Return to Status Quo Ante: The Need for Robust and Reversible Pandemic Emergency Measures.
Identifieur interne : 001055 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 001054; suivant : 001056Return to Status Quo Ante: The Need for Robust and Reversible Pandemic Emergency Measures.
Auteurs : Stephen Rainey ; Alberto GiubiliniSource :
- Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees [ 1469-2147 ] ; 2020.
Abstract
This paper presents a normative analysis of restrictive measures in response to a pandemic emergency. It applies to the context presented by the Corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19) global outbreak of 2019, as well as to future pandemics. First, a Millian-liberal argument justifies lockdown measures in order to protect liberty under pandemic conditions, consistent with commonly accepted principles of public health ethics. Second, a wider argument contextualizes specific issues that attend acting on the justified lockdown for western liberal democratic states, as modeled on discourse and accounted for by Jürgen Habermas. The authors argue that a range of norms are constructed in societies that, justifiably, need to be curtailed for the pandemic. The state has to take on the unusual role of sole guardian of norms under emergency pandemic conditions. Consistently with both the Millian-liberal justification and elements of Habermasian discourse ethics, they argue that that role can only be justified where it includes strategy for how to return political decisionmaking to the status quo ante. This is because emergency conditions are only justified as a means to protecting prepandemic norms. To this end, the authors propose that an emergency power committee is necessary to guarantee that state action during pandemic is aimed at re-establishing the conditions of legitimacy of government action that ecological factors (a virus) have temporarily curtailed.
DOI: 10.1017/S096318012000078X
PubMed: 33004091
PubMed Central: PMC7711351
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Return to Status Quo Ante: The Need for Robust and Reversible Pandemic Emergency Measures.</title><author><name sortKey="Rainey, Stephen" sort="Rainey, Stephen" uniqKey="Rainey S" first="Stephen" last="Rainey">Stephen Rainey</name></author><author><name sortKey="Giubilini, Alberto" sort="Giubilini, Alberto" uniqKey="Giubilini A" first="Alberto" last="Giubilini">Alberto Giubilini</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2020">2020</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:33004091</idno><idno type="pmid">33004091</idno><idno type="doi">10.1017/S096318012000078X</idno><idno type="pmc">PMC7711351</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">001451</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">001451</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">001451</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Curation">001451</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">001451</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Return to Status Quo Ante: The Need for Robust and Reversible Pandemic Emergency Measures.</title><author><name sortKey="Rainey, Stephen" sort="Rainey, Stephen" uniqKey="Rainey S" first="Stephen" last="Rainey">Stephen Rainey</name></author><author><name sortKey="Giubilini, Alberto" sort="Giubilini, Alberto" uniqKey="Giubilini A" first="Alberto" last="Giubilini">Alberto Giubilini</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees</title><idno type="eISSN">1469-2147</idno><imprint><date when="2020" type="published">2020</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">This paper presents a normative analysis of restrictive measures in response to a pandemic emergency. It applies to the context presented by the Corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19) global outbreak of 2019, as well as to future pandemics. First, a Millian-liberal argument justifies lockdown measures in order to protect liberty under pandemic conditions, consistent with commonly accepted principles of public health ethics. Second, a wider argument contextualizes specific issues that attend acting on the justified lockdown for western liberal democratic states, as modeled on discourse and accounted for by Jürgen Habermas. The authors argue that a range of norms are constructed in societies that, justifiably, need to be curtailed for the pandemic. The state has to take on the unusual role of sole guardian of norms under emergency pandemic conditions. Consistently with both the Millian-liberal justification and elements of Habermasian discourse ethics, they argue that that role can only be justified where it includes strategy for how to return political decisionmaking to the status quo ante. This is because emergency conditions are only justified as a means to protecting prepandemic norms. To this end, the authors propose that an emergency power committee is necessary to guarantee that state action during pandemic is aimed at re-establishing the conditions of legitimacy of government action that ecological factors (a virus) have temporarily curtailed.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="Publisher" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">33004091</PMID><DateRevised><Year>2020</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>07</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1469-2147</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><PubDate><Year>2020</Year><Month>Oct</Month><Day>02</Day></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Camb Q Healthc Ethics</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Return to Status Quo Ante: The Need for Robust and Reversible Pandemic Emergency Measures.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>1-12</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1017/S096318012000078X</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText>This paper presents a normative analysis of restrictive measures in response to a pandemic emergency. It applies to the context presented by the Corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19) global outbreak of 2019, as well as to future pandemics. First, a Millian-liberal argument justifies lockdown measures in order to protect liberty under pandemic conditions, consistent with commonly accepted principles of public health ethics. Second, a wider argument contextualizes specific issues that attend acting on the justified lockdown for western liberal democratic states, as modeled on discourse and accounted for by Jürgen Habermas. The authors argue that a range of norms are constructed in societies that, justifiably, need to be curtailed for the pandemic. The state has to take on the unusual role of sole guardian of norms under emergency pandemic conditions. Consistently with both the Millian-liberal justification and elements of Habermasian discourse ethics, they argue that that role can only be justified where it includes strategy for how to return political decisionmaking to the status quo ante. This is because emergency conditions are only justified as a means to protecting prepandemic norms. To this end, the authors propose that an emergency power committee is necessary to guarantee that state action during pandemic is aimed at re-establishing the conditions of legitimacy of government action that ecological factors (a virus) have temporarily curtailed.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Rainey</LastName><ForeName>Stephen</ForeName><Initials>S</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Giubilini</LastName><ForeName>Alberto</ForeName><Initials>A</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2020</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>02</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country><MedlineTA>Camb Q Healthc Ethics</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>9208482</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0963-1801</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>E</CitationSubset><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><KeywordList Owner="NOTNLM"><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Corona virus</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">ethics</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">pandemic response</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">political legitimacy</Keyword></KeywordList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2020</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>3</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2020</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>3</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2020</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>2</Day><Hour>5</Hour><Minute>29</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>aheadofprint</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">33004091</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1017/S096318012000078X</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pii">S096318012000078X</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC7711351</ArticleId></ArticleIdList><ReferenceList><Reference><Citation>BMJ. 2020 Jun 9;369:m2294</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">32518177</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>J Law Med Ethics. 2002 Summer;30(2):170-8</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">12066595</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Nature. 2020 Aug;584(7820):257-261</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">32512579</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2012 Oct;14(10):602-12</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">23285411</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>J Emerg Nurs. 2015 Jul;41(4):300-6</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">25510208</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>BMJ. 2020 Mar 18;368:m1075</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">32188590</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference></ReferenceList></PubmedData></pubmed><affiliations><list></list><tree><noCountry><name sortKey="Giubilini, Alberto" sort="Giubilini, Alberto" uniqKey="Giubilini A" first="Alberto" last="Giubilini">Alberto Giubilini</name><name sortKey="Rainey, Stephen" sort="Rainey, Stephen" uniqKey="Rainey S" first="Stephen" last="Rainey">Stephen Rainey</name></noCountry></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Sante/explor/LockdownV1/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001055 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 001055 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Sante
|area= LockdownV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Exploration
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:33004091
|texte= Return to Status Quo Ante: The Need for Robust and Reversible Pandemic Emergency Measures.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:33004091" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a LockdownV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.38. |  |