BACK TO THE FUTURE: THE IMPERATIVE OF PRIORITIZING FOR THE PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN AFRICA
Identifieur interne : 000E85 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 000E84; suivant : 000E86BACK TO THE FUTURE: THE IMPERATIVE OF PRIORITIZING FOR THE PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN AFRICA
Auteurs : Chidi Anselm OdinkaluSource :
- Journal of African Law [ 0021-8553 ] ; 2003-04.
Abstract
The quite complex problems of human and group survival in Africa do not easily lend themselves to diagnosis or solutions within the human rights frame of analysis. There are several reasons for this. Some arise from the recent and not–so–recent history of the continent, others are associated with the foundations and formulation of the human rights framework itself, and the rest with the orientation of those governments, individuals, and organizations involved in or entrusted with translating the promises of human rights into human reality. The invidious dichotomies within human rights discourse between civil, political, economic, social, cultural, and collective (solidarity) rights or the so–called “categories” or “generations” of human rights, with the attendant and implicit hierarchy among these categories of rights, fails to resonate with most people around the continent for whom contact with the state is a frightening prospect that defies such convenient intellectual categories.
Url:
DOI: 10.1017/S0221855303001962
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:2EF1A4D5504D0DC2D8D42FECF38D8811243B26A3Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title>BACK TO THE FUTURE: THE IMPERATIVE OF PRIORITIZING FOR THE PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN AFRICA</title><author><name sortKey="Odinkalu, Chidi Anselm" sort="Odinkalu, Chidi Anselm" uniqKey="Odinkalu C" first="Chidi Anselm" last="Odinkalu">Chidi Anselm Odinkalu</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:2EF1A4D5504D0DC2D8D42FECF38D8811243B26A3</idno><date when="2017" year="2017">2017</date><idno type="doi">10.1017/S0221855303001962</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/2EF1A4D5504D0DC2D8D42FECF38D8811243B26A3/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000E85</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000E85</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a">BACK TO THE FUTURE: THE IMPERATIVE OF PRIORITIZING FOR THE PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN AFRICA</title><author><name sortKey="Odinkalu, Chidi Anselm" sort="Odinkalu, Chidi Anselm" uniqKey="Odinkalu C" first="Chidi Anselm" last="Odinkalu">Chidi Anselm Odinkalu</name></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Journal of African Law</title><idno type="ISSN">0021-8553</idno><idno type="eISSN">1464-3731</idno><imprint><publisher>Cambridge University Press</publisher><pubPlace>Cambridge, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2003-04">2003-04</date><biblScope unit="volume">47</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="1">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="37">37</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0021-8553</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0021-8553</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The quite complex problems of human and group survival in Africa do not easily lend themselves to diagnosis or solutions within the human rights frame of analysis. There are several reasons for this. Some arise from the recent and not–so–recent history of the continent, others are associated with the foundations and formulation of the human rights framework itself, and the rest with the orientation of those governments, individuals, and organizations involved in or entrusted with translating the promises of human rights into human reality. The invidious dichotomies within human rights discourse between civil, political, economic, social, cultural, and collective (solidarity) rights or the so–called “categories” or “generations” of human rights, with the attendant and implicit hierarchy among these categories of rights, fails to resonate with most people around the continent for whom contact with the state is a frightening prospect that defies such convenient intellectual categories.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>cambridge</corpusName><author><json:item><name>Chidi Anselm Odinkalu</name></json:item></author><arkIstex>ark:/67375/6GQ-GM45HFB9-F</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>research-article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>The quite complex problems of human and group survival in Africa do not easily lend themselves to diagnosis or solutions within the human rights frame of analysis. There are several reasons for this. Some arise from the recent and not–so–recent history of the continent, others are associated with the foundations and formulation of the human rights framework itself, and the rest with the orientation of those governments, individuals, and organizations involved in or entrusted with translating the promises of human rights into human reality. The invidious dichotomies within human rights discourse between civil, political, economic, social, cultural, and collective (solidarity) rights or the so–called “categories” or “generations” of human rights, with the attendant and implicit hierarchy among these categories of rights, fails to resonate with most people around the continent for whom contact with the state is a frightening prospect that defies such convenient intellectual categories.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>8.752</score><pdfWordCount>20841</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>127414</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>37</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>595 x 842 pts (A4)</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>false</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>146</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>997</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>0</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>BACK TO THE FUTURE: THE IMPERATIVE OF PRIORITIZING FOR THE PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN AFRICA</title><pii><json:string>S0021855303001967</json:string></pii><genre><json:string>research-article</json:string></genre><host><title>Journal of African Law</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><issn><json:string>0021-8553</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1464-3731</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>JAL</json:string></publisherId><volume>47</volume><issue>1</issue><pages><first>1</first><last>37</last><total>37</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/6GQ-GM45HFB9-F</json:string></ark><publicationDate>2003</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2017</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1017/S0221855303001962</json:string></doi><id>2EF1A4D5504D0DC2D8D42FECF38D8811243B26A3</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/2EF1A4D5504D0DC2D8D42FECF38D8811243B26A3/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/2EF1A4D5504D0DC2D8D42FECF38D8811243B26A3/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/2EF1A4D5504D0DC2D8D42FECF38D8811243B26A3/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/2EF1A4D5504D0DC2D8D42FECF38D8811243B26A3/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a">BACK TO THE FUTURE: THE IMPERATIVE OF PRIORITIZING FOR THE PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN AFRICA</title><respStmt><resp>Références bibliographiques récupérées via GROBID</resp><name resp="ISTEX-API">ISTEX-API (INIST-CNRS)</name></respStmt></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher scheme="https://publisher-list.data.istex.fr">Cambridge University Press</publisher><pubPlace>Cambridge, UK</pubPlace><availability><licence><p>© School of Oriental and African Studies</p></licence><p scheme="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-G3RCRD03-V">cambridge</p></availability><date>2017-01-03</date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="research-article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-1JC4F85T-7">research-article</note><note type="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a">BACK TO THE FUTURE: THE IMPERATIVE OF PRIORITIZING FOR THE PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN AFRICA</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">Chidi Anselm</forename><surname>Odinkalu</surname></persName></author><idno type="istex">2EF1A4D5504D0DC2D8D42FECF38D8811243B26A3</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/6GQ-GM45HFB9-F</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1017/S0221855303001962</idno><idno type="PII">S0021855303001967</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Journal of African Law</title><idno type="pISSN">0021-8553</idno><idno type="eISSN">1464-3731</idno><idno type="publisher-id">JAL</idno><imprint><publisher>Cambridge University Press</publisher><pubPlace>Cambridge, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2003-04"></date><biblScope unit="volume">47</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="1">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="37">37</biblScope></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>2017-01-03</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract xml:lang="en" style="normal"><p>The quite complex problems of human and group survival in Africa do not easily lend themselves to diagnosis or solutions within the human rights frame of analysis. There are several reasons for this. Some arise from the recent and not–so–recent history of the continent, others are associated with the foundations and formulation of the human rights framework itself, and the rest with the orientation of those governments, individuals, and organizations involved in or entrusted with translating the promises of human rights into human reality. The invidious dichotomies within human rights discourse between civil, political, economic, social, cultural, and collective (solidarity) rights or the so–called “categories” or “generations” of human rights, with the attendant and implicit hierarchy among these categories of rights, fails to resonate with most people around the continent for whom contact with the state is a frightening prospect that defies such convenient intellectual categories.</p></abstract></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="2017-01-03">Created</change><change when="2003-04">Published</change><change xml:id="refBibs-istex" who="#ISTEX-API" when="2017-09-5">References added</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="corpus cambridge not found" wicri:toSee="no header"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:docType PUBLIC="-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" URI="JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd" name="istex:docType"></istex:docType><istex:document><article dtd-version="1.0" article-type="research-article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JAL</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of African Law</journal-title><abbrev-journal-title>J. Afr. law</abbrev-journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1464-3731</issn><issn pub-type="ppub">0021-8553</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Cambridge University Press</publisher-name><publisher-loc>Cambridge, UK</publisher-loc></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="pii">S0021855303001967</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1017/S0221855303001962</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>BACK TO THE FUTURE: THE IMPERATIVE OF PRIORITIZING FOR THE PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN AFRICA</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib><name><surname>Odinkalu</surname><given-names>Chidi Anselm</given-names></name></contrib></contrib-group><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>03</day><month>01</month><year>2017</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="ppub"><month>04</month><year>2003</year></pub-date><volume>47</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>37</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>© School of Oriental and African Studies</copyright-statement></permissions><abstract abstract-type="normal" xml:lang="en"><p>The quite complex problems of human and group survival in Africa do not easily lend themselves to diagnosis or solutions within the human rights frame of analysis. There are several reasons for this. Some arise from the recent and not–so–recent history of the continent, others are associated with the foundations and formulation of the human rights framework itself, and the rest with the orientation of those governments, individuals, and organizations involved in or entrusted with translating the promises of human rights into human reality. The invidious dichotomies within human rights discourse between civil, political, economic, social, cultural, and collective (solidarity) rights or the so–called “categories” or “generations” of human rights, with the attendant and implicit hierarchy among these categories of rights, fails to resonate with most people around the continent for whom contact with the state is a frightening prospect that defies such convenient intellectual categories.</p></abstract><counts><page-count count="37"></page-count></counts><custom-meta-group><custom-meta><meta-name>pdf</meta-name><meta-value>S0021855303001967a.pdf</meta-value></custom-meta></custom-meta-group></article-meta></front></article></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo><title>BACK TO THE FUTURE: THE IMPERATIVE OF PRIORITIZING FOR THE PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN AFRICA</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA"><title>BACK TO THE FUTURE: THE IMPERATIVE OF PRIORITIZING FOR THE PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN AFRICA</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Chidi Anselm</namePart><namePart type="family">Odinkalu</namePart><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="research-article" displayLabel="research-article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-1JC4F85T-7">research-article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Cambridge University Press</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Cambridge, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2003-04</dateIssued><dateCreated encoding="w3cdtf">2017-01-03</dateCreated><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2017</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm></language><abstract type="normal" lang="en">The quite complex problems of human and group survival in Africa do not easily lend themselves to diagnosis or solutions within the human rights frame of analysis. There are several reasons for this. Some arise from the recent and not–so–recent history of the continent, others are associated with the foundations and formulation of the human rights framework itself, and the rest with the orientation of those governments, individuals, and organizations involved in or entrusted with translating the promises of human rights into human reality. The invidious dichotomies within human rights discourse between civil, political, economic, social, cultural, and collective (solidarity) rights or the so–called “categories” or “generations” of human rights, with the attendant and implicit hierarchy among these categories of rights, fails to resonate with most people around the continent for whom contact with the state is a frightening prospect that defies such convenient intellectual categories.</abstract><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Journal of African Law</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">0021-8553</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1464-3731</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">JAL</identifier><part><date>2003</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>47</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>1</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>1</start><end>37</end><total>37</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">2EF1A4D5504D0DC2D8D42FECF38D8811243B26A3</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/6GQ-GM45HFB9-F</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1017/S0221855303001962</identifier><identifier type="PII">S0021855303001967</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">© School of Oriental and African Studies</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-G3RCRD03-V">cambridge</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>© School of Oriental and African Studies</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/2EF1A4D5504D0DC2D8D42FECF38D8811243B26A3/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Sante/explor/SidaSubSaharaV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000E85 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000E85 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Sante
|area= SidaSubSaharaV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:2EF1A4D5504D0DC2D8D42FECF38D8811243B26A3
|texte= BACK TO THE FUTURE: THE IMPERATIVE OF PRIORITIZING FOR THE PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN AFRICA
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |