Movement Disorders (revue)

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Dystonia rating scales: critique and recommendations

Identifieur interne : 000340 ( Pmc/Corpus ); précédent : 000339; suivant : 000341

Dystonia rating scales: critique and recommendations

Auteurs : Alberto Albanese ; Francesca Del Sorbo ; Cynthia Comella ; H. A. Jinnah ; Jonathan W. Mink ; Bart Post ; Marie Vidailhet ; Jens Volkmann ; Thomas T. Warner ; Albert F. G. Leentjens ; Pablo Martinez-Martin ; Glenn T. Stebbins ; Christopher G. Goetz ; Anette Schrag

Source :

RBID : PMC:4207366

Abstract

Background

Many rating scales have been applied to the evaluation of dystonia, but only few have been assessed for clinimetric properties. The Movement Disorders Society commissioned this task force to critique existing dystonia rating scales and place them in the clinical and clinimetric context.

Methods

A systematic literature review was conducted to identify rating scales that have either been validated or used in dystonia.

Results

Thirty six potential scales were identified. Eight were excluded because they did not meet review criteria, leaving twenty-eight scales that were critiqued and rated by the task force. Seven scales were found to meet criteria to be “recommended”: the Blepharospasm Disability Index is recommended for rating blepharospasm; the Cervical Dystonia Impact Scale and the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale for rating cervical dystonia; the Craniocervical Dystonia Questionnaire for blepharospasm and cervical dystonia; the Voice Handicap Index (VHI) and the Vocal Performance Questionnaire (VPQ) for laryngeal dystonia; and the Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale for rating generalized dystonia. Two “recommended” scales (VHI and VPQ) are generic scales validated on few patients with laryngeal dystonia, whereas the others are disease-specific scales. Twelve scales met criteria for “suggested” and seven scales met criteria for “listed”. All the scales are individually reviewed in the online appendix.

Conclusion

The task force recommends five specific dystonia scales and suggests to further validate in dystonia two recommended generic voice-disorder scales. Existing scales for oromandibular, arm and task-specific dystonia should be refined and fully assessed. Scales should be developed for body regions where no scales are available, such as lower limbs and trunk.


Url:
DOI: 10.1002/mds.25579
PubMed: 23893443
PubMed Central: 4207366

Links to Exploration step

PMC:4207366***** Acces problem to record *****\

Le document en format XML


Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/MovDisordV3/Data/Pmc/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000340 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000340 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Santé
   |area=    MovDisordV3
   |flux=    Pmc
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     PMC:4207366
   |texte=   Dystonia rating scales: critique and recommendations
}}

Pour générer des pages wiki

HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Corpus/RBID.i   -Sk "pubmed:23893443" \
       | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Corpus/biblio.hfd   \
       | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a MovDisordV3 

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23.
Data generation: Sun Jul 3 12:29:32 2016. Site generation: Wed Feb 14 10:52:30 2024