Correlation among bioimpedance analysis, sonographic and circumferential measurement in assessment of breast cancer-related arm lymphedema.
Identifieur interne : 001191 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 001190; suivant : 001192Correlation among bioimpedance analysis, sonographic and circumferential measurement in assessment of breast cancer-related arm lymphedema.
Auteurs : Y H Choi ; K S SeoSource :
- Lymphology [ 0024-7766 ] ; 2014.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Anthropometry (methods), Body Composition, Breast Neoplasms (surgery), Electric Impedance, Female, Humans, Lymphedema (diagnosis), Lymphedema (diagnostic imaging), Lymphedema (etiology), Lymphedema (pathology), Mastectomy (adverse effects), Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Severity of Illness Index, Ultrasonography, Upper Extremity (diagnostic imaging), Upper Extremity (pathology).
- MESH :
- adverse effects : Mastectomy.
- diagnosis : Lymphedema.
- diagnostic imaging : Lymphedema, Upper Extremity.
- etiology : Lymphedema.
- methods : Anthropometry.
- pathology : Lymphedema, Upper Extremity.
- surgery : Breast Neoplasms.
- Body Composition, Electric Impedance, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Severity of Illness Index, Ultrasonography.
Abstract
New approaches for assessment of lymphedema using ultrasonography (US) have been introduced recently and are reported to be reliable and simple. Ultrasonography provides detailed information about physical properties of the tissue in addition to volume and size. There have been only limited studies comparing bioimpedance analysis (BIA), US, and circumferential measurement (CM), which is considered a standard measurement. The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between US, BIA, and CM. Twenty-eight patients with lymphedema after breast cancer surgery underwent BIA, US, and CM. Impedance, which reflects the amount of extracellular fluid, was measured with 1 kHz frequency in affected and unaffected arms. Circumferences were measured at 10cm proximal and distal to the elbow and a truncated cone method used to calculate estimated volumes for upper arm and forearm. We found that interlimb forearm subcutis thickness differences measured by US were highly correlated with CM measurements and that interlimb upper arm subcutis thickness differences measured by US were moderately correlated with CM measurements and BIA ratios. However, the interlimb ratio of compressibility measured by US showed no or only weak correlation with impedance measurements and circumferential measurements. Our results also show that compressibility measured by US could not be predicted from BIA or CM measurements despite a high degree of concordance among subcutis thickness measured by US, CM, and BIA.
PubMed: 25420305
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:25420305Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Correlation among bioimpedance analysis, sonographic and circumferential measurement in assessment of breast cancer-related arm lymphedema.</title><author><name sortKey="Choi, Y H" sort="Choi, Y H" uniqKey="Choi Y" first="Y H" last="Choi">Y H Choi</name></author><author><name sortKey="Seo, K S" sort="Seo, K S" uniqKey="Seo K" first="K S" last="Seo">K S Seo</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2014">2014</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:25420305</idno><idno type="pmid">25420305</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">001191</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">001191</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Correlation among bioimpedance analysis, sonographic and circumferential measurement in assessment of breast cancer-related arm lymphedema.</title><author><name sortKey="Choi, Y H" sort="Choi, Y H" uniqKey="Choi Y" first="Y H" last="Choi">Y H Choi</name></author><author><name sortKey="Seo, K S" sort="Seo, K S" uniqKey="Seo K" first="K S" last="Seo">K S Seo</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Lymphology</title><idno type="ISSN">0024-7766</idno><imprint><date when="2014" type="published">2014</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Anthropometry (methods)</term><term>Body Composition</term><term>Breast Neoplasms (surgery)</term><term>Electric Impedance</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Lymphedema (diagnosis)</term><term>Lymphedema (diagnostic imaging)</term><term>Lymphedema (etiology)</term><term>Lymphedema (pathology)</term><term>Mastectomy (adverse effects)</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Predictive Value of Tests</term><term>Severity of Illness Index</term><term>Ultrasonography</term><term>Upper Extremity (diagnostic imaging)</term><term>Upper Extremity (pathology)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="adverse effects" xml:lang="en"><term>Mastectomy</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="diagnosis" xml:lang="en"><term>Lymphedema</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="diagnostic imaging" xml:lang="en"><term>Lymphedema</term><term>Upper Extremity</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="etiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Lymphedema</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Anthropometry</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="pathology" xml:lang="en"><term>Lymphedema</term><term>Upper Extremity</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="surgery" xml:lang="en"><term>Breast Neoplasms</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Body Composition</term><term>Electric Impedance</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Predictive Value of Tests</term><term>Severity of Illness Index</term><term>Ultrasonography</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">New approaches for assessment of lymphedema using ultrasonography (US) have been introduced recently and are reported to be reliable and simple. Ultrasonography provides detailed information about physical properties of the tissue in addition to volume and size. There have been only limited studies comparing bioimpedance analysis (BIA), US, and circumferential measurement (CM), which is considered a standard measurement. The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between US, BIA, and CM. Twenty-eight patients with lymphedema after breast cancer surgery underwent BIA, US, and CM. Impedance, which reflects the amount of extracellular fluid, was measured with 1 kHz frequency in affected and unaffected arms. Circumferences were measured at 10cm proximal and distal to the elbow and a truncated cone method used to calculate estimated volumes for upper arm and forearm. We found that interlimb forearm subcutis thickness differences measured by US were highly correlated with CM measurements and that interlimb upper arm subcutis thickness differences measured by US were moderately correlated with CM measurements and BIA ratios. However, the interlimb ratio of compressibility measured by US showed no or only weak correlation with impedance measurements and circumferential measurements. Our results also show that compressibility measured by US could not be predicted from BIA or CM measurements despite a high degree of concordance among subcutis thickness measured by US, CM, and BIA.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">25420305</PMID><DateCreated><Year>2014</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>25</Day></DateCreated><DateCompleted><Year>2014</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>29</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2016</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>25</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">0024-7766</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>47</Volume><Issue>3</Issue><PubDate><Year>2014</Year><Month>Sep</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Lymphology</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Lymphology</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Correlation among bioimpedance analysis, sonographic and circumferential measurement in assessment of breast cancer-related arm lymphedema.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>123-33</MedlinePgn></Pagination><Abstract><AbstractText>New approaches for assessment of lymphedema using ultrasonography (US) have been introduced recently and are reported to be reliable and simple. Ultrasonography provides detailed information about physical properties of the tissue in addition to volume and size. There have been only limited studies comparing bioimpedance analysis (BIA), US, and circumferential measurement (CM), which is considered a standard measurement. The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between US, BIA, and CM. Twenty-eight patients with lymphedema after breast cancer surgery underwent BIA, US, and CM. Impedance, which reflects the amount of extracellular fluid, was measured with 1 kHz frequency in affected and unaffected arms. Circumferences were measured at 10cm proximal and distal to the elbow and a truncated cone method used to calculate estimated volumes for upper arm and forearm. We found that interlimb forearm subcutis thickness differences measured by US were highly correlated with CM measurements and that interlimb upper arm subcutis thickness differences measured by US were moderately correlated with CM measurements and BIA ratios. However, the interlimb ratio of compressibility measured by US showed no or only weak correlation with impedance measurements and circumferential measurements. Our results also show that compressibility measured by US could not be predicted from BIA or CM measurements despite a high degree of concordance among subcutis thickness measured by US, CM, and BIA.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Choi</LastName><ForeName>Y H</ForeName><Initials>YH</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Seo</LastName><ForeName>K S</ForeName><Initials>KS</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D003160">Comparative Study</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country><MedlineTA>Lymphology</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>0155112</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0024-7766</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000886" MajorTopicYN="N">Anthropometry</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="Y">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D001823" MajorTopicYN="N">Body Composition</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D001943" MajorTopicYN="N">Breast Neoplasms</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="Y">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017097" MajorTopicYN="N">Electric Impedance</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005260" MajorTopicYN="N">Female</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008209" MajorTopicYN="N">Lymphedema</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000175" MajorTopicYN="Y">diagnosis</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000000981" MajorTopicYN="N">diagnostic imaging</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000209" MajorTopicYN="N">etiology</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000473" MajorTopicYN="N">pathology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008408" MajorTopicYN="N">Mastectomy</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000009" MajorTopicYN="Y">adverse effects</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008875" MajorTopicYN="N">Middle Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011237" MajorTopicYN="N">Predictive Value of Tests</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D012720" MajorTopicYN="N">Severity of Illness Index</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D014463" MajorTopicYN="N">Ultrasonography</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D034941" MajorTopicYN="N">Upper Extremity</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000000981" MajorTopicYN="Y">diagnostic imaging</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000473" MajorTopicYN="Y">pathology</QualifierName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2014</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>26</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2014</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>26</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2014</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>30</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">25420305</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Sante/explor/LymphedemaV1/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001191 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001191 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Sante
|area= LymphedemaV1
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:25420305
|texte= Correlation among bioimpedance analysis, sonographic and circumferential measurement in assessment of breast cancer-related arm lymphedema.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:25420305" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a LymphedemaV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.31. |  |