Effectiveness of surgical masks against influenza bioaerosols.
Identifieur interne : 000A68 ( PubMed/Curation ); précédent : 000A67; suivant : 000A69Effectiveness of surgical masks against influenza bioaerosols.
Auteurs : C. Makison Booth [Royaume-Uni] ; M. Clayton ; B. Crook ; J M GawnSource :
- The Journal of hospital infection [ 1532-2939 ] ; 2013.
Descripteurs français
- KwdFr :
- Aérosols, Cellules cultivées, Grippe humaine (), Grippe humaine (transmission), Humains, Lutte contre l'infection (), Masques (virologie), Orthomyxoviridae (isolement et purification), Royaume-Uni, Transmission de maladie infectieuse du patient au professionnel de santé (), Études d'évaluation comme sujet.
- MESH :
- isolement et purification : Orthomyxoviridae.
- virologie : Masques.
- Aérosols, Cellules cultivées, Grippe humaine, Humains, Lutte contre l'infection, Royaume-Uni, Transmission de maladie infectieuse du patient au professionnel de santé, Études d'évaluation comme sujet.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Aerosols, Cells, Cultured, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Humans, Infection Control (methods), Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional (prevention & control), Influenza, Human (prevention & control), Influenza, Human (transmission), Masks (virology), Orthomyxoviridae (isolation & purification), United Kingdom.
- MESH :
- chemical : Aerosols.
- isolation & purification : Orthomyxoviridae.
- methods : Infection Control.
- prevention & control : Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional, Influenza, Human.
- transmission : Influenza, Human.
- virology : Masks.
- Cells, Cultured, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Humans, United Kingdom.
Abstract
Most surgical masks are not certified for use as respiratory protective devices (RPDs). In the event of an influenza pandemic, logistical and practical implications such as storage and fit testing will restrict the use of RPDs to certain high-risk procedures that are likely to generate large amounts of infectious bioaerosols. Studies have shown that in such circumstances increased numbers of surgical masks are worn, but the protection afforded to the wearer by a surgical mask against infectious aerosols is not well understood.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2013.02.007
PubMed: 23498357
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream PubMed, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :000A68
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:23498357Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Effectiveness of surgical masks against influenza bioaerosols.</title><author><name sortKey="Makison Booth, C" sort="Makison Booth, C" uniqKey="Makison Booth C" first="C" last="Makison Booth">C. Makison Booth</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Health & Safety Laboratory (HSL), Buxton, Derbyshire, UK. catherine.makison@hsl.gov.uk</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Royaume-Uni</country><wicri:regionArea>Health & Safety Laboratory (HSL), Buxton, Derbyshire</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Clayton, M" sort="Clayton, M" uniqKey="Clayton M" first="M" last="Clayton">M. Clayton</name></author><author><name sortKey="Crook, B" sort="Crook, B" uniqKey="Crook B" first="B" last="Crook">B. Crook</name></author><author><name sortKey="Gawn, J M" sort="Gawn, J M" uniqKey="Gawn J" first="J M" last="Gawn">J M Gawn</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2013">2013</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:23498357</idno><idno type="pmid">23498357</idno><idno type="doi">10.1016/j.jhin.2013.02.007</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000A68</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000A68</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">000A68</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Curation">000A68</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Effectiveness of surgical masks against influenza bioaerosols.</title><author><name sortKey="Makison Booth, C" sort="Makison Booth, C" uniqKey="Makison Booth C" first="C" last="Makison Booth">C. Makison Booth</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Health & Safety Laboratory (HSL), Buxton, Derbyshire, UK. catherine.makison@hsl.gov.uk</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Royaume-Uni</country><wicri:regionArea>Health & Safety Laboratory (HSL), Buxton, Derbyshire</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Clayton, M" sort="Clayton, M" uniqKey="Clayton M" first="M" last="Clayton">M. Clayton</name></author><author><name sortKey="Crook, B" sort="Crook, B" uniqKey="Crook B" first="B" last="Crook">B. Crook</name></author><author><name sortKey="Gawn, J M" sort="Gawn, J M" uniqKey="Gawn J" first="J M" last="Gawn">J M Gawn</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">The Journal of hospital infection</title><idno type="eISSN">1532-2939</idno><imprint><date when="2013" type="published">2013</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Aerosols</term><term>Cells, Cultured</term><term>Evaluation Studies as Topic</term><term>Humans</term><term>Infection Control (methods)</term><term>Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional (prevention & control)</term><term>Influenza, Human (prevention & control)</term><term>Influenza, Human (transmission)</term><term>Masks (virology)</term><term>Orthomyxoviridae (isolation & purification)</term><term>United Kingdom</term></keywords><keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>Aérosols</term><term>Cellules cultivées</term><term>Grippe humaine ()</term><term>Grippe humaine (transmission)</term><term>Humains</term><term>Lutte contre l'infection ()</term><term>Masques (virologie)</term><term>Orthomyxoviridae (isolement et purification)</term><term>Royaume-Uni</term><term>Transmission de maladie infectieuse du patient au professionnel de santé ()</term><term>Études d'évaluation comme sujet</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" xml:lang="en"><term>Aerosols</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="isolation & purification" xml:lang="en"><term>Orthomyxoviridae</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="isolement et purification" xml:lang="fr"><term>Orthomyxoviridae</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Infection Control</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="prevention & control" xml:lang="en"><term>Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional</term><term>Influenza, Human</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="transmission" xml:lang="en"><term>Influenza, Human</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="virologie" xml:lang="fr"><term>Masques</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="virology" xml:lang="en"><term>Masks</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Cells, Cultured</term><term>Evaluation Studies as Topic</term><term>Humans</term><term>United Kingdom</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr"><term>Aérosols</term><term>Cellules cultivées</term><term>Grippe humaine</term><term>Humains</term><term>Lutte contre l'infection</term><term>Royaume-Uni</term><term>Transmission de maladie infectieuse du patient au professionnel de santé</term><term>Études d'évaluation comme sujet</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Most surgical masks are not certified for use as respiratory protective devices (RPDs). In the event of an influenza pandemic, logistical and practical implications such as storage and fit testing will restrict the use of RPDs to certain high-risk procedures that are likely to generate large amounts of infectious bioaerosols. Studies have shown that in such circumstances increased numbers of surgical masks are worn, but the protection afforded to the wearer by a surgical mask against infectious aerosols is not well understood.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">23498357</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2013</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>02</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2016</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>25</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1532-2939</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>84</Volume><Issue>1</Issue><PubDate><Year>2013</Year><Month>May</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>The Journal of hospital infection</Title><ISOAbbreviation>J. Hosp. Infect.</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Effectiveness of surgical masks against influenza bioaerosols.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>22-6</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1016/j.jhin.2013.02.007</ELocationID><ELocationID EIdType="pii" ValidYN="Y">S0195-6701(13)00069-8</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText Label="BACKGROUND" NlmCategory="BACKGROUND">Most surgical masks are not certified for use as respiratory protective devices (RPDs). In the event of an influenza pandemic, logistical and practical implications such as storage and fit testing will restrict the use of RPDs to certain high-risk procedures that are likely to generate large amounts of infectious bioaerosols. Studies have shown that in such circumstances increased numbers of surgical masks are worn, but the protection afforded to the wearer by a surgical mask against infectious aerosols is not well understood.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="AIM" NlmCategory="OBJECTIVE">To develop and apply a method for assessing the protection afforded by surgical masks against a bioaerosol challenge.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="METHODS" NlmCategory="METHODS">A dummy test head attached to a breathing simulator was used to test the performance of surgical masks against a viral challenge. Several designs of surgical masks commonly used in the UK healthcare sector were evaluated by measuring levels of inert particles and live aerosolised influenza virus in the air, from in front of and behind each mask.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="FINDINGS" NlmCategory="RESULTS">Live influenza virus was measurable from the air behind all surgical masks tested. The data indicate that a surgical mask will reduce exposure to aerosolised infectious influenza virus; reductions ranged from 1.1- to 55-fold (average 6-fold), depending on the design of the mask.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="CONCLUSION" NlmCategory="CONCLUSIONS">We describe a workable method to evaluate the protective efficacy of surgical masks and RPDs against a relevant aerosolised biological challenge. The results demonstrated limitations of surgical masks in this context, although they are to some extent protective.</AbstractText><CopyrightInformation>Crown Copyright © 2013. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</CopyrightInformation></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Makison Booth</LastName><ForeName>C</ForeName><Initials>C</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Health & Safety Laboratory (HSL), Buxton, Derbyshire, UK. catherine.makison@hsl.gov.uk</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Clayton</LastName><ForeName>M</ForeName><Initials>M</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Crook</LastName><ForeName>B</ForeName><Initials>B</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Gawn</LastName><ForeName>J M</ForeName><Initials>JM</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2013</Year><Month>03</Month><Day>14</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>England</Country><MedlineTA>J Hosp Infect</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>8007166</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0195-6701</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D000336">Aerosols</NameOfSubstance></Chemical></ChemicalList><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000336" MajorTopicYN="Y">Aerosols</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D002478" MajorTopicYN="N">Cells, Cultured</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005069" MajorTopicYN="N">Evaluation Studies as Topic</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017053" MajorTopicYN="N">Infection Control</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="Y">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017758" MajorTopicYN="N">Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000517" MajorTopicYN="N">prevention & control</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007251" MajorTopicYN="N">Influenza, Human</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000517" MajorTopicYN="Y">prevention & control</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000635" MajorTopicYN="N">transmission</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008397" MajorTopicYN="N">Masks</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000821" MajorTopicYN="Y">virology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D009975" MajorTopicYN="N">Orthomyxoviridae</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000302" MajorTopicYN="N">isolation & purification</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006113" MajorTopicYN="N">United Kingdom</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2012</Year><Month>01</Month><Day>09</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2013</Year><Month>02</Month><Day>04</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2013</Year><Month>3</Month><Day>19</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2013</Year><Month>3</Month><Day>19</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2013</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>16</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">23498357</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pii">S0195-6701(13)00069-8</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1016/j.jhin.2013.02.007</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Sante/explor/PandemieGrippaleV1/Data/PubMed/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000A68 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 000A68 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Sante
|area= PandemieGrippaleV1
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Curation
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:23498357
|texte= Effectiveness of surgical masks against influenza bioaerosols.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:23498357" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a PandemieGrippaleV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.34. |  |