Infectious Disease Outbreak Response: Mind the Rights Gap.
Identifieur interne : 000C59 ( PubMed/Checkpoint ); précédent : 000C58; suivant : 000C60Infectious Disease Outbreak Response: Mind the Rights Gap.
Auteurs : Sara E. Davies [Australie]Source :
- Medical law review [ 1464-3790 ] ; 2017.
Descripteurs français
- KwdFr :
- MESH :
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
Abstract
The international organization responsible for international coordinated response to disease outbreaks-the World Health Organization (WHO)-was given permission to receive reports from sources other than the state in revisions to the International Health Regulations (IHR) in 2005. However, the organization struggles to protect its corresponding right to receive reports from non-state actors on outbreak events. This article examines the consequences of this implementation gap between what is stated in the IHR-the right of WHO to receive reports from non-state actors on outbreak events-and the reality that states remain able and willing to act to ensure that this right is not exercised. The article examines two recent cases: the first detection of Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) outbreak in Saudi Arabia, and the first months of the Ebola outbreak in Guinea. Both cases demonstrate how the WHO has struggled to balance states' concern with managing risk communication against WHO's right to receive reports from non-state actors. The article argues that to realize the full potential of a transparent disease outbreak reporting process, there is a need for a human rights framework that expressly articulates its right to receive reports and outlines appropriate behaviour for the WHO, states, and non-state actors.
DOI: 10.1093/medlaw/fwx011
PubMed: 28472502
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:28472502Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Infectious Disease Outbreak Response: Mind the Rights Gap.</title><author><name sortKey="Davies, Sara E" sort="Davies, Sara E" uniqKey="Davies S" first="Sara E" last="Davies">Sara E. Davies</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Centre for Governance and Public Policy, School of Government and International Relations, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Australie</country><wicri:regionArea>Centre for Governance and Public Policy, School of Government and International Relations, Griffith University, Brisbane</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Brisbane</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2017">2017</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:28472502</idno><idno type="pmid">28472502</idno><idno type="doi">10.1093/medlaw/fwx011</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000C93</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000C93</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">000C93</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Curation">000C93</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Checkpoint">000C59</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Checkpoint" wicri:step="PubMed">000C59</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Infectious Disease Outbreak Response: Mind the Rights Gap.</title><author><name sortKey="Davies, Sara E" sort="Davies, Sara E" uniqKey="Davies S" first="Sara E" last="Davies">Sara E. Davies</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Centre for Governance and Public Policy, School of Government and International Relations, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Australie</country><wicri:regionArea>Centre for Governance and Public Policy, School of Government and International Relations, Griffith University, Brisbane</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Brisbane</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Medical law review</title><idno type="eISSN">1464-3790</idno><imprint><date when="2017" type="published">2017</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Communicable Diseases</term><term>Disease Outbreaks</term><term>Humans</term><term>International Cooperation</term><term>World Health Organization</term></keywords><keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>Coopération internationale</term><term>Flambées de maladies</term><term>Humains</term><term>Maladies transmissibles</term><term>Organisation mondiale de la santé</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Communicable Diseases</term><term>Disease Outbreaks</term><term>Humans</term><term>International Cooperation</term><term>World Health Organization</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr"><term>Coopération internationale</term><term>Flambées de maladies</term><term>Humains</term><term>Maladies transmissibles</term><term>Organisation mondiale de la santé</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The international organization responsible for international coordinated response to disease outbreaks-the World Health Organization (WHO)-was given permission to receive reports from sources other than the state in revisions to the International Health Regulations (IHR) in 2005. However, the organization struggles to protect its corresponding right to receive reports from non-state actors on outbreak events. This article examines the consequences of this implementation gap between what is stated in the IHR-the right of WHO to receive reports from non-state actors on outbreak events-and the reality that states remain able and willing to act to ensure that this right is not exercised. The article examines two recent cases: the first detection of Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) outbreak in Saudi Arabia, and the first months of the Ebola outbreak in Guinea. Both cases demonstrate how the WHO has struggled to balance states' concern with managing risk communication against WHO's right to receive reports from non-state actors. The article argues that to realize the full potential of a transparent disease outbreak reporting process, there is a need for a human rights framework that expressly articulates its right to receive reports and outlines appropriate behaviour for the WHO, states, and non-state actors.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" IndexingMethod="Curated" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">28472502</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2018</Year><Month>03</Month><Day>02</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2020</Year><Month>04</Month><Day>03</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1464-3790</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>25</Volume><Issue>2</Issue><PubDate><Year>2017</Year><Month>05</Month><Day>01</Day></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Medical law review</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Med Law Rev</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Infectious Disease Outbreak Response: Mind the Rights Gap.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>270-292</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1093/medlaw/fwx011</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText>The international organization responsible for international coordinated response to disease outbreaks-the World Health Organization (WHO)-was given permission to receive reports from sources other than the state in revisions to the International Health Regulations (IHR) in 2005. However, the organization struggles to protect its corresponding right to receive reports from non-state actors on outbreak events. This article examines the consequences of this implementation gap between what is stated in the IHR-the right of WHO to receive reports from non-state actors on outbreak events-and the reality that states remain able and willing to act to ensure that this right is not exercised. The article examines two recent cases: the first detection of Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) outbreak in Saudi Arabia, and the first months of the Ebola outbreak in Guinea. Both cases demonstrate how the WHO has struggled to balance states' concern with managing risk communication against WHO's right to receive reports from non-state actors. The article argues that to realize the full potential of a transparent disease outbreak reporting process, there is a need for a human rights framework that expressly articulates its right to receive reports and outlines appropriate behaviour for the WHO, states, and non-state actors.</AbstractText><CopyrightInformation>© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press; all rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.</CopyrightInformation></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Davies</LastName><ForeName>Sara E</ForeName><Initials>SE</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Centre for Governance and Public Policy, School of Government and International Relations, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>England</Country><MedlineTA>Med Law Rev</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>9308945</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0967-0742</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003141" MajorTopicYN="Y">Communicable Diseases</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D004196" MajorTopicYN="Y">Disease Outbreaks</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007391" MajorTopicYN="N">International Cooperation</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D014944" MajorTopicYN="Y">World Health Organization</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList><KeywordList Owner="NOTNLM"><Keyword MajorTopicYN="Y">Ebola</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="Y">Human Rights</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="Y">International Health Regulations</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="Y">MERS</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="Y">Non-state actors</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="Y">Outbreak surveillance</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="Y">Risk communication</Keyword></KeywordList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2017</Year><Month>5</Month><Day>5</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2018</Year><Month>3</Month><Day>3</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2017</Year><Month>5</Month><Day>5</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">28472502</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pii">3797245</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1093/medlaw/fwx011</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC7107554</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed><affiliations><list><country><li>Australie</li></country></list><tree><country name="Australie"><noRegion><name sortKey="Davies, Sara E" sort="Davies, Sara E" uniqKey="Davies S" first="Sara E" last="Davies">Sara E. Davies</name></noRegion></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Sante/explor/MersV1/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000C59 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd -nk 000C59 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Sante
|area= MersV1
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Checkpoint
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:28472502
|texte= Infectious Disease Outbreak Response: Mind the Rights Gap.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:28472502" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a MersV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33. |  |