MovDisordV3, PascalFrancis, Corpus, bibRecord, 001559

Reliability and validity of the scale for the assessment and rating of ataxia : A study in 64 ataxia patients

Identifieur interne : 001559 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 001558; suivant : 001560

Reliability and validity of the scale for the assessment and rating of ataxia : A study in 64 ataxia patients

Auteurs : Anja Weyer ; Michael Abele ; Tanja Schmitz-Hübsch ; Beate Schoch ; Markus Frings ; Dagmar Timmann ; Thomas Klockgether

Source :

Movement disorders [ 0885-3185 ] ; 2007.

RBID : Pascal:07-0448801

Descripteurs français

Pascal (Inist)
- Système nerveux pathologie, Ataxie, Fiabilité, Validité, Echelle d'évaluation, Homme.

English descriptors

KwdEn :
- Ataxia, Evaluation scale, Human, Nervous system diseases, Reliability, Validity.

Abstract

The objective of this study was to test the reliability and validity of the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) in ataxia patients not suffering from autosomal dominant spinocerebellar ataxia (SCA). To this end, 64 patients with various ataxia disorders or stable cerebellar lesions were rated independently by two investigators. In addition to SARA, the following assessment instruments were applied: ataxia disease stage, Barthel index and part IV (functional assessment) of the Unified Huntington's Disease Rating scale (UHDRS-IV). Eighteen patients were rated twice. Inter-rater and intrarater reliability were very high with ICCs of 0.98 and 0.99. Internal consistency was high indicated by Cronbach's α of 0.97. Factorial analysis revealed that the rating results were mainly determined by one major factor with an eigenvalue of 6.34 which explained 52.8% of the variance. SARA score increased with disease stage (P < 0.0001) and was closely correlated with Barthel index (r = -0.63, P < 0.0001) and UHDRS-IV (r = -0.62, P < 0.0001), but only weakly correlated with disease duration (r = 0.44, P < 0.001). The results suggest that SARA is a reliable and valid measure of ataxia in non-SCA ataxia patients.

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.

A01	`01`	`1`		`@0 0885-3185`
A03		`1`		`@0 Mov. disord.`
A05				`@2 22`
A06				`@2 11`
A08	`01`	`1`	`ENG`	`@1 Reliability and validity of the scale for the assessment and rating of ataxia : A study in 64 ataxia patients`
A11	`01`	`1`		`@1 WEYER (Anja)`
A11	`02`	`1`		`@1 ABELE (Michael)`
A11	`03`	`1`		`@1 SCHMITZ-HÜBSCH (Tanja)`
A11	`04`	`1`		`@1 SCHOCH (Beate)`
A11	`05`	`1`		`@1 FRINGS (Markus)`
A11	`06`	`1`		`@1 TIMMANN (Dagmar)`
A11	`07`	`1`		`@1 KLOCKGETHER (Thomas)`
A14	`01`			`@1 Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Bonn @2 Bonn @3 DEU @Z 1 aut. @Z 2 aut. @Z 3 aut. @Z 7 aut.`
A14	`02`			`@1 Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Essen @2 Essen @3 DEU @Z 4 aut.`
A14	`03`			`@1 Department of Neurology, University Hospital Essen @2 Essen @3 DEU @Z 5 aut. @Z 6 aut.`
A20				`@1 1633-1637`
A21				`@1 2007`
A23	`01`			`@0 ENG`
A43	`01`			`@1 INIST @2 20953 @5 354000149744800180`
A44				`@0 0000 @1 © 2007 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.`
A45				`@0 12 ref.`
A47	`01`	`1`		`@0 07-0448801`
A60				`@1 P @3 CC`
A61				`@0 A`
A64	`01`	`1`		`@0 Movement disorders`
A66	`01`			`@0 USA`
C01	`01`		`ENG`	@0 The objective of this study was to test the reliability and validity of the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) in ataxia patients not suffering from autosomal dominant spinocerebellar ataxia (SCA). To this end, 64 patients with various ataxia disorders or stable cerebellar lesions were rated independently by two investigators. In addition to SARA, the following assessment instruments were applied: ataxia disease stage, Barthel index and part IV (functional assessment) of the Unified Huntington's Disease Rating scale (UHDRS-IV). Eighteen patients were rated twice. Inter-rater and intrarater reliability were very high with ICCs of 0.98 and 0.99. Internal consistency was high indicated by Cronbach's α of 0.97. Factorial analysis revealed that the rating results were mainly determined by one major factor with an eigenvalue of 6.34 which explained 52.8% of the variance. SARA score increased with disease stage (P < 0.0001) and was closely correlated with Barthel index (r = -0.63, P < 0.0001) and UHDRS-IV (r = -0.62, P < 0.0001), but only weakly correlated with disease duration (r = 0.44, P < 0.001). The results suggest that SARA is a reliable and valid measure of ataxia in non-SCA ataxia patients.
C02	`01`	`X`		`@0 002B17`
C02	`02`	`X`		`@0 002B17F`
C02	`03`	`X`		`@0 002B17G`
C03	`01`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Système nerveux pathologie @5 01`
C03	`01`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Nervous system diseases @5 01`
C03	`01`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Sistema nervioso patología @5 01`
C03	`02`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Ataxie @5 02`
C03	`02`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Ataxia @5 02`
C03	`02`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Ataxia @5 02`
C03	`03`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Fiabilité @5 09`
C03	`03`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Reliability @5 09`
C03	`03`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Fiabilidad @5 09`
C03	`04`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Validité @5 10`
C03	`04`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Validity @5 10`
C03	`04`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Validez @5 10`
C03	`05`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Echelle d'évaluation @5 11`
C03	`05`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Evaluation scale @5 11`
C03	`05`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Escala evaluación @5 11`
C03	`06`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Homme @5 12`
C03	`06`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Human @5 12`
C03	`06`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Hombre @5 12`
C07	`01`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Encéphale pathologie @5 37`
C07	`01`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Cerebral disorder @5 37`
C07	`01`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Encéfalo patología @5 37`
C07	`02`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Système nerveux central pathologie @5 38`
C07	`02`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Central nervous system disease @5 38`
C07	`02`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Sistema nervosio central patología @5 38`
C07	`03`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Trouble neurologique @5 39`
C07	`03`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Neurological disorder @5 39`
C07	`03`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Trastorno neurológico @5 39`
N21				`@1 295`
N44	`01`			`@1 OTO`
N82				`@1 OTO`

Format Inist (serveur)

NO :	PASCAL 07-0448801 INIST
ET :	Reliability and validity of the scale for the assessment and rating of ataxia : A study in 64 ataxia patients
AU :	WEYER (Anja); ABELE (Michael); SCHMITZ-HÜBSCH (Tanja); SCHOCH (Beate); FRINGS (Markus); TIMMANN (Dagmar); KLOCKGETHER (Thomas)
AF :	Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Bonn/Bonn/Allemagne (1 aut., 2 aut., 3 aut., 7 aut.); Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Essen/Essen/Allemagne (4 aut.); Department of Neurology, University Hospital Essen/Essen/Allemagne (5 aut., 6 aut.)
DT :	Publication en série; Courte communication, note brève; Niveau analytique
SO :	Movement disorders; ISSN 0885-3185; Etats-Unis; Da. 2007; Vol. 22; No. 11; Pp. 1633-1637; Bibl. 12 ref.
LA :	Anglais
EA :	The objective of this study was to test the reliability and validity of the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) in ataxia patients not suffering from autosomal dominant spinocerebellar ataxia (SCA). To this end, 64 patients with various ataxia disorders or stable cerebellar lesions were rated independently by two investigators. In addition to SARA, the following assessment instruments were applied: ataxia disease stage, Barthel index and part IV (functional assessment) of the Unified Huntington's Disease Rating scale (UHDRS-IV). Eighteen patients were rated twice. Inter-rater and intrarater reliability were very high with ICCs of 0.98 and 0.99. Internal consistency was high indicated by Cronbach's α of 0.97. Factorial analysis revealed that the rating results were mainly determined by one major factor with an eigenvalue of 6.34 which explained 52.8% of the variance. SARA score increased with disease stage (P < 0.0001) and was closely correlated with Barthel index (r = -0.63, P < 0.0001) and UHDRS-IV (r = -0.62, P < 0.0001), but only weakly correlated with disease duration (r = 0.44, P < 0.001). The results suggest that SARA is a reliable and valid measure of ataxia in non-SCA ataxia patients.
CC :	002B17; 002B17F; 002B17G
FD :	Système nerveux pathologie; Ataxie; Fiabilité; Validité; Echelle d'évaluation; Homme
FG :	Encéphale pathologie; Système nerveux central pathologie; Trouble neurologique
ED :	Nervous system diseases; Ataxia; Reliability; Validity; Evaluation scale; Human
EG :	Cerebral disorder; Central nervous system disease; Neurological disorder
SD :	Sistema nervioso patología; Ataxia; Fiabilidad; Validez; Escala evaluación; Hombre
LO :	INIST-20953.354000149744800180
ID :	07-0448801

Links to Exploration step

Pascal:07-0448801

Le document en format XML

<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Reliability and validity of the scale for the assessment and rating of ataxia : A study in 64 ataxia patients</title>
<author><name sortKey="Weyer, Anja" sort="Weyer, Anja" uniqKey="Weyer A" first="Anja" last="Weyer">Anja Weyer</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Bonn</s1>
<s2>Bonn</s2>
<s3>DEU</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Abele, Michael" sort="Abele, Michael" uniqKey="Abele M" first="Michael" last="Abele">Michael Abele</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Bonn</s1>
<s2>Bonn</s2>
<s3>DEU</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Schmitz Hubsch, Tanja" sort="Schmitz Hubsch, Tanja" uniqKey="Schmitz Hubsch T" first="Tanja" last="Schmitz-Hübsch">Tanja Schmitz-Hübsch</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Bonn</s1>
<s2>Bonn</s2>
<s3>DEU</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Schoch, Beate" sort="Schoch, Beate" uniqKey="Schoch B" first="Beate" last="Schoch">Beate Schoch</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Essen</s1>
<s2>Essen</s2>
<s3>DEU</s3>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Frings, Markus" sort="Frings, Markus" uniqKey="Frings M" first="Markus" last="Frings">Markus Frings</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="03"><s1>Department of Neurology, University Hospital Essen</s1>
<s2>Essen</s2>
<s3>DEU</s3>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Timmann, Dagmar" sort="Timmann, Dagmar" uniqKey="Timmann D" first="Dagmar" last="Timmann">Dagmar Timmann</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="03"><s1>Department of Neurology, University Hospital Essen</s1>
<s2>Essen</s2>
<s3>DEU</s3>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Klockgether, Thomas" sort="Klockgether, Thomas" uniqKey="Klockgether T" first="Thomas" last="Klockgether">Thomas Klockgether</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Bonn</s1>
<s2>Bonn</s2>
<s3>DEU</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">07-0448801</idno>
<date when="2007">2007</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 07-0448801 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Pascal:07-0448801</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">001559</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Reliability and validity of the scale for the assessment and rating of ataxia : A study in 64 ataxia patients</title>
<author><name sortKey="Weyer, Anja" sort="Weyer, Anja" uniqKey="Weyer A" first="Anja" last="Weyer">Anja Weyer</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Bonn</s1>
<s2>Bonn</s2>
<s3>DEU</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Abele, Michael" sort="Abele, Michael" uniqKey="Abele M" first="Michael" last="Abele">Michael Abele</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Bonn</s1>
<s2>Bonn</s2>
<s3>DEU</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Schmitz Hubsch, Tanja" sort="Schmitz Hubsch, Tanja" uniqKey="Schmitz Hubsch T" first="Tanja" last="Schmitz-Hübsch">Tanja Schmitz-Hübsch</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Bonn</s1>
<s2>Bonn</s2>
<s3>DEU</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Schoch, Beate" sort="Schoch, Beate" uniqKey="Schoch B" first="Beate" last="Schoch">Beate Schoch</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Essen</s1>
<s2>Essen</s2>
<s3>DEU</s3>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Frings, Markus" sort="Frings, Markus" uniqKey="Frings M" first="Markus" last="Frings">Markus Frings</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="03"><s1>Department of Neurology, University Hospital Essen</s1>
<s2>Essen</s2>
<s3>DEU</s3>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Timmann, Dagmar" sort="Timmann, Dagmar" uniqKey="Timmann D" first="Dagmar" last="Timmann">Dagmar Timmann</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="03"><s1>Department of Neurology, University Hospital Essen</s1>
<s2>Essen</s2>
<s3>DEU</s3>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Klockgether, Thomas" sort="Klockgether, Thomas" uniqKey="Klockgether T" first="Thomas" last="Klockgether">Thomas Klockgether</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Bonn</s1>
<s2>Bonn</s2>
<s3>DEU</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Movement disorders</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Mov. disord.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0885-3185</idno>
<imprint><date when="2007">2007</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">Movement disorders</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Mov. disord.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0885-3185</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Ataxia</term>
<term>Evaluation scale</term>
<term>Human</term>
<term>Nervous system diseases</term>
<term>Reliability</term>
<term>Validity</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Système nerveux pathologie</term>
<term>Ataxie</term>
<term>Fiabilité</term>
<term>Validité</term>
<term>Echelle d'évaluation</term>
<term>Homme</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The objective of this study was to test the reliability and validity of the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) in ataxia patients not suffering from autosomal dominant spinocerebellar ataxia (SCA). To this end, 64 patients with various ataxia disorders or stable cerebellar lesions were rated independently by two investigators. In addition to SARA, the following assessment instruments were applied: ataxia disease stage, Barthel index and part IV (functional assessment) of the Unified Huntington's Disease Rating scale (UHDRS-IV). Eighteen patients were rated twice. Inter-rater and intrarater reliability were very high with ICCs of 0.98 and 0.99. Internal consistency was high indicated by Cronbach's α of 0.97. Factorial analysis revealed that the rating results were mainly determined by one major factor with an eigenvalue of 6.34 which explained 52.8% of the variance. SARA score increased with disease stage (P < 0.0001) and was closely correlated with Barthel index (r = -0.63, P < 0.0001) and UHDRS-IV (r = -0.62, P < 0.0001), but only weakly correlated with disease duration (r = 0.44, P < 0.001). The results suggest that SARA is a reliable and valid measure of ataxia in non-SCA ataxia patients.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist><standard h6="B"><pA><fA01 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>0885-3185</s0>
</fA01>
<fA03 i2="1"><s0>Mov. disord.</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05><s2>22</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06><s2>11</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>Reliability and validity of the scale for the assessment and rating of ataxia : A study in 64 ataxia patients</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>WEYER (Anja)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1"><s1>ABELE (Michael)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="03" i2="1"><s1>SCHMITZ-HÜBSCH (Tanja)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="04" i2="1"><s1>SCHOCH (Beate)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="05" i2="1"><s1>FRINGS (Markus)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="06" i2="1"><s1>TIMMANN (Dagmar)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="07" i2="1"><s1>KLOCKGETHER (Thomas)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Bonn</s1>
<s2>Bonn</s2>
<s3>DEU</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="02"><s1>Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Essen</s1>
<s2>Essen</s2>
<s3>DEU</s3>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="03"><s1>Department of Neurology, University Hospital Essen</s1>
<s2>Essen</s2>
<s3>DEU</s3>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20><s1>1633-1637</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21><s1>2007</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01"><s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01"><s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>20953</s2>
<s5>354000149744800180</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44><s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2007 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45><s0>12 ref.</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>07-0448801</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60><s1>P</s1>
<s3>CC</s3>
</fA60>
<fA61><s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>Movement disorders</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01"><s0>USA</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG"><s0>The objective of this study was to test the reliability and validity of the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) in ataxia patients not suffering from autosomal dominant spinocerebellar ataxia (SCA). To this end, 64 patients with various ataxia disorders or stable cerebellar lesions were rated independently by two investigators. In addition to SARA, the following assessment instruments were applied: ataxia disease stage, Barthel index and part IV (functional assessment) of the Unified Huntington's Disease Rating scale (UHDRS-IV). Eighteen patients were rated twice. Inter-rater and intrarater reliability were very high with ICCs of 0.98 and 0.99. Internal consistency was high indicated by Cronbach's α of 0.97. Factorial analysis revealed that the rating results were mainly determined by one major factor with an eigenvalue of 6.34 which explained 52.8% of the variance. SARA score increased with disease stage (P < 0.0001) and was closely correlated with Barthel index (r = -0.63, P < 0.0001) and UHDRS-IV (r = -0.62, P < 0.0001), but only weakly correlated with disease duration (r = 0.44, P < 0.001). The results suggest that SARA is a reliable and valid measure of ataxia in non-SCA ataxia patients.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X"><s0>002B17</s0>
</fC02>
<fC02 i1="02" i2="X"><s0>002B17F</s0>
</fC02>
<fC02 i1="03" i2="X"><s0>002B17G</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Système nerveux pathologie</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Nervous system diseases</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Sistema nervioso patología</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Ataxie</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Ataxia</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Ataxia</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Fiabilité</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Reliability</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Fiabilidad</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Validité</s0>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Validity</s0>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Validez</s0>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Echelle d'évaluation</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Evaluation scale</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Escala evaluación</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Homme</s0>
<s5>12</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Human</s0>
<s5>12</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Hombre</s0>
<s5>12</s5>
</fC03>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Encéphale pathologie</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Cerebral disorder</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Encéfalo patología</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Système nerveux central pathologie</s0>
<s5>38</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Central nervous system disease</s0>
<s5>38</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Sistema nervosio central patología</s0>
<s5>38</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Trouble neurologique</s0>
<s5>39</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Neurological disorder</s0>
<s5>39</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Trastorno neurológico</s0>
<s5>39</s5>
</fC07>
<fN21><s1>295</s1>
</fN21>
<fN44 i1="01"><s1>OTO</s1>
</fN44>
<fN82><s1>OTO</s1>
</fN82>
</pA>
</standard>
<server><NO>PASCAL 07-0448801 INIST</NO>
<ET>Reliability and validity of the scale for the assessment and rating of ataxia : A study in 64 ataxia patients</ET>
<AU>WEYER (Anja); ABELE (Michael); SCHMITZ-HÜBSCH (Tanja); SCHOCH (Beate); FRINGS (Markus); TIMMANN (Dagmar); KLOCKGETHER (Thomas)</AU>
<AF>Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Bonn/Bonn/Allemagne (1 aut., 2 aut., 3 aut., 7 aut.); Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Essen/Essen/Allemagne (4 aut.); Department of Neurology, University Hospital Essen/Essen/Allemagne (5 aut., 6 aut.)</AF>
<DT>Publication en série; Courte communication, note brève; Niveau analytique</DT>
<SO>Movement disorders; ISSN 0885-3185; Etats-Unis; Da. 2007; Vol. 22; No. 11; Pp. 1633-1637; Bibl. 12 ref.</SO>
<LA>Anglais</LA>
<EA>The objective of this study was to test the reliability and validity of the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) in ataxia patients not suffering from autosomal dominant spinocerebellar ataxia (SCA). To this end, 64 patients with various ataxia disorders or stable cerebellar lesions were rated independently by two investigators. In addition to SARA, the following assessment instruments were applied: ataxia disease stage, Barthel index and part IV (functional assessment) of the Unified Huntington's Disease Rating scale (UHDRS-IV). Eighteen patients were rated twice. Inter-rater and intrarater reliability were very high with ICCs of 0.98 and 0.99. Internal consistency was high indicated by Cronbach's α of 0.97. Factorial analysis revealed that the rating results were mainly determined by one major factor with an eigenvalue of 6.34 which explained 52.8% of the variance. SARA score increased with disease stage (P < 0.0001) and was closely correlated with Barthel index (r = -0.63, P < 0.0001) and UHDRS-IV (r = -0.62, P < 0.0001), but only weakly correlated with disease duration (r = 0.44, P < 0.001). The results suggest that SARA is a reliable and valid measure of ataxia in non-SCA ataxia patients.</EA>
<CC>002B17; 002B17F; 002B17G</CC>
<FD>Système nerveux pathologie; Ataxie; Fiabilité; Validité; Echelle d'évaluation; Homme</FD>
<FG>Encéphale pathologie; Système nerveux central pathologie; Trouble neurologique</FG>
<ED>Nervous system diseases; Ataxia; Reliability; Validity; Evaluation scale; Human</ED>
<EG>Cerebral disorder; Central nervous system disease; Neurological disorder</EG>
<SD>Sistema nervioso patología; Ataxia; Fiabilidad; Validez; Escala evaluación; Hombre</SD>
<LO>INIST-20953.354000149744800180</LO>
<ID>07-0448801</ID>
</server>
</inist>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/MovDisordV3/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001559 | SxmlIndent | more

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001559 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Santé
   |area=    MovDisordV3
   |flux=    PascalFrancis
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     Pascal:07-0448801
   |texte=   Reliability and validity of the scale for the assessment and rating of ataxia : A study in 64 ataxia patients
}}

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23.
Data generation: Sun Jul 3 12:29:32 2016. Site generation: Wed Feb 14 10:52:30 2024

	Movement Disorders (revue)
	Attention, ce site est en cours de développement ! Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts. Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Movement Disorders (revue)

Reliability and validity of the scale for the assessment and rating of ataxia : A study in 64 ataxia patients

Reliability and validity of the scale for the assessment and rating of ataxia : A study in 64 ataxia patients

Source :

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Format Inist (serveur)

Links to Exploration step

Le document en format XML

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri