PandemieGrippaleV1, PascalFrancis, Corpus, bibRecord, 000044

Healthcare workers' attitude towards influenza vaccination after the 2009 pandemic

Identifieur interne : 000044 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 000043; suivant : 000045

Healthcare workers' attitude towards influenza vaccination after the 2009 pandemic

Auteurs : P. Lewthwaite ; K. Campion ; B. Blackburn ; E. Kemp ; D. Major ; K. Sarangi

Source :

Occupational medicine : (Oxford) [ 0962-7480 ] ; 2014.

RBID : Pascal:14-0221011

Descripteurs français

Pascal (Inist)
- Personnel sanitaire, Attitude, Vaccination, Prévention, Immunoprophylaxie, 2009, Grippe, Royaume-Uni, Population active, Pandémie, National Health Service.

English descriptors

KwdEn :
- 2009, Attitude, Health staff, Immunoprophylaxis, Influenza, Labour force, Prevention, United Kingdom, Vaccination.

Abstract

Background Previous studies have demonstrated the variability of healthcare workers' (HCWs) willingness to consider seasonal influenza vaccination, possibly to the detriment of their patients. Aims To ascertain HCW uptake of H1N1 and seasonal influenza vaccination and the reasons why one or both might have been declined following the pandemic of 2009. Methods An online, anonymous survey of HCWs across five, acute National Health Service trusts was undertaken in 2010. Results A total of 765 responses were obtained, of which the two main groups of participants were doctors of all grades (42%) and qualified nurses (40%). The willingness to be vaccinated increased with age. Senior doctors were the occupational group most likely to have had both vaccinations, but where they did decline they mainly did so because they perceived influenza to be a minor illness. Females were more likely to decline vaccination due to a fear of side effects, whereas males, particularly younger ones, viewed influenza as a minor illness. Junior doctors cited lack of availability of immunization sessions as one of the main reasons why they may not have had vaccination. Conclusions Future influenza vaccination campaigns should consider using different approaches depending on the gender and occupational mix of the target population, rather than adopting a 'one-size' fits all approach.

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.

A01	`01`	`1`		`@0 0962-7480`
A03		`1`		`@0 Occup. med. : (Oxf.)`
A05				`@2 64`
A06				`@2 5`
A08	`01`	`1`	`ENG`	`@1 Healthcare workers' attitude towards influenza vaccination after the 2009 pandemic`
A11	`01`	`1`		`@1 LEWTHWAITE (P.)`
A11	`02`	`1`		`@1 CAMPION (K.)`
A11	`03`	`1`		`@1 BLACKBURN (B.)`
A11	`04`	`1`		`@1 KEMP (E.)`
A11	`05`	`1`		`@1 MAJOR (D.)`
A11	`06`	`1`		`@1 SARANGI (K.)`
A14	`01`			`@1 Department of Occupational Health and Wellbeing Services, Luton and Dunstable University Hospital @2 Luton @3 GBR @Z 1 aut.`
A14	`02`			`@1 Department of Occupational Health and Wellbeing, Buckinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust @2 Amersham @3 GBR @Z 2 aut.`
A14	`03`			`@1 Department of Occupational Health, Royal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust @2 Reading @3 GBR @Z 3 aut.`
A14	`04`			`@1 Centre for Occupational Health and Wellbeing, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust @2 Oxford @3 GBR @Z 4 aut. @Z 5 aut.`
A14	`05`			`@1 Department of Occupational Health Service, Milton Keynes Hospital NHS Foundation Trust @2 Bucks @3 GBR @Z 6 aut.`
A20				`@1 348-351`
A21				`@1 2014`
A23	`01`			`@0 ENG`
A43	`01`			`@1 INIST @2 11691 @5 354000501856520080`
A44				`@0 0000 @1 © 2014 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.`
A45				`@0 10 ref.`
A47	`01`	`1`		`@0 14-0221011`
A60				`@1 P`
A61				`@0 A`
A64	`01`	`1`		`@0 Occupational medicine : (Oxford)`
A66	`01`			`@0 GBR`
C01	`01`		`ENG`	@0 Background Previous studies have demonstrated the variability of healthcare workers' (HCWs) willingness to consider seasonal influenza vaccination, possibly to the detriment of their patients. Aims To ascertain HCW uptake of H1N1 and seasonal influenza vaccination and the reasons why one or both might have been declined following the pandemic of 2009. Methods An online, anonymous survey of HCWs across five, acute National Health Service trusts was undertaken in 2010. Results A total of 765 responses were obtained, of which the two main groups of participants were doctors of all grades (42%) and qualified nurses (40%). The willingness to be vaccinated increased with age. Senior doctors were the occupational group most likely to have had both vaccinations, but where they did decline they mainly did so because they perceived influenza to be a minor illness. Females were more likely to decline vaccination due to a fear of side effects, whereas males, particularly younger ones, viewed influenza as a minor illness. Junior doctors cited lack of availability of immunization sessions as one of the main reasons why they may not have had vaccination. Conclusions Future influenza vaccination campaigns should consider using different approaches depending on the gender and occupational mix of the target population, rather than adopting a 'one-size' fits all approach.
C02	`01`	`X`		`@0 002B30A05`
C02	`02`	`X`		`@0 002B05C02C`
C03	`01`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Personnel sanitaire @5 02`
C03	`01`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Health staff @5 02`
C03	`01`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Personal sanitario @5 02`
C03	`02`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Attitude @5 03`
C03	`02`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Attitude @5 03`
C03	`02`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Actitud @5 03`
C03	`03`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Vaccination @5 05`
C03	`03`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Vaccination @5 05`
C03	`03`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Vacunación @5 05`
C03	`04`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Prévention @5 06`
C03	`04`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Prevention @5 06`
C03	`04`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Prevención @5 06`
C03	`05`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Immunoprophylaxie @5 08`
C03	`05`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Immunoprophylaxis @5 08`
C03	`05`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Inmunoprofilaxia @5 08`
C03	`06`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 2009 @5 09`
C03	`06`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 2009 @5 09`
C03	`06`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 2009 @5 09`
C03	`07`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Grippe @5 10`
C03	`07`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Influenza @5 10`
C03	`07`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Gripe @5 10`
C03	`08`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Royaume-Uni @2 NG @5 18`
C03	`08`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 United Kingdom @2 NG @5 18`
C03	`08`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Reino Unido @2 NG @5 18`
C03	`09`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Population active @5 19`
C03	`09`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Labour force @5 19`
C03	`09`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Población activa @5 19`
C03	`10`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Pandémie @4 INC @5 86`
C03	`11`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 National Health Service @4 INC @5 87`
C07	`01`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Virose`
C07	`01`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Viral disease`
C07	`01`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Virosis`
C07	`02`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Infection`
C07	`02`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Infection`
C07	`02`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Infección`
C07	`03`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Europe @2 NG`
C07	`03`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Europe @2 NG`
C07	`03`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Europa @2 NG`
N21				`@1 265`

Format Inist (serveur)

NO :	PASCAL 14-0221011 INIST
ET :	Healthcare workers' attitude towards influenza vaccination after the 2009 pandemic
AU :	LEWTHWAITE (P.); CAMPION (K.); BLACKBURN (B.); KEMP (E.); MAJOR (D.); SARANGI (K.)
AF :	Department of Occupational Health and Wellbeing Services, Luton and Dunstable University Hospital/Luton/Royaume-Uni (1 aut.); Department of Occupational Health and Wellbeing, Buckinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust/Amersham/Royaume-Uni (2 aut.); Department of Occupational Health, Royal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust/Reading/Royaume-Uni (3 aut.); Centre for Occupational Health and Wellbeing, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust/Oxford/Royaume-Uni (4 aut., 5 aut.); Department of Occupational Health Service, Milton Keynes Hospital NHS Foundation Trust/Bucks/Royaume-Uni (6 aut.)
DT :	Publication en série; Niveau analytique
SO :	Occupational medicine : (Oxford); ISSN 0962-7480; Royaume-Uni; Da. 2014; Vol. 64; No. 5; Pp. 348-351; Bibl. 10 ref.
LA :	Anglais
EA :	Background Previous studies have demonstrated the variability of healthcare workers' (HCWs) willingness to consider seasonal influenza vaccination, possibly to the detriment of their patients. Aims To ascertain HCW uptake of H1N1 and seasonal influenza vaccination and the reasons why one or both might have been declined following the pandemic of 2009. Methods An online, anonymous survey of HCWs across five, acute National Health Service trusts was undertaken in 2010. Results A total of 765 responses were obtained, of which the two main groups of participants were doctors of all grades (42%) and qualified nurses (40%). The willingness to be vaccinated increased with age. Senior doctors were the occupational group most likely to have had both vaccinations, but where they did decline they mainly did so because they perceived influenza to be a minor illness. Females were more likely to decline vaccination due to a fear of side effects, whereas males, particularly younger ones, viewed influenza as a minor illness. Junior doctors cited lack of availability of immunization sessions as one of the main reasons why they may not have had vaccination. Conclusions Future influenza vaccination campaigns should consider using different approaches depending on the gender and occupational mix of the target population, rather than adopting a 'one-size' fits all approach.
CC :	002B30A05; 002B05C02C
FD :	Personnel sanitaire; Attitude; Vaccination; Prévention; Immunoprophylaxie; 2009; Grippe; Royaume-Uni; Population active; Pandémie; National Health Service
FG :	Virose; Infection; Europe
ED :	Health staff; Attitude; Vaccination; Prevention; Immunoprophylaxis; 2009; Influenza; United Kingdom; Labour force
EG :	Viral disease; Infection; Europe
SD :	Personal sanitario; Actitud; Vacunación; Prevención; Inmunoprofilaxia; 2009; Gripe; Reino Unido; Población activa
LO :	INIST-11691.354000501856520080
ID :	14-0221011

Links to Exploration step

Pascal:14-0221011

Le document en format XML

<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Healthcare workers' attitude towards influenza vaccination after the 2009 pandemic</title>
<author><name sortKey="Lewthwaite, P" sort="Lewthwaite, P" uniqKey="Lewthwaite P" first="P." last="Lewthwaite">P. Lewthwaite</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Occupational Health and Wellbeing Services, Luton and Dunstable University Hospital</s1>
<s2>Luton</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Campion, K" sort="Campion, K" uniqKey="Campion K" first="K." last="Campion">K. Campion</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Department of Occupational Health and Wellbeing, Buckinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust</s1>
<s2>Amersham</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Blackburn, B" sort="Blackburn, B" uniqKey="Blackburn B" first="B." last="Blackburn">B. Blackburn</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="03"><s1>Department of Occupational Health, Royal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust</s1>
<s2>Reading</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Kemp, E" sort="Kemp, E" uniqKey="Kemp E" first="E." last="Kemp">E. Kemp</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="04"><s1>Centre for Occupational Health and Wellbeing, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust</s1>
<s2>Oxford</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Major, D" sort="Major, D" uniqKey="Major D" first="D." last="Major">D. Major</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="04"><s1>Centre for Occupational Health and Wellbeing, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust</s1>
<s2>Oxford</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Sarangi, K" sort="Sarangi, K" uniqKey="Sarangi K" first="K." last="Sarangi">K. Sarangi</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="05"><s1>Department of Occupational Health Service, Milton Keynes Hospital NHS Foundation Trust</s1>
<s2>Bucks</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">14-0221011</idno>
<date when="2014">2014</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 14-0221011 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Pascal:14-0221011</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000044</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Healthcare workers' attitude towards influenza vaccination after the 2009 pandemic</title>
<author><name sortKey="Lewthwaite, P" sort="Lewthwaite, P" uniqKey="Lewthwaite P" first="P." last="Lewthwaite">P. Lewthwaite</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Occupational Health and Wellbeing Services, Luton and Dunstable University Hospital</s1>
<s2>Luton</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Campion, K" sort="Campion, K" uniqKey="Campion K" first="K." last="Campion">K. Campion</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Department of Occupational Health and Wellbeing, Buckinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust</s1>
<s2>Amersham</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Blackburn, B" sort="Blackburn, B" uniqKey="Blackburn B" first="B." last="Blackburn">B. Blackburn</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="03"><s1>Department of Occupational Health, Royal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust</s1>
<s2>Reading</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Kemp, E" sort="Kemp, E" uniqKey="Kemp E" first="E." last="Kemp">E. Kemp</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="04"><s1>Centre for Occupational Health and Wellbeing, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust</s1>
<s2>Oxford</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Major, D" sort="Major, D" uniqKey="Major D" first="D." last="Major">D. Major</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="04"><s1>Centre for Occupational Health and Wellbeing, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust</s1>
<s2>Oxford</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Sarangi, K" sort="Sarangi, K" uniqKey="Sarangi K" first="K." last="Sarangi">K. Sarangi</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="05"><s1>Department of Occupational Health Service, Milton Keynes Hospital NHS Foundation Trust</s1>
<s2>Bucks</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Occupational medicine : (Oxford)</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Occup. med. : (Oxf.)</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0962-7480</idno>
<imprint><date when="2014">2014</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">Occupational medicine : (Oxford)</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Occup. med. : (Oxf.)</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0962-7480</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>2009</term>
<term>Attitude</term>
<term>Health staff</term>
<term>Immunoprophylaxis</term>
<term>Influenza</term>
<term>Labour force</term>
<term>Prevention</term>
<term>United Kingdom</term>
<term>Vaccination</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Personnel sanitaire</term>
<term>Attitude</term>
<term>Vaccination</term>
<term>Prévention</term>
<term>Immunoprophylaxie</term>
<term>2009</term>
<term>Grippe</term>
<term>Royaume-Uni</term>
<term>Population active</term>
<term>Pandémie</term>
<term>National Health Service</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Background Previous studies have demonstrated the variability of healthcare workers' (HCWs) willingness to consider seasonal influenza vaccination, possibly to the detriment of their patients. Aims To ascertain HCW uptake of H1N1 and seasonal influenza vaccination and the reasons why one or both might have been declined following the pandemic of 2009. Methods An online, anonymous survey of HCWs across five, acute National Health Service trusts was undertaken in 2010. Results A total of 765 responses were obtained, of which the two main groups of participants were doctors  of all grades (42%) and qualified nurses (40%). The willingness to be vaccinated increased with age. Senior doctors were the occupational group most likely to have had both vaccinations, but where they did decline they mainly did so because they perceived influenza to be a minor illness. Females were more likely to decline vaccination due to a fear of side effects, whereas males, particularly younger ones, viewed influenza as a minor illness. Junior doctors cited lack of availability of immunization sessions as one of the main reasons why they may not have had vaccination. Conclusions Future influenza vaccination campaigns should consider using different approaches depending on the gender and occupational mix of the target population, rather than adopting a 'one-size' fits all approach.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist><standard h6="B"><pA><fA01 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>0962-7480</s0>
</fA01>
<fA03 i2="1"><s0>Occup. med. : (Oxf.)</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05><s2>64</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06><s2>5</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>Healthcare workers' attitude towards influenza vaccination after the 2009 pandemic</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>LEWTHWAITE (P.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1"><s1>CAMPION (K.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="03" i2="1"><s1>BLACKBURN (B.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="04" i2="1"><s1>KEMP (E.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="05" i2="1"><s1>MAJOR (D.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="06" i2="1"><s1>SARANGI (K.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Occupational Health and Wellbeing Services, Luton and Dunstable University Hospital</s1>
<s2>Luton</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="02"><s1>Department of Occupational Health and Wellbeing, Buckinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust</s1>
<s2>Amersham</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="03"><s1>Department of Occupational Health, Royal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust</s1>
<s2>Reading</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="04"><s1>Centre for Occupational Health and Wellbeing, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust</s1>
<s2>Oxford</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="05"><s1>Department of Occupational Health Service, Milton Keynes Hospital NHS Foundation Trust</s1>
<s2>Bucks</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20><s1>348-351</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21><s1>2014</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01"><s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01"><s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>11691</s2>
<s5>354000501856520080</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44><s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2014 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45><s0>10 ref.</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>14-0221011</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60><s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61><s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>Occupational medicine : (Oxford)</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01"><s0>GBR</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG"><s0>Background Previous studies have demonstrated the variability of healthcare workers' (HCWs) willingness to consider seasonal influenza vaccination, possibly to the detriment of their patients. Aims To ascertain HCW uptake of H1N1 and seasonal influenza vaccination and the reasons why one or both might have been declined following the pandemic of 2009. Methods An online, anonymous survey of HCWs across five, acute National Health Service trusts was undertaken in 2010. Results A total of 765 responses were obtained, of which the two main groups of participants were doctors  of all grades (42%) and qualified nurses (40%). The willingness to be vaccinated increased with age. Senior doctors were the occupational group most likely to have had both vaccinations, but where they did decline they mainly did so because they perceived influenza to be a minor illness. Females were more likely to decline vaccination due to a fear of side effects, whereas males, particularly younger ones, viewed influenza as a minor illness. Junior doctors cited lack of availability of immunization sessions as one of the main reasons why they may not have had vaccination. Conclusions Future influenza vaccination campaigns should consider using different approaches depending on the gender and occupational mix of the target population, rather than adopting a 'one-size' fits all approach.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X"><s0>002B30A05</s0>
</fC02>
<fC02 i1="02" i2="X"><s0>002B05C02C</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Personnel sanitaire</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Health staff</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Personal sanitario</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Attitude</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Attitude</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Actitud</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Vaccination</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Vaccination</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Vacunación</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Prévention</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Prevention</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Prevención</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Immunoprophylaxie</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Immunoprophylaxis</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Inmunoprofilaxia</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>2009</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>2009</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>2009</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Grippe</s0>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Influenza</s0>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Gripe</s0>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Royaume-Uni</s0>
<s2>NG</s2>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>United Kingdom</s0>
<s2>NG</s2>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Reino Unido</s0>
<s2>NG</s2>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Population active</s0>
<s5>19</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Labour force</s0>
<s5>19</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Población activa</s0>
<s5>19</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Pandémie</s0>
<s4>INC</s4>
<s5>86</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>National Health Service</s0>
<s4>INC</s4>
<s5>87</s5>
</fC03>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Virose</s0>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Viral disease</s0>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Virosis</s0>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Infection</s0>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Infection</s0>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Infección</s0>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Europe</s0>
<s2>NG</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Europe</s0>
<s2>NG</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Europa</s0>
<s2>NG</s2>
</fC07>
<fN21><s1>265</s1>
</fN21>
</pA>
</standard>
<server><NO>PASCAL 14-0221011 INIST</NO>
<ET>Healthcare workers' attitude towards influenza vaccination after the 2009 pandemic</ET>
<AU>LEWTHWAITE (P.); CAMPION (K.); BLACKBURN (B.); KEMP (E.); MAJOR (D.); SARANGI (K.)</AU>
<AF>Department of Occupational Health and Wellbeing Services, Luton and Dunstable University Hospital/Luton/Royaume-Uni (1 aut.); Department of Occupational Health and Wellbeing, Buckinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust/Amersham/Royaume-Uni (2 aut.); Department of Occupational Health, Royal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust/Reading/Royaume-Uni (3 aut.); Centre for Occupational Health and Wellbeing, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust/Oxford/Royaume-Uni (4 aut., 5 aut.); Department of Occupational Health Service, Milton Keynes Hospital NHS Foundation Trust/Bucks/Royaume-Uni (6 aut.)</AF>
<DT>Publication en série; Niveau analytique</DT>
<SO>Occupational medicine : (Oxford); ISSN 0962-7480; Royaume-Uni; Da. 2014; Vol. 64; No. 5; Pp. 348-351; Bibl. 10 ref.</SO>
<LA>Anglais</LA>
<EA>Background Previous studies have demonstrated the variability of healthcare workers' (HCWs) willingness to consider seasonal influenza vaccination, possibly to the detriment of their patients. Aims To ascertain HCW uptake of H1N1 and seasonal influenza vaccination and the reasons why one or both might have been declined following the pandemic of 2009. Methods An online, anonymous survey of HCWs across five, acute National Health Service trusts was undertaken in 2010. Results A total of 765 responses were obtained, of which the two main groups of participants were doctors  of all grades (42%) and qualified nurses (40%). The willingness to be vaccinated increased with age. Senior doctors were the occupational group most likely to have had both vaccinations, but where they did decline they mainly did so because they perceived influenza to be a minor illness. Females were more likely to decline vaccination due to a fear of side effects, whereas males, particularly younger ones, viewed influenza as a minor illness. Junior doctors cited lack of availability of immunization sessions as one of the main reasons why they may not have had vaccination. Conclusions Future influenza vaccination campaigns should consider using different approaches depending on the gender and occupational mix of the target population, rather than adopting a 'one-size' fits all approach.</EA>
<CC>002B30A05; 002B05C02C</CC>
<FD>Personnel sanitaire; Attitude; Vaccination; Prévention; Immunoprophylaxie; 2009; Grippe; Royaume-Uni; Population active; Pandémie; National Health Service</FD>
<FG>Virose; Infection; Europe</FG>
<ED>Health staff; Attitude; Vaccination; Prevention; Immunoprophylaxis; 2009; Influenza; United Kingdom; Labour force</ED>
<EG>Viral disease; Infection; Europe</EG>
<SD>Personal sanitario; Actitud; Vacunación; Prevención; Inmunoprofilaxia; 2009; Gripe; Reino Unido; Población activa</SD>
<LO>INIST-11691.354000501856520080</LO>
<ID>14-0221011</ID>
</server>
</inist>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Sante/explor/PandemieGrippaleV1/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000044 | SxmlIndent | more

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000044 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Sante
   |area=    PandemieGrippaleV1
   |flux=    PascalFrancis
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     Pascal:14-0221011
   |texte=   Healthcare workers' attitude towards influenza vaccination after the 2009 pandemic
}}

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.34.
Data generation: Wed Jun 10 11:04:28 2020. Site generation: Sun Mar 28 09:10:28 2021

	Serveur d'exploration sur les pandémies grippales
	Attention, ce site est en cours de développement ! Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts. Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Serveur d'exploration sur les pandémies grippales

Healthcare workers' attitude towards influenza vaccination after the 2009 pandemic

Healthcare workers' attitude towards influenza vaccination after the 2009 pandemic

Source :

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Format Inist (serveur)

Links to Exploration step

Le document en format XML

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri