Home alone: Methods to maximize Tic expression for objective Videotape assessments in Gilles de la tourette syndrome
Identifieur interne : 002969 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 002968; suivant : 002970Home alone: Methods to maximize Tic expression for objective Videotape assessments in Gilles de la tourette syndrome
Auteurs : Christopher G. Goetz ; Sue Leurgans ; Teresa A. ChmuraSource :
- Movement disorders [ 0885-3185 ] ; 2001.
Descripteurs français
- Pascal (Inist)
English descriptors
Abstract
Our objective was to test whether at-home videotapes yield enhanced information on tics compared to office-based videotapes and a patient questionnaire on the current anatomical distribution of tics. Ten subjects with Gilles de la Tourette syndrome (age range 8-49 years) who were seen for initial evaluation completed a check list of anatomical areas currently affected with tics, and underwent a videotape examination according to the Rush Videotape Protocol. Each patient/ family conducted the same protocol at home at the same time of day within 48 hours. We rated two tapes in random order using the modified published scoring method for the Rush Video-based Tic Rating Scale. Two environments were compared, the doctor's office and at home, with videotapes taken in three conditions: patient engaged in relaxed conversation, patient quietly seated with filmer in the room, and patient quietly seated alone in the room. Data were analyzed using a 2-factor repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Wilcoxon signed rank tests. All patients provided excellent quality videotapes that could be scored without difficulty. Environment (office vs. home) and Condition (conversation, quiet with observer, quiet and alone) were both highly significant (P <.0001) and did not interact (P =.54). The highest tic scores for total tic impairment occurred at home with the patient alone (mean score 14.5), and the lowest yield occurred in the office with an observer present (mean score 5.4), the setting closest to the clinical neurological examination. The Home/Alone video segments revealed tics not otherwise seen. Patient questionnaires on body regions recorded more areas than observed in the office videotape, but patients were unaware of several tics captured on the Home/Alone segment. Patients can produce videotapes for objective tic assessments. Because at-home videotapes consistently yield higher tic expressions than in-office films and capture tics that are not appreciated by patients, this methodology is well-suited for enhanced retrieval of objective data on tic expression.
Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)
Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.
pA |
|
---|
Format Inist (serveur)
NO : | PASCAL 01-0429754 INIST |
---|---|
ET : | Home alone: Methods to maximize Tic expression for objective Videotape assessments in Gilles de la tourette syndrome |
AU : | GOETZ (Christopher G.); LEURGANS (Sue); CHMURA (Teresa A.) |
AF : | Department of Neurological Sciences and Department of Preventive Medicine, Rush University, Rush Presbyterian St. Luke's Medical Center/Chicago, Illinois/Etats-Unis (1 aut., 2 aut., 3 aut.) |
DT : | Publication en série; Niveau analytique |
SO : | Movement disorders; ISSN 0885-3185; Etats-Unis; Da. 2001; Vol. 16; No. 4; Pp. 693-697; Bibl. 10 ref. |
LA : | Anglais |
EA : | Our objective was to test whether at-home videotapes yield enhanced information on tics compared to office-based videotapes and a patient questionnaire on the current anatomical distribution of tics. Ten subjects with Gilles de la Tourette syndrome (age range 8-49 years) who were seen for initial evaluation completed a check list of anatomical areas currently affected with tics, and underwent a videotape examination according to the Rush Videotape Protocol. Each patient/ family conducted the same protocol at home at the same time of day within 48 hours. We rated two tapes in random order using the modified published scoring method for the Rush Video-based Tic Rating Scale. Two environments were compared, the doctor's office and at home, with videotapes taken in three conditions: patient engaged in relaxed conversation, patient quietly seated with filmer in the room, and patient quietly seated alone in the room. Data were analyzed using a 2-factor repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Wilcoxon signed rank tests. All patients provided excellent quality videotapes that could be scored without difficulty. Environment (office vs. home) and Condition (conversation, quiet with observer, quiet and alone) were both highly significant (P <.0001) and did not interact (P =.54). The highest tic scores for total tic impairment occurred at home with the patient alone (mean score 14.5), and the lowest yield occurred in the office with an observer present (mean score 5.4), the setting closest to the clinical neurological examination. The Home/Alone video segments revealed tics not otherwise seen. Patient questionnaires on body regions recorded more areas than observed in the office videotape, but patients were unaware of several tics captured on the Home/Alone segment. Patients can produce videotapes for objective tic assessments. Because at-home videotapes consistently yield higher tic expressions than in-office films and capture tics that are not appreciated by patients, this methodology is well-suited for enhanced retrieval of objective data on tic expression. |
CC : | 002B17G |
FD : | Gilles de la Tourette syndrome; Enregistrement vidéo; Facteur milieu; Exploration; Homme; A domicile |
FG : | Système nerveux pathologie; Système nerveux central pathologie; Encéphale pathologie; Maladie dégénérative |
ED : | Gilles de la Tourette syndrome; Video recording; Environmental factor; Exploration; Human |
EG : | Nervous system diseases; Central nervous system disease; Cerebral disorder; Degenerative disease |
SD : | Gilles de la Tourette síndrome; Registro vídeo; Factor medio; Exploración; Hombre |
LO : | INIST-20953.354000097121190140 |
ID : | 01-0429754 |
Links to Exploration step
Pascal:01-0429754Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Home alone: Methods to maximize Tic expression for objective Videotape assessments in Gilles de la tourette syndrome</title>
<author><name sortKey="Goetz, Christopher G" sort="Goetz, Christopher G" uniqKey="Goetz C" first="Christopher G." last="Goetz">Christopher G. Goetz</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Neurological Sciences and Department of Preventive Medicine, Rush University, Rush Presbyterian St. Luke's Medical Center</s1>
<s2>Chicago, Illinois</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Leurgans, Sue" sort="Leurgans, Sue" uniqKey="Leurgans S" first="Sue" last="Leurgans">Sue Leurgans</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Neurological Sciences and Department of Preventive Medicine, Rush University, Rush Presbyterian St. Luke's Medical Center</s1>
<s2>Chicago, Illinois</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Chmura, Teresa A" sort="Chmura, Teresa A" uniqKey="Chmura T" first="Teresa A." last="Chmura">Teresa A. Chmura</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Neurological Sciences and Department of Preventive Medicine, Rush University, Rush Presbyterian St. Luke's Medical Center</s1>
<s2>Chicago, Illinois</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">01-0429754</idno>
<date when="2001">2001</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 01-0429754 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Pascal:01-0429754</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">002969</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Home alone: Methods to maximize Tic expression for objective Videotape assessments in Gilles de la tourette syndrome</title>
<author><name sortKey="Goetz, Christopher G" sort="Goetz, Christopher G" uniqKey="Goetz C" first="Christopher G." last="Goetz">Christopher G. Goetz</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Neurological Sciences and Department of Preventive Medicine, Rush University, Rush Presbyterian St. Luke's Medical Center</s1>
<s2>Chicago, Illinois</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Leurgans, Sue" sort="Leurgans, Sue" uniqKey="Leurgans S" first="Sue" last="Leurgans">Sue Leurgans</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Neurological Sciences and Department of Preventive Medicine, Rush University, Rush Presbyterian St. Luke's Medical Center</s1>
<s2>Chicago, Illinois</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Chmura, Teresa A" sort="Chmura, Teresa A" uniqKey="Chmura T" first="Teresa A." last="Chmura">Teresa A. Chmura</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Neurological Sciences and Department of Preventive Medicine, Rush University, Rush Presbyterian St. Luke's Medical Center</s1>
<s2>Chicago, Illinois</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Movement disorders</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Mov. disord.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0885-3185</idno>
<imprint><date when="2001">2001</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">Movement disorders</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Mov. disord.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0885-3185</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Environmental factor</term>
<term>Exploration</term>
<term>Gilles de la Tourette syndrome</term>
<term>Human</term>
<term>Video recording</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Gilles de la Tourette syndrome</term>
<term>Enregistrement vidéo</term>
<term>Facteur milieu</term>
<term>Exploration</term>
<term>Homme</term>
<term>A domicile</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Our objective was to test whether at-home videotapes yield enhanced information on tics compared to office-based videotapes and a patient questionnaire on the current anatomical distribution of tics. Ten subjects with Gilles de la Tourette syndrome (age range 8-49 years) who were seen for initial evaluation completed a check list of anatomical areas currently affected with tics, and underwent a videotape examination according to the Rush Videotape Protocol. Each patient/ family conducted the same protocol at home at the same time of day within 48 hours. We rated two tapes in random order using the modified published scoring method for the Rush Video-based Tic Rating Scale. Two environments were compared, the doctor's office and at home, with videotapes taken in three conditions: patient engaged in relaxed conversation, patient quietly seated with filmer in the room, and patient quietly seated alone in the room. Data were analyzed using a 2-factor repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Wilcoxon signed rank tests. All patients provided excellent quality videotapes that could be scored without difficulty. Environment (office vs. home) and Condition (conversation, quiet with observer, quiet and alone) were both highly significant (P <.0001) and did not interact (P =.54). The highest tic scores for total tic impairment occurred at home with the patient alone (mean score 14.5), and the lowest yield occurred in the office with an observer present (mean score 5.4), the setting closest to the clinical neurological examination. The Home/Alone video segments revealed tics not otherwise seen. Patient questionnaires on body regions recorded more areas than observed in the office videotape, but patients were unaware of several tics captured on the Home/Alone segment. Patients can produce videotapes for objective tic assessments. Because at-home videotapes consistently yield higher tic expressions than in-office films and capture tics that are not appreciated by patients, this methodology is well-suited for enhanced retrieval of objective data on tic expression.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist><standard h6="B"><pA><fA01 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>0885-3185</s0>
</fA01>
<fA03 i2="1"><s0>Mov. disord.</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05><s2>16</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06><s2>4</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>Home alone: Methods to maximize Tic expression for objective Videotape assessments in Gilles de la tourette syndrome</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>GOETZ (Christopher G.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1"><s1>LEURGANS (Sue)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="03" i2="1"><s1>CHMURA (Teresa A.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Neurological Sciences and Department of Preventive Medicine, Rush University, Rush Presbyterian St. Luke's Medical Center</s1>
<s2>Chicago, Illinois</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20><s1>693-697</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21><s1>2001</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01"><s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01"><s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>20953</s2>
<s5>354000097121190140</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44><s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2001 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45><s0>10 ref.</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>01-0429754</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60><s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61><s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>Movement disorders</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01"><s0>USA</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG"><s0>Our objective was to test whether at-home videotapes yield enhanced information on tics compared to office-based videotapes and a patient questionnaire on the current anatomical distribution of tics. Ten subjects with Gilles de la Tourette syndrome (age range 8-49 years) who were seen for initial evaluation completed a check list of anatomical areas currently affected with tics, and underwent a videotape examination according to the Rush Videotape Protocol. Each patient/ family conducted the same protocol at home at the same time of day within 48 hours. We rated two tapes in random order using the modified published scoring method for the Rush Video-based Tic Rating Scale. Two environments were compared, the doctor's office and at home, with videotapes taken in three conditions: patient engaged in relaxed conversation, patient quietly seated with filmer in the room, and patient quietly seated alone in the room. Data were analyzed using a 2-factor repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Wilcoxon signed rank tests. All patients provided excellent quality videotapes that could be scored without difficulty. Environment (office vs. home) and Condition (conversation, quiet with observer, quiet and alone) were both highly significant (P <.0001) and did not interact (P =.54). The highest tic scores for total tic impairment occurred at home with the patient alone (mean score 14.5), and the lowest yield occurred in the office with an observer present (mean score 5.4), the setting closest to the clinical neurological examination. The Home/Alone video segments revealed tics not otherwise seen. Patient questionnaires on body regions recorded more areas than observed in the office videotape, but patients were unaware of several tics captured on the Home/Alone segment. Patients can produce videotapes for objective tic assessments. Because at-home videotapes consistently yield higher tic expressions than in-office films and capture tics that are not appreciated by patients, this methodology is well-suited for enhanced retrieval of objective data on tic expression.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X"><s0>002B17G</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Gilles de la Tourette syndrome</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Gilles de la Tourette syndrome</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Gilles de la Tourette síndrome</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Enregistrement vidéo</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Video recording</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Registro vídeo</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Facteur milieu</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Environmental factor</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Factor medio</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Exploration</s0>
<s5>17</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Exploration</s0>
<s5>17</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Exploración</s0>
<s5>17</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Homme</s0>
<s5>20</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Human</s0>
<s5>20</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Hombre</s0>
<s5>20</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>A domicile</s0>
<s4>INC</s4>
<s5>86</s5>
</fC03>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Système nerveux pathologie</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Nervous system diseases</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Sistema nervioso patología</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Système nerveux central pathologie</s0>
<s5>38</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Central nervous system disease</s0>
<s5>38</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Sistema nervosio central patología</s0>
<s5>38</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Encéphale pathologie</s0>
<s5>39</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Cerebral disorder</s0>
<s5>39</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Encéfalo patología</s0>
<s5>39</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Maladie dégénérative</s0>
<s5>40</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Degenerative disease</s0>
<s5>40</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Enfermedad degenerativa</s0>
<s5>40</s5>
</fC07>
<fN21><s1>302</s1>
</fN21>
</pA>
</standard>
<server><NO>PASCAL 01-0429754 INIST</NO>
<ET>Home alone: Methods to maximize Tic expression for objective Videotape assessments in Gilles de la tourette syndrome</ET>
<AU>GOETZ (Christopher G.); LEURGANS (Sue); CHMURA (Teresa A.)</AU>
<AF>Department of Neurological Sciences and Department of Preventive Medicine, Rush University, Rush Presbyterian St. Luke's Medical Center/Chicago, Illinois/Etats-Unis (1 aut., 2 aut., 3 aut.)</AF>
<DT>Publication en série; Niveau analytique</DT>
<SO>Movement disorders; ISSN 0885-3185; Etats-Unis; Da. 2001; Vol. 16; No. 4; Pp. 693-697; Bibl. 10 ref.</SO>
<LA>Anglais</LA>
<EA>Our objective was to test whether at-home videotapes yield enhanced information on tics compared to office-based videotapes and a patient questionnaire on the current anatomical distribution of tics. Ten subjects with Gilles de la Tourette syndrome (age range 8-49 years) who were seen for initial evaluation completed a check list of anatomical areas currently affected with tics, and underwent a videotape examination according to the Rush Videotape Protocol. Each patient/ family conducted the same protocol at home at the same time of day within 48 hours. We rated two tapes in random order using the modified published scoring method for the Rush Video-based Tic Rating Scale. Two environments were compared, the doctor's office and at home, with videotapes taken in three conditions: patient engaged in relaxed conversation, patient quietly seated with filmer in the room, and patient quietly seated alone in the room. Data were analyzed using a 2-factor repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Wilcoxon signed rank tests. All patients provided excellent quality videotapes that could be scored without difficulty. Environment (office vs. home) and Condition (conversation, quiet with observer, quiet and alone) were both highly significant (P <.0001) and did not interact (P =.54). The highest tic scores for total tic impairment occurred at home with the patient alone (mean score 14.5), and the lowest yield occurred in the office with an observer present (mean score 5.4), the setting closest to the clinical neurological examination. The Home/Alone video segments revealed tics not otherwise seen. Patient questionnaires on body regions recorded more areas than observed in the office videotape, but patients were unaware of several tics captured on the Home/Alone segment. Patients can produce videotapes for objective tic assessments. Because at-home videotapes consistently yield higher tic expressions than in-office films and capture tics that are not appreciated by patients, this methodology is well-suited for enhanced retrieval of objective data on tic expression.</EA>
<CC>002B17G</CC>
<FD>Gilles de la Tourette syndrome; Enregistrement vidéo; Facteur milieu; Exploration; Homme; A domicile</FD>
<FG>Système nerveux pathologie; Système nerveux central pathologie; Encéphale pathologie; Maladie dégénérative</FG>
<ED>Gilles de la Tourette syndrome; Video recording; Environmental factor; Exploration; Human</ED>
<EG>Nervous system diseases; Central nervous system disease; Cerebral disorder; Degenerative disease</EG>
<SD>Gilles de la Tourette síndrome; Registro vídeo; Factor medio; Exploración; Hombre</SD>
<LO>INIST-20953.354000097121190140</LO>
<ID>01-0429754</ID>
</server>
</inist>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/MovDisordV3/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002969 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 002969 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Wicri/Santé |area= MovDisordV3 |flux= PascalFrancis |étape= Corpus |type= RBID |clé= Pascal:01-0429754 |texte= Home alone: Methods to maximize Tic expression for objective Videotape assessments in Gilles de la tourette syndrome }}
![]() | This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23. | ![]() |