PosturoV1, Main, Corpus, bibRecord, 000523

Reliability and Validity of the Computerized Dynamic Posturography Sensory Organization Test in People with Multiple Sclerosis.

Identifieur interne : 000523 ( Main/Corpus ); précédent : 000522; suivant : 000524

Reliability and Validity of the Computerized Dynamic Posturography Sensory Organization Test in People with Multiple Sclerosis.

Auteurs : Jeffrey R. Hebert ; Mark M. Manago

Source :

International journal of MS care [ 1537-2073 ]

RBID : pubmed:28603464

Abstract

BACKGROUND

People with multiple sclerosis (MS) frequently have impaired postural control (balance). Psychometric properties of clinical tests of balance for individuals with MS, including the computerized dynamic posturography sensory organization test (CDP-SOT), are poorly understood. This study aimed to determine the reliability and discriminant validity of the CDP-SOT in people with MS.

METHODS

The CDP-SOT was performed on 30 participants with MS. A 2-week-interval, repeated-measures (sessions 1 and 2) design was implemented to investigate test-retest reliability of the CDP-SOT and the ability of the CDP-SOT to discriminate between participants with lower versus higher disability. Self-reported disability level was based on Patient-Determined Disease Steps (PDDS) scale scores: lower (PDDS scale score, 0-3; n = 17) and higher (PDDS scale score, 4-6; n = 13).

RESULTS

All six conditions of the CDP-SOT had good-to-excellent reliability (interclass correlation coefficients, 0.70-0.90) and excellent reliability for composite scores (0.90). Composite scores were significantly greater in the lower-disability group versus the higher-disability group at session 1 (70.89 vs. 48.60, P = .001) and session 2 (74.82 vs. 48.85, P = .002).

CONCLUSIONS

The CDP-SOT is a reliable measure of balance and accurately differentiates disability status in people with MS. Collectively, the results support clinical application of the CDP-SOT as a reliable and valid measure of disease-related progression of impaired balance related to sensory integration and its utility in determining changes in balance in response to treatment.

DOI: 10.7224/1537-2073.2016-027
PubMed: 28603464
PubMed Central: PMC5460869

Links to Exploration step

pubmed:28603464

Le document en format XML

<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Reliability and Validity of the Computerized Dynamic Posturography Sensory Organization Test in People with Multiple Sclerosis.</title>
<author><name sortKey="Hebert, Jeffrey R" sort="Hebert, Jeffrey R" uniqKey="Hebert J" first="Jeffrey R" last="Hebert">Jeffrey R. Hebert</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Manago, Mark M" sort="Manago, Mark M" uniqKey="Manago M" first="Mark M" last="Manago">Mark M. Manago</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno>
<date when="2017">2017 May-Jun</date>
<idno type="RBID">pubmed:28603464</idno>
<idno type="pmid">28603464</idno>
<idno type="doi">10.7224/1537-2073.2016-027</idno>
<idno type="pmc">PMC5460869</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">000523</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000523</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Reliability and Validity of the Computerized Dynamic Posturography Sensory Organization Test in People with Multiple Sclerosis.</title>
<author><name sortKey="Hebert, Jeffrey R" sort="Hebert, Jeffrey R" uniqKey="Hebert J" first="Jeffrey R" last="Hebert">Jeffrey R. Hebert</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Manago, Mark M" sort="Manago, Mark M" uniqKey="Manago M" first="Mark M" last="Manago">Mark M. Manago</name>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j">International journal of MS care</title>
<idno type="ISSN">1537-2073</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass></textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>BACKGROUND</b>
</p>
<p>People with multiple sclerosis (MS) frequently have impaired postural control (balance). Psychometric properties of clinical tests of balance for individuals with MS, including the computerized dynamic posturography sensory organization test (CDP-SOT), are poorly understood. This study aimed to determine the reliability and discriminant validity of the CDP-SOT in people with MS.</p>
</div>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>METHODS</b>
</p>
<p>The CDP-SOT was performed on 30 participants with MS. A 2-week-interval, repeated-measures (sessions 1 and 2) design was implemented to investigate test-retest reliability of the CDP-SOT and the ability of the CDP-SOT to discriminate between participants with lower versus higher disability. Self-reported disability level was based on Patient-Determined Disease Steps (PDDS) scale scores: lower (PDDS scale score, 0-3; n = 17) and higher (PDDS scale score, 4-6; n = 13).</p>
</div>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>RESULTS</b>
</p>
<p>All six conditions of the CDP-SOT had good-to-excellent reliability (interclass correlation coefficients, 0.70-0.90) and excellent reliability for composite scores (0.90). Composite scores were significantly greater in the lower-disability group versus the higher-disability group at session 1 (70.89 vs. 48.60, P = .001) and session 2 (74.82 vs. 48.85, P = .002).</p>
</div>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>
</p>
<p>The CDP-SOT is a reliable measure of balance and accurately differentiates disability status in people with MS. Collectively, the results support clinical application of the CDP-SOT as a reliable and valid measure of disease-related progression of impaired balance related to sensory integration and its utility in determining changes in balance in response to treatment.</p>
</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="PubMed-not-MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">28603464</PMID>
<DateRevised><Year>2020</Year>
<Month>10</Month>
<Day>01</Day>
</DateRevised>
<Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">1537-2073</ISSN>
<JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>19</Volume>
<Issue>3</Issue>
<PubDate><MedlineDate>2017 May-Jun</MedlineDate>
</PubDate>
</JournalIssue>
<Title>International journal of MS care</Title>
<ISOAbbreviation>Int J MS Care</ISOAbbreviation>
</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Reliability and Validity of the Computerized Dynamic Posturography Sensory Organization Test in People with Multiple Sclerosis.</ArticleTitle>
<Pagination><MedlinePgn>151-157</MedlinePgn>
</Pagination>
<ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.7224/1537-2073.2016-027</ELocationID>
<Abstract><AbstractText Label="BACKGROUND" NlmCategory="BACKGROUND">People with multiple sclerosis (MS) frequently have impaired postural control (balance). Psychometric properties of clinical tests of balance for individuals with MS, including the computerized dynamic posturography sensory organization test (CDP-SOT), are poorly understood. This study aimed to determine the reliability and discriminant validity of the CDP-SOT in people with MS.</AbstractText>
<AbstractText Label="METHODS" NlmCategory="METHODS">The CDP-SOT was performed on 30 participants with MS. A 2-week-interval, repeated-measures (sessions 1 and 2) design was implemented to investigate test-retest reliability of the CDP-SOT and the ability of the CDP-SOT to discriminate between participants with lower versus higher disability. Self-reported disability level was based on Patient-Determined Disease Steps (PDDS) scale scores: lower (PDDS scale score, 0-3; n = 17) and higher (PDDS scale score, 4-6; n = 13).</AbstractText>
<AbstractText Label="RESULTS" NlmCategory="RESULTS">All six conditions of the CDP-SOT had good-to-excellent reliability (interclass correlation coefficients, 0.70-0.90) and excellent reliability for composite scores (0.90). Composite scores were significantly greater in the lower-disability group versus the higher-disability group at session 1 (70.89 vs. 48.60, P = .001) and session 2 (74.82 vs. 48.85, P = .002).</AbstractText>
<AbstractText Label="CONCLUSIONS" NlmCategory="CONCLUSIONS">The CDP-SOT is a reliable measure of balance and accurately differentiates disability status in people with MS. Collectively, the results support clinical application of the CDP-SOT as a reliable and valid measure of disease-related progression of impaired balance related to sensory integration and its utility in determining changes in balance in response to treatment.</AbstractText>
</Abstract>
<AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Hebert</LastName>
<ForeName>Jeffrey R</ForeName>
<Initials>JR</Initials>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Manago</LastName>
<ForeName>Mark M</ForeName>
<Initials>MM</Initials>
</Author>
</AuthorList>
<Language>eng</Language>
<PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType>
</PublicationTypeList>
</Article>
<MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country>
<MedlineTA>Int J MS Care</MedlineTA>
<NlmUniqueID>101132980</NlmUniqueID>
<ISSNLinking>1537-2073</ISSNLinking>
</MedlineJournalInfo>
<CoiStatement>Financial Disclosures: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.</CoiStatement>
</MedlineCitation>
<PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2017</Year>
<Month>6</Month>
<Day>13</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2017</Year>
<Month>6</Month>
<Day>13</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2017</Year>
<Month>6</Month>
<Day>13</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>1</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
</History>
<PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">28603464</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="doi">10.7224/1537-2073.2016-027</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC5460869</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
<ReferenceList><Reference><Citation>J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2009 Jun;19(3):380-90</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18023594</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1995 Jan;104(1):62-8</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">7832544</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>J Neurosci. 2015 Feb 25;35(8):3555-65</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">25716854</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Gait Posture. 2013 Feb;37(2):242-5</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">22885161</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>J Neurophysiol. 2011 Jun;105(6):3042-53</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21471398</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2013 Jan;27(1):45-52</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">22593115</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Disabil Rehabil. 2007 Dec 30;29(24):1920-5</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17852286</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Int J MS Care. 2016 Mar-Apr;18(2):86-95</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">27134582</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>PM R. 2011 Aug;3(8):723-9</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21871416</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Mult Scler Int. 2013;2013:875648</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">23606966</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Neurology. 2006 Apr 25;66(8):1235-40</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16636241</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Mult Scler. 2015 Jul;21(8):1055-63</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">25392337</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Int J MS Care. 2015 May-Jun;17(3):146-51</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">26052260</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>J Rehabil Res Dev. 2013;50(10):1401-10</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">24699975</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Clin J Sport Med. 2010 Jul;20(4):278-85</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20606513</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2014 Jan;85(1):67-75</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">23486991</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011 Nov;92(11):1840-6</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21840497</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Int J Rehabil Res. 2011 Mar;34(1):53-8</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20679901</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Mult Scler. 2006 Feb;12(1):24-38</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16459717</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Jan;95(1):65-73</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">24076084</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 May;95(5):862-6</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">24215991</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Brain Res. 2012 Nov 16;1485:95-107</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">22995545</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995 Jan;76(1):77-81</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">7811180</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Physiother Res Int. 2005;10(2):93-109</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16146327</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Int J Rehabil Res. 2016 Mar;39(1):42-7</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">26579696</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Neurology. 2006 Jun 13;66(11):1696-702</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16769943</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2015 Nov;4(6):594-7</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">26590668</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Int J Rehabil Res. 2012 Mar;35(1):69-74</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">22315143</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>BMC Neurol. 2013 Apr 25;13:37</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">23617555</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Nat Neurosci. 2014 Sep;17(9):1233-9</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">25064850</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Phys Ther. 2011 Aug;91(8):1166-83</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21680771</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>PLoS One. 2011;6(11):e28021</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">22132196</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Auris Nasus Larynx. 2015 Feb;42(1):8-14</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">25194853</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Mult Scler. 2015 Jan;21(1):92-100</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">24948687</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 Mar;88(3):374-80</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17321832</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Gait Posture. 2013 May;38(1):37-42</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">23200463</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
</ReferenceList>
</PubmedData>
</pubmed>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Sante/explor/PosturoV1/Data/Main/Corpus

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000523 | SxmlIndent | more

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000523 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Sante
   |area=    PosturoV1
   |flux=    Main
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     pubmed:28603464
   |texte=   Reliability and Validity of the Computerized Dynamic Posturography Sensory Organization Test in People with Multiple Sclerosis.
}}

Pour générer des pages wiki

HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/RBID.i   -Sk "pubmed:28603464" \
       | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/biblio.hfd   \
       | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a PosturoV1

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.37.
Data generation: Fri Nov 13 22:38:36 2020. Site generation: Thu Mar 25 16:16:50 2021

	Serveur d'exploration Posturo
	Attention, ce site est en cours de développement ! Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts. Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Serveur d'exploration Posturo

Reliability and Validity of the Computerized Dynamic Posturography Sensory Organization Test in People with Multiple Sclerosis.

Reliability and Validity of the Computerized Dynamic Posturography Sensory Organization Test in People with Multiple Sclerosis.

Source :

Abstract

Links to Exploration step

Le document en format XML

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

Pour générer des pages wiki