Serveur d'exploration sur les pandémies grippales

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Risk Communication Recommendations and Implementation During Emerging Infectious Diseases: A Case Study of the 2009 H1N1 Influenza Pandemic

Identifieur interne : 000088 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 000087; suivant : 000089

Risk Communication Recommendations and Implementation During Emerging Infectious Diseases: A Case Study of the 2009 H1N1 Influenza Pandemic

Auteurs : Anat Gesser-Edelsburg ; Emilio Mordini ; James J. James ; Donato Greco ; Manfred S. Green

Source :

RBID : Pascal:14-0156024

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Objective: To examine their implementation, we analyzed World Health Organization (WHO) and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines from 2005 to 2008 for risk communication during an emerging infectious disease outbreak, WHO and CDC reports on implementing the guidelines worldwide after the 2009 H1N1 pandemic; and a case study of a member state. Methods: A qualitative study compared WHO and CDC guidelines from 2005 to 2008 with WHO and CDC reports from 2009 to 2011, documenting their implementation during the H1N1 outbreak and assessed how these guidelines were implemented, based on the reports and Israeli stakeholders (n=70). Results: Eight risk communication subthemes were identified: trust, empowerment, uncertainty, communicating the vaccine, inclusion, identification of subpopulations and at-risk groups, segmentation, and 2-way communication. The reports and case study disclosed a gap between international guidelines and their local-level implementation. The guidelines were mostly top-down communications, with little consideration for individual member-state implementation. The WHO and CDC recommendations were not always based on formative evaluation studies, which undermined their validity. Conclusions: In formulating effective communication strategies, the first step is to define the goal of a vaccination program. We recommend implementing conceptual elements from the most current theoretical literature when planning communication strategies and increasing organizational involvement in implementing guidelines in future health crises.

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.

pA  
A01 01  1    @0 1935-7893
A03   1    @0 Disaster med. public health prep.
A05       @2 8
A06       @2 2
A08 01  1  ENG  @1 Risk Communication Recommendations and Implementation During Emerging Infectious Diseases: A Case Study of the 2009 H1N1 Influenza Pandemic
A11 01  1    @1 GESSER-EDELSBURG (Anat)
A11 02  1    @1 MORDINI (Emilio)
A11 03  1    @1 JAMES (James J.)
A11 04  1    @1 GRECO (Donato)
A11 05  1    @1 GREEN (Manfred S.)
A14 01      @1 School of Public Health, University of Haifa @2 Haifa @3 ISR @Z 1 aut. @Z 5 aut.
A14 02      @1 Centre for Science, Society and Citizenship @2 Rome @3 ITA @Z 2 aut.
A14 03      @1 Center for Public Health Preparedness and Disaster Response, American Medical Association @2 Chicago, Illinois @3 USA @Z 3 aut.
A14 04      @1 World Health Organization, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control @2 Rome @3 ITA @Z 4 aut.
A20       @1 158-169
A21       @1 2014
A23 01      @0 ENG
A43 01      @1 INIST @2 28256 @5 354000502710560100
A44       @0 0000 @1 © 2014 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.
A45       @0 35 ref.
A47 01  1    @0 14-0156024
A60       @1 P
A61       @0 A
A64 01  1    @0 Disaster medicine and public health preparedness
A66 01      @0 USA
C01 01    ENG  @0 Objective: To examine their implementation, we analyzed World Health Organization (WHO) and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines from 2005 to 2008 for risk communication during an emerging infectious disease outbreak, WHO and CDC reports on implementing the guidelines worldwide after the 2009 H1N1 pandemic; and a case study of a member state. Methods: A qualitative study compared WHO and CDC guidelines from 2005 to 2008 with WHO and CDC reports from 2009 to 2011, documenting their implementation during the H1N1 outbreak and assessed how these guidelines were implemented, based on the reports and Israeli stakeholders (n=70). Results: Eight risk communication subthemes were identified: trust, empowerment, uncertainty, communicating the vaccine, inclusion, identification of subpopulations and at-risk groups, segmentation, and 2-way communication. The reports and case study disclosed a gap between international guidelines and their local-level implementation. The guidelines were mostly top-down communications, with little consideration for individual member-state implementation. The WHO and CDC recommendations were not always based on formative evaluation studies, which undermined their validity. Conclusions: In formulating effective communication strategies, the first step is to define the goal of a vaccination program. We recommend implementing conceptual elements from the most current theoretical literature when planning communication strategies and increasing organizational involvement in implementing guidelines in future health crises.
C02 01  X    @0 002B30A01C
C02 02  X    @0 002B30A11
C03 01  X  FRE  @0 Maladie émergente @2 NM @5 01
C03 01  X  ENG  @0 Emerging disease @2 NM @5 01
C03 01  X  SPA  @0 Enfermedad emergente @2 NM @5 01
C03 02  X  FRE  @0 Facteur risque @5 02
C03 02  X  ENG  @0 Risk factor @5 02
C03 02  X  SPA  @0 Factor riesgo @5 02
C03 03  X  FRE  @0 Risque @5 03
C03 03  X  ENG  @0 Risk @5 03
C03 03  X  SPA  @0 Riesgo @5 03
C03 04  X  FRE  @0 Infection @5 04
C03 04  X  ENG  @0 Infection @5 04
C03 04  X  SPA  @0 Infección @5 04
C03 05  X  FRE  @0 Communication @5 05
C03 05  X  ENG  @0 Communication @5 05
C03 05  X  SPA  @0 Comunicación @5 05
C03 06  X  FRE  @0 Recommandation @5 06
C03 06  X  ENG  @0 Recommendation @5 06
C03 06  X  SPA  @0 Recomendación @5 06
C03 07  X  FRE  @0 Implémentation @5 08
C03 07  X  ENG  @0 Implementation @5 08
C03 07  X  SPA  @0 Implementación @5 08
C03 08  X  FRE  @0 Etude cas @5 09
C03 08  X  ENG  @0 Case study @5 09
C03 08  X  SPA  @0 Estudio caso @5 09
C03 09  X  FRE  @0 2009 @5 11
C03 09  X  ENG  @0 2009 @5 11
C03 09  X  SPA  @0 2009 @5 11
C03 10  X  FRE  @0 Santé publique @5 12
C03 10  X  ENG  @0 Public health @5 12
C03 10  X  SPA  @0 Salud pública @5 12
C03 11  X  FRE  @0 Procédure @5 17
C03 11  X  ENG  @0 Procedure @5 17
C03 11  X  SPA  @0 Procedimiento @5 17
C03 12  X  FRE  @0 Gestion @5 18
C03 12  X  ENG  @0 Management @5 18
C03 12  X  SPA  @0 Gestión @5 18
C03 13  X  FRE  @0 Prise de décision @5 19
C03 13  X  ENG  @0 Decision making @5 19
C03 13  X  SPA  @0 Toma decision @5 19
C03 14  X  FRE  @0 Grippe pandémique @4 INC @5 86
C03 15  X  FRE  @0 Grippe H1N1 @4 CD @5 96
C03 15  X  ENG  @0 H1N1 influenza @4 CD @5 96
C03 15  X  SPA  @0 Gripe H1N1 @4 CD @5 96
C07 01  X  FRE  @0 Pathologie de l'appareil respiratoire @5 37
C07 01  X  ENG  @0 Respiratory disease @5 37
C07 01  X  SPA  @0 Aparato respiratorio patología @5 37
C07 02  X  FRE  @0 Virose @5 38
C07 02  X  ENG  @0 Viral disease @5 38
C07 02  X  SPA  @0 Virosis @5 38
N21       @1 195
N44 01      @1 OTO
N82       @1 OTO

Format Inist (serveur)

NO : PASCAL 14-0156024 INIST
ET : Risk Communication Recommendations and Implementation During Emerging Infectious Diseases: A Case Study of the 2009 H1N1 Influenza Pandemic
AU : GESSER-EDELSBURG (Anat); MORDINI (Emilio); JAMES (James J.); GRECO (Donato); GREEN (Manfred S.)
AF : School of Public Health, University of Haifa/Haifa/Israël (1 aut., 5 aut.); Centre for Science, Society and Citizenship/Rome/Italie (2 aut.); Center for Public Health Preparedness and Disaster Response, American Medical Association/Chicago, Illinois/Etats-Unis (3 aut.); World Health Organization, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control/Rome/Italie (4 aut.)
DT : Publication en série; Niveau analytique
SO : Disaster medicine and public health preparedness; ISSN 1935-7893; Etats-Unis; Da. 2014; Vol. 8; No. 2; Pp. 158-169; Bibl. 35 ref.
LA : Anglais
EA : Objective: To examine their implementation, we analyzed World Health Organization (WHO) and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines from 2005 to 2008 for risk communication during an emerging infectious disease outbreak, WHO and CDC reports on implementing the guidelines worldwide after the 2009 H1N1 pandemic; and a case study of a member state. Methods: A qualitative study compared WHO and CDC guidelines from 2005 to 2008 with WHO and CDC reports from 2009 to 2011, documenting their implementation during the H1N1 outbreak and assessed how these guidelines were implemented, based on the reports and Israeli stakeholders (n=70). Results: Eight risk communication subthemes were identified: trust, empowerment, uncertainty, communicating the vaccine, inclusion, identification of subpopulations and at-risk groups, segmentation, and 2-way communication. The reports and case study disclosed a gap between international guidelines and their local-level implementation. The guidelines were mostly top-down communications, with little consideration for individual member-state implementation. The WHO and CDC recommendations were not always based on formative evaluation studies, which undermined their validity. Conclusions: In formulating effective communication strategies, the first step is to define the goal of a vaccination program. We recommend implementing conceptual elements from the most current theoretical literature when planning communication strategies and increasing organizational involvement in implementing guidelines in future health crises.
CC : 002B30A01C; 002B30A11
FD : Maladie émergente; Facteur risque; Risque; Infection; Communication; Recommandation; Implémentation; Etude cas; 2009; Santé publique; Procédure; Gestion; Prise de décision; Grippe pandémique; Grippe H1N1
FG : Pathologie de l'appareil respiratoire; Virose
ED : Emerging disease; Risk factor; Risk; Infection; Communication; Recommendation; Implementation; Case study; 2009; Public health; Procedure; Management; Decision making; H1N1 influenza
EG : Respiratory disease; Viral disease
SD : Enfermedad emergente; Factor riesgo; Riesgo; Infección; Comunicación; Recomendación; Implementación; Estudio caso; 2009; Salud pública; Procedimiento; Gestión; Toma decision; Gripe H1N1
LO : INIST-28256.354000502710560100
ID : 14-0156024

Links to Exploration step

Pascal:14-0156024

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI>
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en" level="a">Risk Communication Recommendations and Implementation During Emerging Infectious Diseases: A Case Study of the 2009 H1N1 Influenza Pandemic</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Gesser Edelsburg, Anat" sort="Gesser Edelsburg, Anat" uniqKey="Gesser Edelsburg A" first="Anat" last="Gesser-Edelsburg">Anat Gesser-Edelsburg</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>School of Public Health, University of Haifa</s1>
<s2>Haifa</s2>
<s3>ISR</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Mordini, Emilio" sort="Mordini, Emilio" uniqKey="Mordini E" first="Emilio" last="Mordini">Emilio Mordini</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="02">
<s1>Centre for Science, Society and Citizenship</s1>
<s2>Rome</s2>
<s3>ITA</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="James, James J" sort="James, James J" uniqKey="James J" first="James J." last="James">James J. James</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="03">
<s1>Center for Public Health Preparedness and Disaster Response, American Medical Association</s1>
<s2>Chicago, Illinois</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Greco, Donato" sort="Greco, Donato" uniqKey="Greco D" first="Donato" last="Greco">Donato Greco</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="04">
<s1>World Health Organization, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control</s1>
<s2>Rome</s2>
<s3>ITA</s3>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Green, Manfred S" sort="Green, Manfred S" uniqKey="Green M" first="Manfred S." last="Green">Manfred S. Green</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>School of Public Health, University of Haifa</s1>
<s2>Haifa</s2>
<s3>ISR</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">14-0156024</idno>
<date when="2014">2014</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 14-0156024 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Pascal:14-0156024</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000088</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en" level="a">Risk Communication Recommendations and Implementation During Emerging Infectious Diseases: A Case Study of the 2009 H1N1 Influenza Pandemic</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Gesser Edelsburg, Anat" sort="Gesser Edelsburg, Anat" uniqKey="Gesser Edelsburg A" first="Anat" last="Gesser-Edelsburg">Anat Gesser-Edelsburg</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>School of Public Health, University of Haifa</s1>
<s2>Haifa</s2>
<s3>ISR</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Mordini, Emilio" sort="Mordini, Emilio" uniqKey="Mordini E" first="Emilio" last="Mordini">Emilio Mordini</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="02">
<s1>Centre for Science, Society and Citizenship</s1>
<s2>Rome</s2>
<s3>ITA</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="James, James J" sort="James, James J" uniqKey="James J" first="James J." last="James">James J. James</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="03">
<s1>Center for Public Health Preparedness and Disaster Response, American Medical Association</s1>
<s2>Chicago, Illinois</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Greco, Donato" sort="Greco, Donato" uniqKey="Greco D" first="Donato" last="Greco">Donato Greco</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="04">
<s1>World Health Organization, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control</s1>
<s2>Rome</s2>
<s3>ITA</s3>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Green, Manfred S" sort="Green, Manfred S" uniqKey="Green M" first="Manfred S." last="Green">Manfred S. Green</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>School of Public Health, University of Haifa</s1>
<s2>Haifa</s2>
<s3>ISR</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series>
<title level="j" type="main">Disaster medicine and public health preparedness</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Disaster med. public health prep.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">1935-7893</idno>
<imprint>
<date when="2014">2014</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<title level="j" type="main">Disaster medicine and public health preparedness</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Disaster med. public health prep.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">1935-7893</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>2009</term>
<term>Case study</term>
<term>Communication</term>
<term>Decision making</term>
<term>Emerging disease</term>
<term>H1N1 influenza</term>
<term>Implementation</term>
<term>Infection</term>
<term>Management</term>
<term>Procedure</term>
<term>Public health</term>
<term>Recommendation</term>
<term>Risk</term>
<term>Risk factor</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Maladie émergente</term>
<term>Facteur risque</term>
<term>Risque</term>
<term>Infection</term>
<term>Communication</term>
<term>Recommandation</term>
<term>Implémentation</term>
<term>Etude cas</term>
<term>2009</term>
<term>Santé publique</term>
<term>Procédure</term>
<term>Gestion</term>
<term>Prise de décision</term>
<term>Grippe pandémique</term>
<term>Grippe H1N1</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Objective: To examine their implementation, we analyzed World Health Organization (WHO) and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines from 2005 to 2008 for risk communication during an emerging infectious disease outbreak, WHO and CDC reports on implementing the guidelines worldwide after the 2009 H1N1 pandemic; and a case study of a member state. Methods: A qualitative study compared WHO and CDC guidelines from 2005 to 2008 with WHO and CDC reports from 2009 to 2011, documenting their implementation during the H1N1 outbreak and assessed how these guidelines were implemented, based on the reports and Israeli stakeholders (n=70). Results: Eight risk communication subthemes were identified: trust, empowerment, uncertainty, communicating the vaccine, inclusion, identification of subpopulations and at-risk groups, segmentation, and 2-way communication. The reports and case study disclosed a gap between international guidelines and their local-level implementation. The guidelines were mostly top-down communications, with little consideration for individual member-state implementation. The WHO and CDC recommendations were not always based on formative evaluation studies, which undermined their validity. Conclusions: In formulating effective communication strategies, the first step is to define the goal of a vaccination program. We recommend implementing conceptual elements from the most current theoretical literature when planning communication strategies and increasing organizational involvement in implementing guidelines in future health crises.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist>
<standard h6="B">
<pA>
<fA01 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>1935-7893</s0>
</fA01>
<fA03 i2="1">
<s0>Disaster med. public health prep.</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05>
<s2>8</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06>
<s2>2</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG">
<s1>Risk Communication Recommendations and Implementation During Emerging Infectious Diseases: A Case Study of the 2009 H1N1 Influenza Pandemic</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1">
<s1>GESSER-EDELSBURG (Anat)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1">
<s1>MORDINI (Emilio)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="03" i2="1">
<s1>JAMES (James J.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="04" i2="1">
<s1>GRECO (Donato)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="05" i2="1">
<s1>GREEN (Manfred S.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01">
<s1>School of Public Health, University of Haifa</s1>
<s2>Haifa</s2>
<s3>ISR</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="02">
<s1>Centre for Science, Society and Citizenship</s1>
<s2>Rome</s2>
<s3>ITA</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="03">
<s1>Center for Public Health Preparedness and Disaster Response, American Medical Association</s1>
<s2>Chicago, Illinois</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="04">
<s1>World Health Organization, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control</s1>
<s2>Rome</s2>
<s3>ITA</s3>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20>
<s1>158-169</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21>
<s1>2014</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01">
<s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01">
<s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>28256</s2>
<s5>354000502710560100</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44>
<s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2014 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45>
<s0>35 ref.</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>14-0156024</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60>
<s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61>
<s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>Disaster medicine and public health preparedness</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01">
<s0>USA</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG">
<s0>Objective: To examine their implementation, we analyzed World Health Organization (WHO) and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines from 2005 to 2008 for risk communication during an emerging infectious disease outbreak, WHO and CDC reports on implementing the guidelines worldwide after the 2009 H1N1 pandemic; and a case study of a member state. Methods: A qualitative study compared WHO and CDC guidelines from 2005 to 2008 with WHO and CDC reports from 2009 to 2011, documenting their implementation during the H1N1 outbreak and assessed how these guidelines were implemented, based on the reports and Israeli stakeholders (n=70). Results: Eight risk communication subthemes were identified: trust, empowerment, uncertainty, communicating the vaccine, inclusion, identification of subpopulations and at-risk groups, segmentation, and 2-way communication. The reports and case study disclosed a gap between international guidelines and their local-level implementation. The guidelines were mostly top-down communications, with little consideration for individual member-state implementation. The WHO and CDC recommendations were not always based on formative evaluation studies, which undermined their validity. Conclusions: In formulating effective communication strategies, the first step is to define the goal of a vaccination program. We recommend implementing conceptual elements from the most current theoretical literature when planning communication strategies and increasing organizational involvement in implementing guidelines in future health crises.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X">
<s0>002B30A01C</s0>
</fC02>
<fC02 i1="02" i2="X">
<s0>002B30A11</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Maladie émergente</s0>
<s2>NM</s2>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Emerging disease</s0>
<s2>NM</s2>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Enfermedad emergente</s0>
<s2>NM</s2>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Facteur risque</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Risk factor</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Factor riesgo</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Risque</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Risk</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Riesgo</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Infection</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Infection</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Infección</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Communication</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Communication</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Comunicación</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Recommandation</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Recommendation</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Recomendación</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Implémentation</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Implementation</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Implementación</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Etude cas</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Case study</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Estudio caso</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>2009</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>2009</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>2009</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Santé publique</s0>
<s5>12</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Public health</s0>
<s5>12</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Salud pública</s0>
<s5>12</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Procédure</s0>
<s5>17</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Procedure</s0>
<s5>17</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Procedimiento</s0>
<s5>17</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Gestion</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Management</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Gestión</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="13" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Prise de décision</s0>
<s5>19</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="13" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Decision making</s0>
<s5>19</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="13" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Toma decision</s0>
<s5>19</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="14" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Grippe pandémique</s0>
<s4>INC</s4>
<s5>86</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="15" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Grippe H1N1</s0>
<s4>CD</s4>
<s5>96</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="15" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>H1N1 influenza</s0>
<s4>CD</s4>
<s5>96</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="15" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Gripe H1N1</s0>
<s4>CD</s4>
<s5>96</s5>
</fC03>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Pathologie de l'appareil respiratoire</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Respiratory disease</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Aparato respiratorio patología</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Virose</s0>
<s5>38</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Viral disease</s0>
<s5>38</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Virosis</s0>
<s5>38</s5>
</fC07>
<fN21>
<s1>195</s1>
</fN21>
<fN44 i1="01">
<s1>OTO</s1>
</fN44>
<fN82>
<s1>OTO</s1>
</fN82>
</pA>
</standard>
<server>
<NO>PASCAL 14-0156024 INIST</NO>
<ET>Risk Communication Recommendations and Implementation During Emerging Infectious Diseases: A Case Study of the 2009 H1N1 Influenza Pandemic</ET>
<AU>GESSER-EDELSBURG (Anat); MORDINI (Emilio); JAMES (James J.); GRECO (Donato); GREEN (Manfred S.)</AU>
<AF>School of Public Health, University of Haifa/Haifa/Israël (1 aut., 5 aut.); Centre for Science, Society and Citizenship/Rome/Italie (2 aut.); Center for Public Health Preparedness and Disaster Response, American Medical Association/Chicago, Illinois/Etats-Unis (3 aut.); World Health Organization, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control/Rome/Italie (4 aut.)</AF>
<DT>Publication en série; Niveau analytique</DT>
<SO>Disaster medicine and public health preparedness; ISSN 1935-7893; Etats-Unis; Da. 2014; Vol. 8; No. 2; Pp. 158-169; Bibl. 35 ref.</SO>
<LA>Anglais</LA>
<EA>Objective: To examine their implementation, we analyzed World Health Organization (WHO) and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines from 2005 to 2008 for risk communication during an emerging infectious disease outbreak, WHO and CDC reports on implementing the guidelines worldwide after the 2009 H1N1 pandemic; and a case study of a member state. Methods: A qualitative study compared WHO and CDC guidelines from 2005 to 2008 with WHO and CDC reports from 2009 to 2011, documenting their implementation during the H1N1 outbreak and assessed how these guidelines were implemented, based on the reports and Israeli stakeholders (n=70). Results: Eight risk communication subthemes were identified: trust, empowerment, uncertainty, communicating the vaccine, inclusion, identification of subpopulations and at-risk groups, segmentation, and 2-way communication. The reports and case study disclosed a gap between international guidelines and their local-level implementation. The guidelines were mostly top-down communications, with little consideration for individual member-state implementation. The WHO and CDC recommendations were not always based on formative evaluation studies, which undermined their validity. Conclusions: In formulating effective communication strategies, the first step is to define the goal of a vaccination program. We recommend implementing conceptual elements from the most current theoretical literature when planning communication strategies and increasing organizational involvement in implementing guidelines in future health crises.</EA>
<CC>002B30A01C; 002B30A11</CC>
<FD>Maladie émergente; Facteur risque; Risque; Infection; Communication; Recommandation; Implémentation; Etude cas; 2009; Santé publique; Procédure; Gestion; Prise de décision; Grippe pandémique; Grippe H1N1</FD>
<FG>Pathologie de l'appareil respiratoire; Virose</FG>
<ED>Emerging disease; Risk factor; Risk; Infection; Communication; Recommendation; Implementation; Case study; 2009; Public health; Procedure; Management; Decision making; H1N1 influenza</ED>
<EG>Respiratory disease; Viral disease</EG>
<SD>Enfermedad emergente; Factor riesgo; Riesgo; Infección; Comunicación; Recomendación; Implementación; Estudio caso; 2009; Salud pública; Procedimiento; Gestión; Toma decision; Gripe H1N1</SD>
<LO>INIST-28256.354000502710560100</LO>
<ID>14-0156024</ID>
</server>
</inist>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Sante/explor/PandemieGrippaleV1/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000088 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000088 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Sante
   |area=    PandemieGrippaleV1
   |flux=    PascalFrancis
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     Pascal:14-0156024
   |texte=   Risk Communication Recommendations and Implementation During Emerging Infectious Diseases: A Case Study of the 2009 H1N1 Influenza Pandemic
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.34.
Data generation: Wed Jun 10 11:04:28 2020. Site generation: Sun Mar 28 09:10:28 2021