Enhancing the Legitimacy of Local Government Pandemic Influenza Planning through Transparency and Public Engagement

Enhancing the Legitimacy of Local Government Pandemic Influenza Planning through Transparency and Public Engagement

Source :

• Public Administration Review [ 0033-3352 ] ; 2011-03.

English descriptors

• Teeft :
  • Actionable plan, Address activity, Allocation plans, Antiviral, Average score, Case isolation, Citizen involvement, Communication plans, Communication section, Community leaders, Community preparedness, Community preparedness leadership, Community resources, Community stakeholders, Complete response, Composite score, Composite scores, Considerable planning, Containment, Containment procedures, Dhhs, Dhhs guidelines, Disease control, Diverse values, Diverse values beliefs, Emergency care, Emergency communication activities, Emergency management, Ethical considerations, Ethical considerations checklist, Ethical implications, Ethical issues, Ethical manner, Friedman test, Government leaders, Guideline, Health care services, Health communications, Health threat, Health threats, Human services, Information availability, Initial input, Kansas city, Language minorities, Largest cities, Legal authorities, Legitimacy, Local government, Local government authority, Local government decision, Local government level, Local government pandemic planning, Local government preparation, Local governments, Local plans, Local questions, Minimal response, Mississippi state university, Mock exercises, Movement restriction, Municipal area, Municipal areas, Networking, Next pandemic, Northeast region, Objective activity, Operation plan, Operational objective, Operational objectives, Operational plan, Other plans, Pandemic, Pandemic plan, Pandemic planning, Pandemic plans, Pandemic preparedness, Pandemic response plan, Personal freedom, Plan documents communication activities, Plan notes, Policy decisions, Policy implementation, Possible points, Preexisting knowledge, Preparedness, Preparedness plans, Priority groupings, Private industry, Professional groups, Public administration, Public administration review, Public administration review march april, Public administration series, Public engagement, Public health, Public health communications, Public health decision, Public health interventions, Public health measures, Public health response measures, Public policy, Public release, Public understanding, Regular review, Relevant criteria, Relevant stakeholders, Representative group, Representative sample, Resident protection, Response measures, Response processes, Restrictive measures, Scarce resources, Special issue, Special populations, Stakeholder, Stakeholder groups, State criteria, Statistical analyses, Timely information, Total number, Total score, Transparency, Unique circumstances, Vaccine, Website, West region, West regions, Wichita.

Abstract

• https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/WNG-RHCCM3XC-C/fulltext.pdf

Affiliations:

• États-Unis

Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)

• to stream Istex, to step Corpus: 001688
• to stream Istex, to step Curation: 001688

Links to Exploration step

Le document en format XML

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Sante/explor/SrasV1/Data/Istex/Checkpoint

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000793 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd -nk 000793 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Sante
   |area=    SrasV1
   |flux=    Istex
   |étape=   Checkpoint
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:492DDB7FCB8C3A5E6FC74F4516DFECD352462E08
   |texte=   Enhancing the Legitimacy of Local Government Pandemic Influenza Planning through Transparency and Public Engagement
}}

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33. Data generation: Tue Apr 28 14:49:16 2020. Site generation: Sat Mar 27 22:06:49 2021