Comparison of a 1-day and a 2-day protocol for lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with nonpalpable breast cancer
Identifieur interne : 003779 ( Pmc/Checkpoint ); précédent : 003778; suivant : 003780Comparison of a 1-day and a 2-day protocol for lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with nonpalpable breast cancer
Auteurs : S. Van Esser [Pays-Bas] ; M. Hobbelink [Pays-Bas] ; J. W. Van Isselt [Pays-Bas] ; W. P. Th. M. Mali [Pays-Bas] ; I. H. M. Borel Rinkes [Pays-Bas] ; R. Van Hillegersberg [Pays-Bas]Source :
- European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging [ 1619-7070 ] ; 2009.
Abstract
To compare the identification rate of the sentinel node in a 1-day protocol versus a 2-day protocol in patients with a nonpalpable breast carcinoma.
In the 1-day protocol an average dose of 120 MBq 99mTc-nanocolloid was injected intratumorally on the day of surgery, and in the 2-day protocol an average dose of 370 MBq 99mTc-nanocolloid was injected intratumorally the day before surgery. Both a gamma ray detection probe and patent blue were used to locate the sentinel node.
In 57 of 67 patients (85%) treated in the 1-day protocol and in 51 of 56 patients (91%) treated in the 2-day protocol the sentinel node was detected (
There was no significant difference in the identification rate of the sentinel node between the 1-day protocol and the 2-day protocol in patients diagnosed with a nonpalpable breast carcinoma.
Url:
DOI: 10.1007/s00259-009-1114-0
PubMed: 19319528
PubMed Central: 2724640
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Links to Exploration step
PMC:2724640Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Comparison of a 1-day and a 2-day protocol for lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with nonpalpable breast cancer</title><author><name sortKey="Van Esser, S" sort="Van Esser, S" uniqKey="Van Esser S" first="S." last="Van Esser">S. Van Esser</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:aff id="Aff1">Department of Surgery, Medical Centre Utrecht, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands</nlm:aff><country xml:lang="fr">Pays-Bas</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Surgery, Medical Centre Utrecht, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>3508 GA Utrecht</wicri:noRegion></affiliation><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:aff id="Aff3">Department of Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands</nlm:aff><country xml:lang="fr">Pays-Bas</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>3584 CX Utrecht</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Hobbelink, M" sort="Hobbelink, M" uniqKey="Hobbelink M" first="M." last="Hobbelink">M. Hobbelink</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:aff id="Aff2">Department of Radiology, Radiotherapy and Nuclear Medicine, Medical Centre Utrecht, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands</nlm:aff><country xml:lang="fr">Pays-Bas</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Radiology, Radiotherapy and Nuclear Medicine, Medical Centre Utrecht, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>3508 GA Utrecht</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Van Isselt, J W" sort="Van Isselt, J W" uniqKey="Van Isselt J" first="J. W." last="Van Isselt">J. W. Van Isselt</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:aff id="Aff2">Department of Radiology, Radiotherapy and Nuclear Medicine, Medical Centre Utrecht, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands</nlm:aff><country xml:lang="fr">Pays-Bas</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Radiology, Radiotherapy and Nuclear Medicine, Medical Centre Utrecht, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>3508 GA Utrecht</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Mali, W P Th M" sort="Mali, W P Th M" uniqKey="Mali W" first="W. P. Th. M." last="Mali">W. P. Th. M. Mali</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:aff id="Aff2">Department of Radiology, Radiotherapy and Nuclear Medicine, Medical Centre Utrecht, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands</nlm:aff><country xml:lang="fr">Pays-Bas</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Radiology, Radiotherapy and Nuclear Medicine, Medical Centre Utrecht, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>3508 GA Utrecht</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Borel Rinkes, I H M" sort="Borel Rinkes, I H M" uniqKey="Borel Rinkes I" first="I. H. M." last="Borel Rinkes">I. H. M. Borel Rinkes</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:aff id="Aff1">Department of Surgery, Medical Centre Utrecht, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands</nlm:aff><country xml:lang="fr">Pays-Bas</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Surgery, Medical Centre Utrecht, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>3508 GA Utrecht</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Van Hillegersberg, R" sort="Van Hillegersberg, R" uniqKey="Van Hillegersberg R" first="R." last="Van Hillegersberg">R. Van Hillegersberg</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:aff id="Aff1">Department of Surgery, Medical Centre Utrecht, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands</nlm:aff><country xml:lang="fr">Pays-Bas</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Surgery, Medical Centre Utrecht, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>3508 GA Utrecht</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PMC</idno><idno type="pmid">19319528</idno><idno type="pmc">2724640</idno><idno type="url">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2724640</idno><idno type="RBID">PMC:2724640</idno><idno type="doi">10.1007/s00259-009-1114-0</idno><date when="2009">2009</date><idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Corpus">001D39</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PMC">001D39</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Curation">001D38</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Curation">001D38</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Checkpoint">003779</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Checkpoint">003779</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a" type="main">Comparison of a 1-day and a 2-day protocol for lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with nonpalpable breast cancer</title><author><name sortKey="Van Esser, S" sort="Van Esser, S" uniqKey="Van Esser S" first="S." last="Van Esser">S. Van Esser</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:aff id="Aff1">Department of Surgery, Medical Centre Utrecht, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands</nlm:aff><country xml:lang="fr">Pays-Bas</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Surgery, Medical Centre Utrecht, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>3508 GA Utrecht</wicri:noRegion></affiliation><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:aff id="Aff3">Department of Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands</nlm:aff><country xml:lang="fr">Pays-Bas</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>3584 CX Utrecht</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Hobbelink, M" sort="Hobbelink, M" uniqKey="Hobbelink M" first="M." last="Hobbelink">M. Hobbelink</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:aff id="Aff2">Department of Radiology, Radiotherapy and Nuclear Medicine, Medical Centre Utrecht, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands</nlm:aff><country xml:lang="fr">Pays-Bas</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Radiology, Radiotherapy and Nuclear Medicine, Medical Centre Utrecht, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>3508 GA Utrecht</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Van Isselt, J W" sort="Van Isselt, J W" uniqKey="Van Isselt J" first="J. W." last="Van Isselt">J. W. Van Isselt</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:aff id="Aff2">Department of Radiology, Radiotherapy and Nuclear Medicine, Medical Centre Utrecht, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands</nlm:aff><country xml:lang="fr">Pays-Bas</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Radiology, Radiotherapy and Nuclear Medicine, Medical Centre Utrecht, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>3508 GA Utrecht</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Mali, W P Th M" sort="Mali, W P Th M" uniqKey="Mali W" first="W. P. Th. M." last="Mali">W. P. Th. M. Mali</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:aff id="Aff2">Department of Radiology, Radiotherapy and Nuclear Medicine, Medical Centre Utrecht, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands</nlm:aff><country xml:lang="fr">Pays-Bas</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Radiology, Radiotherapy and Nuclear Medicine, Medical Centre Utrecht, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>3508 GA Utrecht</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Borel Rinkes, I H M" sort="Borel Rinkes, I H M" uniqKey="Borel Rinkes I" first="I. H. M." last="Borel Rinkes">I. H. M. Borel Rinkes</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:aff id="Aff1">Department of Surgery, Medical Centre Utrecht, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands</nlm:aff><country xml:lang="fr">Pays-Bas</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Surgery, Medical Centre Utrecht, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>3508 GA Utrecht</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Van Hillegersberg, R" sort="Van Hillegersberg, R" uniqKey="Van Hillegersberg R" first="R." last="Van Hillegersberg">R. Van Hillegersberg</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:aff id="Aff1">Department of Surgery, Medical Centre Utrecht, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands</nlm:aff><country xml:lang="fr">Pays-Bas</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Surgery, Medical Centre Utrecht, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>3508 GA Utrecht</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j">European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging</title><idno type="ISSN">1619-7070</idno><idno type="eISSN">1619-7089</idno><imprint><date when="2009">2009</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><sec><title>Purpose</title><p>To compare the identification rate of the sentinel node in a 1-day protocol versus a 2-day protocol in patients with a nonpalpable breast carcinoma.</p></sec><sec><title>Methods</title><p>In the 1-day protocol an average dose of 120 MBq <sup>99m</sup>Tc-nanocolloid was injected intratumorally on the day of surgery, and in the 2-day protocol an average dose of 370 MBq <sup>99m</sup>Tc-nanocolloid was injected intratumorally the day before surgery. Both a gamma ray detection probe and patent blue were used to locate the sentinel node.</p></sec><sec><title>Results</title><p>In 57 of 67 patients (85%) treated in the 1-day protocol and in 51 of 56 patients (91%) treated in the 2-day protocol the sentinel node was detected (<italic>p</italic>=0.311). Of the patients in the 1-day protocol and the 2-day protocol, respectively, 18 (27%) and 13 (23%) showed metastasis (<italic>p</italic>=0.975)</p></sec><sec><title>Conclusion</title><p>There was no significant difference in the identification rate of the sentinel node between the 1-day protocol and the 2-day protocol in patients diagnosed with a nonpalpable breast carcinoma.</p></sec></div></front><back><div1 type="bibliography"><listBibl><biblStruct></biblStruct><biblStruct></biblStruct><biblStruct></biblStruct><biblStruct></biblStruct><biblStruct></biblStruct><biblStruct></biblStruct><biblStruct></biblStruct><biblStruct></biblStruct><biblStruct></biblStruct><biblStruct></biblStruct><biblStruct></biblStruct><biblStruct></biblStruct><biblStruct></biblStruct><biblStruct></biblStruct><biblStruct></biblStruct><biblStruct></biblStruct><biblStruct></biblStruct><biblStruct></biblStruct><biblStruct></biblStruct><biblStruct></biblStruct><biblStruct></biblStruct></listBibl></div1></back></TEI><pmc xml:lang="EN" article-type="research-article"><pmc-dir>properties open_access</pmc-dir>
<front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging</journal-id><journal-title>European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging</journal-title><issn pub-type="ppub">1619-7070</issn><issn pub-type="epub">1619-7089</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Springer-Verlag</publisher-name><publisher-loc>Berlin/Heidelberg</publisher-loc></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="pmid">19319528</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="pmc">2724640</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">1114</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00259-009-1114-0</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Original Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Comparison of a 1-day and a 2-day protocol for lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with nonpalpable breast cancer</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name name-style="western"><surname>van Esser</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><address><phone>+31-88-2509746</phone><fax>+31-88-2505459</fax><email>s.vanesser@umcutrecht.nl</email></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff1">1</xref><xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff3">3</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Hobbelink</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff2">2</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Van Isselt</surname><given-names>J. W.</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff2">2</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mali</surname><given-names>W. P. Th. M.</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff2">2</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Borel Rinkes</surname><given-names>I. H. M.</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff1">1</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>van Hillegersberg</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff1">1</xref></contrib><aff id="Aff1"><label>1</label>Department of Surgery, Medical Centre Utrecht, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands</aff><aff id="Aff2"><label>2</label>Department of Radiology, Radiotherapy and Nuclear Medicine, Medical Centre Utrecht, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands</aff><aff id="Aff3"><label>3</label>Department of Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands</aff></contrib-group><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>25</day><month>3</month><year>2009</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="ppub"><month>9</month><year>2009</year></pub-date><volume>36</volume><issue>9</issue><fpage>1383</fpage><lpage>1387</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>24</day><month>11</month><year>2008</year></date><date date-type="accepted"><day>2</day><month>3</month><year>2009</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>© The Author(s) 2009</copyright-statement></permissions><abstract xml:lang="EN"><sec><title>Purpose</title><p>To compare the identification rate of the sentinel node in a 1-day protocol versus a 2-day protocol in patients with a nonpalpable breast carcinoma.</p></sec><sec><title>Methods</title><p>In the 1-day protocol an average dose of 120 MBq <sup>99m</sup>Tc-nanocolloid was injected intratumorally on the day of surgery, and in the 2-day protocol an average dose of 370 MBq <sup>99m</sup>Tc-nanocolloid was injected intratumorally the day before surgery. Both a gamma ray detection probe and patent blue were used to locate the sentinel node.</p></sec><sec><title>Results</title><p>In 57 of 67 patients (85%) treated in the 1-day protocol and in 51 of 56 patients (91%) treated in the 2-day protocol the sentinel node was detected (<italic>p</italic>=0.311). Of the patients in the 1-day protocol and the 2-day protocol, respectively, 18 (27%) and 13 (23%) showed metastasis (<italic>p</italic>=0.975)</p></sec><sec><title>Conclusion</title><p>There was no significant difference in the identification rate of the sentinel node between the 1-day protocol and the 2-day protocol in patients diagnosed with a nonpalpable breast carcinoma.</p></sec></abstract><kwd-group><title>Keywords</title><kwd>Sentinel node biopsy</kwd><kwd>Nonpalpable breast cancer</kwd><kwd>Protocol</kwd></kwd-group><custom-meta-wrap><custom-meta><meta-name>issue-copyright-statement</meta-name><meta-value>© Springer-Verlag 2009</meta-value></custom-meta></custom-meta-wrap></article-meta></front></pmc><affiliations><list><country><li>Pays-Bas</li></country></list><tree><country name="Pays-Bas"><noRegion><name sortKey="Van Esser, S" sort="Van Esser, S" uniqKey="Van Esser S" first="S." last="Van Esser">S. Van Esser</name></noRegion><name sortKey="Borel Rinkes, I H M" sort="Borel Rinkes, I H M" uniqKey="Borel Rinkes I" first="I. H. M." last="Borel Rinkes">I. H. M. Borel Rinkes</name><name sortKey="Hobbelink, M" sort="Hobbelink, M" uniqKey="Hobbelink M" first="M." last="Hobbelink">M. Hobbelink</name><name sortKey="Mali, W P Th M" sort="Mali, W P Th M" uniqKey="Mali W" first="W. P. Th. M." last="Mali">W. P. Th. M. Mali</name><name sortKey="Van Esser, S" sort="Van Esser, S" uniqKey="Van Esser S" first="S." last="Van Esser">S. Van Esser</name><name sortKey="Van Hillegersberg, R" sort="Van Hillegersberg, R" uniqKey="Van Hillegersberg R" first="R." last="Van Hillegersberg">R. Van Hillegersberg</name><name sortKey="Van Isselt, J W" sort="Van Isselt, J W" uniqKey="Van Isselt J" first="J. W." last="Van Isselt">J. W. Van Isselt</name></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Sante/explor/LymphedemaV1/Data/Pmc/Checkpoint
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 003779 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd -nk 003779 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Sante
|area= LymphedemaV1
|flux= Pmc
|étape= Checkpoint
|type= RBID
|clé= PMC:2724640
|texte= Comparison of a 1-day and a 2-day protocol for lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with nonpalpable breast cancer
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Checkpoint/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:19319528" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a LymphedemaV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.31. |  |