Links to Exploration step
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Monitoring Malaria Vector Control Interventions: Effectiveness of Five Different Adult Mosquito Sampling Methods</title><author><name sortKey="Onyango, Shirley A" sort="Onyango, Shirley A" uniqKey="Onyango S" first="Shirley A." last="Onyango">Shirley A. Onyango</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="A1">Department of Zoological Sciences, Kenyatta University, P.O. Box 43844, Nairobi 00100, Kenya</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Kitron, Uriel" sort="Kitron, Uriel" uniqKey="Kitron U" first="Uriel" last="Kitron">Uriel Kitron</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="A2">Department of Environmental Studies, Math and Science Center, 400 Dowman Dr., Suite E511, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Mungai, Peter" sort="Mungai, Peter" uniqKey="Mungai P" first="Peter" last="Mungai">Peter Mungai</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="A3">Center for Global Health and Diseases, CWRU School of Medicine, Wolstein 4126, 10900 Euclid Ave., Cleveland, OH, 44106-7286</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Muchiri, Eric M" sort="Muchiri, Eric M" uniqKey="Muchiri E" first="Eric M." last="Muchiri">Eric M. Muchiri</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="A4">Division of Vector Borne Neglected and Tropical Diseases, Ministry of Public Health and Sanitation, P.O. Box 20750, Nairobi 00202, Kenya</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Kokwaro, Elizabeth" sort="Kokwaro, Elizabeth" uniqKey="Kokwaro E" first="Elizabeth" last="Kokwaro">Elizabeth Kokwaro</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="A1">Department of Zoological Sciences, Kenyatta University, P.O. Box 43844, Nairobi 00100, Kenya</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="King, Charles H" sort="King, Charles H" uniqKey="King C" first="Charles H." last="King">Charles H. King</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="A3">Center for Global Health and Diseases, CWRU School of Medicine, Wolstein 4126, 10900 Euclid Ave., Cleveland, OH, 44106-7286</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Mutuku, Francis M" sort="Mutuku, Francis M" uniqKey="Mutuku F" first="Francis M." last="Mutuku">Francis M. Mutuku</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="A2">Department of Environmental Studies, Math and Science Center, 400 Dowman Dr., Suite E511, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322</nlm:aff></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PMC</idno><idno type="pmid">24180120</idno><idno type="pmc">3975164</idno><idno type="url">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3975164</idno><idno type="RBID">PMC:3975164</idno><date when="2013">2013</date><idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Corpus">003381</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PMC">003381</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a" type="main">Monitoring Malaria Vector Control Interventions: Effectiveness of Five Different Adult Mosquito Sampling Methods</title><author><name sortKey="Onyango, Shirley A" sort="Onyango, Shirley A" uniqKey="Onyango S" first="Shirley A." last="Onyango">Shirley A. Onyango</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="A1">Department of Zoological Sciences, Kenyatta University, P.O. Box 43844, Nairobi 00100, Kenya</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Kitron, Uriel" sort="Kitron, Uriel" uniqKey="Kitron U" first="Uriel" last="Kitron">Uriel Kitron</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="A2">Department of Environmental Studies, Math and Science Center, 400 Dowman Dr., Suite E511, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Mungai, Peter" sort="Mungai, Peter" uniqKey="Mungai P" first="Peter" last="Mungai">Peter Mungai</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="A3">Center for Global Health and Diseases, CWRU School of Medicine, Wolstein 4126, 10900 Euclid Ave., Cleveland, OH, 44106-7286</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Muchiri, Eric M" sort="Muchiri, Eric M" uniqKey="Muchiri E" first="Eric M." last="Muchiri">Eric M. Muchiri</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="A4">Division of Vector Borne Neglected and Tropical Diseases, Ministry of Public Health and Sanitation, P.O. Box 20750, Nairobi 00202, Kenya</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Kokwaro, Elizabeth" sort="Kokwaro, Elizabeth" uniqKey="Kokwaro E" first="Elizabeth" last="Kokwaro">Elizabeth Kokwaro</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="A1">Department of Zoological Sciences, Kenyatta University, P.O. Box 43844, Nairobi 00100, Kenya</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="King, Charles H" sort="King, Charles H" uniqKey="King C" first="Charles H." last="King">Charles H. King</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="A3">Center for Global Health and Diseases, CWRU School of Medicine, Wolstein 4126, 10900 Euclid Ave., Cleveland, OH, 44106-7286</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Mutuku, Francis M" sort="Mutuku, Francis M" uniqKey="Mutuku F" first="Francis M." last="Mutuku">Francis M. Mutuku</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="A2">Department of Environmental Studies, Math and Science Center, 400 Dowman Dr., Suite E511, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322</nlm:aff></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Journal of medical entomology</title><idno type="ISSN">0022-2585</idno><idno type="eISSN">1938-2928</idno><imprint><date when="2013">2013</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p id="P1">Long-term success of ongoing malaria control efforts based on mosquito bed nets (long-lasting insecticidal net) and indoor residual spraying is dependent on continuous monitoring of mosquito vectors, and thus on effective mosquito sampling tools. The objective of our study was to identify the most efficient mosquito sampling tool(s) for routine vector surveillance for malaria and lymphatic filariasis transmission in coastal Kenya. We evaluated relative efficacy of five collection methods—light traps associated with a person sleeping under a net, pyrethrum spray catches, Prokopack aspirator, clay pots, and urine-baited traps—in four villages representing three ecological settings along the south coast of Kenya. Of the five methods, light traps were the most efficient for collecting female <italic>Anopheles gambiae</italic> s.l. (Giles) (Diptera: Culicidae) and <italic>Anopheles funestus</italic> (Giles) (Diptera: Culicidae) mosquitoes, whereas the Prokopack aspirator was most efficient in collecting <italic>Culex quinquefasciatus</italic> (Say) (Diptera: Culicidae) and other culicines. With the low vector densities here, and across much of sub-Saharan Africa, wherever malaria interventions, long-lasting insecticidal nets, and/or indoor residual spraying are in place, the use of a single mosquito collection method will not be sufficient to achieve a representative sample of mosquito population structure. Light traps will remain a relevant tool for host-seeking mosquitoes, especially in the absence of human landing catches. For a fair representation of the indoor mosquito population, light traps will have to be supplemented with aspirator use, which has potential for routine monitoring of indoor resting mosquitoes, and can substitute the more labor-intensive and intrusive pyrethrum spray catches. There are still no sufficiently efficient mosquito collection methods for sampling outdoor mosquitoes, particularly those that are bloodfed.</p></div></front></TEI><pmc article-type="research-article"><pmc-comment>The publisher of this article does not allow downloading of the full text in XML form.</pmc-comment>
<pmc-dir>properties manuscript</pmc-dir>
<front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-journal-id">0375400</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="pubmed-jr-id">4942</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">J Med Entomol</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="iso-abbrev">J. Med. Entomol.</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of medical entomology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">0022-2585</issn><issn pub-type="epub">1938-2928</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="pmid">24180120</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="pmc">3975164</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="manuscript">NIHMS551686</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Monitoring Malaria Vector Control Interventions: Effectiveness of Five Different Adult Mosquito Sampling Methods</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Onyango</surname><given-names>Shirley A.</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1">1</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Kitron</surname><given-names>Uriel</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="A2">2</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Mungai</surname><given-names>Peter</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="A3">3</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Muchiri</surname><given-names>Eric M.</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="A4">4</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Kokwaro</surname><given-names>Elizabeth</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1">1</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>King</surname><given-names>Charles H.</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="A3">3</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Mutuku</surname><given-names>Francis M.</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="A2">2</xref><xref rid="FN1" ref-type="author-notes">5</xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="A1"><label>1</label>Department of Zoological Sciences, Kenyatta University, P.O. Box 43844, Nairobi 00100, Kenya</aff><aff id="A2"><label>2</label>Department of Environmental Studies, Math and Science Center, 400 Dowman Dr., Suite E511, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322</aff><aff id="A3"><label>3</label>Center for Global Health and Diseases, CWRU School of Medicine, Wolstein 4126, 10900 Euclid Ave., Cleveland, OH, 44106-7286</aff><aff id="A4"><label>4</label>Division of Vector Borne Neglected and Tropical Diseases, Ministry of Public Health and Sanitation, P.O. Box 20750, Nairobi 00202, Kenya</aff><author-notes><corresp id="FN1"><label>5</label>Corresponding author, <email>fmutuku73@gmail.com</email></corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="nihms-submitted"><day>26</day><month>3</month><year>2014</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="ppub"><month>9</month><year>2013</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="pmc-release"><day>01</day><month>5</month><year>2014</year></pub-date><volume>50</volume><issue>5</issue><fpage>1140</fpage><lpage>1151</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>© 2013 Entomological Society of America</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2013</copyright-year></permissions><abstract><p id="P1">Long-term success of ongoing malaria control efforts based on mosquito bed nets (long-lasting insecticidal net) and indoor residual spraying is dependent on continuous monitoring of mosquito vectors, and thus on effective mosquito sampling tools. The objective of our study was to identify the most efficient mosquito sampling tool(s) for routine vector surveillance for malaria and lymphatic filariasis transmission in coastal Kenya. We evaluated relative efficacy of five collection methods—light traps associated with a person sleeping under a net, pyrethrum spray catches, Prokopack aspirator, clay pots, and urine-baited traps—in four villages representing three ecological settings along the south coast of Kenya. Of the five methods, light traps were the most efficient for collecting female <italic>Anopheles gambiae</italic> s.l. (Giles) (Diptera: Culicidae) and <italic>Anopheles funestus</italic> (Giles) (Diptera: Culicidae) mosquitoes, whereas the Prokopack aspirator was most efficient in collecting <italic>Culex quinquefasciatus</italic> (Say) (Diptera: Culicidae) and other culicines. With the low vector densities here, and across much of sub-Saharan Africa, wherever malaria interventions, long-lasting insecticidal nets, and/or indoor residual spraying are in place, the use of a single mosquito collection method will not be sufficient to achieve a representative sample of mosquito population structure. Light traps will remain a relevant tool for host-seeking mosquitoes, especially in the absence of human landing catches. For a fair representation of the indoor mosquito population, light traps will have to be supplemented with aspirator use, which has potential for routine monitoring of indoor resting mosquitoes, and can substitute the more labor-intensive and intrusive pyrethrum spray catches. There are still no sufficiently efficient mosquito collection methods for sampling outdoor mosquitoes, particularly those that are bloodfed.</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>mosquito surveillance</kwd><kwd>trapping method</kwd><kwd>low vector density</kwd><kwd>light trap</kwd><kwd>Prokopack</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front></pmc></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Sante/explor/LymphedemaV1/Data/Pmc/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 003381 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 003381 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Sante
|area= LymphedemaV1
|flux= Pmc
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé=
|texte=
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.31. |  |