Serveur d'exploration sur le lymphœdème

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Ecological meta-analysis of density-dependent processes in the transmission of lymphatic filariasis: survival of infected vectors.

Identifieur interne : 002D89 ( PubMed/Curation ); précédent : 002D88; suivant : 002D90

Ecological meta-analysis of density-dependent processes in the transmission of lymphatic filariasis: survival of infected vectors.

Auteurs : Edwin Michael [Royaume-Uni] ; Lucy C. Snow ; Moses J. Bockarie

Source :

RBID : pubmed:19645292

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

The survival rate of infected vectors represents one of the fundamental components that influence the transmission dynamics of mosquito-borne diseases. Despite the occurrence of a number of studies investigating mosquito survival after infection with filarial worms, there remains conflicting evidence from both laboratory and field experiments as to the existence and mechanism for parasite-induced mortality among filarial mosquitoes. Here, we used a mixed effects meta-analytical framework to combine the data from all available vector-human host blood feeding experiments to evaluate the evidence for the impact of parasite load on the mortality rates of the three major lymphatic filariasis transmitting mosquito genera, Culex, Aedes, and Anopheles mosquitoes, over the extrinsic incubation period of parasitic infection. The results show that, despite the application of this approach, or in the case of Anopheles using a convention fixed effects logistic regression analysis supplemented with additional survival analysis of longitudinal data, no strong association between mortality rate and microfilariae (mf) uptake for either of the three mosquito genera is apparent in the combined data. Instead, a key finding is that study effects played a more crucial role in determining the levels of mortality observed in these experimental studies. This was most revealing in the case of Culex, given that the largest single study in terms of both the number of data points and range of mf intensities, in contrast to smaller studies, showed a significant positive association between mf intensity and mortality, indicating that in this genus at least, the detrimental effect of infection may be manifested only at the highest mf intakes. Although no density dependence in vector mortality was also observed for Aedes, possibly because of the use of restricted human mf intensity range in previous studies, an intriguing finding was that a significantly higher overall mortality was observed for this genus over mfintake ranges that produced much less corresponding mortality in Culex and Anopheles. The results also indicate that currently very little can be said about the survival rate of Anopheles mosquitoes infected with filarial worms because of the striking paucity of data for this genus. Further studies, using standardized methods and covering an appropriate range of mf uptake intensities and using study frameworks that allow the design and comparison of data from both experimental and field experiments, are clearly indicated if we are to reliably quantify the likely effect of filarial infection on vector survival.

PubMed: 19645292

Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Links to Exploration step

pubmed:19645292

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI>
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Ecological meta-analysis of density-dependent processes in the transmission of lymphatic filariasis: survival of infected vectors.</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Michael, Edwin" sort="Michael, Edwin" uniqKey="Michael E" first="Edwin" last="Michael">Edwin Michael</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<nlm:affiliation>Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, St. Mary's Campus, Norfolk Place, London W2 1PG, United Kingdom. e.michael@imperial.ac.uk</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Royaume-Uni</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, St. Mary's Campus, Norfolk Place, London W2 1PG</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Snow, Lucy C" sort="Snow, Lucy C" uniqKey="Snow L" first="Lucy C" last="Snow">Lucy C. Snow</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Bockarie, Moses J" sort="Bockarie, Moses J" uniqKey="Bockarie M" first="Moses J" last="Bockarie">Moses J. Bockarie</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno>
<date when="2009">2009</date>
<idno type="RBID">pubmed:19645292</idno>
<idno type="pmid">19645292</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">002D89</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">002D89</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">002D89</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Curation">002D89</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en">Ecological meta-analysis of density-dependent processes in the transmission of lymphatic filariasis: survival of infected vectors.</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Michael, Edwin" sort="Michael, Edwin" uniqKey="Michael E" first="Edwin" last="Michael">Edwin Michael</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<nlm:affiliation>Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, St. Mary's Campus, Norfolk Place, London W2 1PG, United Kingdom. e.michael@imperial.ac.uk</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Royaume-Uni</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, St. Mary's Campus, Norfolk Place, London W2 1PG</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Snow, Lucy C" sort="Snow, Lucy C" uniqKey="Snow L" first="Lucy C" last="Snow">Lucy C. Snow</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Bockarie, Moses J" sort="Bockarie, Moses J" uniqKey="Bockarie M" first="Moses J" last="Bockarie">Moses J. Bockarie</name>
</author>
</analytic>
<series>
<title level="j">Journal of medical entomology</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0022-2585</idno>
<imprint>
<date when="2009" type="published">2009</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Aedes (parasitology)</term>
<term>Animals</term>
<term>Anopheles (parasitology)</term>
<term>Culex (parasitology)</term>
<term>Culicidae (parasitology)</term>
<term>Elephantiasis, Filarial (parasitology)</term>
<term>Elephantiasis, Filarial (transmission)</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Insect Vectors (parasitology)</term>
<term>Larva</term>
<term>Population Density</term>
<term>Wuchereria bancrofti (growth & development)</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Aedes (parasitologie)</term>
<term>Animaux</term>
<term>Anopheles (parasitologie)</term>
<term>Culex (parasitologie)</term>
<term>Culicidae (parasitologie)</term>
<term>Densité de population</term>
<term>Filariose lymphatique (parasitologie)</term>
<term>Filariose lymphatique (transmission)</term>
<term>Humains</term>
<term>Larve</term>
<term>Vecteurs insectes (parasitologie)</term>
<term>Wuchereria bancrofti (croissance et développement)</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="croissance et développement" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Wuchereria bancrofti</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="growth & development" xml:lang="en">
<term>Wuchereria bancrofti</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="parasitologie" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Aedes</term>
<term>Anopheles</term>
<term>Culex</term>
<term>Culicidae</term>
<term>Filariose lymphatique</term>
<term>Vecteurs insectes</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="parasitology" xml:lang="en">
<term>Aedes</term>
<term>Anopheles</term>
<term>Culex</term>
<term>Culicidae</term>
<term>Elephantiasis, Filarial</term>
<term>Insect Vectors</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="transmission" xml:lang="en">
<term>Elephantiasis, Filarial</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en">
<term>Animals</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Larva</term>
<term>Population Density</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="transmission" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Animaux</term>
<term>Densité de population</term>
<term>Filariose lymphatique</term>
<term>Humains</term>
<term>Larve</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The survival rate of infected vectors represents one of the fundamental components that influence the transmission dynamics of mosquito-borne diseases. Despite the occurrence of a number of studies investigating mosquito survival after infection with filarial worms, there remains conflicting evidence from both laboratory and field experiments as to the existence and mechanism for parasite-induced mortality among filarial mosquitoes. Here, we used a mixed effects meta-analytical framework to combine the data from all available vector-human host blood feeding experiments to evaluate the evidence for the impact of parasite load on the mortality rates of the three major lymphatic filariasis transmitting mosquito genera, Culex, Aedes, and Anopheles mosquitoes, over the extrinsic incubation period of parasitic infection. The results show that, despite the application of this approach, or in the case of Anopheles using a convention fixed effects logistic regression analysis supplemented with additional survival analysis of longitudinal data, no strong association between mortality rate and microfilariae (mf) uptake for either of the three mosquito genera is apparent in the combined data. Instead, a key finding is that study effects played a more crucial role in determining the levels of mortality observed in these experimental studies. This was most revealing in the case of Culex, given that the largest single study in terms of both the number of data points and range of mf intensities, in contrast to smaller studies, showed a significant positive association between mf intensity and mortality, indicating that in this genus at least, the detrimental effect of infection may be manifested only at the highest mf intakes. Although no density dependence in vector mortality was also observed for Aedes, possibly because of the use of restricted human mf intensity range in previous studies, an intriguing finding was that a significantly higher overall mortality was observed for this genus over mfintake ranges that produced much less corresponding mortality in Culex and Anopheles. The results also indicate that currently very little can be said about the survival rate of Anopheles mosquitoes infected with filarial worms because of the striking paucity of data for this genus. Further studies, using standardized methods and covering an appropriate range of mf uptake intensities and using study frameworks that allow the design and comparison of data from both experimental and field experiments, are clearly indicated if we are to reliably quantify the likely effect of filarial infection on vector survival.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<pubmed>
<MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM">
<PMID Version="1">19645292</PMID>
<DateCreated>
<Year>2009</Year>
<Month>08</Month>
<Day>03</Day>
</DateCreated>
<DateCompleted>
<Year>2009</Year>
<Month>09</Month>
<Day>14</Day>
</DateCompleted>
<DateRevised>
<Year>2017</Year>
<Month>02</Month>
<Day>20</Day>
</DateRevised>
<Article PubModel="Print">
<Journal>
<ISSN IssnType="Print">0022-2585</ISSN>
<JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print">
<Volume>46</Volume>
<Issue>4</Issue>
<PubDate>
<Year>2009</Year>
<Month>Jul</Month>
</PubDate>
</JournalIssue>
<Title>Journal of medical entomology</Title>
<ISOAbbreviation>J. Med. Entomol.</ISOAbbreviation>
</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Ecological meta-analysis of density-dependent processes in the transmission of lymphatic filariasis: survival of infected vectors.</ArticleTitle>
<Pagination>
<MedlinePgn>873-80</MedlinePgn>
</Pagination>
<Abstract>
<AbstractText>The survival rate of infected vectors represents one of the fundamental components that influence the transmission dynamics of mosquito-borne diseases. Despite the occurrence of a number of studies investigating mosquito survival after infection with filarial worms, there remains conflicting evidence from both laboratory and field experiments as to the existence and mechanism for parasite-induced mortality among filarial mosquitoes. Here, we used a mixed effects meta-analytical framework to combine the data from all available vector-human host blood feeding experiments to evaluate the evidence for the impact of parasite load on the mortality rates of the three major lymphatic filariasis transmitting mosquito genera, Culex, Aedes, and Anopheles mosquitoes, over the extrinsic incubation period of parasitic infection. The results show that, despite the application of this approach, or in the case of Anopheles using a convention fixed effects logistic regression analysis supplemented with additional survival analysis of longitudinal data, no strong association between mortality rate and microfilariae (mf) uptake for either of the three mosquito genera is apparent in the combined data. Instead, a key finding is that study effects played a more crucial role in determining the levels of mortality observed in these experimental studies. This was most revealing in the case of Culex, given that the largest single study in terms of both the number of data points and range of mf intensities, in contrast to smaller studies, showed a significant positive association between mf intensity and mortality, indicating that in this genus at least, the detrimental effect of infection may be manifested only at the highest mf intakes. Although no density dependence in vector mortality was also observed for Aedes, possibly because of the use of restricted human mf intensity range in previous studies, an intriguing finding was that a significantly higher overall mortality was observed for this genus over mfintake ranges that produced much less corresponding mortality in Culex and Anopheles. The results also indicate that currently very little can be said about the survival rate of Anopheles mosquitoes infected with filarial worms because of the striking paucity of data for this genus. Further studies, using standardized methods and covering an appropriate range of mf uptake intensities and using study frameworks that allow the design and comparison of data from both experimental and field experiments, are clearly indicated if we are to reliably quantify the likely effect of filarial infection on vector survival.</AbstractText>
</Abstract>
<AuthorList CompleteYN="Y">
<Author ValidYN="Y">
<LastName>Michael</LastName>
<ForeName>Edwin</ForeName>
<Initials>E</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo>
<Affiliation>Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, St. Mary's Campus, Norfolk Place, London W2 1PG, United Kingdom. e.michael@imperial.ac.uk</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y">
<LastName>Snow</LastName>
<ForeName>Lucy C</ForeName>
<Initials>LC</Initials>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y">
<LastName>Bockarie</LastName>
<ForeName>Moses J</ForeName>
<Initials>MJ</Initials>
</Author>
</AuthorList>
<Language>eng</Language>
<GrantList CompleteYN="Y">
<Grant>
<GrantID>U19 AI033061</GrantID>
<Acronym>AI</Acronym>
<Agency>NIAID NIH HHS</Agency>
<Country>United States</Country>
</Grant>
<Grant>
<GrantID>R01 AI069387-03</GrantID>
<Acronym>AI</Acronym>
<Agency>NIAID NIH HHS</Agency>
<Country>United States</Country>
</Grant>
<Grant>
<Agency>Medical Research Council</Agency>
<Country>United Kingdom</Country>
</Grant>
<Grant>
<GrantID>R01 AI069387</GrantID>
<Acronym>AI</Acronym>
<Agency>NIAID NIH HHS</Agency>
<Country>United States</Country>
</Grant>
<Grant>
<GrantID>R01 AI69387-01A1</GrantID>
<Acronym>AI</Acronym>
<Agency>NIAID NIH HHS</Agency>
<Country>United States</Country>
</Grant>
<Grant>
<GrantID>U19 AI33061</GrantID>
<Acronym>AI</Acronym>
<Agency>NIAID NIH HHS</Agency>
<Country>United States</Country>
</Grant>
</GrantList>
<PublicationTypeList>
<PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType>
<PublicationType UI="D017418">Meta-Analysis</PublicationType>
<PublicationType UI="D052061">Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural</PublicationType>
<PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType>
</PublicationTypeList>
</Article>
<MedlineJournalInfo>
<Country>England</Country>
<MedlineTA>J Med Entomol</MedlineTA>
<NlmUniqueID>0375400</NlmUniqueID>
<ISSNLinking>0022-2585</ISSNLinking>
</MedlineJournalInfo>
<CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset>
<CommentsCorrectionsList>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Proc Biol Sci. 2002 Jun 22;269(1497):1217-24</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">12065037</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1957 Dec;51(4):422-39</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">13498661</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Z Parasitenkd. 1979 Dec 1;60(3):249-61</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">396729</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>J Med Entomol. 1973 Apr 25;10(2):189-93</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">4707754</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1974;68(1):14</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">4150464</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 1997 Jan-Feb;92(1):33-6</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">9302411</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Trends Ecol Evol. 1995 Jun;10(6):236-40</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">21237020</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Annu Rev Entomol. 1992;37:1-19</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">1539935</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1992 Sep-Oct;86(5):523-30</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">1475823</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1982;76(3):288-96</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">6126022</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Parasitol Today. 1986 Aug;2(8):203-9</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">15462840</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Med Vet Entomol. 2006 Sep;20(3):261-72</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">17044876</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Parasitology. 2004 Jul;129(Pt 1):43-50</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">15267110</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Proc Biol Sci. 1994 Apr 22;256(1345):33-40</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">8008755</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Bull World Health Organ. 1967;37(1):117-37</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">5300045</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Parasitology. 1995 Jul;111 ( Pt 1):19-29</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">7609987</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Acta Trop. 1995 Dec;60(3):159-65</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">8907394</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1988;82(1):138-45</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">3051543</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Trends Parasitol. 2002 Jun;18(6):256-61</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">12036738</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1985 Feb;79(1):89-100</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">3885880</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1977;71(2):155-60</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">327630</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 2002 Dec;96 Suppl 2:S143-52</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">12625927</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1978 Dec;72(6):561-5</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">367299</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1985 Feb;79(1):101-7</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">3885878</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Bull World Health Organ. 1963;28(2):229-34</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">20604140</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>J Helminthol. 1986 Sep;60(3):159-68</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">3745870</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Med Vet Entomol. 2002 Dec;16(4):409-23</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">12510894</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Parasitology. 1986 Jun;92 ( Pt 3):721-36</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">3737249</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1970 Dec;64(4):411-20</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">5498784</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 2002 Dec;96 Suppl 2:S129-32</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">12630402</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1957 Sep;51(3):278-96</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">13470767</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Filaria J. 2006 Aug 16;5:10</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">16914040</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
</CommentsCorrectionsList>
<MeshHeadingList>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D000330" MajorTopicYN="N">Aedes</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000469" MajorTopicYN="N">parasitology</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D000818" MajorTopicYN="N">Animals</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D000852" MajorTopicYN="N">Anopheles</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000469" MajorTopicYN="N">parasitology</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D003465" MajorTopicYN="N">Culex</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000469" MajorTopicYN="N">parasitology</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D009033" MajorTopicYN="N">Culicidae</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000469" MajorTopicYN="Y">parasitology</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D004605" MajorTopicYN="N">Elephantiasis, Filarial</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000469" MajorTopicYN="N">parasitology</QualifierName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000635" MajorTopicYN="N">transmission</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D007303" MajorTopicYN="N">Insect Vectors</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000469" MajorTopicYN="Y">parasitology</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D007814" MajorTopicYN="N">Larva</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D011156" MajorTopicYN="N">Population Density</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D014958" MajorTopicYN="N">Wuchereria bancrofti</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000254" MajorTopicYN="Y">growth & development</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
</MeshHeadingList>
<OtherID Source="NLM">NIHMS129940</OtherID>
<OtherID Source="NLM">PMC2747083</OtherID>
</MedlineCitation>
<PubmedData>
<History>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez">
<Year>2009</Year>
<Month>8</Month>
<Day>4</Day>
<Hour>9</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed">
<Year>2009</Year>
<Month>8</Month>
<Day>4</Day>
<Hour>9</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline">
<Year>2009</Year>
<Month>9</Month>
<Day>15</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
</History>
<PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19645292</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC2747083</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="mid">NIHMS129940</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</PubmedData>
</pubmed>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Sante/explor/LymphedemaV1/Data/PubMed/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002D89 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 002D89 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Sante
   |area=    LymphedemaV1
   |flux=    PubMed
   |étape=   Curation
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     pubmed:19645292
   |texte=   Ecological meta-analysis of density-dependent processes in the transmission of lymphatic filariasis: survival of infected vectors.
}}

Pour générer des pages wiki

HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/RBID.i   -Sk "pubmed:19645292" \
       | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/biblio.hfd   \
       | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a LymphedemaV1 

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.31.
Data generation: Sat Nov 4 17:40:35 2017. Site generation: Tue Feb 13 16:42:16 2024