Use of scoring systems for assessing and reporting the outcome results from shoulder surgery and arthroplasty
Identifieur interne : 004897 ( Pmc/Curation ); précédent : 004896; suivant : 004898Use of scoring systems for assessing and reporting the outcome results from shoulder surgery and arthroplasty
Auteurs : Simon Booker ; Nawaf Alfahad ; Martin Scott ; Ben Gooding ; W Angus WallaceSource :
- World Journal of Orthopedics [ 2218-5836 ] ; 2015.
Abstract
To investigate shoulder scoring systems used in Europe and North America and how outcomes might be classified after shoulder joint replacement. All research papers published in four major journals in 2012 and 2013 were reviewed for the shoulder scoring systems used in their published papers. A method of identifying how outcomes after shoulder arthroplasty might be used to categorize patients into fair, good, very good and excellent outcomes was explored using the outcome evaluations from patients treated in our own unit. A total of 174 research articles that were published in the four journals used some form of shoulder scoring system. The outcome from shoulder arthroplasty in our unit has been evaluated using the constant score (CS) and the oxford shoulder score and these scores have been used to evaluate individual patient outcomes. CSs of < 30 = unsatisfactory; 30-39 = fair; 40-59 = good; 60-69 = very good; and 70 and over = excellent. The most popular shoulder scoring systems in North America were Simple Shoulder Test and American shoulder and elbow surgeons standard shoulder assessment form score and in Europe CS, Oxford Shoulder Score and DASH score.
Url:
DOI: 10.5312/wjo.v6.i2.244
PubMed: 25793164
PubMed Central: 4363806
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Pmc, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :004898
Links to Exploration step
PMC:4363806Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Use of scoring systems for assessing and reporting the outcome results from shoulder surgery and arthroplasty</title><author><name sortKey="Booker, Simon" sort="Booker, Simon" uniqKey="Booker S" first="Simon" last="Booker">Simon Booker</name></author><author><name sortKey="Alfahad, Nawaf" sort="Alfahad, Nawaf" uniqKey="Alfahad N" first="Nawaf" last="Alfahad">Nawaf Alfahad</name></author><author><name sortKey="Scott, Martin" sort="Scott, Martin" uniqKey="Scott M" first="Martin" last="Scott">Martin Scott</name></author><author><name sortKey="Gooding, Ben" sort="Gooding, Ben" uniqKey="Gooding B" first="Ben" last="Gooding">Ben Gooding</name></author><author><name sortKey="Wallace, W Angus" sort="Wallace, W Angus" uniqKey="Wallace W" first="W Angus" last="Wallace">W Angus Wallace</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PMC</idno><idno type="pmid">25793164</idno><idno type="pmc">4363806</idno><idno type="url">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4363806</idno><idno type="RBID">PMC:4363806</idno><idno type="doi">10.5312/wjo.v6.i2.244</idno><date when="2015">2015</date><idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Corpus">004898</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PMC">004898</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Curation">004897</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Curation">004897</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a" type="main">Use of scoring systems for assessing and reporting the outcome results from shoulder surgery and arthroplasty</title><author><name sortKey="Booker, Simon" sort="Booker, Simon" uniqKey="Booker S" first="Simon" last="Booker">Simon Booker</name></author><author><name sortKey="Alfahad, Nawaf" sort="Alfahad, Nawaf" uniqKey="Alfahad N" first="Nawaf" last="Alfahad">Nawaf Alfahad</name></author><author><name sortKey="Scott, Martin" sort="Scott, Martin" uniqKey="Scott M" first="Martin" last="Scott">Martin Scott</name></author><author><name sortKey="Gooding, Ben" sort="Gooding, Ben" uniqKey="Gooding B" first="Ben" last="Gooding">Ben Gooding</name></author><author><name sortKey="Wallace, W Angus" sort="Wallace, W Angus" uniqKey="Wallace W" first="W Angus" last="Wallace">W Angus Wallace</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">World Journal of Orthopedics</title><idno type="ISSN">2218-5836</idno><idno type="eISSN">2218-5836</idno><imprint><date when="2015">2015</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p>To investigate shoulder scoring systems used in Europe and North America and how outcomes might be classified after shoulder joint replacement. All research papers published in four major journals in 2012 and 2013 were reviewed for the shoulder scoring systems used in their published papers. A method of identifying how outcomes after shoulder arthroplasty might be used to categorize patients into fair, good, very good and excellent outcomes was explored using the outcome evaluations from patients treated in our own unit. A total of 174 research articles that were published in the four journals used some form of shoulder scoring system. The outcome from shoulder arthroplasty in our unit has been evaluated using the constant score (CS) and the oxford shoulder score and these scores have been used to evaluate individual patient outcomes. CSs of < 30 = unsatisfactory; 30-39 = fair; 40-59 = good; 60-69 = very good; and 70 and over = excellent. The most popular shoulder scoring systems in North America were Simple Shoulder Test and American shoulder and elbow surgeons standard shoulder assessment form score and in Europe CS, Oxford Shoulder Score and DASH score.</p></div></front></TEI><pmc article-type="review-article"><pmc-comment>The publisher of this article does not allow downloading of the full text in XML form.</pmc-comment>
<front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">World J Orthop</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">WJO</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>World Journal of Orthopedics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2218-5836</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2218-5836</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Baishideng Publishing Group Inc</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="pmid">25793164</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="pmc">4363806</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="other">jWJO.v6.i2.pg244</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5312/wjo.v6.i2.244</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Minireviews</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Use of scoring systems for assessing and reporting the outcome results from shoulder surgery and arthroplasty</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Booker</surname><given-names>Simon</given-names></name></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Alfahad</surname><given-names>Nawaf</given-names></name></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Scott</surname><given-names>Martin</given-names></name></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Gooding</surname><given-names>Ben</given-names></name></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Wallace</surname><given-names>W Angus</given-names></name></contrib><aff>Simon Booker, Nawaf Alfahad, Martin Scott, Ben Gooding, W Angus Wallace, Nottingham Shoulder and Elbow Unit, Nottingham City Hospital, NG5 1PB Nottingham, United Kingdom</aff></contrib-group><author-notes><fn><p>Author contributions: Booker S and Alfahad N researched the scoring systems and collated the data on the scoring systems; Alfahad N, Scott M and Gooding B supervised the development of the database of scoring systems; Gooding B and Wallace WA carried out the shoulder arthroplasty operations and edited the final article which was approved by all authors.</p><p>Correspondence to: W Angus Wallace, Professor, Nottingham Shoulder and Elbow Unit, Nottingham City Hospital, Hucknall Road, NG5 1PB Nottingham, United Kingdom. <email>angus.wallace@rcsed.ac.uk</email></p><p>Telephone: +44-115-9691169 Fax: +44-115-9628062</p></fn></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="collection"><day>18</day><month>3</month><year>2015</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>18</day><month>3</month><year>2015</year></pub-date><volume>6</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>244</fpage><lpage>251</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>11</day><month>3</month><year>2014</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>9</day><month>12</month><year>2014</year></date><date date-type="accepted"><day>18</day><month>12</month><year>2014</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>©The Author(s) 2015. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2015</copyright-year></permissions><abstract><p>To investigate shoulder scoring systems used in Europe and North America and how outcomes might be classified after shoulder joint replacement. All research papers published in four major journals in 2012 and 2013 were reviewed for the shoulder scoring systems used in their published papers. A method of identifying how outcomes after shoulder arthroplasty might be used to categorize patients into fair, good, very good and excellent outcomes was explored using the outcome evaluations from patients treated in our own unit. A total of 174 research articles that were published in the four journals used some form of shoulder scoring system. The outcome from shoulder arthroplasty in our unit has been evaluated using the constant score (CS) and the oxford shoulder score and these scores have been used to evaluate individual patient outcomes. CSs of < 30 = unsatisfactory; 30-39 = fair; 40-59 = good; 60-69 = very good; and 70 and over = excellent. The most popular shoulder scoring systems in North America were Simple Shoulder Test and American shoulder and elbow surgeons standard shoulder assessment form score and in Europe CS, Oxford Shoulder Score and DASH score.</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Shoulder joint</kwd><kwd>Arthroplasty</kwd><kwd>Replacement</kwd><kwd>Scoring methods</kwd><kwd>Operations</kwd><kwd>Surgery</kwd><kwd>Surgical therapy</kwd><kwd>Assessment</kwd><kwd>Patient outcomes</kwd><kwd>Classification</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front></pmc></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Sante/explor/LymphedemaV1/Data/Pmc/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 004897 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 004897 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Sante
|area= LymphedemaV1
|flux= Pmc
|étape= Curation
|type= RBID
|clé= PMC:4363806
|texte= Use of scoring systems for assessing and reporting the outcome results from shoulder surgery and arthroplasty
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Curation/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:25793164" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Curation/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a LymphedemaV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.31. |  |