Can paleopathology provide evidence for “compassion”?
Identifieur interne : 001148 ( Istex/Checkpoint ); précédent : 001147; suivant : 001149Can paleopathology provide evidence for “compassion”?
Auteurs : K. A. Dettwyler [États-Unis]Source :
- American Journal of Physical Anthropology [ 0002-9483 ] ; 1991-04.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
Abstract
Paleopathological analyses of skeletal remains have provided significant information about diet and health in prehistoric populations. A number of individuals have been recovered whose remains show evidence of impairments that would have precluded “normal” functioning, resulting in a disability. The most famous example is Shanidar I; more recent discoveries include the Romito 2 dwarf from Italy and a boy with spina bifida from the Windover site in Florida. These finds have been interpreted by some writers as evidence for compassion and “moral decency” among the other members of the community, who would have had to support these nonproductive individuals. However, these interpretations are based on a number of implicit assumptions: about the number of nonproductive members normally present in any population, about the abilities of disabled individuals by other members of the group, and about the “moral rightness” of facilitating the survival of a disabled individual under all circumstances. These assumptions are not justified by the evidence from the archeological record or by reference to ethnographic analogy. A tendency to focus on physical traits as the sole measure of productive ability, images of Rousseau's “noble savage” transported to the past, and unexamined beliefs about the disabled in modern societies have influenced these archeological interpretations. We are not justified in drawing conclusions either about the quality of life for disabled individuals in the past or about the motives or attitudes of the rest of the community from skeletal evidence of physical impairment.
Url:
DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.1330840402
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:C2C5AE41AA92C3A3FAC350D1D3BECF6C5BF4D364Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Can paleopathology provide evidence for “compassion”?</title><author><name sortKey="Dettwyler, K A" sort="Dettwyler, K A" uniqKey="Dettwyler K" first="K. A." last="Dettwyler">K. A. Dettwyler</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:C2C5AE41AA92C3A3FAC350D1D3BECF6C5BF4D364</idno><date when="1991" year="1991">1991</date><idno type="doi">10.1002/ajpa.1330840402</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/C2C5AE41AA92C3A3FAC350D1D3BECF6C5BF4D364/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001582</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">001582</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">001582</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">001148</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">001148</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Can paleopathology provide evidence for “compassion”?</title><author><name sortKey="Dettwyler, K A" sort="Dettwyler, K A" uniqKey="Dettwyler K" first="K. A." last="Dettwyler">K. A. Dettwyler</name><affiliation wicri:level="2"><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><placeName><region type="state">Texas</region></placeName><wicri:cityArea>Department of Anthropology, Texas A&M University, College Station</wicri:cityArea></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">American Journal of Physical Anthropology</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">Am. J. Phys. Anthropol.</title><idno type="ISSN">0002-9483</idno><idno type="eISSN">1096-8644</idno><imprint><publisher>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><pubPlace>New York</pubPlace><date type="published" when="1991-04">1991-04</date><biblScope unit="volume">84</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="375">375</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="384">384</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0002-9483</idno></series><idno type="istex">C2C5AE41AA92C3A3FAC350D1D3BECF6C5BF4D364</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1002/ajpa.1330840402</idno><idno type="ArticleID">AJPA1330840402</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0002-9483</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Archeological inference</term><term>Handicap</term><term>Romito 2</term><term>Shanidar I</term><term>Windover Boy</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Paleopathological analyses of skeletal remains have provided significant information about diet and health in prehistoric populations. A number of individuals have been recovered whose remains show evidence of impairments that would have precluded “normal” functioning, resulting in a disability. The most famous example is Shanidar I; more recent discoveries include the Romito 2 dwarf from Italy and a boy with spina bifida from the Windover site in Florida. These finds have been interpreted by some writers as evidence for compassion and “moral decency” among the other members of the community, who would have had to support these nonproductive individuals. However, these interpretations are based on a number of implicit assumptions: about the number of nonproductive members normally present in any population, about the abilities of disabled individuals by other members of the group, and about the “moral rightness” of facilitating the survival of a disabled individual under all circumstances. These assumptions are not justified by the evidence from the archeological record or by reference to ethnographic analogy. A tendency to focus on physical traits as the sole measure of productive ability, images of Rousseau's “noble savage” transported to the past, and unexamined beliefs about the disabled in modern societies have influenced these archeological interpretations. We are not justified in drawing conclusions either about the quality of life for disabled individuals in the past or about the motives or attitudes of the rest of the community from skeletal evidence of physical impairment.</div></front></TEI><affiliations><list><country><li>États-Unis</li></country><region><li>Texas</li></region></list><tree><country name="États-Unis"><region name="Texas"><name sortKey="Dettwyler, K A" sort="Dettwyler, K A" uniqKey="Dettwyler K" first="K. A." last="Dettwyler">K. A. Dettwyler</name></region></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Archeologie/explor/PaleopathV1/Data/Istex/Checkpoint
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001148 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd -nk 001148 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Archeologie
|area= PaleopathV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Checkpoint
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:C2C5AE41AA92C3A3FAC350D1D3BECF6C5BF4D364
|texte= Can paleopathology provide evidence for “compassion”?
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.27. |  |