La maladie de Parkinson en France (serveur d'exploration)

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

[Evaluation of balance in neurologic and geriatric disorders].

Identifieur interne : 000C12 ( Hal/Corpus ); précédent : 000C11; suivant : 000C13

[Evaluation of balance in neurologic and geriatric disorders].

Auteurs : D. Pérennou ; P. Decavel ; P. Manckoundia ; Y. Penven ; F. Mourey ; F. Launay ; P. Pfitzenmeyer ; J. M. Casillas

Source :

RBID : Hal:hal-00775994

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the clinical usefulness and metrological properties of the main techniques and indices used to assess balance disorders. METHODS: More than 4000 abstracts referenced in MEDLINE and dealing with postural control and postural disorders (wide screening) were reviewed to determine the main postural techniques and indices used in a clinical context. We retained abstracts with a high citation frequency and those with interesting findings. Corresponding key words were identified for a specific search of articles that we analysed. RESULTS: Postural assessment tools can be classified as scales of ordinal items, tests based on metric or chronometric measurement, posturography, and verticality perception. These techniques are complementary, and their association is recommended in a clinical context. Regarding generic tools, the Falls-related Efficacy Scale (FES) and the Activities-specific Balance Confidence scale (ABC scale) would be enhanced if comparatively analysed and reworked to allow for a feasible and reliable assessment of the fear of falling. Despite a wide diffusion in numerous postural fields worldwide, the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) and the Functional Reach Test (FRT) do not have the required criteria to remain the gold standards they were in the 1990s. Static posturography should be normalised and yield more reliable indices. The clinical relevance of the subjective assessment of visual, haptic, and postural verticals are questionable, especially to explain postural disability. Regarding specific tools, the Tinetti test (TT) and the Time Up and Go test (TUG) are the most suited to assess postural capacities in very elderly people, in whom the predictive validity of the postural assessment of falls is still modest. In stroke patients, the Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke (PASS), posturography, lateropulsion assessment, and vertically perception are interesting and complementary techniques. Postural assessment relies mainly upon the 5 postural items of the Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) in people with Parkinson disease and upon the Romberg test and posturography in patients with cerebellar or proprioceptive ataxia. Some novel postural scales for patients with multiple sclerosis or spinal cord injury are also emerging. CONCLUSION: Among numerous tools that contribute to the assessment of postural disorders, only the most recent ones (developed in the last 10 years) have undergone complete validation. It is now crucial to compare these tools, not only in terms of reproducibility and internal consistency, but also overall, in terms of feasibility, responsiveness, and predictive validity for a given population.

Url:
DOI: 10.1016/j.annrmp.2005.04.009

Links to Exploration step

Hal:hal-00775994

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI>
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">[Evaluation of balance in neurologic and geriatric disorders].</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Perennou, D" sort="Perennou, D" uniqKey="Perennou D" first="D." last="Pérennou">D. Pérennou</name>
<affiliation>
<hal:affiliation type="laboratory" xml:id="struct-193141" status="OLD">
<orgName>Motricité - Plasticité</orgName>
<date type="end">2011-12-31</date>
<desc>
<address>
<addrLine>Université de Bourgogne - 21000 Dijon</addrLine>
<country key="FR"></country>
</address>
</desc>
<listRelation>
<relation active="#struct-300270" type="direct"></relation>
<relation name="U887" active="#struct-303623" type="direct"></relation>
</listRelation>
<tutelles>
<tutelle active="#struct-300270" type="direct">
<org type="institution" xml:id="struct-300270" status="VALID">
<orgName>Université de Bourgogne</orgName>
<orgName type="acronym">UB</orgName>
<desc>
<address>
<addrLine>Maison de l'université - Esplanade Érasme - BP 27877 - 21078 Dijon cedex</addrLine>
<country key="FR"></country>
</address>
<ref type="url">http://www.u-bourgogne.fr/</ref>
</desc>
</org>
</tutelle>
<tutelle name="U887" active="#struct-303623" type="direct">
<org type="institution" xml:id="struct-303623" status="VALID">
<idno type="IdRef">026388278</idno>
<orgName>Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale</orgName>
<orgName type="acronym">INSERM</orgName>
<desc>
<address>
<addrLine>101, rue de Tolbiac, 75013 Paris </addrLine>
<country key="FR"></country>
</address>
<ref type="url">http://www.inserm.fr</ref>
</desc>
</org>
</tutelle>
</tutelles>
</hal:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Decavel, P" sort="Decavel, P" uniqKey="Decavel P" first="P." last="Decavel">P. Decavel</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Manckoundia, P" sort="Manckoundia, P" uniqKey="Manckoundia P" first="P." last="Manckoundia">P. Manckoundia</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Penven, Y" sort="Penven, Y" uniqKey="Penven Y" first="Y." last="Penven">Y. Penven</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Mourey, F" sort="Mourey, F" uniqKey="Mourey F" first="F." last="Mourey">F. Mourey</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Launay, F" sort="Launay, F" uniqKey="Launay F" first="F." last="Launay">F. Launay</name>
<affiliation>
<hal:affiliation type="laboratory" xml:id="struct-119" status="VALID">
<orgName>Institut de Physique Nucléaire d'Orsay</orgName>
<orgName type="acronym">IPNO</orgName>
<desc>
<address>
<addrLine>IPN - 15, rue Georges Clemenceau - 91406 ORSAY CEDEX</addrLine>
<country key="FR"></country>
</address>
<ref type="url">http://ipnweb.in2p3.fr</ref>
</desc>
<listRelation>
<relation name="UMR8608" active="#struct-441569" type="direct"></relation>
<relation active="#struct-300046" type="direct"></relation>
<relation active="#struct-92966" type="direct"></relation>
</listRelation>
<tutelles>
<tutelle name="UMR8608" active="#struct-441569" type="direct">
<org type="institution" xml:id="struct-441569" status="VALID">
<idno type="IdRef">02636817X</idno>
<idno type="ISNI">0000000122597504</idno>
<orgName>Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique</orgName>
<orgName type="acronym">CNRS</orgName>
<date type="start">1939-10-19</date>
<desc>
<address>
<country key="FR"></country>
</address>
<ref type="url">http://www.cnrs.fr/</ref>
</desc>
</org>
</tutelle>
<tutelle active="#struct-300046" type="direct">
<org type="institution" xml:id="struct-300046" status="VALID">
<orgName>Institut National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physique des Particules du CNRS</orgName>
<orgName type="acronym">IN2P3</orgName>
<desc>
<address>
<country key="FR"></country>
</address>
</desc>
</org>
</tutelle>
<tutelle active="#struct-92966" type="direct">
<org type="institution" xml:id="struct-92966" status="VALID">
<orgName>Université Paris-Sud - Paris 11</orgName>
<orgName type="acronym">UP11</orgName>
<desc>
<address>
<addrLine>Bâtiment 300 - 91405 Orsay cedex</addrLine>
<country key="FR"></country>
</address>
<ref type="url">http://www.u-psud.fr/</ref>
</desc>
</org>
</tutelle>
</tutelles>
</hal:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Pfitzenmeyer, P" sort="Pfitzenmeyer, P" uniqKey="Pfitzenmeyer P" first="P." last="Pfitzenmeyer">P. Pfitzenmeyer</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Casillas, J M" sort="Casillas, J M" uniqKey="Casillas J" first="J. M." last="Casillas">J. M. Casillas</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">HAL</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Hal:hal-00775994</idno>
<idno type="halId">hal-00775994</idno>
<idno type="halUri">https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00775994</idno>
<idno type="url">https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00775994</idno>
<idno type="doi">10.1016/j.annrmp.2005.04.009</idno>
<date when="2005-07">2005-07</date>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Hal/Corpus">000C12</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en">[Evaluation of balance in neurologic and geriatric disorders].</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Perennou, D" sort="Perennou, D" uniqKey="Perennou D" first="D." last="Pérennou">D. Pérennou</name>
<affiliation>
<hal:affiliation type="laboratory" xml:id="struct-193141" status="OLD">
<orgName>Motricité - Plasticité</orgName>
<date type="end">2011-12-31</date>
<desc>
<address>
<addrLine>Université de Bourgogne - 21000 Dijon</addrLine>
<country key="FR"></country>
</address>
</desc>
<listRelation>
<relation active="#struct-300270" type="direct"></relation>
<relation name="U887" active="#struct-303623" type="direct"></relation>
</listRelation>
<tutelles>
<tutelle active="#struct-300270" type="direct">
<org type="institution" xml:id="struct-300270" status="VALID">
<orgName>Université de Bourgogne</orgName>
<orgName type="acronym">UB</orgName>
<desc>
<address>
<addrLine>Maison de l'université - Esplanade Érasme - BP 27877 - 21078 Dijon cedex</addrLine>
<country key="FR"></country>
</address>
<ref type="url">http://www.u-bourgogne.fr/</ref>
</desc>
</org>
</tutelle>
<tutelle name="U887" active="#struct-303623" type="direct">
<org type="institution" xml:id="struct-303623" status="VALID">
<idno type="IdRef">026388278</idno>
<orgName>Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale</orgName>
<orgName type="acronym">INSERM</orgName>
<desc>
<address>
<addrLine>101, rue de Tolbiac, 75013 Paris </addrLine>
<country key="FR"></country>
</address>
<ref type="url">http://www.inserm.fr</ref>
</desc>
</org>
</tutelle>
</tutelles>
</hal:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Decavel, P" sort="Decavel, P" uniqKey="Decavel P" first="P." last="Decavel">P. Decavel</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Manckoundia, P" sort="Manckoundia, P" uniqKey="Manckoundia P" first="P." last="Manckoundia">P. Manckoundia</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Penven, Y" sort="Penven, Y" uniqKey="Penven Y" first="Y." last="Penven">Y. Penven</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Mourey, F" sort="Mourey, F" uniqKey="Mourey F" first="F." last="Mourey">F. Mourey</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Launay, F" sort="Launay, F" uniqKey="Launay F" first="F." last="Launay">F. Launay</name>
<affiliation>
<hal:affiliation type="laboratory" xml:id="struct-119" status="VALID">
<orgName>Institut de Physique Nucléaire d'Orsay</orgName>
<orgName type="acronym">IPNO</orgName>
<desc>
<address>
<addrLine>IPN - 15, rue Georges Clemenceau - 91406 ORSAY CEDEX</addrLine>
<country key="FR"></country>
</address>
<ref type="url">http://ipnweb.in2p3.fr</ref>
</desc>
<listRelation>
<relation name="UMR8608" active="#struct-441569" type="direct"></relation>
<relation active="#struct-300046" type="direct"></relation>
<relation active="#struct-92966" type="direct"></relation>
</listRelation>
<tutelles>
<tutelle name="UMR8608" active="#struct-441569" type="direct">
<org type="institution" xml:id="struct-441569" status="VALID">
<idno type="IdRef">02636817X</idno>
<idno type="ISNI">0000000122597504</idno>
<orgName>Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique</orgName>
<orgName type="acronym">CNRS</orgName>
<date type="start">1939-10-19</date>
<desc>
<address>
<country key="FR"></country>
</address>
<ref type="url">http://www.cnrs.fr/</ref>
</desc>
</org>
</tutelle>
<tutelle active="#struct-300046" type="direct">
<org type="institution" xml:id="struct-300046" status="VALID">
<orgName>Institut National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physique des Particules du CNRS</orgName>
<orgName type="acronym">IN2P3</orgName>
<desc>
<address>
<country key="FR"></country>
</address>
</desc>
</org>
</tutelle>
<tutelle active="#struct-92966" type="direct">
<org type="institution" xml:id="struct-92966" status="VALID">
<orgName>Université Paris-Sud - Paris 11</orgName>
<orgName type="acronym">UP11</orgName>
<desc>
<address>
<addrLine>Bâtiment 300 - 91405 Orsay cedex</addrLine>
<country key="FR"></country>
</address>
<ref type="url">http://www.u-psud.fr/</ref>
</desc>
</org>
</tutelle>
</tutelles>
</hal:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Pfitzenmeyer, P" sort="Pfitzenmeyer, P" uniqKey="Pfitzenmeyer P" first="P." last="Pfitzenmeyer">P. Pfitzenmeyer</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Casillas, J M" sort="Casillas, J M" uniqKey="Casillas J" first="J. M." last="Casillas">J. M. Casillas</name>
</author>
</analytic>
<idno type="DOI">10.1016/j.annrmp.2005.04.009</idno>
<series>
<title level="j">Annales de Réadaptation et de Médecine Physique</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0168-6054</idno>
<imprint>
<date type="datePub">2005-07</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass></textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">OBJECTIVE: To analyse the clinical usefulness and metrological properties of the main techniques and indices used to assess balance disorders. METHODS: More than 4000 abstracts referenced in MEDLINE and dealing with postural control and postural disorders (wide screening) were reviewed to determine the main postural techniques and indices used in a clinical context. We retained abstracts with a high citation frequency and those with interesting findings. Corresponding key words were identified for a specific search of articles that we analysed. RESULTS: Postural assessment tools can be classified as scales of ordinal items, tests based on metric or chronometric measurement, posturography, and verticality perception. These techniques are complementary, and their association is recommended in a clinical context. Regarding generic tools, the Falls-related Efficacy Scale (FES) and the Activities-specific Balance Confidence scale (ABC scale) would be enhanced if comparatively analysed and reworked to allow for a feasible and reliable assessment of the fear of falling. Despite a wide diffusion in numerous postural fields worldwide, the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) and the Functional Reach Test (FRT) do not have the required criteria to remain the gold standards they were in the 1990s. Static posturography should be normalised and yield more reliable indices. The clinical relevance of the subjective assessment of visual, haptic, and postural verticals are questionable, especially to explain postural disability. Regarding specific tools, the Tinetti test (TT) and the Time Up and Go test (TUG) are the most suited to assess postural capacities in very elderly people, in whom the predictive validity of the postural assessment of falls is still modest. In stroke patients, the Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke (PASS), posturography, lateropulsion assessment, and vertically perception are interesting and complementary techniques. Postural assessment relies mainly upon the 5 postural items of the Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) in people with Parkinson disease and upon the Romberg test and posturography in patients with cerebellar or proprioceptive ataxia. Some novel postural scales for patients with multiple sclerosis or spinal cord injury are also emerging. CONCLUSION: Among numerous tools that contribute to the assessment of postural disorders, only the most recent ones (developed in the last 10 years) have undergone complete validation. It is now crucial to compare these tools, not only in terms of reproducibility and internal consistency, but also overall, in terms of feasibility, responsiveness, and predictive validity for a given population.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<hal api="V3">
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">[Evaluation of balance in neurologic and geriatric disorders].</title>
<author role="crp">
<persName>
<forename type="first">D.</forename>
<surname>Pérennou</surname>
</persName>
<email type="md5">0f282f726ccfa5e250f703526b8035a8</email>
<email type="domain">chu-grenoble.fr</email>
<idno type="halauthorid">805379</idno>
<affiliation ref="#struct-193141"></affiliation>
</author>
<author role="aut">
<persName>
<forename type="first">P.</forename>
<surname>Decavel</surname>
</persName>
<idno type="halauthorid">805471</idno>
</author>
<author role="aut">
<persName>
<forename type="first">P.</forename>
<surname>Manckoundia</surname>
</persName>
<idno type="halauthorid">805466</idno>
</author>
<author role="aut">
<persName>
<forename type="first">Y.</forename>
<surname>Penven</surname>
</persName>
<idno type="halauthorid">805478</idno>
</author>
<author role="aut">
<persName>
<forename type="first">F.</forename>
<surname>Mourey</surname>
</persName>
<idno type="halauthorid">805468</idno>
</author>
<author role="aut">
<persName>
<forename type="first">F.</forename>
<surname>Launay</surname>
</persName>
<idno type="halauthorid">28544</idno>
<affiliation ref="#struct-119"></affiliation>
</author>
<author role="aut">
<persName>
<forename type="first">P.</forename>
<surname>Pfitzenmeyer</surname>
</persName>
<idno type="halauthorid">805467</idno>
</author>
<author role="aut">
<persName>
<forename type="first">J. M.</forename>
<surname>Casillas</surname>
</persName>
<idno type="halauthorid">805462</idno>
</author>
<editor role="depositor">
<persName>
<forename>Estelle</forename>
<surname>Palluel</surname>
</persName>
<email type="md5">e4f0e1624e9214bb21f9eef1b23c6148</email>
<email type="domain">ujf-grenoble.fr</email>
</editor>
</titleStmt>
<editionStmt>
<edition n="v1" type="current">
<date type="whenSubmitted">2013-01-14 18:08:48</date>
<date type="whenModified">2017-01-04 16:23:17</date>
<date type="whenReleased">2013-01-14 18:08:48</date>
<date type="whenProduced">2005-07</date>
</edition>
<respStmt>
<resp>contributor</resp>
<name key="181362">
<persName>
<forename>Estelle</forename>
<surname>Palluel</surname>
</persName>
<email type="md5">e4f0e1624e9214bb21f9eef1b23c6148</email>
<email type="domain">ujf-grenoble.fr</email>
</name>
</respStmt>
</editionStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<distributor>CCSD</distributor>
<idno type="halId">hal-00775994</idno>
<idno type="halUri">https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00775994</idno>
<idno type="halBibtex">perennou:hal-00775994</idno>
<idno type="halRefHtml">Annales de Réadaptation et de Médecine Physique, Elsevier Masson, 2005, 48 (6), pp.317-35. <10.1016/j.annrmp.2005.04.009></idno>
<idno type="halRef">Annales de Réadaptation et de Médecine Physique, Elsevier Masson, 2005, 48 (6), pp.317-35. <10.1016/j.annrmp.2005.04.009></idno>
</publicationStmt>
<seriesStmt>
<idno type="stamp" n="IN2P3">Institut National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physique des Particules</idno>
<idno type="stamp" n="IPNO">Institut de Physique Nucléaire d'Orsay</idno>
<idno type="stamp" n="CNRS">CNRS - Centre national de la recherche scientifique</idno>
<idno type="stamp" n="UNIV-BOURGOGNE">Université de Bourgogne</idno>
</seriesStmt>
<notesStmt>
<note type="audience" n="2">International</note>
<note type="popular" n="0">No</note>
<note type="peer" n="1">Yes</note>
</notesStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en">[Evaluation of balance in neurologic and geriatric disorders].</title>
<author role="crp">
<persName>
<forename type="first">D.</forename>
<surname>Pérennou</surname>
</persName>
<email type="md5">0f282f726ccfa5e250f703526b8035a8</email>
<email type="domain">chu-grenoble.fr</email>
<idno type="halauthorid">805379</idno>
<affiliation ref="#struct-193141"></affiliation>
</author>
<author role="aut">
<persName>
<forename type="first">P.</forename>
<surname>Decavel</surname>
</persName>
<idno type="halauthorid">805471</idno>
</author>
<author role="aut">
<persName>
<forename type="first">P.</forename>
<surname>Manckoundia</surname>
</persName>
<idno type="halauthorid">805466</idno>
</author>
<author role="aut">
<persName>
<forename type="first">Y.</forename>
<surname>Penven</surname>
</persName>
<idno type="halauthorid">805478</idno>
</author>
<author role="aut">
<persName>
<forename type="first">F.</forename>
<surname>Mourey</surname>
</persName>
<idno type="halauthorid">805468</idno>
</author>
<author role="aut">
<persName>
<forename type="first">F.</forename>
<surname>Launay</surname>
</persName>
<idno type="halauthorid">28544</idno>
<affiliation ref="#struct-119"></affiliation>
</author>
<author role="aut">
<persName>
<forename type="first">P.</forename>
<surname>Pfitzenmeyer</surname>
</persName>
<idno type="halauthorid">805467</idno>
</author>
<author role="aut">
<persName>
<forename type="first">J. M.</forename>
<surname>Casillas</surname>
</persName>
<idno type="halauthorid">805462</idno>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr>
<idno type="halJournalId" status="VALID">22700</idno>
<idno type="issn">0168-6054</idno>
<title level="j">Annales de Réadaptation et de Médecine Physique</title>
<imprint>
<publisher>Elsevier Masson</publisher>
<biblScope unit="volume">48</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">6</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="pp">317-35</biblScope>
<date type="datePub">2005-07</date>
</imprint>
</monogr>
<idno type="doi">10.1016/j.annrmp.2005.04.009</idno>
<idno type="pubmed">15932776</idno>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<profileDesc>
<langUsage>
<language ident="fr">French</language>
</langUsage>
<textClass>
<classCode scheme="mesh">Aged</classCode>
<classCode scheme="mesh">Disability Evaluation</classCode>
<classCode scheme="mesh">Gait Disorders, Neurologic</classCode>
<classCode scheme="mesh">Geriatric Assessment</classCode>
<classCode scheme="mesh">Humans</classCode>
<classCode scheme="mesh">Postural Balance</classCode>
<classCode scheme="mesh">Posture</classCode>
<classCode scheme="halDomain" n="sdv.neu.sc">Life Sciences [q-bio]/Neurons and Cognition [q-bio.NC]/Cognitive Sciences</classCode>
<classCode scheme="halTypology" n="ART">Journal articles</classCode>
</textClass>
<abstract xml:lang="en">OBJECTIVE: To analyse the clinical usefulness and metrological properties of the main techniques and indices used to assess balance disorders. METHODS: More than 4000 abstracts referenced in MEDLINE and dealing with postural control and postural disorders (wide screening) were reviewed to determine the main postural techniques and indices used in a clinical context. We retained abstracts with a high citation frequency and those with interesting findings. Corresponding key words were identified for a specific search of articles that we analysed. RESULTS: Postural assessment tools can be classified as scales of ordinal items, tests based on metric or chronometric measurement, posturography, and verticality perception. These techniques are complementary, and their association is recommended in a clinical context. Regarding generic tools, the Falls-related Efficacy Scale (FES) and the Activities-specific Balance Confidence scale (ABC scale) would be enhanced if comparatively analysed and reworked to allow for a feasible and reliable assessment of the fear of falling. Despite a wide diffusion in numerous postural fields worldwide, the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) and the Functional Reach Test (FRT) do not have the required criteria to remain the gold standards they were in the 1990s. Static posturography should be normalised and yield more reliable indices. The clinical relevance of the subjective assessment of visual, haptic, and postural verticals are questionable, especially to explain postural disability. Regarding specific tools, the Tinetti test (TT) and the Time Up and Go test (TUG) are the most suited to assess postural capacities in very elderly people, in whom the predictive validity of the postural assessment of falls is still modest. In stroke patients, the Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke (PASS), posturography, lateropulsion assessment, and vertically perception are interesting and complementary techniques. Postural assessment relies mainly upon the 5 postural items of the Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) in people with Parkinson disease and upon the Romberg test and posturography in patients with cerebellar or proprioceptive ataxia. Some novel postural scales for patients with multiple sclerosis or spinal cord injury are also emerging. CONCLUSION: Among numerous tools that contribute to the assessment of postural disorders, only the most recent ones (developed in the last 10 years) have undergone complete validation. It is now crucial to compare these tools, not only in terms of reproducibility and internal consistency, but also overall, in terms of feasibility, responsiveness, and predictive validity for a given population.</abstract>
</profileDesc>
</hal>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Sante/explor/ParkinsonFranceV1/Data/Hal/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000C12 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Hal/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000C12 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Sante
   |area=    ParkinsonFranceV1
   |flux=    Hal
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     Hal:hal-00775994
   |texte=   [Evaluation of balance in neurologic and geriatric disorders].
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.29.
Data generation: Wed May 17 19:46:39 2017. Site generation: Mon Mar 4 15:48:15 2024