Developing country health systems and the governance of international HIV/AIDS funding
Identifieur interne : 002661 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 002660; suivant : 002662Developing country health systems and the governance of international HIV/AIDS funding
Auteurs : Nana Poku ; Jim WhitmanSource :
- The International Journal of Health Planning and Management [ 0749-6753 ] ; 2012-04.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Aids funding, Aids relief, Building block, Building blocks, Cambridge university press, Comprehensive understanding, Conceptual, Conceptual framework, Consensus framework, Considerable differences, Considerable sums, Copyright, Country health systems, Development results, Donor, Donor community, Donor side, Donors shift focus, Effective leadership, Emergency provision, Empirical study, Evidence base, Executive level, Funders, Funding, Funding impacts, Global, Global fund, Global funding, Global governance, Global health governance, Governance, Health building blocks, Health interventions, Health outcomes, Health plann mgmt, Health provision, Health services, Health system, Health system building blocks, Health system leadership, Health systems, Health systems research, Human organization, Institution building, International donors, International dynamics, International funders, International funding, John wiley sons, Knowledge gaps, Local systems, Managerial levels, Medium income countries, Mgmt, Mutual accountability, National government, National health leaderships, National health system, National health systems, National leaderships, Nations program, Oecd, Paris declaration, Paris declaration principles, Paris principles, Partnership principles, Peace studies, Pilot studies, Plann, Poku, Practical work, Private foundations, Recipient countries, Recipient governments, Recipient nations, Reproductive health, Same time, Service delivery, State intervention, Task force, Universal coverage, Virtuous circle, World bank, World health organization.
- Teeft :
- Aids funding, Aids relief, Building block, Building blocks, Cambridge university press, Comprehensive understanding, Conceptual, Conceptual framework, Consensus framework, Considerable differences, Considerable sums, Copyright, Country health systems, Development results, Donor, Donor community, Donor side, Donors shift focus, Effective leadership, Emergency provision, Empirical study, Evidence base, Executive level, Funders, Funding, Funding impacts, Global, Global fund, Global funding, Global governance, Global health governance, Governance, Health building blocks, Health interventions, Health outcomes, Health plann mgmt, Health provision, Health services, Health system, Health system building blocks, Health system leadership, Health systems, Health systems research, Human organization, Institution building, International donors, International dynamics, International funders, International funding, John wiley sons, Knowledge gaps, Local systems, Managerial levels, Medium income countries, Mgmt, Mutual accountability, National government, National health leaderships, National health system, National health systems, National leaderships, Nations program, Oecd, Paris declaration, Paris declaration principles, Paris principles, Partnership principles, Peace studies, Pilot studies, Plann, Poku, Practical work, Private foundations, Recipient countries, Recipient governments, Recipient nations, Reproductive health, Same time, Service delivery, State intervention, Task force, Universal coverage, Virtuous circle, World bank, World health organization.
Abstract
Donor country initiatives for the prevention and mitigation of HIV/AIDS are not a matter of simple burden sharing. Instead, they have brought in their wake many of the complexities and unforeseen effects that have long been associated with more general overseas development assistance. In the case of funding directed toward HIV/AIDS, these effects are by no means either secondary or easily calculable. It is widely acknowledged that there is no consensus framework on how these impacts may be defined, no framework/toolkit for the evaluation of impacts and no longitudinally significant data that could provide the substance for those evaluations. The subject of this study focuses not on the health outcomes of funding but on how donor–recipient relations could be better deliberated, negotiated and coordinated. We argue that effective leadership and governance of developing country health systems for HIV/AIDS work requires a reconfiguration of how donor–recipient relations are conceived and contracted, and for this purpose, we propose an adaptation of the Organisation for Economic Co‐operation and Development Paris Declaration principles of aid effectiveness. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Url:
DOI: 10.1002/hpm.1101
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:75FDE81A1116A8CFD1E36DD369BD1A29C1229FF5Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Developing country health systems and the governance of international HIV/AIDS funding</title><author><name sortKey="Poku, Nana" sort="Poku, Nana" uniqKey="Poku N" first="Nana" last="Poku">Nana Poku</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Peace Studies, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Whitman, Jim" sort="Whitman, Jim" uniqKey="Whitman J" first="Jim" last="Whitman">Jim Whitman</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Peace Studies, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: j.whitman@bradford.ac.uk</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: j.whitman@bradford.ac.uk</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:75FDE81A1116A8CFD1E36DD369BD1A29C1229FF5</idno><date when="2012" year="2012">2012</date><idno type="doi">10.1002/hpm.1101</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/75FDE81A1116A8CFD1E36DD369BD1A29C1229FF5/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">002661</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">002661</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Developing country health systems and the governance of international HIV/AIDS funding</title><author><name sortKey="Poku, Nana" sort="Poku, Nana" uniqKey="Poku N" first="Nana" last="Poku">Nana Poku</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Peace Studies, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Whitman, Jim" sort="Whitman, Jim" uniqKey="Whitman J" first="Jim" last="Whitman">Jim Whitman</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Peace Studies, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: j.whitman@bradford.ac.uk</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: j.whitman@bradford.ac.uk</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">The International Journal of Health Planning and Management</title><title level="j" type="alt">THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT</title><idno type="ISSN">0749-6753</idno><idno type="eISSN">1099-1751</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">27</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="e146">e146</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="e161">e161</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">16</biblScope><publisher>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Chichester, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2012-04">2012-04</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0749-6753</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0749-6753</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Aids funding</term><term>Aids relief</term><term>Building block</term><term>Building blocks</term><term>Cambridge university press</term><term>Comprehensive understanding</term><term>Conceptual</term><term>Conceptual framework</term><term>Consensus framework</term><term>Considerable differences</term><term>Considerable sums</term><term>Copyright</term><term>Country health systems</term><term>Development results</term><term>Donor</term><term>Donor community</term><term>Donor side</term><term>Donors shift focus</term><term>Effective leadership</term><term>Emergency provision</term><term>Empirical study</term><term>Evidence base</term><term>Executive level</term><term>Funders</term><term>Funding</term><term>Funding impacts</term><term>Global</term><term>Global fund</term><term>Global funding</term><term>Global governance</term><term>Global health governance</term><term>Governance</term><term>Health building blocks</term><term>Health interventions</term><term>Health outcomes</term><term>Health plann mgmt</term><term>Health provision</term><term>Health services</term><term>Health system</term><term>Health system building blocks</term><term>Health system leadership</term><term>Health systems</term><term>Health systems research</term><term>Human organization</term><term>Institution building</term><term>International donors</term><term>International dynamics</term><term>International funders</term><term>International funding</term><term>John wiley sons</term><term>Knowledge gaps</term><term>Local systems</term><term>Managerial levels</term><term>Medium income countries</term><term>Mgmt</term><term>Mutual accountability</term><term>National government</term><term>National health leaderships</term><term>National health system</term><term>National health systems</term><term>National leaderships</term><term>Nations program</term><term>Oecd</term><term>Paris declaration</term><term>Paris declaration principles</term><term>Paris principles</term><term>Partnership principles</term><term>Peace studies</term><term>Pilot studies</term><term>Plann</term><term>Poku</term><term>Practical work</term><term>Private foundations</term><term>Recipient countries</term><term>Recipient governments</term><term>Recipient nations</term><term>Reproductive health</term><term>Same time</term><term>Service delivery</term><term>State intervention</term><term>Task force</term><term>Universal coverage</term><term>Virtuous circle</term><term>World bank</term><term>World health organization</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Aids funding</term><term>Aids relief</term><term>Building block</term><term>Building blocks</term><term>Cambridge university press</term><term>Comprehensive understanding</term><term>Conceptual</term><term>Conceptual framework</term><term>Consensus framework</term><term>Considerable differences</term><term>Considerable sums</term><term>Copyright</term><term>Country health systems</term><term>Development results</term><term>Donor</term><term>Donor community</term><term>Donor side</term><term>Donors shift focus</term><term>Effective leadership</term><term>Emergency provision</term><term>Empirical study</term><term>Evidence base</term><term>Executive level</term><term>Funders</term><term>Funding</term><term>Funding impacts</term><term>Global</term><term>Global fund</term><term>Global funding</term><term>Global governance</term><term>Global health governance</term><term>Governance</term><term>Health building blocks</term><term>Health interventions</term><term>Health outcomes</term><term>Health plann mgmt</term><term>Health provision</term><term>Health services</term><term>Health system</term><term>Health system building blocks</term><term>Health system leadership</term><term>Health systems</term><term>Health systems research</term><term>Human organization</term><term>Institution building</term><term>International donors</term><term>International dynamics</term><term>International funders</term><term>International funding</term><term>John wiley sons</term><term>Knowledge gaps</term><term>Local systems</term><term>Managerial levels</term><term>Medium income countries</term><term>Mgmt</term><term>Mutual accountability</term><term>National government</term><term>National health leaderships</term><term>National health system</term><term>National health systems</term><term>National leaderships</term><term>Nations program</term><term>Oecd</term><term>Paris declaration</term><term>Paris declaration principles</term><term>Paris principles</term><term>Partnership principles</term><term>Peace studies</term><term>Pilot studies</term><term>Plann</term><term>Poku</term><term>Practical work</term><term>Private foundations</term><term>Recipient countries</term><term>Recipient governments</term><term>Recipient nations</term><term>Reproductive health</term><term>Same time</term><term>Service delivery</term><term>State intervention</term><term>Task force</term><term>Universal coverage</term><term>Virtuous circle</term><term>World bank</term><term>World health organization</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Donor country initiatives for the prevention and mitigation of HIV/AIDS are not a matter of simple burden sharing. Instead, they have brought in their wake many of the complexities and unforeseen effects that have long been associated with more general overseas development assistance. In the case of funding directed toward HIV/AIDS, these effects are by no means either secondary or easily calculable. It is widely acknowledged that there is no consensus framework on how these impacts may be defined, no framework/toolkit for the evaluation of impacts and no longitudinally significant data that could provide the substance for those evaluations. The subject of this study focuses not on the health outcomes of funding but on how donor–recipient relations could be better deliberated, negotiated and coordinated. We argue that effective leadership and governance of developing country health systems for HIV/AIDS work requires a reconfiguration of how donor–recipient relations are conceived and contracted, and for this purpose, we propose an adaptation of the Organisation for Economic Co‐operation and Development Paris Declaration principles of aid effectiveness. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>governance</json:string><json:string>funding</json:string><json:string>plann</json:string><json:string>john wiley sons</json:string><json:string>copyright</json:string><json:string>health plann mgmt</json:string><json:string>mgmt</json:string><json:string>national health systems</json:string><json:string>conceptual framework</json:string><json:string>health systems</json:string><json:string>international funding</json:string><json:string>oecd</json:string><json:string>paris declaration principles</json:string><json:string>world bank</json:string><json:string>donor community</json:string><json:string>poku</json:string><json:string>funders</json:string><json:string>executive level</json:string><json:string>building blocks</json:string><json:string>paris declaration</json:string><json:string>funding impacts</json:string><json:string>donor</json:string><json:string>managerial levels</json:string><json:string>global fund</json:string><json:string>health outcomes</json:string><json:string>recipient countries</json:string><json:string>global health governance</json:string><json:string>health system</json:string><json:string>state intervention</json:string><json:string>medium income countries</json:string><json:string>health system leadership</json:string><json:string>peace studies</json:string><json:string>international donors</json:string><json:string>recipient nations</json:string><json:string>same time</json:string><json:string>national health system</json:string><json:string>development results</json:string><json:string>global</json:string><json:string>aids relief</json:string><json:string>service delivery</json:string><json:string>health building blocks</json:string><json:string>global governance</json:string><json:string>country health systems</json:string><json:string>considerable differences</json:string><json:string>human organization</json:string><json:string>health system building blocks</json:string><json:string>world health organization</json:string><json:string>comprehensive understanding</json:string><json:string>recipient governments</json:string><json:string>national government</json:string><json:string>consensus framework</json:string><json:string>empirical study</json:string><json:string>emergency provision</json:string><json:string>national health leaderships</json:string><json:string>building block</json:string><json:string>national leaderships</json:string><json:string>effective leadership</json:string><json:string>partnership principles</json:string><json:string>international funders</json:string><json:string>international dynamics</json:string><json:string>local systems</json:string><json:string>donors shift focus</json:string><json:string>health services</json:string><json:string>health interventions</json:string><json:string>health provision</json:string><json:string>nations program</json:string><json:string>private foundations</json:string><json:string>practical work</json:string><json:string>donor side</json:string><json:string>knowledge gaps</json:string><json:string>aids funding</json:string><json:string>global funding</json:string><json:string>reproductive health</json:string><json:string>universal coverage</json:string><json:string>task force</json:string><json:string>health systems research</json:string><json:string>considerable sums</json:string><json:string>evidence base</json:string><json:string>pilot studies</json:string><json:string>institution building</json:string><json:string>virtuous circle</json:string><json:string>mutual accountability</json:string><json:string>paris principles</json:string><json:string>cambridge university press</json:string><json:string>conceptual</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Nana Poku</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Peace Studies, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Jim Whitman</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Peace Studies, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK</json:string><json:string>E-mail: j.whitman@bradford.ac.uk</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>governance</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>HIV/AIDS</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>health systems</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>leadership</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>donors</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>HPM1101</json:string></articleId><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Donor country initiatives for the prevention and mitigation of HIV/AIDS are not a matter of simple burden sharing. Instead, they have brought in their wake many of the complexities and unforeseen effects that have long been associated with more general overseas development assistance. In the case of funding directed toward HIV/AIDS, these effects are by no means either secondary or easily calculable. It is widely acknowledged that there is no consensus framework on how these impacts may be defined, no framework/toolkit for the evaluation of impacts and no longitudinally significant data that could provide the substance for those evaluations. The subject of this study focuses not on the health outcomes of funding but on how donor–recipient relations could be better deliberated, negotiated and coordinated. We argue that effective leadership and governance of developing country health systems for HIV/AIDS work requires a reconfiguration of how donor–recipient relations are conceived and contracted, and for this purpose, we propose an adaptation of the Organisation for Economic Co‐operation and Development Paris Declaration principles of aid effectiveness. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>7.16</score><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageSize>464.882 x 702.992 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractCharCount>1211</abstractCharCount><pdfWordCount>7449</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>47160</pdfCharCount><pdfPageCount>16</pdfPageCount><abstractWordCount>180</abstractWordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Developing country health systems and the governance of international HIV/AIDS funding</title><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>The International Journal of Health Planning and Management</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1751</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>0749-6753</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1099-1751</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>HPM</json:string></publisherId><volume>27</volume><issue>2</issue><pages><first>e146</first><last>e161</last><total>16</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><subject><json:item><value>Research Article</value></json:item></subject></host><categories><wos><json:string>social science</json:string><json:string>public, environmental & occupational health</json:string><json:string>health policy & services</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>health sciences</json:string><json:string>public health & health services</json:string><json:string>health policy & services</json:string></scienceMetrix></categories><publicationDate>2012</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2012</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1002/hpm.1101</json:string></doi><id>75FDE81A1116A8CFD1E36DD369BD1A29C1229FF5</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/75FDE81A1116A8CFD1E36DD369BD1A29C1229FF5/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/75FDE81A1116A8CFD1E36DD369BD1A29C1229FF5/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/75FDE81A1116A8CFD1E36DD369BD1A29C1229FF5/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">Developing country health systems and the governance of international HIV/AIDS funding</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Chichester, UK</pubPlace><availability><licence>Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</licence></availability><date type="published" when="2012-04"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Developing country health systems and the governance of international HIV/AIDS funding</title><title level="a" type="short">GOVERNANCE OF HIV/AIDS FUNDING</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">Nana</forename><surname>Poku</surname></persName><affiliation><orgName>Department of Peace Studies</orgName><orgName>University of Bradford</orgName><address><settlement type="city">Bradford</settlement><country key="GB">UK</country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001" role="corresp"><persName><forename type="first">Jim</forename><surname>Whitman</surname></persName><email>j.whitman@bradford.ac.uk</email><affiliation><orgName>Department of Peace Studies</orgName><orgName>University of Bradford</orgName><address><settlement type="city">Bradford</settlement><country key="GB">UK</country></address></affiliation><affiliation>J. Whitman, Department of Peace Studies, University of Bradford, Bradford BD7 1DP, UK. E‐mail: j.whitman@bradford.ac.uk</affiliation></author><idno type="istex">75FDE81A1116A8CFD1E36DD369BD1A29C1229FF5</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-2C0XVH46-G</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1002/hpm.1101</idno><idno type="unit">HPM1101</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:HPM.HPM1101.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">The International Journal of Health Planning and Management</title><title level="j" type="alt">THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT</title><idno type="pISSN">0749-6753</idno><idno type="eISSN">1099-1751</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1751</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1002/hpm.v27.2</idno><idno type="product">HPM</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">27</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="e146">e146</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="e161">e161</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">16</biblScope><publisher>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Chichester, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2012-04"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract style="main"><head>SUMMARY</head><p>Donor country initiatives for the prevention and mitigation of HIV/AIDS are not a matter of simple burden sharing. Instead, they have brought in their wake many of the complexities and unforeseen effects that have long been associated with more general overseas development assistance. In the case of funding directed toward HIV/AIDS, these effects are by no means either secondary or easily calculable. It is widely acknowledged that there is no consensus framework on how these impacts may be defined, no framework/toolkit for the evaluation of impacts and no longitudinally significant data that could provide the substance for those evaluations.</p><p>The subject of this study focuses not on the health outcomes of funding but on how donor–recipient relations could be better deliberated, negotiated and coordinated. We argue that effective leadership and governance of developing country health systems for HIV/AIDS work requires a reconfiguration of how donor–recipient relations are conceived and contracted, and for this purpose, we propose an adaptation of the Organisation for Economic Co‐operation and Development Paris Declaration principles of aid effectiveness. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords><term xml:id="hpm1101-kwd-0001">governance</term><term xml:id="hpm1101-kwd-0002">HIV/AIDS</term><term xml:id="hpm1101-kwd-0003">health systems</term><term xml:id="hpm1101-kwd-0004">leadership</term><term xml:id="hpm1101-kwd-0005">donors</term></keywords><keywords rend="articleCategory"><term>Research Article</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Research Articles</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/75FDE81A1116A8CFD1E36DD369BD1A29C1229FF5/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component type="serialArticle" version="2.0" xml:lang="en" xml:id="hpm1101"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Chichester, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi>10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1751</doi><issn type="print">0749-6753</issn><issn type="electronic">1099-1751</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="HPM"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT">The International Journal of Health Planning and Management</title><title type="short">Int J Health Plann Mgmt</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="20"><doi>10.1002/hpm.v27.2</doi><copyright ownership="publisher">Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</copyright><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="27">27</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue">2</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2012-04">April/June 2012</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" position="130" type="article" status="forIssue"><doi>10.1002/hpm.1101</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="HPM1101"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="16"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="articleCategory">Research Article</title><title type="tocHeading1">Research Articles</title></titleGroup><copyright ownership="publisher">Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</copyright><eventGroup><event type="xmlCreated" agent="SPi Global" date="2011-07-07"></event><event type="publishedOnlineEarlyUnpaginated" date="2011-08-08"></event><event type="firstOnline" date="2011-08-08"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2012-06-04"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-27"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.3.4 mode:FullText" date="2015-02-24"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst">e146</numbering><numbering type="pageLast">e161</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>J. Whitman, Department of Peace Studies, University of Bradford, Bradford BD7 1DP, UK. E‐mail: <email>j.whitman@bradford.ac.uk</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:HPM.HPM1101.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><titleGroup><title type="main">Developing country health systems and the governance of international HIV/AIDS funding</title><title type="short">GOVERNANCE OF HIV/AIDS FUNDING</title><title type="shortAuthors">N. POKU AND J. WHITMAN</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="hpm1101-cr-0001" affiliationRef="#hpm1101-aff-0001"><personName><givenNames>Nana</givenNames><familyName>Poku</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="hpm1101-cr-0002" affiliationRef="#hpm1101-aff-0002" corresponding="yes"><personName><givenNames>Jim</givenNames><familyName>Whitman</familyName></personName><contactDetails><email>j.whitman@bradford.ac.uk</email></contactDetails></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="hpm1101-aff-0001" countryCode="GB" type="organization"><orgDiv>Department of Peace Studies</orgDiv><orgName>University of Bradford</orgName><address><city>Bradford</city><country>UK</country></address></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="hpm1101-aff-0002" countryCode="GB" type="organization"><orgDiv>Department of Peace Studies</orgDiv><orgName>University of Bradford</orgName><address><city>Bradford</city><country>UK</country></address></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup type="author"><keyword xml:id="hpm1101-kwd-0001">governance</keyword><keyword xml:id="hpm1101-kwd-0002">HIV/AIDS</keyword><keyword xml:id="hpm1101-kwd-0003">health systems</keyword><keyword xml:id="hpm1101-kwd-0004">leadership</keyword><keyword xml:id="hpm1101-kwd-0005">donors</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main"><title type="main">SUMMARY</title><p>Donor country initiatives for the prevention and mitigation of HIV/AIDS are not a matter of simple burden sharing. Instead, they have brought in their wake many of the complexities and unforeseen effects that have long been associated with more general overseas development assistance. In the case of funding directed toward HIV/AIDS, these effects are by no means either secondary or easily calculable. It is widely acknowledged that there is no consensus framework on how these impacts may be defined, no framework/toolkit for the evaluation of impacts and no longitudinally significant data that could provide the substance for those evaluations.</p><p>The subject of this study focuses not on the health outcomes of funding but on how donor–recipient relations could be better deliberated, negotiated and coordinated. We argue that effective leadership and governance of developing country health systems for HIV/AIDS work requires a reconfiguration of how donor–recipient relations are conceived and contracted, and for this purpose, we propose an adaptation of the Organisation for Economic Co‐operation and Development Paris Declaration principles of aid effectiveness. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Developing country health systems and the governance of international HIV/AIDS funding</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>GOVERNANCE OF HIV/AIDS FUNDING</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Developing country health systems and the governance of international HIV/AIDS funding</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Nana</namePart><namePart type="family">Poku</namePart><affiliation>Department of Peace Studies, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Jim</namePart><namePart type="family">Whitman</namePart><affiliation>Department of Peace Studies, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK</affiliation><affiliation>E-mail: j.whitman@bradford.ac.uk</affiliation><affiliation>E-mail: j.whitman@bradford.ac.uk</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Chichester, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2012-04</dateIssued><dateCreated encoding="w3cdtf">2011-07-07</dateCreated><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2012</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><abstract>Donor country initiatives for the prevention and mitigation of HIV/AIDS are not a matter of simple burden sharing. Instead, they have brought in their wake many of the complexities and unforeseen effects that have long been associated with more general overseas development assistance. In the case of funding directed toward HIV/AIDS, these effects are by no means either secondary or easily calculable. It is widely acknowledged that there is no consensus framework on how these impacts may be defined, no framework/toolkit for the evaluation of impacts and no longitudinally significant data that could provide the substance for those evaluations. The subject of this study focuses not on the health outcomes of funding but on how donor–recipient relations could be better deliberated, negotiated and coordinated. We argue that effective leadership and governance of developing country health systems for HIV/AIDS work requires a reconfiguration of how donor–recipient relations are conceived and contracted, and for this purpose, we propose an adaptation of the Organisation for Economic Co‐operation and Development Paris Declaration principles of aid effectiveness. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</abstract><subject><genre>keywords</genre><topic>governance</topic><topic>HIV/AIDS</topic><topic>health systems</topic><topic>leadership</topic><topic>donors</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>The International Journal of Health Planning and Management</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>Int J Health Plann Mgmt</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><subject><genre>article-category</genre><topic>Research Article</topic></subject><identifier type="ISSN">0749-6753</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1099-1751</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1751</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">HPM</identifier><part><date>2012</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>27</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>2</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>e146</start><end>e161</end><total>16</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">75FDE81A1116A8CFD1E36DD369BD1A29C1229FF5</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-2C0XVH46-G</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1002/hpm.1101</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">HPM1101</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/75FDE81A1116A8CFD1E36DD369BD1A29C1229FF5/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Sante/explor/SidaSubSaharaV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002661 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 002661 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Sante
|area= SidaSubSaharaV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:75FDE81A1116A8CFD1E36DD369BD1A29C1229FF5
|texte= Developing country health systems and the governance of international HIV/AIDS funding
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |