Molecular profiles of Trypanosoma brucei, T. evansi and T. equiperdum stocks revealed by the random amplified polymorphic DNA method.
Identifieur interne : 002412 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 002411; suivant : 002413Molecular profiles of Trypanosoma brucei, T. evansi and T. equiperdum stocks revealed by the random amplified polymorphic DNA method.
Auteurs : Zhao-Rong Lun ; An-Xing Li ; Xiao-Guang Chen ; Li-Xin Lu ; Xing-Quan ZhuSource :
- Parasitology research [ 0932-0113 ] ; 2004.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Animals, Brazil, China, DNA Fingerprinting, DNA, Protozoan (analysis), DNA, Protozoan (isolation & purification), Humans, Kenya, Molecular Epidemiology, Nigeria, Phylogeny, Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA Technique, Tanzania, Trypanosoma (classification), Trypanosoma (genetics), Trypanosoma (isolation & purification), Trypanosoma brucei brucei (classification), Trypanosoma brucei brucei (genetics), Zambia.
- MESH :
- chemical , analysis : DNA, Protozoan.
- chemical , isolation & purification : DNA, Protozoan.
- geographic : Brazil, China, Kenya, Nigeria, Tanzania, Zambia.
- classification : Trypanosoma, Trypanosoma brucei brucei.
- genetics : Trypanosoma, Trypanosoma brucei brucei.
- isolation & purification : Trypanosoma.
- Animals, DNA Fingerprinting, Humans, Molecular Epidemiology, Phylogeny, Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA Technique.
Abstract
A total of 20 random primers (10-mers) were used to amplify RAPD markers from the genomic DNA of four Trypanosoma brucei stocks from East and West Africa, four T. evansi stocks from Africa, Asia and South America and one T. equiperdum stock from Asia. Between 65 and 88 reproducible fragments ranging from 0.25 to 2.15 kb were generated from these stocks depending on the stock/primer combination. The similarity coefficient (SC) among the stocks of T. brucei from Kenya, Nigeria, Tanzania and Zambia ranged from 62.9% to 74.0% (average: 67.6%). The SC among the stocks of T. evansi from Kenya, China and Brazil was 76.4%-95.5% (average: 86.4%), while the SC between T. evansi stock from China and Brazil was 95.5%. For T. evansi and T. equiperdum, the SC among the stocks ranged from 81.2% to 94.4% (average: 87.6%). As for the SC among the stocks of T. brucei and T. evansi, it was found to be from 54.7% to 80.3% (average: 68.0%) and the SC among stocks of T. brucei and T. equiperdum was from 59.4% to 76.9% (average: 68.1%). Our results indicate that the stocks of T. evansi from China and from Brazil are more closely related to the stock of T. equiperdum from China than to the stocks of T. evansi isolated from Kenya and to the stocks of T. brucei. In addition, our results further support the hypothesis that T. evansi stocks from China and Brazil could have arisen from a single lineage. The possible evolution of T. evansi and T. equiperdum is also discussed.
DOI: 10.1007/s00436-003-1054-8
PubMed: 14727188
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:14727188Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Molecular profiles of Trypanosoma brucei, T. evansi and T. equiperdum stocks revealed by the random amplified polymorphic DNA method.</title><author><name sortKey="Lun, Zhao Rong" sort="Lun, Zhao Rong" uniqKey="Lun Z" first="Zhao-Rong" last="Lun">Zhao-Rong Lun</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Center for Parasitic Organisms, School of Life Sciences, Zhongshan University, Guangzhou 510275, PR China, lsslzr@zsu.edu.cn</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Li, An Xing" sort="Li, An Xing" uniqKey="Li A" first="An-Xing" last="Li">An-Xing Li</name></author><author><name sortKey="Chen, Xiao Guang" sort="Chen, Xiao Guang" uniqKey="Chen X" first="Xiao-Guang" last="Chen">Xiao-Guang Chen</name></author><author><name sortKey="Lu, Li Xin" sort="Lu, Li Xin" uniqKey="Lu L" first="Li-Xin" last="Lu">Li-Xin Lu</name></author><author><name sortKey="Zhu, Xing Quan" sort="Zhu, Xing Quan" uniqKey="Zhu X" first="Xing-Quan" last="Zhu">Xing-Quan Zhu</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2004">2004</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:14727188</idno><idno type="pmid">14727188</idno><idno type="doi">10.1007/s00436-003-1054-8</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">002412</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">002412</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Molecular profiles of Trypanosoma brucei, T. evansi and T. equiperdum stocks revealed by the random amplified polymorphic DNA method.</title><author><name sortKey="Lun, Zhao Rong" sort="Lun, Zhao Rong" uniqKey="Lun Z" first="Zhao-Rong" last="Lun">Zhao-Rong Lun</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Center for Parasitic Organisms, School of Life Sciences, Zhongshan University, Guangzhou 510275, PR China, lsslzr@zsu.edu.cn</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Li, An Xing" sort="Li, An Xing" uniqKey="Li A" first="An-Xing" last="Li">An-Xing Li</name></author><author><name sortKey="Chen, Xiao Guang" sort="Chen, Xiao Guang" uniqKey="Chen X" first="Xiao-Guang" last="Chen">Xiao-Guang Chen</name></author><author><name sortKey="Lu, Li Xin" sort="Lu, Li Xin" uniqKey="Lu L" first="Li-Xin" last="Lu">Li-Xin Lu</name></author><author><name sortKey="Zhu, Xing Quan" sort="Zhu, Xing Quan" uniqKey="Zhu X" first="Xing-Quan" last="Zhu">Xing-Quan Zhu</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Parasitology research</title><idno type="ISSN">0932-0113</idno><imprint><date when="2004" type="published">2004</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Animals</term><term>Brazil</term><term>China</term><term>DNA Fingerprinting</term><term>DNA, Protozoan (analysis)</term><term>DNA, Protozoan (isolation & purification)</term><term>Humans</term><term>Kenya</term><term>Molecular Epidemiology</term><term>Nigeria</term><term>Phylogeny</term><term>Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA Technique</term><term>Tanzania</term><term>Trypanosoma (classification)</term><term>Trypanosoma (genetics)</term><term>Trypanosoma (isolation & purification)</term><term>Trypanosoma brucei brucei (classification)</term><term>Trypanosoma brucei brucei (genetics)</term><term>Zambia</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" qualifier="analysis" xml:lang="en"><term>DNA, Protozoan</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" qualifier="isolation & purification" xml:lang="en"><term>DNA, Protozoan</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="geographic" xml:lang="en"><term>Brazil</term><term>China</term><term>Kenya</term><term>Nigeria</term><term>Tanzania</term><term>Zambia</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="classification" xml:lang="en"><term>Trypanosoma</term><term>Trypanosoma brucei brucei</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="genetics" xml:lang="en"><term>Trypanosoma</term><term>Trypanosoma brucei brucei</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="isolation & purification" xml:lang="en"><term>Trypanosoma</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Animals</term><term>DNA Fingerprinting</term><term>Humans</term><term>Molecular Epidemiology</term><term>Phylogeny</term><term>Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA Technique</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">A total of 20 random primers (10-mers) were used to amplify RAPD markers from the genomic DNA of four Trypanosoma brucei stocks from East and West Africa, four T. evansi stocks from Africa, Asia and South America and one T. equiperdum stock from Asia. Between 65 and 88 reproducible fragments ranging from 0.25 to 2.15 kb were generated from these stocks depending on the stock/primer combination. The similarity coefficient (SC) among the stocks of T. brucei from Kenya, Nigeria, Tanzania and Zambia ranged from 62.9% to 74.0% (average: 67.6%). The SC among the stocks of T. evansi from Kenya, China and Brazil was 76.4%-95.5% (average: 86.4%), while the SC between T. evansi stock from China and Brazil was 95.5%. For T. evansi and T. equiperdum, the SC among the stocks ranged from 81.2% to 94.4% (average: 87.6%). As for the SC among the stocks of T. brucei and T. evansi, it was found to be from 54.7% to 80.3% (average: 68.0%) and the SC among stocks of T. brucei and T. equiperdum was from 59.4% to 76.9% (average: 68.1%). Our results indicate that the stocks of T. evansi from China and from Brazil are more closely related to the stock of T. equiperdum from China than to the stocks of T. evansi isolated from Kenya and to the stocks of T. brucei. In addition, our results further support the hypothesis that T. evansi stocks from China and Brazil could have arisen from a single lineage. The possible evolution of T. evansi and T. equiperdum is also discussed.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">14727188</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2004</Year><Month>07</Month><Day>06</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2018</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>13</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">0932-0113</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>92</Volume><Issue>4</Issue><PubDate><Year>2004</Year><Month>Mar</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Parasitology research</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Parasitol. Res.</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Molecular profiles of Trypanosoma brucei, T. evansi and T. equiperdum stocks revealed by the random amplified polymorphic DNA method.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>335-40</MedlinePgn></Pagination><Abstract><AbstractText>A total of 20 random primers (10-mers) were used to amplify RAPD markers from the genomic DNA of four Trypanosoma brucei stocks from East and West Africa, four T. evansi stocks from Africa, Asia and South America and one T. equiperdum stock from Asia. Between 65 and 88 reproducible fragments ranging from 0.25 to 2.15 kb were generated from these stocks depending on the stock/primer combination. The similarity coefficient (SC) among the stocks of T. brucei from Kenya, Nigeria, Tanzania and Zambia ranged from 62.9% to 74.0% (average: 67.6%). The SC among the stocks of T. evansi from Kenya, China and Brazil was 76.4%-95.5% (average: 86.4%), while the SC between T. evansi stock from China and Brazil was 95.5%. For T. evansi and T. equiperdum, the SC among the stocks ranged from 81.2% to 94.4% (average: 87.6%). As for the SC among the stocks of T. brucei and T. evansi, it was found to be from 54.7% to 80.3% (average: 68.0%) and the SC among stocks of T. brucei and T. equiperdum was from 59.4% to 76.9% (average: 68.1%). Our results indicate that the stocks of T. evansi from China and from Brazil are more closely related to the stock of T. equiperdum from China than to the stocks of T. evansi isolated from Kenya and to the stocks of T. brucei. In addition, our results further support the hypothesis that T. evansi stocks from China and Brazil could have arisen from a single lineage. The possible evolution of T. evansi and T. equiperdum is also discussed.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Lun</LastName><ForeName>Zhao-Rong</ForeName><Initials>ZR</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Center for Parasitic Organisms, School of Life Sciences, Zhongshan University, Guangzhou 510275, PR China, lsslzr@zsu.edu.cn</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Li</LastName><ForeName>An-Xing</ForeName><Initials>AX</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Chen</LastName><ForeName>Xiao-Guang</ForeName><Initials>XG</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Lu</LastName><ForeName>Li-Xin</ForeName><Initials>LX</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Zhu</LastName><ForeName>Xing-Quan</ForeName><Initials>XQ</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2004</Year><Month>01</Month><Day>16</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>Germany</Country><MedlineTA>Parasitol Res</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>8703571</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0932-0113</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D016054">DNA, Protozoan</NameOfSubstance></Chemical></ChemicalList><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000818" MajorTopicYN="N">Animals</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D001938" MajorTopicYN="N" Type="Geographic">Brazil</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D002681" MajorTopicYN="N" Type="Geographic">China</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016172" MajorTopicYN="Y">DNA Fingerprinting</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016054" MajorTopicYN="N">DNA, Protozoan</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000032" MajorTopicYN="N">analysis</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000302" MajorTopicYN="N">isolation & purification</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007630" MajorTopicYN="N" Type="Geographic">Kenya</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017720" MajorTopicYN="N">Molecular Epidemiology</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D009549" MajorTopicYN="N" Type="Geographic">Nigeria</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D010802" MajorTopicYN="N">Phylogeny</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D019105" MajorTopicYN="Y">Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA Technique</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D013636" MajorTopicYN="N" Type="Geographic">Tanzania</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D014345" MajorTopicYN="N">Trypanosoma</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000145" MajorTopicYN="Y">classification</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000235" MajorTopicYN="Y">genetics</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000302" MajorTopicYN="N">isolation & purification</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D014346" MajorTopicYN="N">Trypanosoma brucei brucei</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000145" MajorTopicYN="N">classification</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000235" MajorTopicYN="N">genetics</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015024" MajorTopicYN="N" Type="Geographic">Zambia</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2003</Year><Month>09</Month><Day>23</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2003</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>19</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2004</Year><Month>1</Month><Day>17</Day><Hour>5</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2004</Year><Month>7</Month><Day>9</Day><Hour>5</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2004</Year><Month>1</Month><Day>17</Day><Hour>5</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">14727188</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1007/s00436-003-1054-8</ArticleId></ArticleIdList><ReferenceList><Reference><Citation>Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2000 Feb 5;105(2):185-201</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">10693742</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Trop Med Parasitol. 1988 Mar;39(1):45-50</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">3291076</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Trends Parasitol. 2002 May;18(5):219-24</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">11983603</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1993 Mar;58(1):181-5</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">8459833</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Parasitol Res. 1997;83(8):816-8</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">9342750</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Res Vet Sci. 1983 Jan;34(1):114-8</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">6836172</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1993 Sep;61(1):69-77</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">8259134</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Vet Parasitol. 1998 Oct;79(2):95-107</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">9806490</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Vet Res Commun. 1999 Jun;23 (4):249-55</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">10461802</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>J Eukaryot Microbiol. 1997 Nov-Dec;44(6):545-52</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">9435127</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1987 Feb;23(1):31-8</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">3033499</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1992 Feb;50(2):189-96</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">1311051</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Nucleic Acids Res. 1990 Nov 25;18(22):6531-5</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">1979162</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Parasitol Today. 1993 Feb;9(2):41-5</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15463701</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1992 Aug;86(4):333-40</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">1463353</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Exp Parasitol. 1970 Dec;28(3):521-34</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">4993889</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Oct;76(10):5269-73</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">291943</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Acta Trop. 1989 Jul;46(4):213-22</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">2571248</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Acta Trop. 1999 Mar 15;72(2):137-48</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">10206114</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>J Parasitol. 2000 Dec;86(6):1289-98</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">11191906</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Parasitol Res. 1996;82(6):535-41</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">8832735</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Int J Parasitol. 2002 Jan;32(1):53-63</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">11796122</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Parasitology. 1993 Feb;106 ( Pt 2):137-49</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">8095328</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1990 Dec;43(2):167-79</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">1982554</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Nucleic Acids Res. 1994 May 11;22(9):1696-700</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">8202373</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1995 Jun;72(1-2):89-101</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">8538703</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Parasitology. 2003 May;126(Pt 5):425-31</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">12793646</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Parasitol Today. 1988 May;4(5):137-42</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15463067</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Nucleic Acids Res. 1982 Jan 22;10(2):593-609</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">6278423</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Vet Parasitol. 1994 Jun;53(3-4):197-208</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">7975115</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1991 May;46(1):97-102</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">1677160</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Biochim Biophys Acta. 1980 May 30;607(3):397-410</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">6249368</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Adv Parasitol. 1980;18:175-246</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">7001872</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Int J Parasitol. 2000 Jan;30(1):35-44</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">10675742</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Adv Parasitol. 2001;48:1-56</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">11013754</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>J Eukaryot Microbiol. 1994 May-Jun;41(3):261-7</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">8049688</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Parasitol Today. 1995 Apr;11(4):131-3</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15275353</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Parasitology. 1992 Feb;104 Pt 1:67-74</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">1319564</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1993 Jun;59(2):211-21</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">8341320</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Parasitol Res. 1996;82(1):22-7</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">8825440</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference></ReferenceList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Sante/explor/MersV1/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002412 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 002412 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Sante
|area= MersV1
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:14727188
|texte= Molecular profiles of Trypanosoma brucei, T. evansi and T. equiperdum stocks revealed by the random amplified polymorphic DNA method.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:14727188" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a MersV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33. |  |