Evaluating signal-to-noise ratios, loudness, and related measures as indicators of airborne sound insulation.
Identifieur interne : 001640 ( Main/Curation ); précédent : 001639; suivant : 001641Evaluating signal-to-noise ratios, loudness, and related measures as indicators of airborne sound insulation.
Auteurs : H K Park [Corée du Sud] ; J S BradleySource :
- The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America [ 1520-8524 ] ; 2009.
Descripteurs français
- KwdFr :
- MESH :
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
Abstract
Subjective ratings of the audibility, annoyance, and loudness of music and speech sounds transmitted through 20 different simulated walls were used to identify better single number ratings of airborne sound insulation. The first part of this research considered standard measures such as the sound transmission class the weighted sound reduction index (R(w)) and variations of these measures [H. K. Park and J. S. Bradley, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 126, 208-219 (2009)]. This paper considers a number of other measures including signal-to-noise ratios related to the intelligibility of speech and measures related to the loudness of sounds. An exploration of the importance of the included frequencies showed that the optimum ranges of included frequencies were different for speech and music sounds. Measures related to speech intelligibility were useful indicators of responses to speech sounds but were not as successful for music sounds. A-weighted level differences, signal-to-noise ratios and an A-weighted sound transmission loss measure were good predictors of responses when the included frequencies were optimized for each type of sound. The addition of new spectrum adaptation terms to R(w) values were found to be the most practical approach for achieving more accurate predictions of subjective ratings of transmitted speech and music sounds.
DOI: 10.1121/1.3192347
PubMed: 19739735
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Main, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :001640
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:19739735Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Evaluating signal-to-noise ratios, loudness, and related measures as indicators of airborne sound insulation.</title>
<author><name sortKey="Park, H K" sort="Park, H K" uniqKey="Park H" first="H K" last="Park">H K Park</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Chonnam National University, Gwangju 500-757, Korea. [corrected]</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Corée du Sud</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Chonnam National University, Gwangju 500-757</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Bradley, J S" sort="Bradley, J S" uniqKey="Bradley J" first="J S" last="Bradley">J S Bradley</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno>
<date when="2009">2009</date>
<idno type="RBID">pubmed:19739735</idno>
<idno type="pmid">19739735</idno>
<idno type="doi">10.1121/1.3192347</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">001640</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">001640</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">001640</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Curation">001640</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Evaluating signal-to-noise ratios, loudness, and related measures as indicators of airborne sound insulation.</title>
<author><name sortKey="Park, H K" sort="Park, H K" uniqKey="Park H" first="H K" last="Park">H K Park</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Chonnam National University, Gwangju 500-757, Korea. [corrected]</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Corée du Sud</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Chonnam National University, Gwangju 500-757</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Bradley, J S" sort="Bradley, J S" uniqKey="Bradley J" first="J S" last="Bradley">J S Bradley</name>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j">The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</title>
<idno type="eISSN">1520-8524</idno>
<imprint><date when="2009" type="published">2009</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Acoustic Stimulation (MeSH)</term>
<term>Auditory Perception (MeSH)</term>
<term>Emotions (MeSH)</term>
<term>Humans (MeSH)</term>
<term>Loudness Perception (MeSH)</term>
<term>Music (MeSH)</term>
<term>Noise (MeSH)</term>
<term>Psychoacoustics (MeSH)</term>
<term>Regression Analysis (MeSH)</term>
<term>Speech (MeSH)</term>
<term>Speech Perception (MeSH)</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>Analyse de régression (MeSH)</term>
<term>Bruit (MeSH)</term>
<term>Humains (MeSH)</term>
<term>Musique (MeSH)</term>
<term>Parole (MeSH)</term>
<term>Perception auditive (MeSH)</term>
<term>Perception de la parole (MeSH)</term>
<term>Perception sonore (MeSH)</term>
<term>Psychoacoustique (MeSH)</term>
<term>Stimulation acoustique (MeSH)</term>
<term>Émotions (MeSH)</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Acoustic Stimulation</term>
<term>Auditory Perception</term>
<term>Emotions</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Loudness Perception</term>
<term>Music</term>
<term>Noise</term>
<term>Psychoacoustics</term>
<term>Regression Analysis</term>
<term>Speech</term>
<term>Speech Perception</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr"><term>Analyse de régression</term>
<term>Bruit</term>
<term>Humains</term>
<term>Musique</term>
<term>Parole</term>
<term>Perception auditive</term>
<term>Perception de la parole</term>
<term>Perception sonore</term>
<term>Psychoacoustique</term>
<term>Stimulation acoustique</term>
<term>Émotions</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Subjective ratings of the audibility, annoyance, and loudness of music and speech sounds transmitted through 20 different simulated walls were used to identify better single number ratings of airborne sound insulation. The first part of this research considered standard measures such as the sound transmission class the weighted sound reduction index (R(w)) and variations of these measures [H. K. Park and J. S. Bradley, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 126, 208-219 (2009)]. This paper considers a number of other measures including signal-to-noise ratios related to the intelligibility of speech and measures related to the loudness of sounds. An exploration of the importance of the included frequencies showed that the optimum ranges of included frequencies were different for speech and music sounds. Measures related to speech intelligibility were useful indicators of responses to speech sounds but were not as successful for music sounds. A-weighted level differences, signal-to-noise ratios and an A-weighted sound transmission loss measure were good predictors of responses when the included frequencies were optimized for each type of sound. The addition of new spectrum adaptation terms to R(w) values were found to be the most practical approach for achieving more accurate predictions of subjective ratings of transmitted speech and music sounds.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">19739735</PMID>
<DateCompleted><Year>2009</Year>
<Month>12</Month>
<Day>07</Day>
</DateCompleted>
<DateRevised><Year>2010</Year>
<Month>04</Month>
<Day>28</Day>
</DateRevised>
<Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1520-8524</ISSN>
<JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>126</Volume>
<Issue>3</Issue>
<PubDate><Year>2009</Year>
<Month>Sep</Month>
</PubDate>
</JournalIssue>
<Title>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</Title>
<ISOAbbreviation>J Acoust Soc Am</ISOAbbreviation>
</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Evaluating signal-to-noise ratios, loudness, and related measures as indicators of airborne sound insulation.</ArticleTitle>
<Pagination><MedlinePgn>1219-30</MedlinePgn>
</Pagination>
<ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1121/1.3192347</ELocationID>
<Abstract><AbstractText>Subjective ratings of the audibility, annoyance, and loudness of music and speech sounds transmitted through 20 different simulated walls were used to identify better single number ratings of airborne sound insulation. The first part of this research considered standard measures such as the sound transmission class the weighted sound reduction index (R(w)) and variations of these measures [H. K. Park and J. S. Bradley, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 126, 208-219 (2009)]. This paper considers a number of other measures including signal-to-noise ratios related to the intelligibility of speech and measures related to the loudness of sounds. An exploration of the importance of the included frequencies showed that the optimum ranges of included frequencies were different for speech and music sounds. Measures related to speech intelligibility were useful indicators of responses to speech sounds but were not as successful for music sounds. A-weighted level differences, signal-to-noise ratios and an A-weighted sound transmission loss measure were good predictors of responses when the included frequencies were optimized for each type of sound. The addition of new spectrum adaptation terms to R(w) values were found to be the most practical approach for achieving more accurate predictions of subjective ratings of transmitted speech and music sounds.</AbstractText>
</Abstract>
<AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Park</LastName>
<ForeName>H K</ForeName>
<Initials>HK</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Chonnam National University, Gwangju 500-757, Korea. [corrected]</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Bradley</LastName>
<ForeName>J S</ForeName>
<Initials>JS</Initials>
</Author>
</AuthorList>
<Language>eng</Language>
<PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType>
<PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType>
</PublicationTypeList>
</Article>
<MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country>
<MedlineTA>J Acoust Soc Am</MedlineTA>
<NlmUniqueID>7503051</NlmUniqueID>
<ISSNLinking>0001-4966</ISSNLinking>
</MedlineJournalInfo>
<CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset>
<CommentsCorrectionsList><CommentsCorrections RefType="ErratumIn"><RefSource>J Acoust Soc Am. 2010 Feb;127(2):1165</RefSource>
</CommentsCorrections>
</CommentsCorrectionsList>
<MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000161" MajorTopicYN="N">Acoustic Stimulation</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D001307" MajorTopicYN="Y">Auditory Perception</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D004644" MajorTopicYN="N">Emotions</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008144" MajorTopicYN="Y">Loudness Perception</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D009146" MajorTopicYN="Y">Music</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D009622" MajorTopicYN="Y">Noise</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011571" MajorTopicYN="N">Psychoacoustics</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D012044" MajorTopicYN="N">Regression Analysis</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D013060" MajorTopicYN="Y">Speech</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D013067" MajorTopicYN="N">Speech Perception</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
</MeshHeadingList>
</MedlineCitation>
<PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2009</Year>
<Month>9</Month>
<Day>11</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2009</Year>
<Month>9</Month>
<Day>11</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2009</Year>
<Month>12</Month>
<Day>16</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
</History>
<PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19739735</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1121/1.3192347</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</PubmedData>
</pubmed>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Sante/explor/SanteMusiqueV1/Data/Main/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001640 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 001640 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Sante |area= SanteMusiqueV1 |flux= Main |étape= Curation |type= RBID |clé= pubmed:19739735 |texte= Evaluating signal-to-noise ratios, loudness, and related measures as indicators of airborne sound insulation. }}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Curation/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:19739735" \ | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Curation/biblio.hfd \ | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a SanteMusiqueV1
This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.38. |