CAMBODIAN PATIENTS' AND HEALTH PROFESSIONALS' VIEWS REGARDING THE ALLOCATION OF ANTIRETROVIRAL DRUGS
Identifieur interne : 000638 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 000637; suivant : 000639CAMBODIAN PATIENTS' AND HEALTH PROFESSIONALS' VIEWS REGARDING THE ALLOCATION OF ANTIRETROVIRAL DRUGS
Auteurs : Stephanie Nann ; Jean-Phlippe Dousset ; Chanthy Sok ; Pisey Khim ; Sopheap Y ; Paul Sorum ; Etienne MulletSource :
- Developing World Bioethics [ 1471-8731 ] ; 2012-08.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Acceptability rating, Adult children, Aids care, Antiretroviral, Antiretroviral drugs, Antiretroviral therapy, Bedside rationing, Blackwell publishing, Cambodia, Cambodian, Cambodian patients, Clear impact, Clinical stage, Counsellor, Etienne mullet, Experimental phase, Familial point, Familiarization phase, Family conditions, Family physicians, Family responsibilities, Family situation, Family situations, Favoured, Financial infection time responsibilities, Furnham, Greatest impact, Health counsellor, Health counsellors, Health educators, Health professionals, Health professionals judge, Health status, Heart transplants, High priority, High probability, High sustainability, Higher incomes, Infection, Infection cluster, Kapiriri martin, Less priority, Medical dispensary, Medical ethics, Medical staff, Much impact, Mullet, Nancial, Nancial condition, Nancial situation, Older father, Other words, Participant, Paul sorum, Penh, Phnom, Phnom penh, Pisey khim, Poor countries, Potential recipients, Present study, Priority judgments, Priority ratings, Rationing antiretroviral therapy, Response scale, Responsibilities infection responsibilities time responsibilities, Right panel, Rosen, Second cluster, Second hypothesis, Seropositive persons, Severe level, Small children, Social situation, Stephanie nann, Support centre, Time factor, Time infection time, World bioeth, World health organization, Young children, Young father, Young mother.
- Teeft :
- Acceptability rating, Adult children, Aids care, Antiretroviral, Antiretroviral drugs, Antiretroviral therapy, Bedside rationing, Blackwell publishing, Cambodia, Cambodian, Cambodian patients, Clear impact, Clinical stage, Counsellor, Etienne mullet, Experimental phase, Familial point, Familiarization phase, Family conditions, Family physicians, Family responsibilities, Family situation, Family situations, Favoured, Financial infection time responsibilities, Furnham, Greatest impact, Health counsellor, Health counsellors, Health educators, Health professionals, Health professionals judge, Health status, Heart transplants, High priority, High probability, High sustainability, Higher incomes, Infection, Infection cluster, Kapiriri martin, Less priority, Medical dispensary, Medical ethics, Medical staff, Much impact, Mullet, Nancial, Nancial condition, Nancial situation, Older father, Other words, Participant, Paul sorum, Penh, Phnom, Phnom penh, Pisey khim, Poor countries, Potential recipients, Present study, Priority judgments, Priority ratings, Rationing antiretroviral therapy, Response scale, Responsibilities infection responsibilities time responsibilities, Right panel, Rosen, Second cluster, Second hypothesis, Seropositive persons, Severe level, Small children, Social situation, Stephanie nann, Support centre, Time factor, Time infection time, World bioeth, World health organization, Young children, Young father, Young mother.
Abstract
The way Cambodian patients and health professionals judge the priority of HIV‐infected patients in relation to the allocation of antiretroviral drugs was examined. Participants were either HIV‐infected patients attending the HIV/AIDS Care and Support Centre for People Living with HIV/AIDS in Phnom Penh (29 females and 21 males) or members of the staff (9 physicians, 6 pharmacists and 15 health counsellors and health educators). They were presented with stories of a few lines depicting a patient's situation and were instructed to judge the extent to which the patient should be given priority for HIV drugs. The stories were composed according to a four within‐subject factor design: (a) the patient's family responsibilities, (b) the severity of infection, (c) the time elapsed since the first consultation, and (d) the financial difficulties of the family. Most patients expressed the view that the drugs should be used for the patients who are most important from a familial point of view, namely, when the family contains small children and/or is already in a precarious financial condition.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-8847.2012.00323.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:88D14C3417C001E298E7628D1FCE6EE7AF2754BELe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">CAMBODIAN PATIENTS' AND HEALTH PROFESSIONALS' VIEWS REGARDING THE ALLOCATION OF ANTIRETROVIRAL DRUGS</title><author><name sortKey="Nann, Stephanie" sort="Nann, Stephanie" uniqKey="Nann S" first="Stephanie" last="Nann">Stephanie Nann</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Freelance Researcher</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Dousset, Jean Hlippe" sort="Dousset, Jean Hlippe" uniqKey="Dousset J" first="Jean-Phlippe" last="Dousset">Jean-Phlippe Dousset</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>‘Sharing Experience for Adapted Development (SEAD)’ NGO, Phnom Penh, Cambodia</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Sok, Chanthy" sort="Sok, Chanthy" uniqKey="Sok C" first="Chanthy" last="Sok">Chanthy Sok</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>‘Sharing Experience for Adapted Development (SEAD)’ NGO, Phnom Penh, Cambodia</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Khim, Pisey" sort="Khim, Pisey" uniqKey="Khim P" first="Pisey" last="Khim">Pisey Khim</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>‘Sharing Experience for Adapted Development (SEAD)’ NGO, Phnom Penh, Cambodia</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Y, Sopheap" sort="Y, Sopheap" uniqKey="Y S" first="Sopheap" last="Y">Sopheap Y</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>‘Sharing Experience for Adapted Development (SEAD)’ NGO, Phnom Penh, Cambodia</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Sorum, Paul" sort="Sorum, Paul" uniqKey="Sorum P" first="Paul" last="Sorum">Paul Sorum</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Albany Medical College, Albany, New York, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Mullet, Etienne" sort="Mullet, Etienne" uniqKey="Mullet E" first="Etienne" last="Mullet">Etienne Mullet</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Institute of Advanced Studies (EPHE), Paris, France</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: etienne.mullet@wanadoo.fr</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:88D14C3417C001E298E7628D1FCE6EE7AF2754BE</idno><date when="2012" year="2012">2012</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1471-8847.2012.00323.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/88D14C3417C001E298E7628D1FCE6EE7AF2754BE/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000638</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000638</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">CAMBODIAN PATIENTS' AND HEALTH PROFESSIONALS' VIEWS REGARDING THE ALLOCATION OF ANTIRETROVIRAL DRUGS</title><author><name sortKey="Nann, Stephanie" sort="Nann, Stephanie" uniqKey="Nann S" first="Stephanie" last="Nann">Stephanie Nann</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Freelance Researcher</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Dousset, Jean Hlippe" sort="Dousset, Jean Hlippe" uniqKey="Dousset J" first="Jean-Phlippe" last="Dousset">Jean-Phlippe Dousset</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>‘Sharing Experience for Adapted Development (SEAD)’ NGO, Phnom Penh, Cambodia</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Sok, Chanthy" sort="Sok, Chanthy" uniqKey="Sok C" first="Chanthy" last="Sok">Chanthy Sok</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>‘Sharing Experience for Adapted Development (SEAD)’ NGO, Phnom Penh, Cambodia</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Khim, Pisey" sort="Khim, Pisey" uniqKey="Khim P" first="Pisey" last="Khim">Pisey Khim</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>‘Sharing Experience for Adapted Development (SEAD)’ NGO, Phnom Penh, Cambodia</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Y, Sopheap" sort="Y, Sopheap" uniqKey="Y S" first="Sopheap" last="Y">Sopheap Y</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>‘Sharing Experience for Adapted Development (SEAD)’ NGO, Phnom Penh, Cambodia</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Sorum, Paul" sort="Sorum, Paul" uniqKey="Sorum P" first="Paul" last="Sorum">Paul Sorum</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Albany Medical College, Albany, New York, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Mullet, Etienne" sort="Mullet, Etienne" uniqKey="Mullet E" first="Etienne" last="Mullet">Etienne Mullet</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Institute of Advanced Studies (EPHE), Paris, France</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: etienne.mullet@wanadoo.fr</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Developing World Bioethics</title><title level="j" type="alt">DEVELOPING WORLD BIOETHICS</title><idno type="ISSN">1471-8731</idno><idno type="eISSN">1471-8847</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">12</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="96">96</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="103">103</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">8</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2012-08">2012-08</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">1471-8731</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1471-8731</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Acceptability rating</term><term>Adult children</term><term>Aids care</term><term>Antiretroviral</term><term>Antiretroviral drugs</term><term>Antiretroviral therapy</term><term>Bedside rationing</term><term>Blackwell publishing</term><term>Cambodia</term><term>Cambodian</term><term>Cambodian patients</term><term>Clear impact</term><term>Clinical stage</term><term>Counsellor</term><term>Etienne mullet</term><term>Experimental phase</term><term>Familial point</term><term>Familiarization phase</term><term>Family conditions</term><term>Family physicians</term><term>Family responsibilities</term><term>Family situation</term><term>Family situations</term><term>Favoured</term><term>Financial infection time responsibilities</term><term>Furnham</term><term>Greatest impact</term><term>Health counsellor</term><term>Health counsellors</term><term>Health educators</term><term>Health professionals</term><term>Health professionals judge</term><term>Health status</term><term>Heart transplants</term><term>High priority</term><term>High probability</term><term>High sustainability</term><term>Higher incomes</term><term>Infection</term><term>Infection cluster</term><term>Kapiriri martin</term><term>Less priority</term><term>Medical dispensary</term><term>Medical ethics</term><term>Medical staff</term><term>Much impact</term><term>Mullet</term><term>Nancial</term><term>Nancial condition</term><term>Nancial situation</term><term>Older father</term><term>Other words</term><term>Participant</term><term>Paul sorum</term><term>Penh</term><term>Phnom</term><term>Phnom penh</term><term>Pisey khim</term><term>Poor countries</term><term>Potential recipients</term><term>Present study</term><term>Priority judgments</term><term>Priority ratings</term><term>Rationing antiretroviral therapy</term><term>Response scale</term><term>Responsibilities infection responsibilities time responsibilities</term><term>Right panel</term><term>Rosen</term><term>Second cluster</term><term>Second hypothesis</term><term>Seropositive persons</term><term>Severe level</term><term>Small children</term><term>Social situation</term><term>Stephanie nann</term><term>Support centre</term><term>Time factor</term><term>Time infection time</term><term>World bioeth</term><term>World health organization</term><term>Young children</term><term>Young father</term><term>Young mother</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Acceptability rating</term><term>Adult children</term><term>Aids care</term><term>Antiretroviral</term><term>Antiretroviral drugs</term><term>Antiretroviral therapy</term><term>Bedside rationing</term><term>Blackwell publishing</term><term>Cambodia</term><term>Cambodian</term><term>Cambodian patients</term><term>Clear impact</term><term>Clinical stage</term><term>Counsellor</term><term>Etienne mullet</term><term>Experimental phase</term><term>Familial point</term><term>Familiarization phase</term><term>Family conditions</term><term>Family physicians</term><term>Family responsibilities</term><term>Family situation</term><term>Family situations</term><term>Favoured</term><term>Financial infection time responsibilities</term><term>Furnham</term><term>Greatest impact</term><term>Health counsellor</term><term>Health counsellors</term><term>Health educators</term><term>Health professionals</term><term>Health professionals judge</term><term>Health status</term><term>Heart transplants</term><term>High priority</term><term>High probability</term><term>High sustainability</term><term>Higher incomes</term><term>Infection</term><term>Infection cluster</term><term>Kapiriri martin</term><term>Less priority</term><term>Medical dispensary</term><term>Medical ethics</term><term>Medical staff</term><term>Much impact</term><term>Mullet</term><term>Nancial</term><term>Nancial condition</term><term>Nancial situation</term><term>Older father</term><term>Other words</term><term>Participant</term><term>Paul sorum</term><term>Penh</term><term>Phnom</term><term>Phnom penh</term><term>Pisey khim</term><term>Poor countries</term><term>Potential recipients</term><term>Present study</term><term>Priority judgments</term><term>Priority ratings</term><term>Rationing antiretroviral therapy</term><term>Response scale</term><term>Responsibilities infection responsibilities time responsibilities</term><term>Right panel</term><term>Rosen</term><term>Second cluster</term><term>Second hypothesis</term><term>Seropositive persons</term><term>Severe level</term><term>Small children</term><term>Social situation</term><term>Stephanie nann</term><term>Support centre</term><term>Time factor</term><term>Time infection time</term><term>World bioeth</term><term>World health organization</term><term>Young children</term><term>Young father</term><term>Young mother</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The way Cambodian patients and health professionals judge the priority of HIV‐infected patients in relation to the allocation of antiretroviral drugs was examined. Participants were either HIV‐infected patients attending the HIV/AIDS Care and Support Centre for People Living with HIV/AIDS in Phnom Penh (29 females and 21 males) or members of the staff (9 physicians, 6 pharmacists and 15 health counsellors and health educators). They were presented with stories of a few lines depicting a patient's situation and were instructed to judge the extent to which the patient should be given priority for HIV drugs. The stories were composed according to a four within‐subject factor design: (a) the patient's family responsibilities, (b) the severity of infection, (c) the time elapsed since the first consultation, and (d) the financial difficulties of the family. Most patients expressed the view that the drugs should be used for the patients who are most important from a familial point of view, namely, when the family contains small children and/or is already in a precarious financial condition.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>antiretroviral</json:string><json:string>priority ratings</json:string><json:string>furnham</json:string><json:string>nancial</json:string><json:string>penh</json:string><json:string>phnom</json:string><json:string>mullet</json:string><json:string>phnom penh</json:string><json:string>health professionals</json:string><json:string>blackwell publishing</json:string><json:string>antiretroviral drugs</json:string><json:string>older father</json:string><json:string>favoured</json:string><json:string>young children</json:string><json:string>counsellor</json:string><json:string>cambodian</json:string><json:string>young mother</json:string><json:string>young father</json:string><json:string>adult children</json:string><json:string>antiretroviral therapy</json:string><json:string>nancial situation</json:string><json:string>high priority</json:string><json:string>potential recipients</json:string><json:string>much impact</json:string><json:string>present study</json:string><json:string>familiarization phase</json:string><json:string>stephanie nann</json:string><json:string>social situation</json:string><json:string>right panel</json:string><json:string>cambodia</json:string><json:string>responsibilities infection responsibilities time responsibilities</json:string><json:string>higher incomes</json:string><json:string>world bioeth</json:string><json:string>clinical stage</json:string><json:string>support centre</json:string><json:string>family situation</json:string><json:string>response scale</json:string><json:string>priority judgments</json:string><json:string>health counsellor</json:string><json:string>family situations</json:string><json:string>family responsibilities</json:string><json:string>second cluster</json:string><json:string>financial infection time responsibilities</json:string><json:string>time infection time</json:string><json:string>cambodian patients</json:string><json:string>participant</json:string><json:string>infection</json:string><json:string>nancial condition</json:string><json:string>second hypothesis</json:string><json:string>world health organization</json:string><json:string>seropositive persons</json:string><json:string>other words</json:string><json:string>etienne mullet</json:string><json:string>aids care</json:string><json:string>health counsellors</json:string><json:string>severe level</json:string><json:string>medical staff</json:string><json:string>family physicians</json:string><json:string>health educators</json:string><json:string>experimental phase</json:string><json:string>pisey khim</json:string><json:string>greatest impact</json:string><json:string>family conditions</json:string><json:string>rationing antiretroviral therapy</json:string><json:string>high sustainability</json:string><json:string>acceptability rating</json:string><json:string>paul sorum</json:string><json:string>heart transplants</json:string><json:string>health professionals judge</json:string><json:string>less priority</json:string><json:string>clear impact</json:string><json:string>time factor</json:string><json:string>infection cluster</json:string><json:string>poor countries</json:string><json:string>familial point</json:string><json:string>bedside rationing</json:string><json:string>small children</json:string><json:string>high probability</json:string><json:string>kapiriri martin</json:string><json:string>medical ethics</json:string><json:string>medical dispensary</json:string><json:string>health status</json:string><json:string>rosen</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>STEPHANIE NANN</name><affiliations><json:string>Freelance Researcher</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>JEAN‐PHLIPPE DOUSSET</name><affiliations><json:string>‘Sharing Experience for Adapted Development (SEAD)’ NGO, Phnom Penh, Cambodia</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>CHANTHY SOK</name><affiliations><json:string>‘Sharing Experience for Adapted Development (SEAD)’ NGO, Phnom Penh, Cambodia</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>PISEY KHIM</name><affiliations><json:string>‘Sharing Experience for Adapted Development (SEAD)’ NGO, Phnom Penh, Cambodia</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>SOPHEAP Y</name><affiliations><json:string>‘Sharing Experience for Adapted Development (SEAD)’ NGO, Phnom Penh, Cambodia</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>PAUL SORUM</name><affiliations><json:string>Albany Medical College, Albany, New York, USA</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>ETIENNE MULLET</name><affiliations><json:string>Institute of Advanced Studies (EPHE), Paris, France</json:string><json:string>E-mail: etienne.mullet@wanadoo.fr</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Cambodia</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>antiretroviral therapy</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>developing world bioethics</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>empirical ethics</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>rationing treatment</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>DEWB323</json:string></articleId><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>The way Cambodian patients and health professionals judge the priority of HIV‐infected patients in relation to the allocation of antiretroviral drugs was examined. Participants were either HIV‐infected patients attending the HIV/AIDS Care and Support Centre for People Living with HIV/AIDS in Phnom Penh (29 females and 21 males) or members of the staff (9 physicians, 6 pharmacists and 15 health counsellors and health educators). They were presented with stories of a few lines depicting a patient's situation and were instructed to judge the extent to which the patient should be given priority for HIV drugs. The stories were composed according to a four within‐subject factor design: (a) the patient's family responsibilities, (b) the severity of infection, (c) the time elapsed since the first consultation, and (d) the financial difficulties of the family. Most patients expressed the view that the drugs should be used for the patients who are most important from a familial point of view, namely, when the family contains small children and/or is already in a precarious financial condition.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>6.927</score><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageSize>595.276 x 799.37 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>false</refBibsNative><abstractCharCount>1100</abstractCharCount><pdfWordCount>4875</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>30441</pdfCharCount><pdfPageCount>8</pdfPageCount><abstractWordCount>171</abstractWordCount></qualityIndicators><title>CAMBODIAN PATIENTS' AND HEALTH PROFESSIONALS' VIEWS REGARDING THE ALLOCATION OF ANTIRETROVIRAL DRUGS</title><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Developing World Bioethics</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1471-8847</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>1471-8731</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1471-8847</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>DEWB</json:string></publisherId><volume>12</volume><issue>2</issue><pages><first>96</first><last>103</last><total>8</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><categories><wos><json:string>social science</json:string><json:string>ethics</json:string><json:string>science</json:string><json:string>medical ethics</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>arts & humanities</json:string><json:string>philosophy & theology</json:string><json:string>applied ethics</json:string></scienceMetrix><inist><json:string>sciences appliquees, technologies et medecines</json:string><json:string>sciences biologiques et medicales</json:string><json:string>sciences medicales</json:string></inist></categories><publicationDate>2012</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2012</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1471-8847.2012.00323.x</json:string></doi><id>88D14C3417C001E298E7628D1FCE6EE7AF2754BE</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/88D14C3417C001E298E7628D1FCE6EE7AF2754BE/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/88D14C3417C001E298E7628D1FCE6EE7AF2754BE/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/88D14C3417C001E298E7628D1FCE6EE7AF2754BE/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">CAMBODIAN PATIENTS' AND HEALTH PROFESSIONALS' VIEWS REGARDING THE ALLOCATION OF ANTIRETROVIRAL DRUGS</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><availability><licence>© 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.</licence></availability><date type="published" when="2012-08"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">CAMBODIAN PATIENTS' AND HEALTH PROFESSIONALS' VIEWS REGARDING THE ALLOCATION OF ANTIRETROVIRAL DRUGS</title><title level="a" type="short">Allocation of Antiretroviral Drugs</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">STEPHANIE</forename><surname>NANN</surname></persName><affiliation>Freelance Researcher</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">JEAN‐PHLIPPE</forename><surname>DOUSSET</surname></persName><affiliation>‘Sharing Experience for Adapted Development (SEAD)’ NGO, Phnom Penh, Cambodia<address><country key="KH"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">CHANTHY</forename><surname>SOK</surname></persName><affiliation>‘Sharing Experience for Adapted Development (SEAD)’ NGO, Phnom Penh, Cambodia<address><country key="KH"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0003"><persName><forename type="first">PISEY</forename><surname>KHIM</surname></persName><affiliation>‘Sharing Experience for Adapted Development (SEAD)’ NGO, Phnom Penh, Cambodia<address><country key="KH"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0004"><persName><forename type="first">SOPHEAP</forename><surname>Y</surname></persName><affiliation>‘Sharing Experience for Adapted Development (SEAD)’ NGO, Phnom Penh, Cambodia<address><country key="KH"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0005"><persName><forename type="first">PAUL</forename><surname>SORUM</surname></persName><affiliation>Albany Medical College, Albany, New York, USA<address><country key="US"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0006" role="corresp"><persName><forename type="first">ETIENNE</forename><surname>MULLET</surname></persName><affiliation>Institute of Advanced Studies (EPHE), Paris, France<address><country key="FR"></country></address></affiliation><affiliation>Etienne Mullet, Institute of Advanced Studies (EPHE) – Ethics and Work, Quefes 17 bis, F‐31830 Plaisance, France. Email: etienne.mullet@wanadoo.fr.</affiliation></author><idno type="istex">88D14C3417C001E298E7628D1FCE6EE7AF2754BE</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1471-8847.2012.00323.x</idno><idno type="unit">DEWB323</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:DEWB.DEWB323.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Developing World Bioethics</title><title level="j" type="alt">DEVELOPING WORLD BIOETHICS</title><idno type="pISSN">1471-8731</idno><idno type="eISSN">1471-8847</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1471-8847</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/dewb.2012.12.issue-2</idno><idno type="product">DEWB</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">12</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="96">96</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="103">103</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">8</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2012-08"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><head>ABSTRACT</head><p>The way Cambodian patients and health professionals judge the priority of HIV‐infected patients in relation to the allocation of antiretroviral drugs was examined. Participants were either HIV‐infected patients attending the HIV/AIDS Care and Support Centre for People Living with HIV/AIDS in Phnom Penh (29 females and 21 males) or members of the staff (9 physicians, 6 pharmacists and 15 health counsellors and health educators). They were presented with stories of a few lines depicting a patient's situation and were instructed to judge the extent to which the patient should be given priority for HIV drugs. The stories were composed according to a four within‐subject factor design: (a) the patient's family responsibilities, (b) the severity of infection, (c) the time elapsed since the first consultation, and (d) the financial difficulties of the family. Most patients expressed the view that the drugs should be used for the patients who are most important from a familial point of view, namely, when the family contains small children and/or is already in a precarious financial condition.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">Cambodia</term><term xml:id="k2">antiretroviral therapy</term><term xml:id="k3">developing world bioethics</term><term xml:id="k4">empirical ethics</term><term xml:id="k5">rationing treatment</term></keywords><classCode scheme="tocHeading1">ARTICLES</classCode></textClass><langUsage><language ident="EN"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/88D14C3417C001E298E7628D1FCE6EE7AF2754BE/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1471-8847</doi><issn type="print">1471-8731</issn><issn type="electronic">1471-8847</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="DEWB"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="DEVELOPING WORLD BIOETHICS">Developing World Bioethics</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="08102"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/dewb.2012.12.issue-2</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="12">12</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="2">2</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2012-08">August 2012</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="6" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1471-8847.2012.00323.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="DEWB323"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="8"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">ARTICLES</title></titleGroup><copyright>© 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.</copyright><eventGroup><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:3.1.5.1 mode:FullText" date="2012-07-09"></event><event type="publishedOnlineEarlyUnpaginated" date="2012-04-20"></event><event type="firstOnline" date="2012-04-20"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2012-07-09"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-17"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.3.4 mode:FullText" date="2015-02-25"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="96">96</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="103">103</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>Etienne Mullet, Institute of Advanced Studies (EPHE) – Ethics and Work, Quefes 17 bis, F‐31830 Plaisance, France. Email: <email>etienne.mullet@wanadoo.fr</email>.</correspondenceTo><objectNameGroup><objectName elementName="appendix">Appendix</objectName></objectNameGroup><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:DEWB.DEWB323.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="1"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="2"></count><count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="0"></count><count type="wordTotal" number="5166"></count><count type="linksPubMed" number="0"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="0"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">CAMBODIAN PATIENTS' AND HEALTH PROFESSIONALS' VIEWS REGARDING THE ALLOCATION OF ANTIRETROVIRAL DRUGS</title><title type="shortAuthors">Stephanie Nann et al.</title><title type="short">Allocation of Antiretroviral Drugs</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>STEPHANIE</givenNames><familyName>NANN</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>JEAN‐PHLIPPE</givenNames><familyName>DOUSSET</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>CHANTHY</givenNames><familyName>SOK</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr4" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>PISEY</givenNames><familyName>KHIM</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr5" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>SOPHEAP</givenNames><familyName>Y</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr6" affiliationRef="#a3"><personName><givenNames>PAUL</givenNames><familyName>SORUM</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr7" affiliationRef="#a4" corresponding="yes"><personName><givenNames>ETIENNE</givenNames><familyName>MULLET</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1"><unparsedAffiliation>Freelance Researcher</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2" countryCode="KH"><unparsedAffiliation>‘Sharing Experience for Adapted Development (SEAD)’ NGO, Phnom Penh, Cambodia</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a3" countryCode="US"><unparsedAffiliation>Albany Medical College, Albany, New York, USA</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a4" countryCode="FR"><unparsedAffiliation>Institute of Advanced Studies (EPHE), Paris, France</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">Cambodia</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">antiretroviral therapy</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">developing world bioethics</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">empirical ethics</keyword><keyword xml:id="k5">rationing treatment</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><title type="main">ABSTRACT</title><p>The way Cambodian patients and health professionals judge the priority of HIV‐infected patients in relation to the allocation of antiretroviral drugs was examined. Participants were either HIV‐infected patients attending the HIV/AIDS Care and Support Centre for People Living with HIV/AIDS in Phnom Penh (29 females and 21 males) or members of the staff (9 physicians, 6 pharmacists and 15 health counsellors and health educators). They were presented with stories of a few lines depicting a patient's situation and were instructed to judge the extent to which the patient should be given priority for HIV drugs. The stories were composed according to a four within‐subject factor design: (a) the patient's family responsibilities, (b) the severity of infection, (c) the time elapsed since the first consultation, and (d) the financial difficulties of the family. Most patients expressed the view that the drugs should be used for the patients who are most important from a familial point of view, namely, when the family contains small children and/or is already in a precarious financial condition.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta><noteGroup><note xml:id="fn43"><p>Conflict of interest statement: No conflicts declared</p></note></noteGroup></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>CAMBODIAN PATIENTS' AND HEALTH PROFESSIONALS' VIEWS REGARDING THE ALLOCATION OF ANTIRETROVIRAL DRUGS</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Allocation of Antiretroviral Drugs</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>CAMBODIAN PATIENTS' AND HEALTH PROFESSIONALS' VIEWS REGARDING THE ALLOCATION OF ANTIRETROVIRAL DRUGS</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">STEPHANIE</namePart><namePart type="family">NANN</namePart><affiliation>Freelance Researcher</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">JEAN‐PHLIPPE</namePart><namePart type="family">DOUSSET</namePart><affiliation>‘Sharing Experience for Adapted Development (SEAD)’ NGO, Phnom Penh, Cambodia</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">CHANTHY</namePart><namePart type="family">SOK</namePart><affiliation>‘Sharing Experience for Adapted Development (SEAD)’ NGO, Phnom Penh, Cambodia</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">PISEY</namePart><namePart type="family">KHIM</namePart><affiliation>‘Sharing Experience for Adapted Development (SEAD)’ NGO, Phnom Penh, Cambodia</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">SOPHEAP</namePart><namePart type="family">Y</namePart><affiliation>‘Sharing Experience for Adapted Development (SEAD)’ NGO, Phnom Penh, Cambodia</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">PAUL</namePart><namePart type="family">SORUM</namePart><affiliation>Albany Medical College, Albany, New York, USA</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">ETIENNE</namePart><namePart type="family">MULLET</namePart><affiliation>Institute of Advanced Studies (EPHE), Paris, France</affiliation><affiliation>E-mail: etienne.mullet@wanadoo.fr</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article"></genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2012-08</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2012</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType><extent unit="figures">1</extent><extent unit="tables">2</extent><extent unit="words">5166</extent></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">The way Cambodian patients and health professionals judge the priority of HIV‐infected patients in relation to the allocation of antiretroviral drugs was examined. Participants were either HIV‐infected patients attending the HIV/AIDS Care and Support Centre for People Living with HIV/AIDS in Phnom Penh (29 females and 21 males) or members of the staff (9 physicians, 6 pharmacists and 15 health counsellors and health educators). They were presented with stories of a few lines depicting a patient's situation and were instructed to judge the extent to which the patient should be given priority for HIV drugs. The stories were composed according to a four within‐subject factor design: (a) the patient's family responsibilities, (b) the severity of infection, (c) the time elapsed since the first consultation, and (d) the financial difficulties of the family. Most patients expressed the view that the drugs should be used for the patients who are most important from a familial point of view, namely, when the family contains small children and/or is already in a precarious financial condition.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>Cambodia</topic><topic>antiretroviral therapy</topic><topic>developing world bioethics</topic><topic>empirical ethics</topic><topic>rationing treatment</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Developing World Bioethics</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">1471-8731</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1471-8847</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1471-8847</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">DEWB</identifier><part><date>2012</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>12</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>2</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>96</start><end>103</end><total>8</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">88D14C3417C001E298E7628D1FCE6EE7AF2754BE</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1471-8847.2012.00323.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">DEWB323</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">© 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource>WILEY</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Sante/explor/SidaGhanaV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000638 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000638 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Sante
|area= SidaGhanaV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:88D14C3417C001E298E7628D1FCE6EE7AF2754BE
|texte= CAMBODIAN PATIENTS' AND HEALTH PROFESSIONALS' VIEWS REGARDING THE ALLOCATION OF ANTIRETROVIRAL DRUGS
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.31. |  |