Serveur d'exploration sur le lymphœdème

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Thoracic Central Venous Evaluation: Comparison of First Pass Direct versus Delayed Phase Indirect Multidetector CT Venography

Identifieur interne : 003867 ( Pmc/Corpus ); précédent : 003866; suivant : 003868

Thoracic Central Venous Evaluation: Comparison of First Pass Direct versus Delayed Phase Indirect Multidetector CT Venography

Auteurs : Baskaran Sundaram ; Jean W. Kuriakose ; Jadranka Stojanovska ; Kuanwong Watcharotone ; Robert A. Parker ; Ella A. Kazerooni

Source :

RBID : PMC:4412308

Abstract

Purpose

To compare first pass and delayed phase thoracic Computed Tomography (CT) venography for the evaluation of suspected central thoracic venous pathology.

Material and methods

CT images and medical records of all patients who underwent thoracic CT venography over a five year period were retrospectively reviewed. Both first pass (18 seconds) and delayed phase (60 seconds) venous images were obtained in all patients. The images were reviewed in random order by three readers using a semi-quantitative visual grading scheme for image quality, including artifacts and the uniformity of venous enhancement. In addition, enhancement was quantitatively evaluated. The presence and type of venous pathology, and overall diagnostic confidence were recorded and compared. Reference verification was performed when available.

Results

18 patients formed the study group, mean age 49.5 years and 28% male. Dual arm injection was successful in 72% of exams. All readers reported more streak artifacts on first pass imaging than delayed imaging (72–94% vs. 27–44% respectively; p < 0.05). First pass imaging had significantly higher measured enhancement across all central venous segments than delayed imaging (mean HU range: 212–906 HU vs. 173–414 HU; p < 0.05), but also had significantly more heterogeneous enhancement (mean SD range 75–1058 HU vs. 67–378 HU; p <0.05). For overall diagnosis, reader agreement, accuracy and confidence levels were higher for delayed phase images (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

Indirect thoracic CT venography using delayed phase imaging alone may be sufficient for evaluating clinically suspected central venous abnormality.


Url:
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2015.02.005
PubMed: 25724223
PubMed Central: 4412308

Links to Exploration step

PMC:4412308

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI>
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Thoracic Central Venous Evaluation: Comparison of First Pass Direct versus Delayed Phase Indirect Multidetector CT Venography</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Sundaram, Baskaran" sort="Sundaram, Baskaran" uniqKey="Sundaram B" first="Baskaran" last="Sundaram">Baskaran Sundaram</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Kuriakose, Jean W" sort="Kuriakose, Jean W" uniqKey="Kuriakose J" first="Jean W." last="Kuriakose">Jean W. Kuriakose</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Stojanovska, Jadranka" sort="Stojanovska, Jadranka" uniqKey="Stojanovska J" first="Jadranka" last="Stojanovska">Jadranka Stojanovska</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Watcharotone, Kuanwong" sort="Watcharotone, Kuanwong" uniqKey="Watcharotone K" first="Kuanwong" last="Watcharotone">Kuanwong Watcharotone</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Parker, Robert A" sort="Parker, Robert A" uniqKey="Parker R" first="Robert A." last="Parker">Robert A. Parker</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Kazerooni, Ella A" sort="Kazerooni, Ella A" uniqKey="Kazerooni E" first="Ella A." last="Kazerooni">Ella A. Kazerooni</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">PMC</idno>
<idno type="pmid">25724223</idno>
<idno type="pmc">4412308</idno>
<idno type="url">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4412308</idno>
<idno type="RBID">PMC:4412308</idno>
<idno type="doi">10.1016/j.clinimag.2015.02.005</idno>
<date when="2015">2015</date>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Corpus">003867</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PMC">003867</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en" level="a" type="main">Thoracic Central Venous Evaluation: Comparison of First Pass Direct versus Delayed Phase Indirect Multidetector CT Venography</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Sundaram, Baskaran" sort="Sundaram, Baskaran" uniqKey="Sundaram B" first="Baskaran" last="Sundaram">Baskaran Sundaram</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Kuriakose, Jean W" sort="Kuriakose, Jean W" uniqKey="Kuriakose J" first="Jean W." last="Kuriakose">Jean W. Kuriakose</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Stojanovska, Jadranka" sort="Stojanovska, Jadranka" uniqKey="Stojanovska J" first="Jadranka" last="Stojanovska">Jadranka Stojanovska</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Watcharotone, Kuanwong" sort="Watcharotone, Kuanwong" uniqKey="Watcharotone K" first="Kuanwong" last="Watcharotone">Kuanwong Watcharotone</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Parker, Robert A" sort="Parker, Robert A" uniqKey="Parker R" first="Robert A." last="Parker">Robert A. Parker</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Kazerooni, Ella A" sort="Kazerooni, Ella A" uniqKey="Kazerooni E" first="Ella A." last="Kazerooni">Ella A. Kazerooni</name>
</author>
</analytic>
<series>
<title level="j">Clinical imaging</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0899-7071</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1873-4499</idno>
<imprint>
<date when="2015">2015</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass></textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">
<sec id="S1">
<title>Purpose</title>
<p id="P1">To compare first pass and delayed phase thoracic Computed Tomography (CT) venography for the evaluation of suspected central thoracic venous pathology.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2">
<title>Material and methods</title>
<p id="P2">CT images and medical records of all patients who underwent thoracic CT venography over a five year period were retrospectively reviewed. Both first pass (18 seconds) and delayed phase (60 seconds) venous images were obtained in all patients. The images were reviewed in random order by three readers using a semi-quantitative visual grading scheme for image quality, including artifacts and the uniformity of venous enhancement. In addition, enhancement was quantitatively evaluated. The presence and type of venous pathology, and overall diagnostic confidence were recorded and compared. Reference verification was performed when available.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S3">
<title>Results</title>
<p id="P3">18 patients formed the study group, mean age 49.5 years and 28% male. Dual arm injection was successful in 72% of exams. All readers reported more streak artifacts on first pass imaging than delayed imaging (72–94% vs. 27–44% respectively; p < 0.05). First pass imaging had significantly higher measured enhancement across all central venous segments than delayed imaging (mean HU range: 212–906 HU vs. 173–414 HU; p < 0.05), but also had significantly more heterogeneous enhancement (mean SD range 75–1058 HU vs. 67–378 HU; p <0.05). For overall diagnosis, reader agreement, accuracy and confidence levels were higher for delayed phase images (p < 0.05).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S4">
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p id="P4">Indirect thoracic CT venography using delayed phase imaging alone may be sufficient for evaluating clinically suspected central venous abnormality.</p>
</sec>
</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<pmc article-type="research-article">
<pmc-comment>The publisher of this article does not allow downloading of the full text in XML form.</pmc-comment>
<pmc-dir>properties manuscript</pmc-dir>
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-journal-id">8911831</journal-id>
<journal-id journal-id-type="pubmed-jr-id">2732</journal-id>
<journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">Clin Imaging</journal-id>
<journal-id journal-id-type="iso-abbrev">Clin Imaging</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Clinical imaging</journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="ppub">0899-7071</issn>
<issn pub-type="epub">1873-4499</issn>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="pmid">25724223</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="pmc">4412308</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.clinimag.2015.02.005</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="manuscript">NIHMS676890</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Article</subject>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Thoracic Central Venous Evaluation: Comparison of First Pass Direct versus Delayed Phase Indirect Multidetector CT Venography</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sundaram</surname>
<given-names>Baskaran</given-names>
</name>
<degrees>M.D.</degrees>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kuriakose</surname>
<given-names>Jean W.</given-names>
</name>
<degrees>M.D.</degrees>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Stojanovska</surname>
<given-names>Jadranka</given-names>
</name>
<degrees>M.D., M.S.</degrees>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Watcharotone</surname>
<given-names>Kuanwong</given-names>
</name>
<degrees>PhD</degrees>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Parker</surname>
<given-names>Robert A.</given-names>
</name>
<degrees>ScD</degrees>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kazerooni</surname>
<given-names>Ella A.</given-names>
</name>
<degrees>M.D., M.S.</degrees>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<author-notes>
<corresp id="cor1">Corresponding author: Baskaran Sundaram, M.D., Professor and Director of Cardiothoracic Imaging Division, Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, 132 S 10th St, Suite 1063 Main Bldg, Philadelphia, PA 19107</corresp>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="nihms-submitted">
<day>12</day>
<month>4</month>
<year>2015</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>12</day>
<month>2</month>
<year>2015</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="ppub">
<season>May-Jun</season>
<year>2015</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="pmc-release">
<day>01</day>
<month>5</month>
<year>2016</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>39</volume>
<issue>3</issue>
<fpage>412</fpage>
<lpage>416</lpage>
<pmc-comment>elocation-id from pubmed: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2015.02.005</pmc-comment>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>© 2015 Published by Elsevier Inc.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2015</copyright-year>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<sec id="S1">
<title>Purpose</title>
<p id="P1">To compare first pass and delayed phase thoracic Computed Tomography (CT) venography for the evaluation of suspected central thoracic venous pathology.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2">
<title>Material and methods</title>
<p id="P2">CT images and medical records of all patients who underwent thoracic CT venography over a five year period were retrospectively reviewed. Both first pass (18 seconds) and delayed phase (60 seconds) venous images were obtained in all patients. The images were reviewed in random order by three readers using a semi-quantitative visual grading scheme for image quality, including artifacts and the uniformity of venous enhancement. In addition, enhancement was quantitatively evaluated. The presence and type of venous pathology, and overall diagnostic confidence were recorded and compared. Reference verification was performed when available.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S3">
<title>Results</title>
<p id="P3">18 patients formed the study group, mean age 49.5 years and 28% male. Dual arm injection was successful in 72% of exams. All readers reported more streak artifacts on first pass imaging than delayed imaging (72–94% vs. 27–44% respectively; p < 0.05). First pass imaging had significantly higher measured enhancement across all central venous segments than delayed imaging (mean HU range: 212–906 HU vs. 173–414 HU; p < 0.05), but also had significantly more heterogeneous enhancement (mean SD range 75–1058 HU vs. 67–378 HU; p <0.05). For overall diagnosis, reader agreement, accuracy and confidence levels were higher for delayed phase images (p < 0.05).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S4">
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p id="P4">Indirect thoracic CT venography using delayed phase imaging alone may be sufficient for evaluating clinically suspected central venous abnormality.</p>
</sec>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>superior vena cava</kwd>
<kwd>first pass</kwd>
<kwd>delayed phase</kwd>
<kwd>single phase</kwd>
<kwd>dual phase</kwd>
<kwd>CT venography</kwd>
<kwd>Superior Vena Cava syndrome</kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front>
</pmc>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Sante/explor/LymphedemaV1/Data/Pmc/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 003867 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 003867 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Sante
   |area=    LymphedemaV1
   |flux=    Pmc
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     PMC:4412308
   |texte=   Thoracic Central Venous Evaluation: Comparison of First Pass Direct versus Delayed Phase Indirect Multidetector CT Venography
}}

Pour générer des pages wiki

HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Corpus/RBID.i   -Sk "pubmed:25724223" \
       | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Corpus/biblio.hfd   \
       | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a LymphedemaV1 

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.31.
Data generation: Sat Nov 4 17:40:35 2017. Site generation: Tue Feb 13 16:42:16 2024