PandemieGrippaleV1, PascalFrancis, Corpus, bibRecord, 000134

Cleaning of filtering facepiece respirators contaminated with mucin and Staphylococcus aureus

Identifieur interne : 000134 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 000133; suivant : 000135

Cleaning of filtering facepiece respirators contaminated with mucin and Staphylococcus aureus

Auteurs : Brian K. Heimbuch ; Kimberly Kinney ; April E. Lumley ; Delbert A. Harnish ; Michael Bergman ; Joseph D. Wander

Source :

American journal of infection control [ 0196-6553 ] ; 2014.

RBID : Pascal:14-0092839

Descripteurs français

Pascal (Inist)
- Staphylococcie, Grippe, Nettoyage, Contamination, Mucine, Staphylococcus aureus, Aérosol, Décontamination, Salive, Contrôle, Pandémie.

English descriptors

KwdEn :
- Aerosols, Check, Cleaning, Contamination, Decontamination, Influenza, Mucin, Saliva, Staphylococcal infection, Staphylococcus aureus.

Abstract

Background: Decontamination, cleaning, and reuse of filtering facepiece respirators (FFRs) has been proposed to mitigate an acute FFR shortage during a public health emergency. Our study evaluates the ability of commercially available wipe products to clean FFRs contaminated with either infectious or noninfectious aerosols. Methods: Three models of surgical N95 FFRs were contaminated with aerosols of mucin or viable Staphylococcus aureus then cleaned with hypochlorite, benzalkonium chloride, or nonantimicrobial wipes. After cleaning, FFRs were separated into components (nose pad, fabrics, and perforated strip), and contaminants were extracted and quantified. Filtration performance was assessed for cleaned FFRs. Results: Mucin removal was <1 log for all wipe products on all components. Inert wipes achieved ∼ 1-log attenuation in viable S aureus on fabrics from all FFR models-removal was less effective from nose pads and perforated edges. Both antimicrobial wipes achieved 3-5-log attenuation on most components, with smaller reductions on nose pads and greater reductions on perforated strips. Particle penetration following cleaning yielded mean values <5%. The highest penetrations were observed in FFRs cleaned with benzalkonium chloride wipes. Conclusions: FFRs can be disinfected using antimicrobial wipe products, but not effectively cleaned with the wipes evaluated in this study. This study provides informative data for the development of better FFRs and applicable cleaning products.

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.

A01	`01`	`1`		`@0 0196-6553`
A03		`1`		`@0 Am. j. infect. control`
A05				`@2 42`
A06				`@2 3`
A08	`01`	`1`	`ENG`	`@1 Cleaning of filtering facepiece respirators contaminated with mucin and Staphylococcus aureus`
A11	`01`	`1`		`@1 HEIMBUCH (Brian K.)`
A11	`02`	`1`		`@1 KINNEY (Kimberly)`
A11	`03`	`1`		`@1 LUMLEY (April E.)`
A11	`04`	`1`		`@1 HARNISH (Delbert A.)`
A11	`05`	`1`		`@1 BERGMAN (Michael)`
A11	`06`	`1`		`@1 WANDER (Joseph D.)`
A14	`01`			`@1 Applied Research Associates @2 Panama City, FL @3 USA @Z 1 aut. @Z 2 aut. @Z 3 aut. @Z 4 aut.`
A14	`02`			`@1 National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health @2 Pittsburgh, PA @3 USA @Z 5 aut.`
A14	`03`			`@1 Air Force Research Laboratory @2 Tyndall Air Force Base, FL @3 USA @Z 6 aut.`
A20				`@1 265-270`
A21				`@1 2014`
A23	`01`			`@0 ENG`
A43	`01`			`@1 INIST @2 19097 @5 354000506157160090`
A44				`@0 0000 @1 © 2014 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.`
A45				`@0 22 ref.`
A47	`01`	`1`		`@0 14-0092839`
A60				`@1 P`
A61				`@0 A`
A64	`01`	`1`		`@0 American journal of infection control`
A66	`01`			`@0 USA`
C01	`01`		`ENG`	@0 Background: Decontamination, cleaning, and reuse of filtering facepiece respirators (FFRs) has been proposed to mitigate an acute FFR shortage during a public health emergency. Our study evaluates the ability of commercially available wipe products to clean FFRs contaminated with either infectious or noninfectious aerosols. Methods: Three models of surgical N95 FFRs were contaminated with aerosols of mucin or viable Staphylococcus aureus then cleaned with hypochlorite, benzalkonium chloride, or nonantimicrobial wipes. After cleaning, FFRs were separated into components (nose pad, fabrics, and perforated strip), and contaminants were extracted and quantified. Filtration performance was assessed for cleaned FFRs. Results: Mucin removal was <1 log for all wipe products on all components. Inert wipes achieved ∼ 1-log attenuation in viable S aureus on fabrics from all FFR models-removal was less effective from nose pads and perforated edges. Both antimicrobial wipes achieved 3-5-log attenuation on most components, with smaller reductions on nose pads and greater reductions on perforated strips. Particle penetration following cleaning yielded mean values <5%. The highest penetrations were observed in FFRs cleaned with benzalkonium chloride wipes. Conclusions: FFRs can be disinfected using antimicrobial wipe products, but not effectively cleaned with the wipes evaluated in this study. This study provides informative data for the development of better FFRs and applicable cleaning products.
C02	`01`	`X`		`@0 002B05A02`
C02	`02`	`X`		`@0 002B05B02N`
C02	`03`	`X`		`@0 002B05C02C`
C03	`01`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Staphylococcie @5 01`
C03	`01`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Staphylococcal infection @5 01`
C03	`01`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Estafilococia @5 01`
C03	`02`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Grippe @5 02`
C03	`02`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Influenza @5 02`
C03	`02`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Gripe @5 02`
C03	`03`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Nettoyage @5 07`
C03	`03`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Cleaning @5 07`
C03	`03`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Limpieza @5 07`
C03	`04`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Contamination @5 08`
C03	`04`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Contamination @5 08`
C03	`04`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Contaminación @5 08`
C03	`05`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Mucine @5 09`
C03	`05`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Mucin @5 09`
C03	`05`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Mucina @5 09`
C03	`06`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Staphylococcus aureus @2 NS @5 10`
C03	`06`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Staphylococcus aureus @2 NS @5 10`
C03	`06`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Staphylococcus aureus @2 NS @5 10`
C03	`07`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Aérosol @5 13`
C03	`07`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Aerosols @5 13`
C03	`07`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Aerosol @5 13`
C03	`08`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Décontamination @5 14`
C03	`08`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Decontamination @5 14`
C03	`08`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Descontaminación @5 14`
C03	`09`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Salive @5 15`
C03	`09`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Saliva @5 15`
C03	`09`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Saliva @5 15`
C03	`10`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Contrôle @5 30`
C03	`10`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Check @5 30`
C03	`10`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Control @5 30`
C03	`11`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Pandémie @4 INC @5 86`
C07	`01`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Bactériose`
C07	`01`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Bacteriosis`
C07	`01`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Bacteriosis`
C07	`02`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Infection`
C07	`02`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Infection`
C07	`02`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Infección`
C07	`03`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Virose`
C07	`03`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Viral disease`
C07	`03`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Virosis`
C07	`04`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Micrococcaceae @2 NS`
C07	`04`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Micrococcaceae @2 NS`
C07	`04`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Micrococcaceae @2 NS`
C07	`05`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Micrococcales @2 NS`
C07	`05`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Micrococcales @2 NS`
C07	`05`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Micrococcales @2 NS`
C07	`06`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Bactérie`
C07	`06`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Bacteria`
C07	`06`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Bacteria`
C07	`07`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Prévention @5 37`
C07	`07`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Prevention @5 37`
C07	`07`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Prevención @5 37`
N21				`@1 125`
N44	`01`			`@1 OTO`
N82				`@1 OTO`

Format Inist (serveur)

NO :	PASCAL 14-0092839 INIST
ET :	Cleaning of filtering facepiece respirators contaminated with mucin and Staphylococcus aureus
AU :	HEIMBUCH (Brian K.); KINNEY (Kimberly); LUMLEY (April E.); HARNISH (Delbert A.); BERGMAN (Michael); WANDER (Joseph D.)
AF :	Applied Research Associates/Panama City, FL/Etats-Unis (1 aut., 2 aut., 3 aut., 4 aut.); National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health/Pittsburgh, PA/Etats-Unis (5 aut.); Air Force Research Laboratory/Tyndall Air Force Base, FL/Etats-Unis (6 aut.)
DT :	Publication en série; Niveau analytique
SO :	American journal of infection control; ISSN 0196-6553; Etats-Unis; Da. 2014; Vol. 42; No. 3; Pp. 265-270; Bibl. 22 ref.
LA :	Anglais
EA :	Background: Decontamination, cleaning, and reuse of filtering facepiece respirators (FFRs) has been proposed to mitigate an acute FFR shortage during a public health emergency. Our study evaluates the ability of commercially available wipe products to clean FFRs contaminated with either infectious or noninfectious aerosols. Methods: Three models of surgical N95 FFRs were contaminated with aerosols of mucin or viable Staphylococcus aureus then cleaned with hypochlorite, benzalkonium chloride, or nonantimicrobial wipes. After cleaning, FFRs were separated into components (nose pad, fabrics, and perforated strip), and contaminants were extracted and quantified. Filtration performance was assessed for cleaned FFRs. Results: Mucin removal was <1 log for all wipe products on all components. Inert wipes achieved ∼ 1-log attenuation in viable S aureus on fabrics from all FFR models-removal was less effective from nose pads and perforated edges. Both antimicrobial wipes achieved 3-5-log attenuation on most components, with smaller reductions on nose pads and greater reductions on perforated strips. Particle penetration following cleaning yielded mean values <5%. The highest penetrations were observed in FFRs cleaned with benzalkonium chloride wipes. Conclusions: FFRs can be disinfected using antimicrobial wipe products, but not effectively cleaned with the wipes evaluated in this study. This study provides informative data for the development of better FFRs and applicable cleaning products.
CC :	002B05A02; 002B05B02N; 002B05C02C
FD :	Staphylococcie; Grippe; Nettoyage; Contamination; Mucine; Staphylococcus aureus; Aérosol; Décontamination; Salive; Contrôle; Pandémie
FG :	Bactériose; Infection; Virose; Micrococcaceae; Micrococcales; Bactérie; Prévention
ED :	Staphylococcal infection; Influenza; Cleaning; Contamination; Mucin; Staphylococcus aureus; Aerosols; Decontamination; Saliva; Check
EG :	Bacteriosis; Infection; Viral disease; Micrococcaceae; Micrococcales; Bacteria; Prevention
SD :	Estafilococia; Gripe; Limpieza; Contaminación; Mucina; Staphylococcus aureus; Aerosol; Descontaminación; Saliva; Control
LO :	INIST-19097.354000506157160090
ID :	14-0092839

Links to Exploration step

Pascal:14-0092839

Le document en format XML

<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Cleaning of filtering facepiece respirators contaminated with mucin and Staphylococcus aureus</title>
<author><name sortKey="Heimbuch, Brian K" sort="Heimbuch, Brian K" uniqKey="Heimbuch B" first="Brian K." last="Heimbuch">Brian K. Heimbuch</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Applied Research Associates</s1>
<s2>Panama City, FL</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Kinney, Kimberly" sort="Kinney, Kimberly" uniqKey="Kinney K" first="Kimberly" last="Kinney">Kimberly Kinney</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Applied Research Associates</s1>
<s2>Panama City, FL</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Lumley, April E" sort="Lumley, April E" uniqKey="Lumley A" first="April E." last="Lumley">April E. Lumley</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Applied Research Associates</s1>
<s2>Panama City, FL</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Harnish, Delbert A" sort="Harnish, Delbert A" uniqKey="Harnish D" first="Delbert A." last="Harnish">Delbert A. Harnish</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Applied Research Associates</s1>
<s2>Panama City, FL</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Bergman, Michael" sort="Bergman, Michael" uniqKey="Bergman M" first="Michael" last="Bergman">Michael Bergman</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health</s1>
<s2>Pittsburgh, PA</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Wander, Joseph D" sort="Wander, Joseph D" uniqKey="Wander J" first="Joseph D." last="Wander">Joseph D. Wander</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="03"><s1>Air Force Research Laboratory</s1>
<s2>Tyndall Air Force Base, FL</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">14-0092839</idno>
<date when="2014">2014</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 14-0092839 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Pascal:14-0092839</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000134</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Cleaning of filtering facepiece respirators contaminated with mucin and Staphylococcus aureus</title>
<author><name sortKey="Heimbuch, Brian K" sort="Heimbuch, Brian K" uniqKey="Heimbuch B" first="Brian K." last="Heimbuch">Brian K. Heimbuch</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Applied Research Associates</s1>
<s2>Panama City, FL</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Kinney, Kimberly" sort="Kinney, Kimberly" uniqKey="Kinney K" first="Kimberly" last="Kinney">Kimberly Kinney</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Applied Research Associates</s1>
<s2>Panama City, FL</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Lumley, April E" sort="Lumley, April E" uniqKey="Lumley A" first="April E." last="Lumley">April E. Lumley</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Applied Research Associates</s1>
<s2>Panama City, FL</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Harnish, Delbert A" sort="Harnish, Delbert A" uniqKey="Harnish D" first="Delbert A." last="Harnish">Delbert A. Harnish</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Applied Research Associates</s1>
<s2>Panama City, FL</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Bergman, Michael" sort="Bergman, Michael" uniqKey="Bergman M" first="Michael" last="Bergman">Michael Bergman</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health</s1>
<s2>Pittsburgh, PA</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Wander, Joseph D" sort="Wander, Joseph D" uniqKey="Wander J" first="Joseph D." last="Wander">Joseph D. Wander</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="03"><s1>Air Force Research Laboratory</s1>
<s2>Tyndall Air Force Base, FL</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j" type="main">American journal of infection control</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Am. j. infect. control</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0196-6553</idno>
<imprint><date when="2014">2014</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">American journal of infection control</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Am. j. infect. control</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0196-6553</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Aerosols</term>
<term>Check</term>
<term>Cleaning</term>
<term>Contamination</term>
<term>Decontamination</term>
<term>Influenza</term>
<term>Mucin</term>
<term>Saliva</term>
<term>Staphylococcal infection</term>
<term>Staphylococcus aureus</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Staphylococcie</term>
<term>Grippe</term>
<term>Nettoyage</term>
<term>Contamination</term>
<term>Mucine</term>
<term>Staphylococcus aureus</term>
<term>Aérosol</term>
<term>Décontamination</term>
<term>Salive</term>
<term>Contrôle</term>
<term>Pandémie</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Background: Decontamination, cleaning, and reuse of filtering facepiece respirators (FFRs) has been proposed to mitigate an acute FFR shortage during a public health emergency. Our study evaluates the ability of commercially available wipe products to clean FFRs contaminated with either infectious or noninfectious aerosols. Methods: Three models of surgical N95 FFRs were contaminated with aerosols of mucin or viable Staphylococcus aureus then cleaned with hypochlorite, benzalkonium chloride, or nonantimicrobial wipes. After cleaning, FFRs were separated into components (nose pad, fabrics, and perforated strip), and contaminants were extracted and quantified. Filtration performance was assessed for cleaned FFRs. Results: Mucin removal was <1 log for all wipe products on all components. Inert wipes achieved ∼ 1-log attenuation in viable S aureus on fabrics from all FFR models-removal was less effective from nose pads and perforated edges. Both antimicrobial wipes achieved 3-5-log attenuation on most components, with smaller reductions on nose pads and greater reductions on perforated strips. Particle penetration following cleaning yielded mean values <5%. The highest penetrations were observed in FFRs cleaned with benzalkonium chloride wipes. Conclusions: FFRs can be disinfected using antimicrobial wipe products, but not effectively cleaned with the wipes evaluated in this study. This study provides informative data for the development of better FFRs and applicable cleaning products.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist><standard h6="B"><pA><fA01 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>0196-6553</s0>
</fA01>
<fA03 i2="1"><s0>Am. j. infect. control</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05><s2>42</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06><s2>3</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>Cleaning of filtering facepiece respirators contaminated with mucin and Staphylococcus aureus</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>HEIMBUCH (Brian K.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1"><s1>KINNEY (Kimberly)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="03" i2="1"><s1>LUMLEY (April E.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="04" i2="1"><s1>HARNISH (Delbert A.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="05" i2="1"><s1>BERGMAN (Michael)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="06" i2="1"><s1>WANDER (Joseph D.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01"><s1>Applied Research Associates</s1>
<s2>Panama City, FL</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="02"><s1>National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health</s1>
<s2>Pittsburgh, PA</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="03"><s1>Air Force Research Laboratory</s1>
<s2>Tyndall Air Force Base, FL</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20><s1>265-270</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21><s1>2014</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01"><s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01"><s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>19097</s2>
<s5>354000506157160090</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44><s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2014 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45><s0>22 ref.</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>14-0092839</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60><s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61><s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>American journal of infection control</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01"><s0>USA</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG"><s0>Background: Decontamination, cleaning, and reuse of filtering facepiece respirators (FFRs) has been proposed to mitigate an acute FFR shortage during a public health emergency. Our study evaluates the ability of commercially available wipe products to clean FFRs contaminated with either infectious or noninfectious aerosols. Methods: Three models of surgical N95 FFRs were contaminated with aerosols of mucin or viable Staphylococcus aureus then cleaned with hypochlorite, benzalkonium chloride, or nonantimicrobial wipes. After cleaning, FFRs were separated into components (nose pad, fabrics, and perforated strip), and contaminants were extracted and quantified. Filtration performance was assessed for cleaned FFRs. Results: Mucin removal was <1 log for all wipe products on all components. Inert wipes achieved ∼ 1-log attenuation in viable S aureus on fabrics from all FFR models-removal was less effective from nose pads and perforated edges. Both antimicrobial wipes achieved 3-5-log attenuation on most components, with smaller reductions on nose pads and greater reductions on perforated strips. Particle penetration following cleaning yielded mean values <5%. The highest penetrations were observed in FFRs cleaned with benzalkonium chloride wipes. Conclusions: FFRs can be disinfected using antimicrobial wipe products, but not effectively cleaned with the wipes evaluated in this study. This study provides informative data for the development of better FFRs and applicable cleaning products.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X"><s0>002B05A02</s0>
</fC02>
<fC02 i1="02" i2="X"><s0>002B05B02N</s0>
</fC02>
<fC02 i1="03" i2="X"><s0>002B05C02C</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Staphylococcie</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Staphylococcal infection</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Estafilococia</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Grippe</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Influenza</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Gripe</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Nettoyage</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Cleaning</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Limpieza</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Contamination</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Contamination</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Contaminación</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Mucine</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Mucin</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Mucina</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Staphylococcus aureus</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Staphylococcus aureus</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Staphylococcus aureus</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Aérosol</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Aerosols</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Aerosol</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Décontamination</s0>
<s5>14</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Decontamination</s0>
<s5>14</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Descontaminación</s0>
<s5>14</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Salive</s0>
<s5>15</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Saliva</s0>
<s5>15</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Saliva</s0>
<s5>15</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Contrôle</s0>
<s5>30</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Check</s0>
<s5>30</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Control</s0>
<s5>30</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Pandémie</s0>
<s4>INC</s4>
<s5>86</s5>
</fC03>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Bactériose</s0>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Bacteriosis</s0>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Bacteriosis</s0>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Infection</s0>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Infection</s0>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Infección</s0>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Virose</s0>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Viral disease</s0>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Virosis</s0>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Micrococcaceae</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Micrococcaceae</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Micrococcaceae</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Micrococcales</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Micrococcales</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Micrococcales</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Bactérie</s0>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Bacteria</s0>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Bacteria</s0>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Prévention</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Prevention</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Prevención</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fN21><s1>125</s1>
</fN21>
<fN44 i1="01"><s1>OTO</s1>
</fN44>
<fN82><s1>OTO</s1>
</fN82>
</pA>
</standard>
<server><NO>PASCAL 14-0092839 INIST</NO>
<ET>Cleaning of filtering facepiece respirators contaminated with mucin and Staphylococcus aureus</ET>
<AU>HEIMBUCH (Brian K.); KINNEY (Kimberly); LUMLEY (April E.); HARNISH (Delbert A.); BERGMAN (Michael); WANDER (Joseph D.)</AU>
<AF>Applied Research Associates/Panama City, FL/Etats-Unis (1 aut., 2 aut., 3 aut., 4 aut.); National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health/Pittsburgh, PA/Etats-Unis (5 aut.); Air Force Research Laboratory/Tyndall Air Force Base, FL/Etats-Unis (6 aut.)</AF>
<DT>Publication en série; Niveau analytique</DT>
<SO>American journal of infection control; ISSN 0196-6553; Etats-Unis; Da. 2014; Vol. 42; No. 3; Pp. 265-270; Bibl. 22 ref.</SO>
<LA>Anglais</LA>
<EA>Background: Decontamination, cleaning, and reuse of filtering facepiece respirators (FFRs) has been proposed to mitigate an acute FFR shortage during a public health emergency. Our study evaluates the ability of commercially available wipe products to clean FFRs contaminated with either infectious or noninfectious aerosols. Methods: Three models of surgical N95 FFRs were contaminated with aerosols of mucin or viable Staphylococcus aureus then cleaned with hypochlorite, benzalkonium chloride, or nonantimicrobial wipes. After cleaning, FFRs were separated into components (nose pad, fabrics, and perforated strip), and contaminants were extracted and quantified. Filtration performance was assessed for cleaned FFRs. Results: Mucin removal was <1 log for all wipe products on all components. Inert wipes achieved ∼ 1-log attenuation in viable S aureus on fabrics from all FFR models-removal was less effective from nose pads and perforated edges. Both antimicrobial wipes achieved 3-5-log attenuation on most components, with smaller reductions on nose pads and greater reductions on perforated strips. Particle penetration following cleaning yielded mean values <5%. The highest penetrations were observed in FFRs cleaned with benzalkonium chloride wipes. Conclusions: FFRs can be disinfected using antimicrobial wipe products, but not effectively cleaned with the wipes evaluated in this study. This study provides informative data for the development of better FFRs and applicable cleaning products.</EA>
<CC>002B05A02; 002B05B02N; 002B05C02C</CC>
<FD>Staphylococcie; Grippe; Nettoyage; Contamination; Mucine; Staphylococcus aureus; Aérosol; Décontamination; Salive; Contrôle; Pandémie</FD>
<FG>Bactériose; Infection; Virose; Micrococcaceae; Micrococcales; Bactérie; Prévention</FG>
<ED>Staphylococcal infection; Influenza; Cleaning; Contamination; Mucin; Staphylococcus aureus; Aerosols; Decontamination; Saliva; Check</ED>
<EG>Bacteriosis; Infection; Viral disease; Micrococcaceae; Micrococcales; Bacteria; Prevention</EG>
<SD>Estafilococia; Gripe; Limpieza; Contaminación; Mucina; Staphylococcus aureus; Aerosol; Descontaminación; Saliva; Control</SD>
<LO>INIST-19097.354000506157160090</LO>
<ID>14-0092839</ID>
</server>
</inist>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Sante/explor/PandemieGrippaleV1/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000134 | SxmlIndent | more

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000134 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Sante
   |area=    PandemieGrippaleV1
   |flux=    PascalFrancis
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     Pascal:14-0092839
   |texte=   Cleaning of filtering facepiece respirators contaminated with mucin and Staphylococcus aureus
}}

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.34.
Data generation: Wed Jun 10 11:04:28 2020. Site generation: Sun Mar 28 09:10:28 2021

	Serveur d'exploration sur les pandémies grippales
	Attention, ce site est en cours de développement ! Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts. Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Serveur d'exploration sur les pandémies grippales

Cleaning of filtering facepiece respirators contaminated with mucin and Staphylococcus aureus

Cleaning of filtering facepiece respirators contaminated with mucin and Staphylococcus aureus

Source :

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Format Inist (serveur)

Links to Exploration step

Le document en format XML

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri