SrasV1, Istex, Corpus, bibRecord, 000390

What are the most appropriate methods of surveillance for monitoring an emerging respiratory infection such as SARS?

Identifieur interne : 000390 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 000389; suivant : 000391

What are the most appropriate methods of surveillance for monitoring an emerging respiratory infection such as SARS?

Source :

Journal of Public Health [ 1741-3842 ] ; 2004.

RBID : ISTEX:F5BD94618CD253B508245820B396694FF3B30A70

Abstract

Effective surveillance is necessary for the successful management of emerging infection. It allows public health protection measures such as contact tracing and isolation to be put in place. This study aimed to find the most appropriate surveillance method for a disease like SARS. Existing surveillance methods were evaluated against a set of new criteria in a qualitative manner. Influenza and tuberculosis (TB) surveillance were used as models. A literature search was undertaken to find relevant evidence. The results show that TB surveillance is more appropriate than influenza surveillance as a model because it is more complete in its reporting. Clinician‐based reporting is better than laboratory‐based because it is more timely. The results suggest a clinician‐based notification system would be the most appropriate form of surveillance for a disease like SARS for public health purposes.

Url:

https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/HXZ-94XRX629-7/fulltext.pdf

DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdh155

Links to Exploration step

ISTEX:F5BD94618CD253B508245820B396694FF3B30A70

Le document en format XML

<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">What are the most appropriate methods of surveillance for monitoring an emerging respiratory infection such as SARS?</title>
<author wicri:is="90%"><name sortKey="Greaves, Felix" sort="Greaves, Felix" uniqKey="Greaves F" first="Felix" last="Greaves">Felix Greaves</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford OX2 6QA</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:F5BD94618CD253B508245820B396694FF3B30A70</idno>
<date when="2004" year="2004">2004</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1093/pubmed/fdh155</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/HXZ-94XRX629-7/fulltext.pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000390</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000390</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">What are the most appropriate methods of surveillance for monitoring an emerging respiratory infection such as SARS?</title>
<author wicri:is="90%"><name sortKey="Greaves, Felix" sort="Greaves, Felix" uniqKey="Greaves F" first="Felix" last="Greaves">Felix Greaves</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford OX2 6QA</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Public Health</title>
<title level="j" type="abbrev">J Public Health</title>
<idno type="ISSN">1741-3842</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1741-3850</idno>
<imprint><publisher>Oxford University Press</publisher>
<date type="published">2004</date>
<biblScope unit="vol">26</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">3</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="288">288</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="292">292</biblScope>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">1741-3842</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1741-3842</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass></textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Effective surveillance is necessary for the successful management of emerging infection. It allows public health protection measures such as contact tracing and isolation to be put in place. This study aimed to find the most appropriate surveillance method for a disease like SARS. Existing surveillance methods were evaluated against a set of new criteria in a qualitative manner. Influenza and tuberculosis (TB) surveillance were used as models. A literature search was undertaken to find relevant evidence. The results show that TB surveillance is more appropriate than influenza surveillance as a model because it is more complete in its reporting. Clinician‐based reporting is better than laboratory‐based because it is more timely. The results suggest a clinician‐based notification system would be the most appropriate form of surveillance for a disease like SARS for public health purposes.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<istex><corpusName>oup</corpusName>
<keywords><teeft><json:string>sars</json:string>
<json:string>surveillance system</json:string>
<json:string>surveillance method</json:string>
<json:string>hlth</json:string>
<json:string>datum</json:string>
<json:string>commun</json:string>
<json:string>publ hlth</json:string>
<json:string>publ</json:string>
<json:string>surveillance</json:string>
<json:string>public health</json:string>
<json:string>health protection agency</json:string>
<json:string>respiratory infection</json:string>
<json:string>outbreak</json:string>
<json:string>article datum</json:string>
<json:string>system description</json:string>
<json:string>control measure</json:string>
<json:string>local outbreak</json:string>
<json:string>laboratory datum</json:string>
<json:string>appropriate method</json:string>
<json:string>literature search</json:string>
<json:string>tuberculosis case</json:string>
<json:string>individual case</json:string>
<json:string>statutory basis</json:string>
<json:string>world health organisation</json:string>
<json:string>more timely</json:string>
<json:string>severe acute respiratory syndrome</json:string>
<json:string>laboratory diagnosis</json:string>
<json:string>result show</json:string>
<json:string>relevant article</json:string>
<json:string>search term</json:string>
<json:string>continuous monitoring</json:string>
<json:string>sentinel</json:string>
</teeft>
</keywords>
<author><json:item><name>Felix Greaves</name>
<affiliations><json:string>Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford OX2 6QA</json:string>
</affiliations>
</json:item>
</author>
<subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>SARS</value>
</json:item>
<json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>respiratory infection</value>
</json:item>
<json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>surveillance</value>
</json:item>
</subject>
<arkIstex>ark:/67375/HXZ-94XRX629-7</arkIstex>
<language><json:string>eng</json:string>
</language>
<originalGenre><json:string>research-article</json:string>
</originalGenre>
<abstract>Effective surveillance is necessary for the successful management of emerging infection. It allows public health protection measures such as contact tracing and isolation to be put in place. This study aimed to find the most appropriate surveillance method for a disease like SARS. Existing surveillance methods were evaluated against a set of new criteria in a qualitative manner. Influenza and tuberculosis (TB) surveillance were used as models. A literature search was undertaken to find relevant evidence. The results show that TB surveillance is more appropriate than influenza surveillance as a model because it is more complete in its reporting. Clinician‐based reporting is better than laboratory‐based because it is more timely. The results suggest a clinician‐based notification system would be the most appropriate form of surveillance for a disease like SARS for public health purposes.</abstract>
<qualityIndicators><score>4.23</score>
<pdfWordCount>2622</pdfWordCount>
<pdfCharCount>17760</pdfCharCount>
<pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion>
<pdfPageCount>5</pdfPageCount>
<pdfPageSize>595 x 842 pts (A4)</pdfPageSize>
<pdfWordsPerPage>524</pdfWordsPerPage>
<pdfText>true</pdfText>
<refBibsNative>false</refBibsNative>
<abstractWordCount>134</abstractWordCount>
<abstractCharCount>898</abstractCharCount>
<keywordCount>3</keywordCount>
</qualityIndicators>
<title>What are the most appropriate methods of surveillance for monitoring an emerging respiratory infection such as SARS?</title>
<pmid><json:string>15454599</json:string>
</pmid>
<genre><json:string>research-article</json:string>
</genre>
<host><title>Journal of Public Health</title>
<language><json:string>unknown</json:string>
</language>
<issn><json:string>1741-3842</json:string>
</issn>
<eissn><json:string>1741-3850</json:string>
</eissn>
<publisherId><json:string>pubmed</json:string>
</publisherId>
<volume>26</volume>
<issue>3</issue>
<pages><first>288</first>
<last>292</last>
</pages>
<genre><json:string>journal</json:string>
</genre>
</host>
<namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>1968</json:string>
<json:string>1957</json:string>
<json:string>1918</json:string>
<json:string>2003</json:string>
<json:string>2004</json:string>
</date>
<geogName></geogName>
<orgName><json:string>Laboratory Mortality B</json:string>
<json:string>Oxford University Department of Public Health</json:string>
<json:string>Notif Enhanced Laboratory Mortality Speci</json:string>
<json:string>Laboratory Mortality</json:string>
<json:string>Sentinel Spotter Laboratory Mortality NHS</json:string>
<json:string>A</json:string>
<json:string>United Kingdom, Europe</json:string>
</orgName>
<orgName_funder></orgName_funder>
<orgName_provider></orgName_provider>
<persName><json:string>Margaret Hall</json:string>
<json:string>School</json:string>
<json:string>Clinician</json:string>
<json:string>Mortality</json:string>
<json:string>Dr Richard</json:string>
<json:string>Felix Greaves</json:string>
</persName>
<placeName><json:string>Australia</json:string>
<json:string>America</json:string>
<json:string>United Kingdom</json:string>
</placeName>
<ref_url></ref_url>
<ref_bibl></ref_bibl>
<bibl></bibl>
</unitex>
</namedEntities>
<ark><json:string>ark:/67375/HXZ-94XRX629-7</json:string>
</ark>
<categories><wos><json:string>1 - social science</json:string>
<json:string>2 - public, environmental & occupational health</json:string>
</wos>
<scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string>
<json:string>2 - public health & health services</json:string>
<json:string>3 - public health</json:string>
</scienceMetrix>
<scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string>
<json:string>2 - Medicine</json:string>
<json:string>3 - Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health</json:string>
<json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string>
<json:string>2 - Medicine</json:string>
<json:string>3 - General Medicine</json:string>
</scopus>
<inist><json:string>1 - sciences appliquees, technologies et medecines</json:string>
<json:string>2 - sciences biologiques et medicales</json:string>
<json:string>3 - sciences medicales</json:string>
</inist>
</categories>
<publicationDate>2004</publicationDate>
<copyrightDate>2004</copyrightDate>
<doi><json:string>10.1093/pubmed/fdh155</json:string>
</doi>
<id>F5BD94618CD253B508245820B396694FF3B30A70</id>
<score>1</score>
<fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension>
<original>true</original>
<mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/HXZ-94XRX629-7/fulltext.pdf</uri>
</json:item>
<json:item><extension>zip</extension>
<original>false</original>
<mimetype>application/zip</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/HXZ-94XRX629-7/bundle.zip</uri>
</json:item>
<istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/HXZ-94XRX629-7/fulltext.tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">What are the most appropriate methods of surveillance for monitoring an emerging respiratory infection such as SARS?</title>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority>
<publisher>Oxford University Press</publisher>
<availability><licence>Journal of Public Health 26(3) © Faculty of Public Health 2004; all rights reserved.</licence>
</availability>
<date type="published">2004</date>
<date type="Copyright" when="2004">2004</date>
</publicationStmt>
<notesStmt><note type="content-type" source="research-article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-1JC4F85T-7">research-article</note>
<note type="publication-type" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note>
</notesStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">What are the most appropriate methods of surveillance for monitoring an emerging respiratory infection such as SARS?</title>
<author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><surname>Greaves</surname>
<forename type="first">Felix</forename>
</persName>
</author>
<idno type="istex">F5BD94618CD253B508245820B396694FF3B30A70</idno>
<idno type="ark">ark:/67375/HXZ-94XRX629-7</idno>
<idno type="other">fdh155</idno>
<idno type="DOI">10.1093/pubmed/fdh155</idno>
</analytic>
<monogr><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Public Health</title>
<title level="j" type="abbrev">J Public Health</title>
<idno type="hwp">jphm</idno>
<idno type="nlm-ta">J Public Health (Oxf)</idno>
<idno type="publisher-id">pubmed</idno>
<idno type="pISSN">1741-3842</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1741-3850</idno>
<imprint><publisher>Oxford University Press</publisher>
<date type="published">2004</date>
<biblScope unit="vol">26</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">3</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="288">288</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="292">292</biblScope>
</imprint>
</monogr>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<encodingDesc><schemaRef type="ODD" url="https://xml-schema.delivery.istex.fr/tei-istex.odd"></schemaRef>
<appInfo><application ident="pub2tei" version="1.0.41" when="2020-04-06"><label>pub2TEI-ISTEX</label>
<desc>A set of style sheets for converting XML documents encoded in various scientific publisher formats into a common TEI format.
                        <ref target="http://www.tei-c.org/">We use TEI</ref>
</desc>
</application>
</appInfo>
</encodingDesc>
<profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Effective surveillance is necessary for the successful management of emerging infection. It allows public health protection measures such as contact tracing and isolation to be put in place. This study aimed to find the most appropriate surveillance method for a disease like SARS. Existing surveillance methods were evaluated against a set of new criteria in a qualitative manner. Influenza and tuberculosis (TB) surveillance were used as models. A literature search was undertaken to find relevant evidence. The results show that TB surveillance is more appropriate than influenza surveillance as a model because it is more complete in its reporting. Clinician‐based reporting is better than laboratory‐based because it is more timely. The results suggest a clinician‐based notification system would be the most appropriate form of surveillance for a disease like SARS for public health purposes.</p>
</abstract>
<textClass ana="subject"><keywords scheme="heading"><term>Health protection</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
<textClass ana="keyword"><keywords scheme="KWD" xml:lang="en"><term>SARS</term>
<term>respiratory infection</term>
<term>surveillance</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
<langUsage><language ident="en"></language>
</langUsage>
</profileDesc>
<revisionDesc><change when="2020-04-06" who="#istex" xml:id="pub2tei">formatting</change>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
</istex:fulltextTEI>
<json:item><extension>txt</extension>
<original>false</original>
<mimetype>text/plain</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/HXZ-94XRX629-7/fulltext.txt</uri>
</json:item>
</fulltext>
<metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="corpus oup, element #text not found" wicri:toSee="no header"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"</istex:xmlDeclaration>
<istex:docType PUBLIC="-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" URI="journalpublishing.dtd" name="istex:docType"></istex:docType>
<istex:document><article xml:lang="en" article-type="research-article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="hwp">jphm</journal-id>
<journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">J Public Health (Oxf)</journal-id>

<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">pubmed</journal-id>
<journal-title>Journal of Public Health</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">J Public Health</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="ppub">1741-3842</issn>
<issn pub-type="epub">1741-3850</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Oxford University Press</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="other">fdh155</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/pubmed/fdh155</article-id>
<article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Health protection</subject>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group><article-title>What are the most appropriate methods of surveillance for monitoring an emerging respiratory infection such as SARS?</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>

      <contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Greaves</surname>
<given-names>Felix</given-names>
</name>

        

        

        <role>Medical Student</role>

      

      

      

    </contrib>
<aff id="AFF1">Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford OX2 6QA</aff>
</contrib-group>
<author-notes><corresp id="COR1">E-mail: <ext-link xlink:href="felix.greaves@lady-margaret-hall.oxford.ac.uk" ext-link-type="email">felix.greaves@lady-margaret-hall.oxford.ac.uk</ext-link>
</corresp>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="ppub"><month>9</month>
<year>2004</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>26</volume>
<issue>3</issue>
<fpage>288</fpage>
<lpage>292</lpage>
<permissions><copyright-statement>Journal of Public Health 26(3) © Faculty of Public Health 2004; all rights reserved.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2004</copyright-year>
</permissions>
<abstract xml:lang="en">

      <p>Effective surveillance is necessary for the successful management of emerging infection. It allows public health protection measures such as contact tracing and isolation to be put in place. This study aimed to find the most appropriate surveillance method for a disease like SARS. Existing surveillance methods were evaluated against a set of new criteria in a qualitative manner. Influenza and tuberculosis (TB) surveillance were used as models. A literature search was undertaken to find relevant evidence. The results show that TB surveillance is more appropriate than influenza surveillance as a model because it is more complete in its reporting. Clinician‐based reporting is better than laboratory‐based because it is more timely. The results suggest a clinician‐based notification system would be the most appropriate form of surveillance for a disease like SARS for public health purposes.</p>

    </abstract>
<kwd-group kwd-group-type="KWD" xml:lang="en">

      <kwd>SARS</kwd>

      <kwd>respiratory infection</kwd>

      <kwd>surveillance</kwd>

    </kwd-group>
<custom-meta-wrap><custom-meta><meta-name>hwp-legacy-fpage</meta-name>
<meta-value>288</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
<custom-meta><meta-name>hwp-legacy-dochead</meta-name>
<meta-value>Article</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-wrap>
</article-meta>
</front>

  

  

  

  

    

    

    

    

  

</article>
</istex:document>
</istex:metadataXml>
<mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>What are the most appropriate methods of surveillance for monitoring an emerging respiratory infection such as SARS?</title>
</titleInfo>
<titleInfo type="alternative" lang="en" contentType="CDATA"><title>What are the most appropriate methods of surveillance for monitoring an emerging respiratory infection such as SARS?</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Felix</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Greaves</namePart>
<affiliation>Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford OX2 6QA</affiliation>
<description>Medical Student</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre type="research-article" displayLabel="research-article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-1JC4F85T-7">research-article</genre>
<originInfo><publisher>Oxford University Press</publisher>
<dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2004-09</dateIssued>
<copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2004</copyrightDate>
</originInfo>
<language><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
<languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm>
</language>
<abstract lang="en">Effective surveillance is necessary for the successful management of emerging infection. It allows public health protection measures such as contact tracing and isolation to be put in place. This study aimed to find the most appropriate surveillance method for a disease like SARS. Existing surveillance methods were evaluated against a set of new criteria in a qualitative manner. Influenza and tuberculosis (TB) surveillance were used as models. A literature search was undertaken to find relevant evidence. The results show that TB surveillance is more appropriate than influenza surveillance as a model because it is more complete in its reporting. Clinician‐based reporting is better than laboratory‐based because it is more timely. The results suggest a clinician‐based notification system would be the most appropriate form of surveillance for a disease like SARS for public health purposes.</abstract>
<note type="author-notes">E-mail: felix.greaves@lady-margaret-hall.oxford.ac.uk</note>
<subject lang="en"><genre>KWD</genre>
<topic>SARS</topic>
<topic>respiratory infection</topic>
<topic>surveillance</topic>
</subject>
<relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Journal of Public Health</title>
</titleInfo>
<titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>J Public Health</title>
</titleInfo>
<genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre>
<identifier type="ISSN">1741-3842</identifier>
<identifier type="eISSN">1741-3850</identifier>
<identifier type="PublisherID">pubmed</identifier>
<identifier type="PublisherID-hwp">jphm</identifier>
<identifier type="PublisherID-nlm-ta">J Public Health (Oxf)</identifier>
<part><date>2004</date>
<detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption>
<number>26</number>
</detail>
<detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption>
<number>3</number>
</detail>
<extent unit="pages"><start>288</start>
<end>292</end>
</extent>
</part>
</relatedItem>
<identifier type="istex">F5BD94618CD253B508245820B396694FF3B30A70</identifier>
<identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/HXZ-94XRX629-7</identifier>
<identifier type="DOI">10.1093/pubmed/fdh155</identifier>
<identifier type="local">fdh155</identifier>
<accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">Journal of Public Health 26(3) © Faculty of Public Health 2004; all rights reserved.</accessCondition>
<recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-GTWS0RDP-M">oup</recordContentSource>
<recordOrigin>Converted from  (version 1.2.10) to MODS version 3.6.</recordOrigin>
<recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2020-04-16</recordCreationDate>
</recordInfo>
</mods>
<json:item><extension>json</extension>
<original>false</original>
<mimetype>application/json</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/HXZ-94XRX629-7/record.json</uri>
</json:item>
</metadata>
<serie></serie>
</istex>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Sante/explor/SrasV1/Data/Istex/Corpus

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000390 | SxmlIndent | more

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000390 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Sante
   |area=    SrasV1
   |flux=    Istex
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:F5BD94618CD253B508245820B396694FF3B30A70
   |texte=   What are the most appropriate methods of surveillance for monitoring an emerging respiratory infection such as SARS?
}}

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33.
Data generation: Tue Apr 28 14:49:16 2020. Site generation: Sat Mar 27 22:06:49 2021

	Serveur d'exploration SRAS
	Attention, ce site est en cours de développement ! Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts. Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Serveur d'exploration SRAS

What are the most appropriate methods of surveillance for monitoring an emerging respiratory infection such as SARS?

What are the most appropriate methods of surveillance for monitoring an emerging respiratory infection such as SARS?

Source :

Abstract

Links to Exploration step

Le document en format XML

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri