LymphedemaV1, Main, Merge, bibRecord, 007E49

Health Services Research as a Source of Legislative Analysis and Input: The Role of the California Health Benefits Review Program

Identifieur interne : 007E49 ( Main/Merge ); précédent : 007E48; suivant : 007E50

Health Services Research as a Source of Legislative Analysis and Input: The Role of the California Health Benefits Review Program

Auteurs : Thomas R. Oliver ; Rachel Friedman Singer [États-Unis]

Source :

Health Services Research [ 0017-9124 ] ; 2006-06.

RBID : ISTEX:B79BE5CA1A46F888020473518605A30F126348F8

Abstract

This article examines the role of the California Health Benefits Review Program (CHBRP) as a source of information in state health policy making. It explains why the California benefits review process relies heavily on university‐based researchers and employs a broad set of criteria for review, which set it apart from similar programs in other states. It then analyzes the politics of health insurance mandates and how independent research and analysis might alter the perceived benefits and costs of health insurance mandates and thus political outcomes. It considers how research and analysis is typically used by policy makers, and illustrates how participants inside and outside of state government have used the reports prepared by CHBRP as both guidance in policy design and as political ammunition. Although there is consensus that the review process has reduced the number of mandate bills that are passed out of the legislature, both supporters and opponents favor the new process and generally believe the reports strengthen their case in legislative debates over health insurance mandates. The role of the CHBRP is narrowly defined by statute at the present time, but the program may well face pressure to evolve from its current academic orientation into a more interactive, advisory role for legislators in the future.

Url:

DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00523.x

Links to Exploration step

ISTEX:B79BE5CA1A46F888020473518605A30F126348F8

Le document en format XML

<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Health Services Research as a Source of Legislative Analysis and Input: The Role of the California Health Benefits Review Program</title>
<author><name sortKey="Oliver, Thomas R" sort="Oliver, Thomas R" uniqKey="Oliver T" first="Thomas R." last="Oliver">Thomas R. Oliver</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Singer, Rachel Friedman" sort="Singer, Rachel Friedman" uniqKey="Singer R" first="Rachel Friedman" last="Singer">Rachel Friedman Singer</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:B79BE5CA1A46F888020473518605A30F126348F8</idno>
<date when="2006" year="2006">2006</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00523.x</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/B79BE5CA1A46F888020473518605A30F126348F8/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">005628</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">005628</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">005628</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">001740</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">001740</idno>
<idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0017-9124:2006:Oliver T:health:services:research</idno>
<idno type="wicri:source">PMC</idno>
<idno type="url">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1713221</idno>
<idno type="RBID">PMC:1713221</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Corpus">002E42</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PMC">002E42</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Curation">002E41</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Curation">002E41</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Checkpoint">003C70</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Checkpoint">003C70</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Merge">002241</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Curation">002241</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Checkpoint">002241</idno>
<idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0017-9124:2006:Oliver T:health:services:research</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">007E49</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Health Services Research as a Source of Legislative Analysis and Input: The Role of the California Health Benefits Review Program</title>
<author><name sortKey="Oliver, Thomas R" sort="Oliver, Thomas R" uniqKey="Oliver T" first="Thomas R." last="Oliver">Thomas R. Oliver</name>
<affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="subField"></wicri:noCountry>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Singer, Rachel Friedman" sort="Singer, Rachel Friedman" uniqKey="Singer R" first="Rachel Friedman" last="Singer">Rachel Friedman Singer</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="2"><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<placeName><region type="state">Maryland</region>
</placeName>
<wicri:cityArea>Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins University, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore</wicri:cityArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Health Services Research</title>
<title level="j" type="alt">HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0017-9124</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1475-6773</idno>
<imprint><biblScope unit="vol">41</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">3p2</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="1124">1124</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="1158">1158</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page-count">35</biblScope>
<publisher>Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher>
<pubPlace>Malden, USA</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2006-06">2006-06</date>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0017-9124</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0017-9124</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass></textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">This article examines the role of the California Health Benefits Review Program (CHBRP) as a source of information in state health policy making. It explains why the California benefits review process relies heavily on university‐based researchers and employs a broad set of criteria for review, which set it apart from similar programs in other states. It then analyzes the politics of health insurance mandates and how independent research and analysis might alter the perceived benefits and costs of health insurance mandates and thus political outcomes. It considers how research and analysis is typically used by policy makers, and illustrates how participants inside and outside of state government have used the reports prepared by CHBRP as both guidance in policy design and as political ammunition. Although there is consensus that the review process has reduced the number of mandate bills that are passed out of the legislature, both supporters and opponents favor the new process and generally believe the reports strengthen their case in legislative debates over health insurance mandates. The role of the CHBRP is narrowly defined by statute at the present time, but the program may well face pressure to evolve from its current academic orientation into a more interactive, advisory role for legislators in the future.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<double doi="10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00523.x"><ISTEX><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Health Services Research as a Source of Legislative Analysis and Input: The Role of the California Health Benefits Review Program</title>
<author><name sortKey="Oliver, Thomas R" sort="Oliver, Thomas R" uniqKey="Oliver T" first="Thomas R." last="Oliver">Thomas R. Oliver</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Singer, Rachel Friedman" sort="Singer, Rachel Friedman" uniqKey="Singer R" first="Rachel Friedman" last="Singer">Rachel Friedman Singer</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:B79BE5CA1A46F888020473518605A30F126348F8</idno>
<date when="2006" year="2006">2006</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00523.x</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/B79BE5CA1A46F888020473518605A30F126348F8/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">005628</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">005628</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">005628</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">001740</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">001740</idno>
<idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0017-9124:2006:Oliver T:health:services:research</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Health Services Research as a Source of Legislative Analysis and Input: The Role of the California Health Benefits Review Program</title>
<author><name sortKey="Oliver, Thomas R" sort="Oliver, Thomas R" uniqKey="Oliver T" first="Thomas R." last="Oliver">Thomas R. Oliver</name>
<affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="subField"></wicri:noCountry>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Singer, Rachel Friedman" sort="Singer, Rachel Friedman" uniqKey="Singer R" first="Rachel Friedman" last="Singer">Rachel Friedman Singer</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="2"><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<placeName><region type="state">Maryland</region>
</placeName>
<wicri:cityArea>Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins University, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore</wicri:cityArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Health Services Research</title>
<title level="j" type="alt">HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0017-9124</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1475-6773</idno>
<imprint><biblScope unit="vol">41</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">3p2</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="1124">1124</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="1158">1158</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page-count">35</biblScope>
<publisher>Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher>
<pubPlace>Malden, USA</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2006-06">2006-06</date>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0017-9124</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0017-9124</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass></textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">This article examines the role of the California Health Benefits Review Program (CHBRP) as a source of information in state health policy making. It explains why the California benefits review process relies heavily on university‐based researchers and employs a broad set of criteria for review, which set it apart from similar programs in other states. It then analyzes the politics of health insurance mandates and how independent research and analysis might alter the perceived benefits and costs of health insurance mandates and thus political outcomes. It considers how research and analysis is typically used by policy makers, and illustrates how participants inside and outside of state government have used the reports prepared by CHBRP as both guidance in policy design and as political ammunition. Although there is consensus that the review process has reduced the number of mandate bills that are passed out of the legislature, both supporters and opponents favor the new process and generally believe the reports strengthen their case in legislative debates over health insurance mandates. The role of the CHBRP is narrowly defined by statute at the present time, but the program may well face pressure to evolve from its current academic orientation into a more interactive, advisory role for legislators in the future.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
</ISTEX>
<PMC><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Health Services Research as a Source of Legislative Analysis and Input: The Role of the California Health Benefits Review Program</title>
<author><name sortKey="Oliver, Thomas R" sort="Oliver, Thomas R" uniqKey="Oliver T" first="Thomas R" last="Oliver">Thomas R. Oliver</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Singer, Rachel Friedman" sort="Singer, Rachel Friedman" uniqKey="Singer R" first="Rachel Friedman" last="Singer">Rachel Friedman Singer</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PMC</idno>
<idno type="pmid">16704675</idno>
<idno type="pmc">1713221</idno>
<idno type="url">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1713221</idno>
<idno type="RBID">PMC:1713221</idno>
<idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00523.x</idno>
<date when="2006">2006</date>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Corpus">002E42</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PMC">002E42</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Curation">002E41</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Curation">002E41</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Checkpoint">003C70</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Checkpoint">003C70</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Merge">002241</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Curation">002241</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Checkpoint">002241</idno>
<idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0017-9124:2006:Oliver T:health:services:research</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a" type="main">Health Services Research as a Source of Legislative Analysis and Input: The Role of the California Health Benefits Review Program</title>
<author><name sortKey="Oliver, Thomas R" sort="Oliver, Thomas R" uniqKey="Oliver T" first="Thomas R" last="Oliver">Thomas R. Oliver</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Singer, Rachel Friedman" sort="Singer, Rachel Friedman" uniqKey="Singer R" first="Rachel Friedman" last="Singer">Rachel Friedman Singer</name>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j">Health Services Research</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0017-9124</idno>
<imprint><date when="2006">2006</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass></textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p>This article examines the role of the California Health Benefits Review Program (CHBRP) as a source of information in state health policy making. It explains why the California benefits review process relies heavily on university-based researchers and employs a broad set of criteria for review, which set it apart from similar programs in other states. It then analyzes the politics of health insurance mandates and how independent research and analysis might alter the perceived benefits and costs of health insurance mandates and thus political outcomes. It considers how research and analysis is typically used by policy makers, and illustrates how participants inside and outside of state government have used the reports prepared by CHBRP as both guidance in policy design and as political ammunition. Although there is consensus that the review process has reduced the number of mandate bills that are passed out of the legislature, both supporters and opponents favor the new process and generally believe the reports strengthen their case in legislative debates over health insurance mandates. The role of the CHBRP is narrowly defined by statute at the present time, but the program may well face pressure to evolve from its current academic orientation into a more interactive, advisory role for legislators in the future.</p>
</div>
</front>
</TEI>
</PMC>
</double>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Sante/explor/LymphedemaV1/Data/Main/Merge

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 007E49 | SxmlIndent | more

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Merge/biblio.hfd -nk 007E49 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Sante
   |area=    LymphedemaV1
   |flux=    Main
   |étape=   Merge
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:B79BE5CA1A46F888020473518605A30F126348F8
   |texte=   Health Services Research as a Source of Legislative Analysis and Input: The Role of the California Health Benefits Review Program
}}

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.31.
Data generation: Sat Nov 4 17:40:35 2017. Site generation: Tue Feb 13 16:42:16 2024

Serveur d'exploration sur le lymphœdème

Health Services Research as a Source of Legislative Analysis and Input: The Role of the California Health Benefits Review Program

Health Services Research as a Source of Legislative Analysis and Input: The Role of the California Health Benefits Review Program

Source :

Abstract

Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)

Links to Exploration step

Le document en format XML

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

	Serveur d'exploration sur le lymphœdème
	Attention, ce site est en cours de développement ! Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts. Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.