10" when="2019-12-20"><label>pub2TEI-ISTEX</label><desc>A set of style sheets for converting XML documents encoded in various scientific publisher formats into a common TEI format.
<ref target="http://www.tei-c.org/">We use TEI</ref></desc></application></appInfo></encodingDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><head>ABSTRACT</head><p>Disease in wildlife raises a number of issues that have not been widely considered in the bioethical literature. However, wildlife disease has major implications for human welfare. The majority of emerging human infectious diseases are zoonotic: that is, they occur in humans by cross‐species transmission from animal hosts. Managing these diseases often involves balancing concerns with human health against animal welfare and conservation concerns. Many infectious diseases of domestic animals are shared with wild animals, although it is often unclear whether the infection spills over from wild animals to domestic animals or vice versa. Culling is the standard means of managing such diseases, bringing economic considerations, animal welfare and conservation into conflict. Infectious diseases are also major threatening processes in conservation biology and their appropriate management by culling, vaccination or treatment raises substantial animal ethics issues. One particular issue of great significance in Australia is an ongoing research program to develop genetically modified pathogens to control vertebrate pests including rabbits, foxes and house mice. Release of any self‐replicating GMO vertebrate pathogen gives rise to a whole series of ethical questions. We briefly review current Australian legal responses to these problems. Finally, we present two unresolved problems of general importance that are exemplified by wildlife disease. First, to what extent can or should ‘bioethics’ be broadened beyond direct concerns with human welfare to animal welfare and environmental welfare? Second, how should the irreducible uncertainty of ecological systems be accounted for in ethical decision making?</p></abstract><textClass><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Special Issue: Ethical Issues in Infectious Disease Control</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="2019-12-20" who="#istex" xml:id="pub2tei">formatting</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/WNG-SWHS8TDS-R/fulltext.txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd.</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1467-8519</doi><issn type="print">0269-9702</issn><issn type="electronic">1467-8519</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="BIOE"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="BIOETHICS">Bioethics</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="08004"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/biot.2005.19.issue-4</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="19">19</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="4">4</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2005-08">August 2005</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="4" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1467-8519.2005.00447.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="BIOE447"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="12"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Special Issue: Ethical Issues in Infectious Disease Control</title></titleGroup><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2005-08-05"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2005-08-05"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.2 mode:FullText source:HeaderRef result:HeaderRef" date="2010-03-09"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-07"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-15"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="336">336</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="347">347</numbering></numberingGroup><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:BIOE.BIOE447.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="0"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="0"></count><count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="37"></count><count type="wordTotal" number="4631"></count><count type="linksPubMed" number="0"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="0"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">REFLECTING ON ETHICAL AND LEGAL ISSUES IN WILDLIFE DISEASE</title><title type="shortAuthors">HAMISH MCCALLUM AND BARBARA ANN HOCKING</title><title type="short">ETHICAL AND LEGAL ISSUES IN WILDLIFE DISEASE</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>HAMISH</givenNames><familyName>MCCALLUM</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>BARBARA ANN</givenNames><familyName>HOCKING</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="AU"><unparsedAffiliation>
School of Integrative Biology
The University of Queensland
Brisbane 4072
Australia
<email>h.mccallum@uq.edu.au</email></unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2" countryCode="AU"><unparsedAffiliation>
School of Justice Studies
Faculty of Law
Queensland University of Technology
Brisbane, 4059
Australia
<email>b.hocking@qut.edu.au</email></unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><title type="main">ABSTRACT</title><p>Disease in wildlife raises a number of issues that have not been widely considered in the bioethical literature. However, wildlife disease has major implications for human welfare. The majority of emerging human infectious diseases are zoonotic: that is, they occur in humans by cross‐species transmission from animal hosts. Managing these diseases often involves balancing concerns with human health against animal welfare and conservation concerns. Many infectious diseases of domestic animals are shared with wild animals, although it is often unclear whether the infection spills over from wild animals to domestic animals or vice versa. Culling is the standard means of managing such diseases, bringing economic considerations, animal welfare and conservation into conflict. Infectious diseases are also major threatening processes in conservation biology and their appropriate management by culling, vaccination or treatment raises substantial animal ethics issues. One particular issue of great significance in Australia is an ongoing research program to develop genetically modified pathogens to control vertebrate pests including rabbits, foxes and house mice. Release of any self‐replicating GMO vertebrate pathogen gives rise to a whole series of ethical questions. We briefly review current Australian legal responses to these problems. Finally, we present two unresolved problems of general importance that are exemplified by wildlife disease. First, to what extent can or should ‘bioethics’ be broadened beyond direct concerns with human welfare to animal welfare and environmental welfare? Second, how should the irreducible uncertainty of ecological systems be accounted for in ethical decision making?</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>REFLECTING ON ETHICAL AND LEGAL ISSUES IN WILDLIFE DISEASE</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>ETHICAL AND LEGAL ISSUES IN WILDLIFE DISEASE</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>REFLECTING ON ETHICAL AND LEGAL ISSUES IN WILDLIFE DISEASE</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">HAMISH</namePart><namePart type="family">MCCALLUM</namePart><affiliation>School of Integrative BiologyThe University of QueenslandBrisbane 4072Australiah.mccallum@uq.edu.au</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">BARBARA ANN</namePart><namePart type="family">HOCKING</namePart><affiliation>School of Justice StudiesFaculty of LawQueensland University of TechnologyBrisbane, 4059Australiab.hocking@qut.edu.au</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd.</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2005-08</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2005</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="figures">0</extent><extent unit="tables">0</extent><extent unit="formulas">0</extent><extent unit="references">37</extent><extent unit="linksCrossRef">0</extent><extent unit="words">4631</extent></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">Disease in wildlife raises a number of issues that have not been widely considered in the bioethical literature. However, wildlife disease has major implications for human welfare. The majority of emerging human infectious diseases are zoonotic: that is, they occur in humans by cross‐species transmission from animal hosts. Managing these diseases often involves balancing concerns with human health against animal welfare and conservation concerns. Many infectious diseases of domestic animals are shared with wild animals, although it is often unclear whether the infection spills over from wild animals to domestic animals or vice versa. Culling is the standard means of managing such diseases, bringing economic considerations, animal welfare and conservation into conflict. Infectious diseases are also major threatening processes in conservation biology and their appropriate management by culling, vaccination or treatment raises substantial animal ethics issues. One particular issue of great significance in Australia is an ongoing research program to develop genetically modified pathogens to control vertebrate pests including rabbits, foxes and house mice. Release of any self‐replicating GMO vertebrate pathogen gives rise to a whole series of ethical questions. We briefly review current Australian legal responses to these problems. Finally, we present two unresolved problems of general importance that are exemplified by wildlife disease. First, to what extent can or should ‘bioethics’ be broadened beyond direct concerns with human welfare to animal welfare and environmental welfare? Second, how should the irreducible uncertainty of ecological systems be accounted for in ethical decision making?</abstract><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Bioethics</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">0269-9702</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1467-8519</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1467-8519</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">BIOE</identifier><part><date>2005</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>19</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>4</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>336</start><end>347</end><total>12</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">24555D5EE801A779900D0F4565628CBD7EBEC47D</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-SWHS8TDS-R</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1467-8519.2005.00447.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">BIOE447</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">© Wiley. All rights reserved.</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Converted from (version ) to MODS version 3.6.</recordOrigin><recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2019-11-13</recordCreationDate></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/WNG-SWHS8TDS-R/record.json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Sante/explor/SrasV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000A12 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000A12 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Sante
|area= SrasV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:24555D5EE801A779900D0F4565628CBD7EBEC47D
|texte= REFLECTING ON ETHICAL AND LEGAL ISSUES IN WILDLIFE DISEASE
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33. |  |