Spondylolysis, spondylolisthesis, and lumbo-sacral morphology in a medieval English skeletal population
Identifieur interne : 000123 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 000122; suivant : 000124Spondylolysis, spondylolisthesis, and lumbo-sacral morphology in a medieval English skeletal population
Auteurs : S. MaysSource :
- American journal of physical anthropology [ 0002-9483 ] ; 2006.
Descripteurs français
- Pascal (Inist)
- Ancien, Groupe A, Grande-Bretagne, Age, Morphologie, Squelette, Population, Site archéologique, Table, Etui, Analyse, Etude, Forme, Basse Epoque, Croissance, Risque, Anglais, Rôle, Passé, Variable, Valeur.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- A-Group, Age, Analysis, Archaeological site, Case, Early, Form, Great Britain, Growth, Late Period, Morphology, Population, Risk, Skeleton, Study, Table.
Abstract
The prevalence of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis was studied in an adult skeletal series from a rural English medieval archaeological site. Attempts were made to evaluate the association of three aspects of lumbo-sacral skeletal morphology (pelvic incidence (a measure of the anterior inclination of the sacral table), lumbar transverse process width, and the presence of lumbo-sacral spina bifida occulta) with spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis. Results indicated a high prevalence of spondylolysis compared with a modern reference population, but few cases of spondylolisthesis were identified. Analysis of prevalence with respect to age suggests that in the study population, pars interarticularis defects generally formed late in the growth period or early in adult life. The study group showed a high mean pelvic incidence compared with modern Western Europeans, indicating a more steeply inclined sacral table, which may have elevated the risk of developing pars interarticularis defects. However, no statistically valid association could be demonstrated between the presence/absence of spondylolysis and pelvic incidence in the study material. There was no evidence for a link between lumbar transverse process index or lumbo-sacral spina bifida occulta and spondylolysis/ spondylolisthesis. It is concluded that the potential role of lumbo-sacral morphology, as well as of activity regimes, should be considered when interpreting spondylolysis in paleopathological studies. If the frequency of spondylolysis is to some extent an indicator of past activity regimes, it may reflect lifestyle in younger individuals rather than in mature adults. Further work investigating the link between spondylolysis and lumbo-sacral morphological variables in premodern populations would be of value.
Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)
Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.
| pA |
|
|---|
Format Inist (serveur)
| NO : | FRANCIS 08-0171769 INIST |
|---|---|
| ET : | Spondylolysis, spondylolisthesis, and lumbo-sacral morphology in a medieval English skeletal population |
| AU : | MAYS (S.) |
| AF : | Ancient Monuments Laboratory, English Heritage Centre for Archaeology/Eastney, Portsmouth PO4 9LD/Royaume-Uni (1 aut.) |
| DT : | Publication en série; Niveau analytique |
| SO : | American journal of physical anthropology; ISSN 0002-9483; Etats-Unis; Da. 2006; Vol. 131; No. 3; Pp. 352-362; Bibl. 1 p.3/4 |
| LA : | Anglais |
| EA : | The prevalence of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis was studied in an adult skeletal series from a rural English medieval archaeological site. Attempts were made to evaluate the association of three aspects of lumbo-sacral skeletal morphology (pelvic incidence (a measure of the anterior inclination of the sacral table), lumbar transverse process width, and the presence of lumbo-sacral spina bifida occulta) with spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis. Results indicated a high prevalence of spondylolysis compared with a modern reference population, but few cases of spondylolisthesis were identified. Analysis of prevalence with respect to age suggests that in the study population, pars interarticularis defects generally formed late in the growth period or early in adult life. The study group showed a high mean pelvic incidence compared with modern Western Europeans, indicating a more steeply inclined sacral table, which may have elevated the risk of developing pars interarticularis defects. However, no statistically valid association could be demonstrated between the presence/absence of spondylolysis and pelvic incidence in the study material. There was no evidence for a link between lumbar transverse process index or lumbo-sacral spina bifida occulta and spondylolysis/ spondylolisthesis. It is concluded that the potential role of lumbo-sacral morphology, as well as of activity regimes, should be considered when interpreting spondylolysis in paleopathological studies. If the frequency of spondylolysis is to some extent an indicator of past activity regimes, it may reflect lifestyle in younger individuals rather than in mature adults. Further work investigating the link between spondylolysis and lumbo-sacral morphological variables in premodern populations would be of value. |
| CC : | 52531; 52524; 525 |
| FD : | Ancien; Groupe A; Grande-Bretagne; Age; Morphologie; Squelette; Population; Site archéologique; Table; Etui; Analyse; Etude; Forme; Basse Epoque; Croissance; Risque; Anglais; Rôle; Passé; Variable; Valeur |
| FG : | Europe; Chalcolithique |
| ED : | Early; A-Group; Great Britain; Age; Morphology; Skeleton; Population; Archaeological site; Table; Case; Analysis; Study; Form; Late Period; Growth; Risk |
| EG : | Europe; Chalcolithic |
| LO : | INIST-3188.354000157244390060 |
| ID : | 08-0171769 |
Links to Exploration step
Francis:08-0171769Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Spondylolysis, spondylolisthesis, and lumbo-sacral morphology in a medieval English skeletal population</title><author><name sortKey="Mays, S" sort="Mays, S" uniqKey="Mays S" first="S." last="Mays">S. Mays</name><affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Ancient Monuments Laboratory, English Heritage Centre for Archaeology</s1><s2>Eastney, Portsmouth PO4 9LD</s2><s3>GBR</s3><sZ>1 aut.</sZ></inist:fA14></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno><idno type="inist">08-0171769</idno><date when="2006">2006</date><idno type="stanalyst">FRANCIS 08-0171769 INIST</idno><idno type="RBID">Francis:08-0171769</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000123</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Spondylolysis, spondylolisthesis, and lumbo-sacral morphology in a medieval English skeletal population</title><author><name sortKey="Mays, S" sort="Mays, S" uniqKey="Mays S" first="S." last="Mays">S. Mays</name><affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Ancient Monuments Laboratory, English Heritage Centre for Archaeology</s1><s2>Eastney, Portsmouth PO4 9LD</s2><s3>GBR</s3><sZ>1 aut.</sZ></inist:fA14></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j" type="main">American journal of physical anthropology</title><title level="j" type="abbreviated">Am. j. phys. anthropol.</title><idno type="ISSN">0002-9483</idno><imprint><date when="2006">2006</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">American journal of physical anthropology</title><title level="j" type="abbreviated">Am. j. phys. anthropol.</title><idno type="ISSN">0002-9483</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>A-Group</term><term>Age</term><term>Analysis</term><term>Archaeological site</term><term>Case</term><term>Early</term><term>Form</term><term>Great Britain</term><term>Growth</term><term>Late Period</term><term>Morphology</term><term>Population</term><term>Risk</term><term>Skeleton</term><term>Study</term><term>Table</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Ancien</term><term>Groupe A</term><term>Grande-Bretagne</term><term>Age</term><term>Morphologie</term><term>Squelette</term><term>Population</term><term>Site archéologique</term><term>Table</term><term>Etui</term><term>Analyse</term><term>Etude</term><term>Forme</term><term>Basse Epoque</term><term>Croissance</term><term>Risque</term><term>Anglais</term><term>Rôle</term><term>Passé</term><term>Variable</term><term>Valeur</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The prevalence of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis was studied in an adult skeletal series from a rural English medieval archaeological site. Attempts were made to evaluate the association of three aspects of lumbo-sacral skeletal morphology (pelvic incidence (a measure of the anterior inclination of the sacral table), lumbar transverse process width, and the presence of lumbo-sacral spina bifida occulta) with spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis. Results indicated a high prevalence of spondylolysis compared with a modern reference population, but few cases of spondylolisthesis were identified. Analysis of prevalence with respect to age suggests that in the study population, pars interarticularis defects generally formed late in the growth period or early in adult life. The study group showed a high mean pelvic incidence compared with modern Western Europeans, indicating a more steeply inclined sacral table, which may have elevated the risk of developing pars interarticularis defects. However, no statistically valid association could be demonstrated between the presence/absence of spondylolysis and pelvic incidence in the study material. There was no evidence for a link between lumbar transverse process index or lumbo-sacral spina bifida occulta and spondylolysis/ spondylolisthesis. It is concluded that the potential role of lumbo-sacral morphology, as well as of activity regimes, should be considered when interpreting spondylolysis in paleopathological studies. If the frequency of spondylolysis is to some extent an indicator of past activity regimes, it may reflect lifestyle in younger individuals rather than in mature adults. Further work investigating the link between spondylolysis and lumbo-sacral morphological variables in premodern populations would be of value.</div></front></TEI><inist><standard h6="B"><pA><fA01 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>0002-9483</s0></fA01><fA03 i2="1"><s0>Am. j. phys. anthropol.</s0></fA03><fA05><s2>131</s2></fA05><fA06><s2>3</s2></fA06><fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>Spondylolysis, spondylolisthesis, and lumbo-sacral morphology in a medieval English skeletal population</s1></fA08><fA11 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>MAYS (S.)</s1></fA11><fA14 i1="01"><s1>Ancient Monuments Laboratory, English Heritage Centre for Archaeology</s1><s2>Eastney, Portsmouth PO4 9LD</s2><s3>GBR</s3><sZ>1 aut.</sZ></fA14><fA20><s1>352-362</s1></fA20><fA21><s1>2006</s1></fA21><fA23 i1="01"><s0>ENG</s0></fA23><fA43 i1="01"><s1>INIST</s1><s2>3188</s2><s5>354000157244390060</s5></fA43><fA44><s0>0000</s0><s1>© 2008 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1></fA44><fA45><s0>1 p.3/4</s0></fA45><fA47 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>08-0171769</s0></fA47><fA60><s1>P</s1></fA60><fA61><s0>A</s0></fA61><fA64 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>American journal of physical anthropology</s0></fA64><fA66 i1="01"><s0>USA</s0></fA66><fC01 i1="01" l="ENG"><s0>The prevalence of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis was studied in an adult skeletal series from a rural English medieval archaeological site. Attempts were made to evaluate the association of three aspects of lumbo-sacral skeletal morphology (pelvic incidence (a measure of the anterior inclination of the sacral table), lumbar transverse process width, and the presence of lumbo-sacral spina bifida occulta) with spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis. Results indicated a high prevalence of spondylolysis compared with a modern reference population, but few cases of spondylolisthesis were identified. Analysis of prevalence with respect to age suggests that in the study population, pars interarticularis defects generally formed late in the growth period or early in adult life. The study group showed a high mean pelvic incidence compared with modern Western Europeans, indicating a more steeply inclined sacral table, which may have elevated the risk of developing pars interarticularis defects. However, no statistically valid association could be demonstrated between the presence/absence of spondylolysis and pelvic incidence in the study material. There was no evidence for a link between lumbar transverse process index or lumbo-sacral spina bifida occulta and spondylolysis/ spondylolisthesis. It is concluded that the potential role of lumbo-sacral morphology, as well as of activity regimes, should be considered when interpreting spondylolysis in paleopathological studies. If the frequency of spondylolysis is to some extent an indicator of past activity regimes, it may reflect lifestyle in younger individuals rather than in mature adults. Further work investigating the link between spondylolysis and lumbo-sacral morphological variables in premodern populations would be of value.</s0></fC01><fC02 i1="01" i2="H"><s0>52531</s0><s1>II</s1></fC02><fC02 i1="02" i2="H"><s0>52524</s0><s1>II</s1></fC02><fC02 i1="03" i2="H"><s0>525</s0></fC02><fC03 i1="01" i2="H" l="FRE"><s0>Ancien</s0><s2>ND</s2><s5>01</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="01" i2="H" l="ENG"><s0>Early</s0><s2>ND</s2><s5>01</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="02" i2="H" l="FRE"><s0>Groupe A</s0><s2>ND</s2><s5>02</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="02" i2="H" l="ENG"><s0>A-Group</s0><s2>ND</s2><s5>02</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="03" i2="H" l="FRE"><s0>Grande-Bretagne</s0><s2>NG</s2><s5>05</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="03" i2="H" l="ENG"><s0>Great Britain</s0><s2>NG</s2><s5>05</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="04" i2="H" l="FRE"><s0>Age</s0><s2>NI</s2><s5>14</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="04" i2="H" l="ENG"><s0>Age</s0><s2>NI</s2><s5>14</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="05" i2="A" l="FRE"><s0>Morphologie</s0><s5>19</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="05" i2="A" l="ENG"><s0>Morphology</s0><s5>19</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="06" i2="H" l="FRE"><s0>Squelette</s0><s5>20</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="06" i2="H" l="ENG"><s0>Skeleton</s0><s5>20</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="07" i2="H" l="FRE"><s0>Population</s0><s5>21</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="07" i2="H" l="ENG"><s0>Population</s0><s5>21</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="08" i2="H" l="FRE"><s0>Site archéologique</s0><s5>22</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="08" i2="H" l="ENG"><s0>Archaeological site</s0><s5>22</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="09" i2="H" l="FRE"><s0>Table</s0><s5>23</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="09" i2="H" l="ENG"><s0>Table</s0><s5>23</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="10" i2="H" l="FRE"><s0>Etui</s0><s5>24</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="10" i2="H" l="ENG"><s0>Case</s0><s5>24</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="11" i2="A" l="FRE"><s0>Analyse</s0><s2>NI</s2><s2>FM</s2><s5>25</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="11" i2="A" l="ENG"><s0>Analysis</s0><s2>NI</s2><s2>FM</s2><s5>25</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="12" i2="H" l="FRE"><s0>Etude</s0><s5>26</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="12" i2="H" l="ENG"><s0>Study</s0><s5>26</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="13" i2="H" l="FRE"><s0>Forme</s0><s5>27</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="13" i2="H" l="ENG"><s0>Form</s0><s5>27</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="14" i2="A" l="FRE"><s0>Basse Epoque</s0><s2>ND</s2><s5>28</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="14" i2="A" l="ENG"><s0>Late Period</s0><s2>ND</s2><s5>28</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="15" i2="H" l="FRE"><s0>Croissance</s0><s5>29</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="15" i2="H" l="ENG"><s0>Growth</s0><s5>29</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="16" i2="H" l="FRE"><s0>Risque</s0><s5>30</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="16" i2="H" l="ENG"><s0>Risk</s0><s5>30</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="17" i2="H" l="FRE"><s0>Anglais</s0><s4>INC</s4><s5>31</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="18" i2="H" l="FRE"><s0>Rôle</s0><s4>INC</s4><s5>32</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="19" i2="H" l="FRE"><s0>Passé</s0><s4>INC</s4><s5>33</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="20" i2="H" l="FRE"><s0>Variable</s0><s4>INC</s4><s5>34</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="21" i2="H" l="FRE"><s0>Valeur</s0><s4>INC</s4><s5>35</s5></fC03><fC07 i1="01" i2="H" l="FRE"><s0>Europe</s0><s2>NG</s2></fC07><fC07 i1="01" i2="H" l="ENG"><s0>Europe</s0><s2>NG</s2></fC07><fC07 i1="02" i2="H" l="FRE"><s0>Chalcolithique</s0><s2>ND</s2><s5>09</s5></fC07><fC07 i1="02" i2="H" l="ENG"><s0>Chalcolithic</s0><s2>ND</s2><s5>09</s5></fC07><fN21><s1>105</s1></fN21><fN44 i1="01"><s1>OTO</s1></fN44><fN82><s1>OTO</s1></fN82></pA></standard><server><NO>FRANCIS 08-0171769 INIST</NO><ET>Spondylolysis, spondylolisthesis, and lumbo-sacral morphology in a medieval English skeletal population</ET><AU>MAYS (S.)</AU><AF>Ancient Monuments Laboratory, English Heritage Centre for Archaeology/Eastney, Portsmouth PO4 9LD/Royaume-Uni (1 aut.)</AF><DT>Publication en série; Niveau analytique</DT><SO>American journal of physical anthropology; ISSN 0002-9483; Etats-Unis; Da. 2006; Vol. 131; No. 3; Pp. 352-362; Bibl. 1 p.3/4</SO><LA>Anglais</LA><EA>The prevalence of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis was studied in an adult skeletal series from a rural English medieval archaeological site. Attempts were made to evaluate the association of three aspects of lumbo-sacral skeletal morphology (pelvic incidence (a measure of the anterior inclination of the sacral table), lumbar transverse process width, and the presence of lumbo-sacral spina bifida occulta) with spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis. Results indicated a high prevalence of spondylolysis compared with a modern reference population, but few cases of spondylolisthesis were identified. Analysis of prevalence with respect to age suggests that in the study population, pars interarticularis defects generally formed late in the growth period or early in adult life. The study group showed a high mean pelvic incidence compared with modern Western Europeans, indicating a more steeply inclined sacral table, which may have elevated the risk of developing pars interarticularis defects. However, no statistically valid association could be demonstrated between the presence/absence of spondylolysis and pelvic incidence in the study material. There was no evidence for a link between lumbar transverse process index or lumbo-sacral spina bifida occulta and spondylolysis/ spondylolisthesis. It is concluded that the potential role of lumbo-sacral morphology, as well as of activity regimes, should be considered when interpreting spondylolysis in paleopathological studies. If the frequency of spondylolysis is to some extent an indicator of past activity regimes, it may reflect lifestyle in younger individuals rather than in mature adults. Further work investigating the link between spondylolysis and lumbo-sacral morphological variables in premodern populations would be of value.</EA><CC>52531; 52524; 525</CC><FD>Ancien; Groupe A; Grande-Bretagne; Age; Morphologie; Squelette; Population; Site archéologique; Table; Etui; Analyse; Etude; Forme; Basse Epoque; Croissance; Risque; Anglais; Rôle; Passé; Variable; Valeur</FD><FG>Europe; Chalcolithique</FG><ED>Early; A-Group; Great Britain; Age; Morphology; Skeleton; Population; Archaeological site; Table; Case; Analysis; Study; Form; Late Period; Growth; Risk</ED><EG>Europe; Chalcolithic</EG><LO>INIST-3188.354000157244390060</LO><ID>08-0171769</ID></server></inist></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Archeologie/explor/PaleopathV1/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000123 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000123 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Archeologie
|area= PaleopathV1
|flux= PascalFrancis
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= Francis:08-0171769
|texte= Spondylolysis, spondylolisthesis, and lumbo-sacral morphology in a medieval English skeletal population
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.27. |  |