Risk Perceptions Related to SARS and Avian Influenza: Theoretical Foundations of Current Empirical Research
Identifieur interne : 000310 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 000309; suivant : 000311Risk Perceptions Related to SARS and Avian Influenza: Theoretical Foundations of Current Empirical Research
Auteurs : Anja Leppin ; Arja R. AroSource :
- International Journal of Behavioral Medicine [ 1070-5503 ] ; 2009-03-01.
English descriptors
Abstract
Abstract: Background: The outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome in 2003 and the subsequent emergence of the H5N1 virus have highlighted the threat of a global pandemic influenza outbreak. Planning effective public health control measures for such a case will be highly dependent on sound theory-based research on how people perceive the risks involved in such an event. Purpose: The present article aims to review theoretical models and concepts underlying current empirical research on pandemic influenza risk perception. Method: A review was conducted based on 28 empirical studies from 30 articles which were published between 2003 and 2007. Results: Concepts of risk perception mostly seemed more pragmatic than theory-based and were highly heterogeneous, for instance, in terms of conceptualizing risk perception as an exclusively cognitive or as a cognitive and emotional phenomenon or whether the concept was dominated by expectancy or expectancy and value components. Similarly, the majority of studies investigating risk perceptions and protective behaviors were not model-based. Conclusions: The current body of knowledge can only provide preliminary insights. Unlike the reviewed studies, which were mostly launched as a rapid response to outbreak situations, future research will have to invest more strongly into theoretical work to provide sounder evidence.
Url:
DOI: 10.1007/s12529-008-9002-8
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:09D21A166998C0814AA4CF0E4D385DFA1A9B06C0Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Risk Perceptions Related to SARS and Avian Influenza: Theoretical Foundations of Current Empirical Research</title><author><name sortKey="Leppin, Anja" sort="Leppin, Anja" uniqKey="Leppin A" first="Anja" last="Leppin">Anja Leppin</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Southern Denmark, Institute of Public Health, Unit for Health Promotion, Niels Bohrs Vej 9, 6700, Esbjerg, Denmark</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: aleppin@health.sdu.dk</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Aro, Arja R" sort="Aro, Arja R" uniqKey="Aro A" first="Arja R." last="Aro">Arja R. Aro</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Southern Denmark, Institute of Public Health, Unit for Health Promotion, Niels Bohrs Vej 9, 6700, Esbjerg, Denmark</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:09D21A166998C0814AA4CF0E4D385DFA1A9B06C0</idno><date when="2009" year="2009">2009</date><idno type="doi">10.1007/s12529-008-9002-8</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/VQC-GGZZFGWJ-9/fulltext.pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000310</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000310</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Risk Perceptions Related to SARS and Avian Influenza: Theoretical Foundations of Current Empirical Research</title><author><name sortKey="Leppin, Anja" sort="Leppin, Anja" uniqKey="Leppin A" first="Anja" last="Leppin">Anja Leppin</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Southern Denmark, Institute of Public Health, Unit for Health Promotion, Niels Bohrs Vej 9, 6700, Esbjerg, Denmark</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: aleppin@health.sdu.dk</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Aro, Arja R" sort="Aro, Arja R" uniqKey="Aro A" first="Arja R." last="Aro">Arja R. Aro</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Southern Denmark, Institute of Public Health, Unit for Health Promotion, Niels Bohrs Vej 9, 6700, Esbjerg, Denmark</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">International Journal of Behavioral Medicine</title><title level="j" type="sub">Official Journal of the International Society of Behavioral Medicine</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">Int.J. Behav. Med.</title><idno type="ISSN">1070-5503</idno><idno type="eISSN">1532-7558</idno><imprint><publisher>Springer US; http://www.springer-ny.com</publisher><pubPlace>Boston</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2009-03-01">2009-03-01</date><biblScope unit="volume">16</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="7">7</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="29">29</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">1070-5503</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1070-5503</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Avian influenza</term><term>Models</term><term>Risk perception</term><term>Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)</term><term>Theory</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Abstract: Background: The outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome in 2003 and the subsequent emergence of the H5N1 virus have highlighted the threat of a global pandemic influenza outbreak. Planning effective public health control measures for such a case will be highly dependent on sound theory-based research on how people perceive the risks involved in such an event. Purpose: The present article aims to review theoretical models and concepts underlying current empirical research on pandemic influenza risk perception. Method: A review was conducted based on 28 empirical studies from 30 articles which were published between 2003 and 2007. Results: Concepts of risk perception mostly seemed more pragmatic than theory-based and were highly heterogeneous, for instance, in terms of conceptualizing risk perception as an exclusively cognitive or as a cognitive and emotional phenomenon or whether the concept was dominated by expectancy or expectancy and value components. Similarly, the majority of studies investigating risk perceptions and protective behaviors were not model-based. Conclusions: The current body of knowledge can only provide preliminary insights. Unlike the reviewed studies, which were mostly launched as a rapid response to outbreak situations, future research will have to invest more strongly into theoretical work to provide sounder evidence.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>springer-journals</corpusName><author><json:item><name>Anja Leppin</name><affiliations><json:string>University of Southern Denmark, Institute of Public Health, Unit for Health Promotion, Niels Bohrs Vej 9, 6700, Esbjerg, Denmark</json:string><json:string>E-mail: aleppin@health.sdu.dk</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Arja R. Aro</name><affiliations><json:string>University of Southern Denmark, Institute of Public Health, Unit for Health Promotion, Niels Bohrs Vej 9, 6700, Esbjerg, Denmark</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Avian influenza</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Risk perception</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Theory</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Models</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>9002</json:string><json:string>s12529-008-9002-8</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/VQC-GGZZFGWJ-9</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>ReviewPaper</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Abstract: Background: The outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome in 2003 and the subsequent emergence of the H5N1 virus have highlighted the threat of a global pandemic influenza outbreak. Planning effective public health control measures for such a case will be highly dependent on sound theory-based research on how people perceive the risks involved in such an event. Purpose: The present article aims to review theoretical models and concepts underlying current empirical research on pandemic influenza risk perception. Method: A review was conducted based on 28 empirical studies from 30 articles which were published between 2003 and 2007. Results: Concepts of risk perception mostly seemed more pragmatic than theory-based and were highly heterogeneous, for instance, in terms of conceptualizing risk perception as an exclusively cognitive or as a cognitive and emotional phenomenon or whether the concept was dominated by expectancy or expectancy and value components. Similarly, the majority of studies investigating risk perceptions and protective behaviors were not model-based. Conclusions: The current body of knowledge can only provide preliminary insights. Unlike the reviewed studies, which were mostly launched as a rapid response to outbreak situations, future research will have to invest more strongly into theoretical work to provide sounder evidence.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>9.4</score><pdfWordCount>14697</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>100538</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>23</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>595.276 x 790.866 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>false</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>200</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>1379</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>5</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Risk Perceptions Related to SARS and Avian Influenza: Theoretical Foundations of Current Empirical Research</title><genre><json:string>review-article</json:string></genre><host><title>International Journal of Behavioral Medicine</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><publicationDate>2009</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2009</copyrightDate><issn><json:string>1070-5503</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1532-7558</json:string></eissn><journalId><json:string>12529</json:string></journalId><volume>16</volume><issue>1</issue><pages><first>7</first><last>29</last></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><subject><json:item><value>Cross Cultural Psychology</value></json:item><json:item><value>General Practice / Family Medicine</value></json:item><json:item><value>Primary Care Medicine</value></json:item><json:item><value>Psychotherapy and Counseling</value></json:item><json:item><value>Medicine/Public Health, general</value></json:item><json:item><value>Health Psychology</value></json:item></subject></host><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/VQC-GGZZFGWJ-9</json:string></ark><publicationDate>2009</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2009</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1007/s12529-008-9002-8</json:string></doi><id>09D21A166998C0814AA4CF0E4D385DFA1A9B06C0</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/VQC-GGZZFGWJ-9/fulltext.pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/VQC-GGZZFGWJ-9/bundle.zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/VQC-GGZZFGWJ-9/fulltext.tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Risk Perceptions Related to SARS and Avian Influenza: Theoretical Foundations of Current Empirical Research</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher scheme="https://scientific-publisher.data.istex.fr">Springer US; http://www.springer-ny.com</publisher><pubPlace>Boston</pubPlace><availability><licence><p>International Society of Behavioral Medicine, 2009</p></licence><p scheme="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-3XSW68JL-F">springer</p></availability><date>2009</date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="review-article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-L5L7X3NF-P">review-article</note><note type="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note><note>Review</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Risk Perceptions Related to SARS and Avian Influenza: Theoretical Foundations of Current Empirical Research</title><author xml:id="author-0000" corresp="yes"><persName><forename type="first">Anja</forename><surname>Leppin</surname></persName><email>aleppin@health.sdu.dk</email><affiliation>University of Southern Denmark, Institute of Public Health, Unit for Health Promotion, Niels Bohrs Vej 9, 6700, Esbjerg, Denmark</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">Arja</forename><surname>Aro</surname></persName><affiliation>University of Southern Denmark, Institute of Public Health, Unit for Health Promotion, Niels Bohrs Vej 9, 6700, Esbjerg, Denmark</affiliation></author><idno type="istex">09D21A166998C0814AA4CF0E4D385DFA1A9B06C0</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/VQC-GGZZFGWJ-9</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1007/s12529-008-9002-8</idno><idno type="article-id">9002</idno><idno type="article-id">s12529-008-9002-8</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j">International Journal of Behavioral Medicine</title><title level="j" type="sub">Official Journal of the International Society of Behavioral Medicine</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">Int.J. Behav. Med.</title><idno type="pISSN">1070-5503</idno><idno type="eISSN">1532-7558</idno><idno type="journal-ID">true</idno><idno type="issue-article-count">10</idno><idno type="volume-issue-count">4</idno><imprint><publisher>Springer US; http://www.springer-ny.com</publisher><pubPlace>Boston</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2009-03-01"></date><biblScope unit="volume">16</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="7">7</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="29">29</biblScope></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>2009</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Abstract: Background: The outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome in 2003 and the subsequent emergence of the H5N1 virus have highlighted the threat of a global pandemic influenza outbreak. Planning effective public health control measures for such a case will be highly dependent on sound theory-based research on how people perceive the risks involved in such an event. Purpose: The present article aims to review theoretical models and concepts underlying current empirical research on pandemic influenza risk perception. Method: A review was conducted based on 28 empirical studies from 30 articles which were published between 2003 and 2007. Results: Concepts of risk perception mostly seemed more pragmatic than theory-based and were highly heterogeneous, for instance, in terms of conceptualizing risk perception as an exclusively cognitive or as a cognitive and emotional phenomenon or whether the concept was dominated by expectancy or expectancy and value components. Similarly, the majority of studies investigating risk perceptions and protective behaviors were not model-based. Conclusions: The current body of knowledge can only provide preliminary insights. Unlike the reviewed studies, which were mostly launched as a rapid response to outbreak situations, future research will have to invest more strongly into theoretical work to provide sounder evidence.</p></abstract><textClass xml:lang="en"><keywords scheme="keyword"><list><head>Keywords</head><item><term>Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)</term></item><item><term>Avian influenza</term></item><item><term>Risk perception</term></item><item><term>Theory</term></item><item><term>Models</term></item></list></keywords></textClass><textClass><keywords scheme="Journal Subject"><list><head>Psychology</head><item><term>Cross Cultural Psychology</term></item><item><term>General Practice / Family Medicine</term></item><item><term>Primary Care Medicine</term></item><item><term>Psychotherapy and Counseling</term></item><item><term>Medicine/Public Health, general</term></item><item><term>Health Psychology</term></item></list></keywords></textClass></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="2009-03-01">Published</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/VQC-GGZZFGWJ-9/fulltext.txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="corpus springer-journals not found" wicri:toSee="no header"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:docType PUBLIC="-//Springer-Verlag//DTD A++ V2.4//EN" URI="http://devel.springer.de/A++/V2.4/DTD/A++V2.4.dtd" name="istex:docType"></istex:docType><istex:document><Publisher><PublisherInfo><PublisherName>Springer US</PublisherName><PublisherLocation>Boston</PublisherLocation><PublisherURL>http://www.springer-ny.com</PublisherURL></PublisherInfo><Journal OutputMedium="All"><JournalInfo JournalProductType="ArchiveJournal" NumberingStyle="Unnumbered"><JournalID>12529</JournalID><JournalPrintISSN>1070-5503</JournalPrintISSN><JournalElectronicISSN>1532-7558</JournalElectronicISSN><JournalTitle>International Journal of Behavioral Medicine</JournalTitle><JournalSubTitle>Official Journal of the International Society of Behavioral Medicine</JournalSubTitle><JournalAbbreviatedTitle>Int.J. Behav. Med.</JournalAbbreviatedTitle><JournalSubjectGroup><JournalSubject Type="Primary">Psychology</JournalSubject><JournalSubject Type="Secondary">Cross Cultural Psychology</JournalSubject><JournalSubject Type="Secondary">General Practice / Family Medicine</JournalSubject><JournalSubject Type="Secondary">Primary Care Medicine </JournalSubject><JournalSubject Type="Secondary">Psychotherapy and Counseling</JournalSubject><JournalSubject Type="Secondary">Medicine/Public Health, general </JournalSubject><JournalSubject Type="Secondary">Health Psychology</JournalSubject></JournalSubjectGroup></JournalInfo><Volume OutputMedium="All"><VolumeInfo TocLevels="0" VolumeType="Regular"><VolumeIDStart>16</VolumeIDStart><VolumeIDEnd>16</VolumeIDEnd><VolumeIssueCount>4</VolumeIssueCount></VolumeInfo><Issue IssueType="Regular" OutputMedium="All"><IssueInfo IssueType="Regular" TocLevels="0"><IssueIDStart>1</IssueIDStart><IssueIDEnd>1</IssueIDEnd><IssueArticleCount>10</IssueArticleCount><IssueHistory><OnlineDate><Year>2009</Year><Month>3</Month><Day>10</Day></OnlineDate><PrintDate><Year>2009</Year><Month>3</Month><Day>9</Day></PrintDate><CoverDate><Year>2009</Year><Month>3</Month></CoverDate><PricelistYear>2009</PricelistYear></IssueHistory><IssueCopyright><CopyrightHolderName>International Society of Behavioral Medicine</CopyrightHolderName><CopyrightYear>2009</CopyrightYear></IssueCopyright></IssueInfo><Article ID="s12529-008-9002-8" OutputMedium="All"><ArticleInfo ArticleType="ReviewPaper" ContainsESM="No" Language="En" NumberingStyle="Unnumbered" TocLevels="0"><ArticleID>9002</ArticleID><ArticleDOI>10.1007/s12529-008-9002-8</ArticleDOI><ArticleSequenceNumber>3</ArticleSequenceNumber><ArticleTitle Language="En">Risk Perceptions Related to SARS and Avian Influenza: Theoretical Foundations of Current Empirical Research</ArticleTitle><ArticleCategory>Review</ArticleCategory><ArticleFirstPage>7</ArticleFirstPage><ArticleLastPage>29</ArticleLastPage><ArticleHistory><RegistrationDate><Year>2008</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>6</Day></RegistrationDate><Accepted><Year>2008</Year><Month>9</Month><Day>29</Day></Accepted><OnlineDate><Year>2009</Year><Month>2</Month><Day>12</Day></OnlineDate></ArticleHistory><ArticleCopyright><CopyrightHolderName>International Society of Behavioral Medicine</CopyrightHolderName><CopyrightYear>2009</CopyrightYear></ArticleCopyright><ArticleGrants Type="Regular"><MetadataGrant Grant="OpenAccess"></MetadataGrant><AbstractGrant Grant="OpenAccess"></AbstractGrant><BodyPDFGrant Grant="Restricted"></BodyPDFGrant><BodyHTMLGrant Grant="Restricted"></BodyHTMLGrant><BibliographyGrant Grant="Restricted"></BibliographyGrant><ESMGrant Grant="Restricted"></ESMGrant></ArticleGrants></ArticleInfo><ArticleHeader><AuthorGroup><Author AffiliationIDS="Aff1" CorrespondingAffiliationID="Aff1"><AuthorName DisplayOrder="Western"><GivenName>Anja</GivenName><FamilyName>Leppin</FamilyName></AuthorName><Contact><Email>aleppin@health.sdu.dk</Email></Contact></Author><Author AffiliationIDS="Aff1"><AuthorName DisplayOrder="Western"><GivenName>Arja</GivenName><GivenName>R.</GivenName><FamilyName>Aro</FamilyName></AuthorName></Author><Affiliation ID="Aff1"><OrgName>University of Southern Denmark, Institute of Public Health, Unit for Health Promotion</OrgName><OrgAddress><Street>Niels Bohrs Vej 9</Street><Postcode>6700</Postcode><City>Esbjerg</City><Country Code="DK">Denmark</Country></OrgAddress></Affiliation></AuthorGroup><Abstract ID="Abs1" Language="En"><Heading>Abstract</Heading><AbstractSection ID="ASec1"><Heading>Background</Heading><Para>The outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome in 2003 and the subsequent emergence of the H5N1 virus have highlighted the threat of a global pandemic influenza outbreak. Planning effective public health control measures for such a case will be highly dependent on sound theory-based research on how people perceive the risks involved in such an event.</Para></AbstractSection><AbstractSection ID="ASec2"><Heading>Purpose</Heading><Para>The present article aims to review theoretical models and concepts underlying current empirical research on pandemic influenza risk perception.</Para></AbstractSection><AbstractSection ID="ASec3"><Heading>Method</Heading><Para>A review was conducted based on 28 empirical studies from 30 articles which were published between 2003 and 2007.</Para></AbstractSection><AbstractSection ID="ASec4"><Heading>Results</Heading><Para>Concepts of risk perception mostly seemed more pragmatic than theory-based and were highly heterogeneous, for instance, in terms of conceptualizing risk perception as an exclusively cognitive or as a cognitive <Emphasis Type="Italic">and</Emphasis> emotional phenomenon or whether the concept was dominated by expectancy or expectancy <Emphasis Type="Italic">and</Emphasis> value components. Similarly, the majority of studies investigating risk perceptions and protective behaviors were not model-based.</Para></AbstractSection><AbstractSection ID="ASec5"><Heading>Conclusions</Heading><Para>The current body of knowledge can only provide preliminary insights. Unlike the reviewed studies, which were mostly launched as a rapid response to outbreak situations, future research will have to invest more strongly into theoretical work to provide sounder evidence.</Para></AbstractSection></Abstract><KeywordGroup Language="En"><Heading>Keywords</Heading><Keyword>Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)</Keyword><Keyword>Avian influenza</Keyword><Keyword>Risk perception</Keyword><Keyword>Theory</Keyword><Keyword>Models</Keyword></KeywordGroup></ArticleHeader><NoBody></NoBody></Article></Issue></Volume></Journal></Publisher></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Risk Perceptions Related to SARS and Avian Influenza: Theoretical Foundations of Current Empirical Research</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA"><title>Risk Perceptions Related to SARS and Avian Influenza: Theoretical Foundations of Current Empirical Research</title></titleInfo><name type="personal" displayLabel="corresp"><namePart type="given">Anja</namePart><namePart type="family">Leppin</namePart><affiliation>University of Southern Denmark, Institute of Public Health, Unit for Health Promotion, Niels Bohrs Vej 9, 6700, Esbjerg, Denmark</affiliation><affiliation>E-mail: aleppin@health.sdu.dk</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Arja</namePart><namePart type="given">R.</namePart><namePart type="family">Aro</namePart><affiliation>University of Southern Denmark, Institute of Public Health, Unit for Health Promotion, Niels Bohrs Vej 9, 6700, Esbjerg, Denmark</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="review-article" displayLabel="ReviewPaper" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-L5L7X3NF-P">review-article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Springer US; http://www.springer-ny.com</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Boston</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2009-03-01</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2009</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><abstract lang="en">Abstract: Background: The outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome in 2003 and the subsequent emergence of the H5N1 virus have highlighted the threat of a global pandemic influenza outbreak. Planning effective public health control measures for such a case will be highly dependent on sound theory-based research on how people perceive the risks involved in such an event. Purpose: The present article aims to review theoretical models and concepts underlying current empirical research on pandemic influenza risk perception. Method: A review was conducted based on 28 empirical studies from 30 articles which were published between 2003 and 2007. Results: Concepts of risk perception mostly seemed more pragmatic than theory-based and were highly heterogeneous, for instance, in terms of conceptualizing risk perception as an exclusively cognitive or as a cognitive and emotional phenomenon or whether the concept was dominated by expectancy or expectancy and value components. Similarly, the majority of studies investigating risk perceptions and protective behaviors were not model-based. Conclusions: The current body of knowledge can only provide preliminary insights. Unlike the reviewed studies, which were mostly launched as a rapid response to outbreak situations, future research will have to invest more strongly into theoretical work to provide sounder evidence.</abstract><note>Review</note><subject lang="en"><genre>Keywords</genre><topic>Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)</topic><topic>Avian influenza</topic><topic>Risk perception</topic><topic>Theory</topic><topic>Models</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>International Journal of Behavioral Medicine</title><subTitle>Official Journal of the International Society of Behavioral Medicine</subTitle></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>Int.J. Behav. Med.</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><originInfo><publisher>Springer</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2009-03-10</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2009</copyrightDate></originInfo><subject><genre>Psychology</genre><topic>Cross Cultural Psychology</topic><topic>General Practice / Family Medicine</topic><topic>Primary Care Medicine</topic><topic>Psychotherapy and Counseling</topic><topic>Medicine/Public Health, general</topic><topic>Health Psychology</topic></subject><identifier type="ISSN">1070-5503</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1532-7558</identifier><identifier type="JournalID">12529</identifier><identifier type="IssueArticleCount">10</identifier><identifier type="VolumeIssueCount">4</identifier><part><date>2009</date><detail type="volume"><number>16</number><caption>vol.</caption></detail><detail type="issue"><number>1</number><caption>no.</caption></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>7</start><end>29</end></extent></part><recordInfo><recordOrigin>International Society of Behavioral Medicine, 2009</recordOrigin></recordInfo></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">09D21A166998C0814AA4CF0E4D385DFA1A9B06C0</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/VQC-GGZZFGWJ-9</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1007/s12529-008-9002-8</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">9002</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">s12529-008-9002-8</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">International Society of Behavioral Medicine, 2009</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-3XSW68JL-F">springer</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>International Society of Behavioral Medicine, 2009</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/VQC-GGZZFGWJ-9/record.json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Sante/explor/SrasV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000310 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000310 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Sante
|area= SrasV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:09D21A166998C0814AA4CF0E4D385DFA1A9B06C0
|texte= Risk Perceptions Related to SARS and Avian Influenza: Theoretical Foundations of Current Empirical Research
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33. |  |