LymphedemaV1, PascalFrancis, Corpus, bibRecord, 000A87

A randomized study comparing manual lymph drainage with sequential pneumatic compression for treatment of postoperative arm lymphedema

Identifieur interne : 000A87 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 000A86; suivant : 000A88

A randomized study comparing manual lymph drainage with sequential pneumatic compression for treatment of postoperative arm lymphedema

Auteurs : K. Johansson ; E. Lie ; C. Ekdahl ; J. Lindfeldt

Source :

Lymphology [ 0024-7766 ] ; 1998.

RBID : Pascal:98-0367305

Descripteurs français

Pascal (Inist)
- Lymphoedème, Bras, Drainage, Manuel, Compression instrumentale, Pneumatique, Etude comparative, Traitement, Technique, Efficacité traitement, Homme.

English descriptors

KwdEn :
- Arm, Comparative study, Drainage, Human, Instrumental compression, Lymphedema, Manuals, Technique, Treatment, Treatment efficiency, Tyre.

Abstract

We compared manual lymph drainage (MLD) with sequential pneumatic compression (SPC) for treatment of unilateral arm lymphedema in 28 women previously treated for breast cancer. After 2 weeks of therapy with a standard compression sleeve (Part I) with maintenance of a steady arm volume, each patient was randomly assigned to either one of two treatment regimens (Part II). MLD was performed according to the Vodder technique for 45 min/day and SPC was performed with a pressure of 40-60 mmHg for 2 hours/day. Both treatments were carried out for 2 weeks. Arm volume was measured by water displacement. Arm mobility, strength, and subjective assessments were also determined. Lymphedema was reduced by 49 ml (7% reduction) (p=0.01) in the total group during Part I. During Part II, the MLD group decreased by 75 ml (15% reduction) (p<0.001) and the SPC group by 28 ml (7% reduction) (p=0.03). The total group reported a decrease of tension (p=0.004) and heaviness (p=0.01) during Part I. During Part II, only the MLD group reported a further decrease of tension (p=0.01) and heaviness (p=0.008). MLD and SPC each significantly decreased arm volume but no significant difference was detected between the two treatment methods.

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.

A01	`01`	`1`		`@0 0024-7766`
A02	`01`			`@0 LYMPBN`
A03		`1`		`@0 Lymphology`
A05				`@2 31`
A06				`@2 2`
A08	`01`	`1`	`ENG`	`@1 A randomized study comparing manual lymph drainage with sequential pneumatic compression for treatment of postoperative arm lymphedema`
A11	`01`	`1`		`@1 JOHANSSON (K.)`
A11	`02`	`1`		`@1 LIE (E.)`
A11	`03`	`1`		`@1 EKDAHL (C.)`
A11	`04`	`1`		`@1 LINDFELDT (J.)`
A14	`01`			`@1 Department of Physical Therapy, University Hospital @2 Lund @3 SWE @Z 1 aut. @Z 2 aut. @Z 3 aut.`
A14	`02`			`@1 Department of Surgery, University Hospital @2 Lund @3 SWE @Z 4 aut.`
A20				`@1 56-64`
A21				`@1 1998`
A23	`01`			`@0 ENG`
A43	`01`			`@1 INIST @2 14604 @5 354000072262290020`
A44				`@0 0000 @1 © 1998 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.`
A45				`@0 35 ref.`
A47	`01`	`1`		`@0 98-0367305`
A60				`@1 P`
A61				`@0 A`
A64		`1`		`@0 Lymphology`
A66	`01`			`@0 DEU`
C01	`01`		`ENG`	@0 We compared manual lymph drainage (MLD) with sequential pneumatic compression (SPC) for treatment of unilateral arm lymphedema in 28 women previously treated for breast cancer. After 2 weeks of therapy with a standard compression sleeve (Part I) with maintenance of a steady arm volume, each patient was randomly assigned to either one of two treatment regimens (Part II). MLD was performed according to the Vodder technique for 45 min/day and SPC was performed with a pressure of 40-60 mmHg for 2 hours/day. Both treatments were carried out for 2 weeks. Arm volume was measured by water displacement. Arm mobility, strength, and subjective assessments were also determined. Lymphedema was reduced by 49 ml (7% reduction) (p=0.01) in the total group during Part I. During Part II, the MLD group decreased by 75 ml (15% reduction) (p<0.001) and the SPC group by 28 ml (7% reduction) (p=0.03). The total group reported a decrease of tension (p=0.004) and heaviness (p=0.01) during Part I. During Part II, only the MLD group reported a further decrease of tension (p=0.01) and heaviness (p=0.008). MLD and SPC each significantly decreased arm volume but no significant difference was detected between the two treatment methods.
C02	`01`	`X`		`@0 002B12B04`
C03	`01`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Lymphoedème @5 01`
C03	`01`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Lymphedema @5 01`
C03	`01`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Linfedema @5 01`
C03	`02`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Bras @5 02`
C03	`02`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Arm @5 02`
C03	`02`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Brazo @5 02`
C03	`03`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Drainage @5 04`
C03	`03`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Drainage @5 04`
C03	`03`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Drenaje @5 04`
C03	`04`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Manuel @5 05`
C03	`04`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Manuals @5 05`
C03	`04`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Manual @5 05`
C03	`05`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Compression instrumentale @5 07`
C03	`05`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Instrumental compression @5 07`
C03	`05`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Compresión instrumental @5 07`
C03	`06`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Pneumatique @5 08`
C03	`06`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Tyre @5 08`
C03	`06`	`X`	`GER`	`@0 Luftreifen @5 08`
C03	`06`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Neumático @5 08`
C03	`07`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Etude comparative @5 16`
C03	`07`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Comparative study @5 16`
C03	`07`	`X`	`GER`	`@0 Vergleich @5 16`
C03	`07`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Estudio comparativo @5 16`
C03	`08`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Traitement @5 17`
C03	`08`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Treatment @5 17`
C03	`08`	`X`	`GER`	`@0 Aufbereiten @5 17`
C03	`08`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Tratamiento @5 17`
C03	`09`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Technique @5 18`
C03	`09`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Technique @5 18`
C03	`09`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Técnica @5 18`
C03	`10`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Efficacité traitement @5 19`
C03	`10`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Treatment efficiency @5 19`
C03	`10`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Eficacia tratamiento @5 19`
C03	`11`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Homme @5 20`
C03	`11`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Human @5 20`
C03	`11`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Hombre @5 20`
C07	`01`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Appareil circulatoire pathologie @5 37`
C07	`01`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Cardiovascular disease @5 37`
C07	`01`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Aparato circulatorio patología @5 37`
C07	`02`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Lymphatique pathologie @5 38`
C07	`02`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Lymphatic vessel disease @5 38`
C07	`02`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Linfático patología @5 38`
N21				`@1 251`

Format Inist (serveur)

NO :	PASCAL 98-0367305 INIST
ET :	A randomized study comparing manual lymph drainage with sequential pneumatic compression for treatment of postoperative arm lymphedema
AU :	JOHANSSON (K.); LIE (E.); EKDAHL (C.); LINDFELDT (J.)
AF :	Department of Physical Therapy, University Hospital/Lund/Suède (1 aut., 2 aut., 3 aut.); Department of Surgery, University Hospital/Lund/Suède (4 aut.)
DT :	Publication en série; Niveau analytique
SO :	Lymphology; ISSN 0024-7766; Coden LYMPBN; Allemagne; Da. 1998; Vol. 31; No. 2; Pp. 56-64; Bibl. 35 ref.
LA :	Anglais
EA :	We compared manual lymph drainage (MLD) with sequential pneumatic compression (SPC) for treatment of unilateral arm lymphedema in 28 women previously treated for breast cancer. After 2 weeks of therapy with a standard compression sleeve (Part I) with maintenance of a steady arm volume, each patient was randomly assigned to either one of two treatment regimens (Part II). MLD was performed according to the Vodder technique for 45 min/day and SPC was performed with a pressure of 40-60 mmHg for 2 hours/day. Both treatments were carried out for 2 weeks. Arm volume was measured by water displacement. Arm mobility, strength, and subjective assessments were also determined. Lymphedema was reduced by 49 ml (7% reduction) (p=0.01) in the total group during Part I. During Part II, the MLD group decreased by 75 ml (15% reduction) (p<0.001) and the SPC group by 28 ml (7% reduction) (p=0.03). The total group reported a decrease of tension (p=0.004) and heaviness (p=0.01) during Part I. During Part II, only the MLD group reported a further decrease of tension (p=0.01) and heaviness (p=0.008). MLD and SPC each significantly decreased arm volume but no significant difference was detected between the two treatment methods.
CC :	002B12B04
FD :	Lymphoedème; Bras; Drainage; Manuel; Compression instrumentale; Pneumatique; Etude comparative; Traitement; Technique; Efficacité traitement; Homme
FG :	Appareil circulatoire pathologie; Lymphatique pathologie
ED :	Lymphedema; Arm; Drainage; Manuals; Instrumental compression; Tyre; Comparative study; Treatment; Technique; Treatment efficiency; Human
EG :	Cardiovascular disease; Lymphatic vessel disease
GD :	Luftreifen; Vergleich; Aufbereiten
SD :	Linfedema; Brazo; Drenaje; Manual; Compresión instrumental; Neumático; Estudio comparativo; Tratamiento; Técnica; Eficacia tratamiento; Hombre
LO :	INIST-14604.354000072262290020
ID :	98-0367305

Links to Exploration step

Pascal:98-0367305

Le document en format XML

<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">A randomized study comparing manual lymph drainage with sequential pneumatic compression for treatment of postoperative arm lymphedema</title>
<author><name sortKey="Johansson, K" sort="Johansson, K" uniqKey="Johansson K" first="K." last="Johansson">K. Johansson</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Physical Therapy, University Hospital</s1>
<s2>Lund</s2>
<s3>SWE</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Lie, E" sort="Lie, E" uniqKey="Lie E" first="E." last="Lie">E. Lie</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Physical Therapy, University Hospital</s1>
<s2>Lund</s2>
<s3>SWE</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Ekdahl, C" sort="Ekdahl, C" uniqKey="Ekdahl C" first="C." last="Ekdahl">C. Ekdahl</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Physical Therapy, University Hospital</s1>
<s2>Lund</s2>
<s3>SWE</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Lindfeldt, J" sort="Lindfeldt, J" uniqKey="Lindfeldt J" first="J." last="Lindfeldt">J. Lindfeldt</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Department of Surgery, University Hospital</s1>
<s2>Lund</s2>
<s3>SWE</s3>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">98-0367305</idno>
<date when="1998">1998</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 98-0367305 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Pascal:98-0367305</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000A87</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">A randomized study comparing manual lymph drainage with sequential pneumatic compression for treatment of postoperative arm lymphedema</title>
<author><name sortKey="Johansson, K" sort="Johansson, K" uniqKey="Johansson K" first="K." last="Johansson">K. Johansson</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Physical Therapy, University Hospital</s1>
<s2>Lund</s2>
<s3>SWE</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Lie, E" sort="Lie, E" uniqKey="Lie E" first="E." last="Lie">E. Lie</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Physical Therapy, University Hospital</s1>
<s2>Lund</s2>
<s3>SWE</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Ekdahl, C" sort="Ekdahl, C" uniqKey="Ekdahl C" first="C." last="Ekdahl">C. Ekdahl</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Physical Therapy, University Hospital</s1>
<s2>Lund</s2>
<s3>SWE</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Lindfeldt, J" sort="Lindfeldt, J" uniqKey="Lindfeldt J" first="J." last="Lindfeldt">J. Lindfeldt</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Department of Surgery, University Hospital</s1>
<s2>Lund</s2>
<s3>SWE</s3>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Lymphology</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Lymphology</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0024-7766</idno>
<imprint><date when="1998">1998</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">Lymphology</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Lymphology</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0024-7766</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Arm</term>
<term>Comparative study</term>
<term>Drainage</term>
<term>Human</term>
<term>Instrumental compression</term>
<term>Lymphedema</term>
<term>Manuals</term>
<term>Technique</term>
<term>Treatment</term>
<term>Treatment efficiency</term>
<term>Tyre</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Lymphoedème</term>
<term>Bras</term>
<term>Drainage</term>
<term>Manuel</term>
<term>Compression instrumentale</term>
<term>Pneumatique</term>
<term>Etude comparative</term>
<term>Traitement</term>
<term>Technique</term>
<term>Efficacité traitement</term>
<term>Homme</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">We compared manual lymph drainage (MLD) with sequential pneumatic compression (SPC) for treatment of unilateral arm lymphedema in 28 women previously treated for breast cancer. After 2 weeks of therapy with a standard compression sleeve (Part I) with maintenance of a steady arm volume, each patient was randomly assigned to either one of two treatment regimens (Part II). MLD was performed according to the Vodder technique for 45 min/day and SPC was performed with a pressure of 40-60 mmHg for 2 hours/day. Both treatments were carried out for 2 weeks. Arm volume was measured by water displacement. Arm mobility, strength, and subjective assessments were also determined. Lymphedema was reduced by 49 ml (7% reduction) (p=0.01) in the total group during Part I. During Part II, the MLD group decreased by 75 ml (15% reduction) (p<0.001) and the SPC group by 28 ml (7% reduction) (p=0.03). The total group reported a decrease of tension (p=0.004) and heaviness (p=0.01) during Part I. During Part II, only the MLD group reported a further decrease of tension (p=0.01) and heaviness (p=0.008). MLD and SPC each significantly decreased arm volume but no significant difference was detected between the two treatment methods.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist><standard h6="B"><pA><fA01 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>0024-7766</s0>
</fA01>
<fA02 i1="01"><s0>LYMPBN</s0>
</fA02>
<fA03 i2="1"><s0>Lymphology</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05><s2>31</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06><s2>2</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>A randomized study comparing manual lymph drainage with sequential pneumatic compression for treatment of postoperative arm lymphedema</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>JOHANSSON (K.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1"><s1>LIE (E.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="03" i2="1"><s1>EKDAHL (C.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="04" i2="1"><s1>LINDFELDT (J.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Physical Therapy, University Hospital</s1>
<s2>Lund</s2>
<s3>SWE</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="02"><s1>Department of Surgery, University Hospital</s1>
<s2>Lund</s2>
<s3>SWE</s3>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20><s1>56-64</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21><s1>1998</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01"><s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01"><s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>14604</s2>
<s5>354000072262290020</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44><s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 1998 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45><s0>35 ref.</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>98-0367305</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60><s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61><s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i2="1"><s0>Lymphology</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01"><s0>DEU</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG"><s0>We compared manual lymph drainage (MLD) with sequential pneumatic compression (SPC) for treatment of unilateral arm lymphedema in 28 women previously treated for breast cancer. After 2 weeks of therapy with a standard compression sleeve (Part I) with maintenance of a steady arm volume, each patient was randomly assigned to either one of two treatment regimens (Part II). MLD was performed according to the Vodder technique for 45 min/day and SPC was performed with a pressure of 40-60 mmHg for 2 hours/day. Both treatments were carried out for 2 weeks. Arm volume was measured by water displacement. Arm mobility, strength, and subjective assessments were also determined. Lymphedema was reduced by 49 ml (7% reduction) (p=0.01) in the total group during Part I. During Part II, the MLD group decreased by 75 ml (15% reduction) (p<0.001) and the SPC group by 28 ml (7% reduction) (p=0.03). The total group reported a decrease of tension (p=0.004) and heaviness (p=0.01) during Part I. During Part II, only the MLD group reported a further decrease of tension (p=0.01) and heaviness (p=0.008). MLD and SPC each significantly decreased arm volume but no significant difference was detected between the two treatment methods.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X"><s0>002B12B04</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Lymphoedème</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Lymphedema</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Linfedema</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Bras</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Arm</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Brazo</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Drainage</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Drainage</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Drenaje</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Manuel</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Manuals</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Manual</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Compression instrumentale</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Instrumental compression</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Compresión instrumental</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Pneumatique</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Tyre</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="GER"><s0>Luftreifen</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Neumático</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Etude comparative</s0>
<s5>16</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Comparative study</s0>
<s5>16</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="GER"><s0>Vergleich</s0>
<s5>16</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Estudio comparativo</s0>
<s5>16</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Traitement</s0>
<s5>17</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Treatment</s0>
<s5>17</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="GER"><s0>Aufbereiten</s0>
<s5>17</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Tratamiento</s0>
<s5>17</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Technique</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Technique</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Técnica</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Efficacité traitement</s0>
<s5>19</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Treatment efficiency</s0>
<s5>19</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Eficacia tratamiento</s0>
<s5>19</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Homme</s0>
<s5>20</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Human</s0>
<s5>20</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Hombre</s0>
<s5>20</s5>
</fC03>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Appareil circulatoire pathologie</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Cardiovascular disease</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Aparato circulatorio patología</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Lymphatique pathologie</s0>
<s5>38</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Lymphatic vessel disease</s0>
<s5>38</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Linfático patología</s0>
<s5>38</s5>
</fC07>
<fN21><s1>251</s1>
</fN21>
</pA>
</standard>
<server><NO>PASCAL 98-0367305 INIST</NO>
<ET>A randomized study comparing manual lymph drainage with sequential pneumatic compression for treatment of postoperative arm lymphedema</ET>
<AU>JOHANSSON (K.); LIE (E.); EKDAHL (C.); LINDFELDT (J.)</AU>
<AF>Department of Physical Therapy, University Hospital/Lund/Suède (1 aut., 2 aut., 3 aut.); Department of Surgery, University Hospital/Lund/Suède (4 aut.)</AF>
<DT>Publication en série; Niveau analytique</DT>
<SO>Lymphology; ISSN 0024-7766; Coden LYMPBN; Allemagne; Da. 1998; Vol. 31; No. 2; Pp. 56-64; Bibl. 35 ref.</SO>
<LA>Anglais</LA>
<EA>We compared manual lymph drainage (MLD) with sequential pneumatic compression (SPC) for treatment of unilateral arm lymphedema in 28 women previously treated for breast cancer. After 2 weeks of therapy with a standard compression sleeve (Part I) with maintenance of a steady arm volume, each patient was randomly assigned to either one of two treatment regimens (Part II). MLD was performed according to the Vodder technique for 45 min/day and SPC was performed with a pressure of 40-60 mmHg for 2 hours/day. Both treatments were carried out for 2 weeks. Arm volume was measured by water displacement. Arm mobility, strength, and subjective assessments were also determined. Lymphedema was reduced by 49 ml (7% reduction) (p=0.01) in the total group during Part I. During Part II, the MLD group decreased by 75 ml (15% reduction) (p<0.001) and the SPC group by 28 ml (7% reduction) (p=0.03). The total group reported a decrease of tension (p=0.004) and heaviness (p=0.01) during Part I. During Part II, only the MLD group reported a further decrease of tension (p=0.01) and heaviness (p=0.008). MLD and SPC each significantly decreased arm volume but no significant difference was detected between the two treatment methods.</EA>
<CC>002B12B04</CC>
<FD>Lymphoedème; Bras; Drainage; Manuel; Compression instrumentale; Pneumatique; Etude comparative; Traitement; Technique; Efficacité traitement; Homme</FD>
<FG>Appareil circulatoire pathologie; Lymphatique pathologie</FG>
<ED>Lymphedema; Arm; Drainage; Manuals; Instrumental compression; Tyre; Comparative study; Treatment; Technique; Treatment efficiency; Human</ED>
<EG>Cardiovascular disease; Lymphatic vessel disease</EG>
<GD>Luftreifen; Vergleich; Aufbereiten</GD>
<SD>Linfedema; Brazo; Drenaje; Manual; Compresión instrumental; Neumático; Estudio comparativo; Tratamiento; Técnica; Eficacia tratamiento; Hombre</SD>
<LO>INIST-14604.354000072262290020</LO>
<ID>98-0367305</ID>
</server>
</inist>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Sante/explor/LymphedemaV1/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000A87 | SxmlIndent | more

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000A87 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Sante
   |area=    LymphedemaV1
   |flux=    PascalFrancis
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     Pascal:98-0367305
   |texte=   A randomized study comparing manual lymph drainage with sequential pneumatic compression for treatment of postoperative arm lymphedema
}}

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.31.
Data generation: Sat Nov 4 17:40:35 2017. Site generation: Tue Feb 13 16:42:16 2024

	Serveur d'exploration sur le lymphœdème
	Attention, ce site est en cours de développement ! Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts. Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Serveur d'exploration sur le lymphœdème

A randomized study comparing manual lymph drainage with sequential pneumatic compression for treatment of postoperative arm lymphedema

A randomized study comparing manual lymph drainage with sequential pneumatic compression for treatment of postoperative arm lymphedema

Source :

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Format Inist (serveur)

Links to Exploration step

Le document en format XML

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri