Serveur d'exploration sur les pandémies grippales

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Evaluation of Five Decontamination Methods for Filtering Facepiece Respirators

Identifieur interne : 000652 ( Pmc/Corpus ); précédent : 000651; suivant : 000653

Evaluation of Five Decontamination Methods for Filtering Facepiece Respirators

Auteurs : Dennis J. Viscusi ; Michael S. Bergman ; Benjamin C. Eimer ; Ronald E. Shaffer

Source :

RBID : PMC:2781738

Abstract

Concerns have been raised regarding the availability of National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)-certified N95 filtering facepiece respirators (FFRs) during an influenza pandemic. One possible strategy to mitigate a respirator shortage is to reuse FFRs following a biological decontamination process to render infectious material on the FFR inactive. However, little data exist on the effects of decontamination methods on respirator integrity and performance. This study evaluated five decontamination methods [ultraviolet germicidal irradiation (UVGI), ethylene oxide, vaporized hydrogen peroxide (VHP), microwave oven irradiation, and bleach] using nine models of NIOSH-certified respirators (three models each of N95 FFRs, surgical N95 respirators, and P100 FFRs) to determine which methods should be considered for future research studies. Following treatment by each decontamination method, the FFRs were evaluated for changes in physical appearance, odor, and laboratory performance (filter aerosol penetration and filter airflow resistance). Additional experiments (dry heat laboratory oven exposures, off-gassing, and FFR hydrophobicity) were subsequently conducted to better understand material properties and possible health risks to the respirator user following decontamination. However, this study did not assess the efficiency of the decontamination methods to inactivate viable microorganisms. Microwave oven irradiation melted samples from two FFR models. The remainder of the FFR samples that had been decontaminated had expected levels of filter aerosol penetration and filter airflow resistance. The scent of bleach remained noticeable following overnight drying and low levels of chlorine gas were found to off-gas from bleach-decontaminated FFRs when rehydrated with deionized water. UVGI, ethylene oxide (EtO), and VHP were found to be the most promising decontamination methods; however, concerns remain about the throughput capabilities for EtO and VHP. Further research is needed before any specific decontamination methods can be recommended.


Url:
DOI: 10.1093/annhyg/mep070
PubMed: 19805391
PubMed Central: 2781738

Links to Exploration step

PMC:2781738

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI>
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Evaluation of Five Decontamination Methods for Filtering Facepiece Respirators</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Viscusi, Dennis J" sort="Viscusi, Dennis J" uniqKey="Viscusi D" first="Dennis J." last="Viscusi">Dennis J. Viscusi</name>
<affiliation>
<nlm:aff id="aff1">National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, National Personal Protective Technology Laboratory, 626 Cochrans Mill Road, Pittsburgh, PA 15236, USA</nlm:aff>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Bergman, Michael S" sort="Bergman, Michael S" uniqKey="Bergman M" first="Michael S." last="Bergman">Michael S. Bergman</name>
<affiliation>
<nlm:aff id="aff2">EG&G Technical Services, Inc., 626 Cochrans Mill Road, PO Box 18070, Pittsburgh, PA 15236, USA</nlm:aff>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Eimer, Benjamin C" sort="Eimer, Benjamin C" uniqKey="Eimer B" first="Benjamin C." last="Eimer">Benjamin C. Eimer</name>
<affiliation>
<nlm:aff id="aff2">EG&G Technical Services, Inc., 626 Cochrans Mill Road, PO Box 18070, Pittsburgh, PA 15236, USA</nlm:aff>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Shaffer, Ronald E" sort="Shaffer, Ronald E" uniqKey="Shaffer R" first="Ronald E." last="Shaffer">Ronald E. Shaffer</name>
<affiliation>
<nlm:aff id="aff1">National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, National Personal Protective Technology Laboratory, 626 Cochrans Mill Road, Pittsburgh, PA 15236, USA</nlm:aff>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">PMC</idno>
<idno type="pmid">19805391</idno>
<idno type="pmc">2781738</idno>
<idno type="url">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2781738</idno>
<idno type="RBID">PMC:2781738</idno>
<idno type="doi">10.1093/annhyg/mep070</idno>
<date when="2009">2009</date>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Corpus">000652</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PMC">000652</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en" level="a" type="main">Evaluation of Five Decontamination Methods for Filtering Facepiece Respirators</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Viscusi, Dennis J" sort="Viscusi, Dennis J" uniqKey="Viscusi D" first="Dennis J." last="Viscusi">Dennis J. Viscusi</name>
<affiliation>
<nlm:aff id="aff1">National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, National Personal Protective Technology Laboratory, 626 Cochrans Mill Road, Pittsburgh, PA 15236, USA</nlm:aff>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Bergman, Michael S" sort="Bergman, Michael S" uniqKey="Bergman M" first="Michael S." last="Bergman">Michael S. Bergman</name>
<affiliation>
<nlm:aff id="aff2">EG&G Technical Services, Inc., 626 Cochrans Mill Road, PO Box 18070, Pittsburgh, PA 15236, USA</nlm:aff>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Eimer, Benjamin C" sort="Eimer, Benjamin C" uniqKey="Eimer B" first="Benjamin C." last="Eimer">Benjamin C. Eimer</name>
<affiliation>
<nlm:aff id="aff2">EG&G Technical Services, Inc., 626 Cochrans Mill Road, PO Box 18070, Pittsburgh, PA 15236, USA</nlm:aff>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Shaffer, Ronald E" sort="Shaffer, Ronald E" uniqKey="Shaffer R" first="Ronald E." last="Shaffer">Ronald E. Shaffer</name>
<affiliation>
<nlm:aff id="aff1">National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, National Personal Protective Technology Laboratory, 626 Cochrans Mill Road, Pittsburgh, PA 15236, USA</nlm:aff>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series>
<title level="j">Annals of Occupational Hygiene</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0003-4878</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1475-3162</idno>
<imprint>
<date when="2009">2009</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass></textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">
<p>Concerns have been raised regarding the availability of National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)-certified N95 filtering facepiece respirators (FFRs) during an influenza pandemic. One possible strategy to mitigate a respirator shortage is to reuse FFRs following a biological decontamination process to render infectious material on the FFR inactive. However, little data exist on the effects of decontamination methods on respirator integrity and performance. This study evaluated five decontamination methods [ultraviolet germicidal irradiation (UVGI), ethylene oxide, vaporized hydrogen peroxide (VHP), microwave oven irradiation, and bleach] using nine models of NIOSH-certified respirators (three models each of N95 FFRs, surgical N95 respirators, and P100 FFRs) to determine which methods should be considered for future research studies. Following treatment by each decontamination method, the FFRs were evaluated for changes in physical appearance, odor, and laboratory performance (filter aerosol penetration and filter airflow resistance). Additional experiments (dry heat laboratory oven exposures, off-gassing, and FFR hydrophobicity) were subsequently conducted to better understand material properties and possible health risks to the respirator user following decontamination. However, this study did not assess the efficiency of the decontamination methods to inactivate viable microorganisms. Microwave oven irradiation melted samples from two FFR models. The remainder of the FFR samples that had been decontaminated had expected levels of filter aerosol penetration and filter airflow resistance. The scent of bleach remained noticeable following overnight drying and low levels of chlorine gas were found to off-gas from bleach-decontaminated FFRs when rehydrated with deionized water. UVGI, ethylene oxide (EtO), and VHP were found to be the most promising decontamination methods; however, concerns remain about the throughput capabilities for EtO and VHP. Further research is needed before any specific decontamination methods can be recommended.</p>
</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<pmc article-type="research-article">
<pmc-comment>The publisher of this article does not allow downloading of the full text in XML form.</pmc-comment>
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">Ann Occup Hyg</journal-id>
<journal-id journal-id-type="hwp">annhyg</journal-id>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">annhyg</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Annals of Occupational Hygiene</journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="ppub">0003-4878</issn>
<issn pub-type="epub">1475-3162</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Oxford University Press</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="pmid">19805391</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="pmc">2781738</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/annhyg/mep070</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Original Articles</subject>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Evaluation of Five Decontamination Methods for Filtering Facepiece Respirators</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Viscusi</surname>
<given-names>Dennis J.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bergman</surname>
<given-names>Michael S.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Eimer</surname>
<given-names>Benjamin C.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Shaffer</surname>
<given-names>Ronald E.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1">*</xref>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">
<label>1</label>
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, National Personal Protective Technology Laboratory, 626 Cochrans Mill Road, Pittsburgh, PA 15236, USA</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<label>2</label>
EG&G Technical Services, Inc., 626 Cochrans Mill Road, PO Box 18070, Pittsburgh, PA 15236, USA</aff>
<author-notes>
<corresp id="cor1">
<label>*</label>
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +412-386-4001; fax: +412-386-6864; e-mail:
<email>rshaffer@cdc.gov</email>
</corresp>
</author-notes>
<pmc-comment>Fake ppub date generated by PMC from publisher pub-date/@pub-type='epub-ppub' </pmc-comment>
<pub-date pub-type="ppub">
<month>11</month>
<year>2009</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>4</day>
<month>10</month>
<year>2009</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>53</volume>
<issue>8</issue>
<fpage>815</fpage>
<lpage>827</lpage>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>27</day>
<month>5</month>
<year>2009</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>2</day>
<month>9</month>
<year>2009</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Occupational Hygiene Society</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2009</copyright-year>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>Concerns have been raised regarding the availability of National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)-certified N95 filtering facepiece respirators (FFRs) during an influenza pandemic. One possible strategy to mitigate a respirator shortage is to reuse FFRs following a biological decontamination process to render infectious material on the FFR inactive. However, little data exist on the effects of decontamination methods on respirator integrity and performance. This study evaluated five decontamination methods [ultraviolet germicidal irradiation (UVGI), ethylene oxide, vaporized hydrogen peroxide (VHP), microwave oven irradiation, and bleach] using nine models of NIOSH-certified respirators (three models each of N95 FFRs, surgical N95 respirators, and P100 FFRs) to determine which methods should be considered for future research studies. Following treatment by each decontamination method, the FFRs were evaluated for changes in physical appearance, odor, and laboratory performance (filter aerosol penetration and filter airflow resistance). Additional experiments (dry heat laboratory oven exposures, off-gassing, and FFR hydrophobicity) were subsequently conducted to better understand material properties and possible health risks to the respirator user following decontamination. However, this study did not assess the efficiency of the decontamination methods to inactivate viable microorganisms. Microwave oven irradiation melted samples from two FFR models. The remainder of the FFR samples that had been decontaminated had expected levels of filter aerosol penetration and filter airflow resistance. The scent of bleach remained noticeable following overnight drying and low levels of chlorine gas were found to off-gas from bleach-decontaminated FFRs when rehydrated with deionized water. UVGI, ethylene oxide (EtO), and VHP were found to be the most promising decontamination methods; however, concerns remain about the throughput capabilities for EtO and VHP. Further research is needed before any specific decontamination methods can be recommended.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>decontamination</kwd>
<kwd>filtering facepiece respirator</kwd>
<kwd>healthcare workers</kwd>
<kwd>N95 respirator</kwd>
<kwd>pandemic influenza</kwd>
<kwd>respirator reuse</kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front>
</pmc>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Sante/explor/PandemieGrippaleV1/Data/Pmc/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000652 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000652 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Sante
   |area=    PandemieGrippaleV1
   |flux=    Pmc
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     PMC:2781738
   |texte=   Evaluation of Five Decontamination Methods for Filtering Facepiece Respirators
}}

Pour générer des pages wiki

HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Corpus/RBID.i   -Sk "pubmed:19805391" \
       | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Corpus/biblio.hfd   \
       | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a PandemieGrippaleV1 

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.34.
Data generation: Wed Jun 10 11:04:28 2020. Site generation: Sun Mar 28 09:10:28 2021