Relational mobility and cultural differences in analytic and holistic thinking.
Identifieur interne : 000296 ( PubMed/Curation ); précédent : 000295; suivant : 000297Relational mobility and cultural differences in analytic and holistic thinking.
Auteurs : Alvaro San Martin ; Joanna Schug ; William W. Maddux [États-Unis]Source :
- Journal of personality and social psychology [ 1939-1315 ] ; 2019.
Descripteurs français
- KwdFr :
- Adulte (MeSH), Adulte d'âge moyen (MeSH), Attention (MeSH), Cognition (MeSH), Comparaison interculturelle (MeSH), Contrôle interne-externe (MeSH), Espagne (ethnologie), Femelle (MeSH), Humains (MeSH), Israël (ethnologie), Japon (ethnologie), Maroc (ethnologie), Mâle (MeSH), Nigeria (ethnologie), Pensée (activité mentale) (MeSH), Perception sociale (MeSH), Relations interpersonnelles (MeSH), États-Unis (ethnologie).
- MESH :
- Wicri :
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Adult (MeSH), Attention (MeSH), Cognition (MeSH), Cross-Cultural Comparison (MeSH), Female (MeSH), Humans (MeSH), Internal-External Control (MeSH), Interpersonal Relations (MeSH), Israel (ethnology), Japan (ethnology), Male (MeSH), Middle Aged (MeSH), Morocco (ethnology), Nigeria (ethnology), Social Perception (MeSH), Spain (ethnology), Thinking (MeSH), United States (ethnology).
- MESH :
- geographic , ethnology : Israel, Japan, Morocco, Nigeria, Spain, United States.
- Adult, Attention, Cognition, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Female, Humans, Internal-External Control, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Middle Aged, Social Perception, Thinking.
Abstract
We hypothesized that individuals in cultures typified by lower levels of relational mobility would tend to show more attention to the surrounding social and physical context (i.e., holistic vs. analytic thinking) compared with individuals in higher mobility cultural contexts. Six studies provided support for this idea. Studies 1a and 1b showed that differences in relational mobility in cultures as diverse as the U.S., Spain, Israel, Nigeria, and Morocco predicted patterns of dispositional bias as well as holistic (vs. analytic) attention. Study 2 demonstrated that, for Americans and Japanese, relational mobility offered better predictive validity of these cognitive tendencies than related cultural constructs; moreover, Studies 1b and 2 showed that relational mobility mediated cross-cultural differences in perception and attribution. Studies 3a and 3b showed that lower relational mobility induces a weaker sense of internal locus of control and a stronger sense of external locus of control, which led to more holistic (vs. analytic) cognition. Last, Study 4 replicated these results in an experimental setting and demonstrated the causal effect of relational mobility on analytic/holistic cognition. Overall, we suggest that relational mobility may be an important socioecological factor that can help explain robust cognitive differences observed across cultures. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
DOI: 10.1037/pspa0000142
PubMed: 30614727
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream PubMed, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :000297
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:30614727Curation
No country items
Alvaro San Martin<affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Managing People in Organizations Department.</nlm:affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="no comma">Managing People in Organizations Department.</wicri:noCountry><wicri:noCountry code="no comma">Managing People in Organizations Department.</wicri:noCountry></affiliation><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Managing People in Organizations Department.</nlm:affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="no comma">Managing People in Organizations Department.</wicri:noCountry><wicri:noCountry code="no comma">Managing People in Organizations Department.</wicri:noCountry></affiliation><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Psychology, College of William and Mary.</nlm:affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="subField">College of William and Mary</wicri:noCountry></affiliation>Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Relational mobility and cultural differences in analytic and holistic thinking.</title><author><name sortKey="San Martin, Alvaro" sort="San Martin, Alvaro" uniqKey="San Martin A" first="Alvaro" last="San Martin">Alvaro San Martin</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Managing People in Organizations Department.</nlm:affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="no comma">Managing People in Organizations Department.</wicri:noCountry><wicri:noCountry code="no comma">Managing People in Organizations Department.</wicri:noCountry></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Schug, Joanna" sort="Schug, Joanna" uniqKey="Schug J" first="Joanna" last="Schug">Joanna Schug</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Psychology, College of William and Mary.</nlm:affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="subField">College of William and Mary</wicri:noCountry></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Maddux, William W" sort="Maddux, William W" uniqKey="Maddux W" first="William W" last="Maddux">William W. Maddux</name><affiliation wicri:level="4"><nlm:affiliation>Organizational Behavior Department, Kenan-Flagler Business School, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.</nlm:affiliation><country>États-Unis</country><placeName><settlement type="city">Chapel Hill (Caroline du Nord)</settlement><region type="state">Caroline du Nord</region></placeName><orgName type="university">Université de Caroline du Nord à Chapel Hill</orgName></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2019">2019</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:30614727</idno><idno type="pmid">30614727</idno><idno type="doi">10.1037/pspa0000142</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000297</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000297</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">000296</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Curation">000296</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Relational mobility and cultural differences in analytic and holistic thinking.</title><author><name sortKey="San Martin, Alvaro" sort="San Martin, Alvaro" uniqKey="San Martin A" first="Alvaro" last="San Martin">Alvaro San Martin</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Managing People in Organizations Department.</nlm:affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="no comma">Managing People in Organizations Department.</wicri:noCountry><wicri:noCountry code="no comma">Managing People in Organizations Department.</wicri:noCountry></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Schug, Joanna" sort="Schug, Joanna" uniqKey="Schug J" first="Joanna" last="Schug">Joanna Schug</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Psychology, College of William and Mary.</nlm:affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="subField">College of William and Mary</wicri:noCountry></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Maddux, William W" sort="Maddux, William W" uniqKey="Maddux W" first="William W" last="Maddux">William W. Maddux</name><affiliation wicri:level="4"><nlm:affiliation>Organizational Behavior Department, Kenan-Flagler Business School, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.</nlm:affiliation><country>États-Unis</country><placeName><settlement type="city">Chapel Hill (Caroline du Nord)</settlement><region type="state">Caroline du Nord</region></placeName><orgName type="university">Université de Caroline du Nord à Chapel Hill</orgName></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Journal of personality and social psychology</title><idno type="eISSN">1939-1315</idno><imprint><date when="2019" type="published">2019</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult (MeSH)</term><term>Attention (MeSH)</term><term>Cognition (MeSH)</term><term>Cross-Cultural Comparison (MeSH)</term><term>Female (MeSH)</term><term>Humans (MeSH)</term><term>Internal-External Control (MeSH)</term><term>Interpersonal Relations (MeSH)</term><term>Israel (ethnology)</term><term>Japan (ethnology)</term><term>Male (MeSH)</term><term>Middle Aged (MeSH)</term><term>Morocco (ethnology)</term><term>Nigeria (ethnology)</term><term>Social Perception (MeSH)</term><term>Spain (ethnology)</term><term>Thinking (MeSH)</term><term>United States (ethnology)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>Adulte (MeSH)</term><term>Adulte d'âge moyen (MeSH)</term><term>Attention (MeSH)</term><term>Cognition (MeSH)</term><term>Comparaison interculturelle (MeSH)</term><term>Contrôle interne-externe (MeSH)</term><term>Espagne (ethnologie)</term><term>Femelle (MeSH)</term><term>Humains (MeSH)</term><term>Israël (ethnologie)</term><term>Japon (ethnologie)</term><term>Maroc (ethnologie)</term><term>Mâle (MeSH)</term><term>Nigeria (ethnologie)</term><term>Pensée (activité mentale) (MeSH)</term><term>Perception sociale (MeSH)</term><term>Relations interpersonnelles (MeSH)</term><term>États-Unis (ethnologie)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="geographic" qualifier="ethnology" xml:lang="en"><term>Israel</term><term>Japan</term><term>Morocco</term><term>Nigeria</term><term>Spain</term><term>United States</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="ethnologie" xml:lang="fr"><term>Espagne</term><term>Israël</term><term>Japon</term><term>Maroc</term><term>Nigeria</term><term>États-Unis</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Attention</term><term>Cognition</term><term>Cross-Cultural Comparison</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Internal-External Control</term><term>Interpersonal Relations</term><term>Male</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Social Perception</term><term>Thinking</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr"><term>Adulte</term><term>Adulte d'âge moyen</term><term>Attention</term><term>Cognition</term><term>Comparaison interculturelle</term><term>Contrôle interne-externe</term><term>Femelle</term><term>Humains</term><term>Mâle</term><term>Pensée (activité mentale)</term><term>Perception sociale</term><term>Relations interpersonnelles</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Wicri" type="geographic" xml:lang="fr"><term>Israël</term><term>Japon</term><term>Maroc</term><term>Nigeria</term><term>Espagne</term><term>États-Unis</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">We hypothesized that individuals in cultures typified by lower levels of relational mobility would tend to show more attention to the surrounding social and physical context (i.e., holistic vs. analytic thinking) compared with individuals in higher mobility cultural contexts. Six studies provided support for this idea. Studies 1a and 1b showed that differences in relational mobility in cultures as diverse as the U.S., Spain, Israel, Nigeria, and Morocco predicted patterns of dispositional bias as well as holistic (vs. analytic) attention. Study 2 demonstrated that, for Americans and Japanese, relational mobility offered better predictive validity of these cognitive tendencies than related cultural constructs; moreover, Studies 1b and 2 showed that relational mobility mediated cross-cultural differences in perception and attribution. Studies 3a and 3b showed that lower relational mobility induces a weaker sense of internal locus of control and a stronger sense of external locus of control, which led to more holistic (vs. analytic) cognition. Last, Study 4 replicated these results in an experimental setting and demonstrated the causal effect of relational mobility on analytic/holistic cognition. Overall, we suggest that relational mobility may be an important socioecological factor that can help explain robust cognitive differences observed across cultures. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" IndexingMethod="Curated" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">30614727</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2019</Year><Month>05</Month><Day>29</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2019</Year><Month>05</Month><Day>29</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1939-1315</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>116</Volume><Issue>4</Issue><PubDate><Year>2019</Year><Month>Apr</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Journal of personality and social psychology</Title><ISOAbbreviation>J Pers Soc Psychol</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Relational mobility and cultural differences in analytic and holistic thinking.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>495-518</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1037/pspa0000142</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText>We hypothesized that individuals in cultures typified by lower levels of relational mobility would tend to show more attention to the surrounding social and physical context (i.e., holistic vs. analytic thinking) compared with individuals in higher mobility cultural contexts. Six studies provided support for this idea. Studies 1a and 1b showed that differences in relational mobility in cultures as diverse as the U.S., Spain, Israel, Nigeria, and Morocco predicted patterns of dispositional bias as well as holistic (vs. analytic) attention. Study 2 demonstrated that, for Americans and Japanese, relational mobility offered better predictive validity of these cognitive tendencies than related cultural constructs; moreover, Studies 1b and 2 showed that relational mobility mediated cross-cultural differences in perception and attribution. Studies 3a and 3b showed that lower relational mobility induces a weaker sense of internal locus of control and a stronger sense of external locus of control, which led to more holistic (vs. analytic) cognition. Last, Study 4 replicated these results in an experimental setting and demonstrated the causal effect of relational mobility on analytic/holistic cognition. Overall, we suggest that relational mobility may be an important socioecological factor that can help explain robust cognitive differences observed across cultures. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>San Martin</LastName><ForeName>Alvaro</ForeName><Initials>A</Initials><Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0001-7168-3214</Identifier><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Managing People in Organizations Department.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Schug</LastName><ForeName>Joanna</ForeName><Initials>J</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Psychology, College of William and Mary.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Maddux</LastName><ForeName>William W</ForeName><Initials>WW</Initials><Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0003-4218-5747</Identifier><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Organizational Behavior Department, Kenan-Flagler Business School, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><GrantList CompleteYN="Y"><Grant><Agency>INSEAD Research and Development Committee</Agency><Country></Country></Grant></GrantList><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2019</Year><Month>01</Month><Day>07</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country><MedlineTA>J Pers Soc Psychol</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>0014171</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0022-3514</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000328" MajorTopicYN="N">Adult</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D001288" MajorTopicYN="Y">Attention</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003071" MajorTopicYN="Y">Cognition</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003431" MajorTopicYN="Y">Cross-Cultural Comparison</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005260" MajorTopicYN="N">Female</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007389" MajorTopicYN="Y">Internal-External Control</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007398" MajorTopicYN="Y">Interpersonal Relations</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007557" MajorTopicYN="N" Type="Geographic">Israel</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000208" MajorTopicYN="N">ethnology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007564" MajorTopicYN="N" Type="Geographic">Japan</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000208" MajorTopicYN="N">ethnology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008297" MajorTopicYN="N">Male</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008875" MajorTopicYN="N">Middle Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D009018" MajorTopicYN="N" Type="Geographic">Morocco</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000208" MajorTopicYN="N">ethnology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D009549" MajorTopicYN="N" Type="Geographic">Nigeria</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000208" MajorTopicYN="N">ethnology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D012938" MajorTopicYN="N">Social Perception</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D013030" MajorTopicYN="N" Type="Geographic">Spain</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000208" MajorTopicYN="N">ethnology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D013850" MajorTopicYN="Y">Thinking</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D014481" MajorTopicYN="N" Type="Geographic">United States</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000208" MajorTopicYN="N">ethnology</QualifierName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2019</Year><Month>1</Month><Day>8</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2019</Year><Month>5</Month><Day>30</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2019</Year><Month>1</Month><Day>8</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">30614727</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pii">2019-00520-001</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1037/pspa0000142</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Sante/explor/MaghrebDataLibMedV2/Data/PubMed/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000296 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 000296 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Sante
|area= MaghrebDataLibMedV2
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Curation
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:30614727
|texte= Relational mobility and cultural differences in analytic and holistic thinking.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:30614727" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a MaghrebDataLibMedV2
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.38. |  |