La maladie de Parkinson en France (serveur d'exploration)

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Dopamine agonists: what is the place of the newer compounds in the treatment of Parkinson's disease?

Identifieur interne : 003C55 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 003C54; suivant : 003C56

Dopamine agonists: what is the place of the newer compounds in the treatment of Parkinson's disease?

Auteurs : O. Rascol [France]

Source :

RBID : pubmed:10335491

English descriptors

Abstract

Three new dopamine agonists (cabergoline, pramipexole, ropinirole) have been put on to the market within the past months to treat patients with Parkinson's disease. Like any marketed dopamine agonists, the new compounds bind to the D2-like receptors. Pramipexole and ropinirole appear to be quite close drugs. Both are selective non ergot D2 (and preferentially D3) agonists, with an elimination half-life of 5 to 10 hours. Conversely, cabergoline is an ergot derivative, less selective for the D2 receptors, with a much longer elimination half-life (60 hours or more). In moderately advanced levodopa treated patients with Parkinson's disease and motor fluctuations, cabergoline, pramipexole and ropinirole all do significantly better than placebo in reducing UPDRS motor examination scores, time spent off and daily dose of levodopa. None of the 3 newer agonists proved to do significantly better than bromocriptine in this indication, at the cost of very similar adverse effects. In de novo levodopa naive patients, pramipexole and ropinirole did significantly better than placebo in short-term (few months) follow-up trials, at the cost again of classical dopaminergic adverse effects. Ropinirole was marginally more effective than bromocriptine, while its use induced the same risk of psychosis than the "old" reference agonist. Early treatment with cabergoline, compared with levodopa, in a long-term (5 year) study reduced the relative risk of developping motor complication by more than 50%. A similar study is presently on-going to compare ropinirole and levodopa. Clinical trials to assess putative neuroprotective effects are also on going with ropinirole and pramipexole. Up to now, the available clinical controlled data suggest that the newer dopamine agonists have very similar clinical effects with only minor superiority, if any, versus bromocriptine.

PubMed: 10335491


Affiliations:


Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI>
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Dopamine agonists: what is the place of the newer compounds in the treatment of Parkinson's disease?</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Rascol, O" sort="Rascol, O" uniqKey="Rascol O" first="O" last="Rascol">O. Rascol</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="3">
<nlm:affiliation>Department of Clinical Pharmacology, INSERM U455, University Hospital, Toulouse, France.</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">France</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Clinical Pharmacology, INSERM U455, University Hospital, Toulouse</wicri:regionArea>
<placeName>
<region type="region">Occitanie (région administrative)</region>
<region type="old region">Midi-Pyrénées</region>
<settlement type="city">Toulouse</settlement>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno>
<date when="1999">1999</date>
<idno type="RBID">pubmed:10335491</idno>
<idno type="pmid">10335491</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">001435</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">001435</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">001394</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Curation">001394</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Checkpoint">001394</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Checkpoint" wicri:step="PubMed">001394</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Merge">000021</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Curation">000021</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Checkpoint">000021</idno>
<idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0303-6995:1999:Rascol O:dopamine:agonists:what</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">004360</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">003C55</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">003C55</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en">Dopamine agonists: what is the place of the newer compounds in the treatment of Parkinson's disease?</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Rascol, O" sort="Rascol, O" uniqKey="Rascol O" first="O" last="Rascol">O. Rascol</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="3">
<nlm:affiliation>Department of Clinical Pharmacology, INSERM U455, University Hospital, Toulouse, France.</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">France</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Clinical Pharmacology, INSERM U455, University Hospital, Toulouse</wicri:regionArea>
<placeName>
<region type="region">Occitanie (région administrative)</region>
<region type="old region">Midi-Pyrénées</region>
<settlement type="city">Toulouse</settlement>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series>
<title level="j">Journal of neural transmission. Supplementum</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0303-6995</idno>
<imprint>
<date when="1999" type="published">1999</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Dopamine Agonists (therapeutic use)</term>
<term>Evidence-Based Medicine</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Parkinson Disease (drug therapy)</term>
<term>Receptors, Dopamine D2 (agonists)</term>
<term>Treatment Outcome</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" qualifier="agonists" xml:lang="en">
<term>Receptors, Dopamine D2</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" qualifier="therapeutic use" xml:lang="en">
<term>Dopamine Agonists</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="drug therapy" xml:lang="en">
<term>Parkinson Disease</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en">
<term>Evidence-Based Medicine</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Treatment Outcome</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Three new dopamine agonists (cabergoline, pramipexole, ropinirole) have been put on to the market within the past months to treat patients with Parkinson's disease. Like any marketed dopamine agonists, the new compounds bind to the D2-like receptors. Pramipexole and ropinirole appear to be quite close drugs. Both are selective non ergot D2 (and preferentially D3) agonists, with an elimination half-life of 5 to 10 hours. Conversely, cabergoline is an ergot derivative, less selective for the D2 receptors, with a much longer elimination half-life (60 hours or more). In moderately advanced levodopa treated patients with Parkinson's disease and motor fluctuations, cabergoline, pramipexole and ropinirole all do significantly better than placebo in reducing UPDRS motor examination scores, time spent off and daily dose of levodopa. None of the 3 newer agonists proved to do significantly better than bromocriptine in this indication, at the cost of very similar adverse effects. In de novo levodopa naive patients, pramipexole and ropinirole did significantly better than placebo in short-term (few months) follow-up trials, at the cost again of classical dopaminergic adverse effects. Ropinirole was marginally more effective than bromocriptine, while its use induced the same risk of psychosis than the "old" reference agonist. Early treatment with cabergoline, compared with levodopa, in a long-term (5 year) study reduced the relative risk of developping motor complication by more than 50%. A similar study is presently on-going to compare ropinirole and levodopa. Clinical trials to assess putative neuroprotective effects are also on going with ropinirole and pramipexole. Up to now, the available clinical controlled data suggest that the newer dopamine agonists have very similar clinical effects with only minor superiority, if any, versus bromocriptine.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<affiliations>
<list>
<country>
<li>France</li>
</country>
<region>
<li>Midi-Pyrénées</li>
<li>Occitanie (région administrative)</li>
</region>
<settlement>
<li>Toulouse</li>
</settlement>
</list>
<tree>
<country name="France">
<region name="Occitanie (région administrative)">
<name sortKey="Rascol, O" sort="Rascol, O" uniqKey="Rascol O" first="O" last="Rascol">O. Rascol</name>
</region>
</country>
</tree>
</affiliations>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Sante/explor/ParkinsonFranceV1/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 003C55 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 003C55 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Sante
   |area=    ParkinsonFranceV1
   |flux=    Main
   |étape=   Exploration
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     pubmed:10335491
   |texte=   Dopamine agonists: what is the place of the newer compounds in the treatment of Parkinson's disease?
}}

Pour générer des pages wiki

HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/RBID.i   -Sk "pubmed:10335491" \
       | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd   \
       | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a ParkinsonFranceV1 

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.29.
Data generation: Wed May 17 19:46:39 2017. Site generation: Mon Mar 4 15:48:15 2024