A COVID-19 descriptive study of life after lockdown in Wuhan, China.
Identifieur interne : 001287 ( Main/Corpus ); précédent : 001286; suivant : 001288A COVID-19 descriptive study of life after lockdown in Wuhan, China.
Auteurs : Tong Zhou ; Thuy-Vy Thi Nguyen ; Jiayi Zhong ; Junsheng LiuSource :
- Royal Society open science [ 2054-5703 ] ; 2020.
Abstract
On 8 April 2020, the Chinese government lifted the lockdown and opened up public transportation in Wuhan, China, the epicentre of the COVID-19 pandemic. After 76 days in lockdown, Wuhan residents were allowed to travel outside of the city and go back to work. Yet, given that there is still no vaccine for the virus, this leaves many doubting whether life will indeed go back to normal. The aim of this research was to track longitudinal changes in motivation for self-isolating, life-structured, indicators of well-being and mental health after lockdown was lifted. We have recruited 462 participants in Wuhan, China, prior to lockdown lift between 3 and 7 April 2020 (Time 1), and have followed up with 292 returning participants between 18 and 22 April 2020 (Time 2), 284 between 6 and 10 May 2020 (Time 3), and 279 between 25 and 29 May 2020 (Time 4). This four-wave study used latent growth models to examine how Wuhan residents' psychological experiences change (if at all) within the first two months after lockdown was lifted. The Stage 1 manuscript associated with this submission received in-principle acceptance (IPA) on 2 June 2020. Following IPA, the accepted Stage 1 version of the manuscript was preregistered on the OSF at https://osf.io/g2t3b. This preregistration was performed prior to data analysis. Generally, our study found that: (i) a majority of people still continue to value self-isolation after lockdown was lifted; (ii) by the end of lockdown, people perceived gradual return to normality and restored structure of everyday life; (iii) the psychological well-being slightly improved after lockdown was lifted; (iv) people who used problem solving and help-seeking as coping strategies during lockdown had better well-being and mental health by the end of the lockdown; (v) those who experienced more disruptions in daily life during lockdown would display more indicators of psychological ill-being by the end of the lockdown.
DOI: 10.1098/rsos.200705
PubMed: 33047032
PubMed Central: PMC7540789
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:33047032Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">A COVID-19 descriptive study of life after lockdown in Wuhan, China.</title><author><name sortKey="Zhou, Tong" sort="Zhou, Tong" uniqKey="Zhou T" first="Tong" last="Zhou">Tong Zhou</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Psychology, The School of Psychology and Cognitive Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Nguyen, Thuy Vy Thi" sort="Nguyen, Thuy Vy Thi" uniqKey="Nguyen T" first="Thuy-Vy Thi" last="Nguyen">Thuy-Vy Thi Nguyen</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>University of Durham, Durham, UK.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Zhong, Jiayi" sort="Zhong, Jiayi" uniqKey="Zhong J" first="Jiayi" last="Zhong">Jiayi Zhong</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Psychology, The School of Psychology and Cognitive Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Liu, Junsheng" sort="Liu, Junsheng" uniqKey="Liu J" first="Junsheng" last="Liu">Junsheng Liu</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Psychology, The School of Psychology and Cognitive Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2020">2020</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:33047032</idno><idno type="pmid">33047032</idno><idno type="doi">10.1098/rsos.200705</idno><idno type="pmc">PMC7540789</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">001287</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">001287</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">A COVID-19 descriptive study of life after lockdown in Wuhan, China.</title><author><name sortKey="Zhou, Tong" sort="Zhou, Tong" uniqKey="Zhou T" first="Tong" last="Zhou">Tong Zhou</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Psychology, The School of Psychology and Cognitive Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Nguyen, Thuy Vy Thi" sort="Nguyen, Thuy Vy Thi" uniqKey="Nguyen T" first="Thuy-Vy Thi" last="Nguyen">Thuy-Vy Thi Nguyen</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>University of Durham, Durham, UK.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Zhong, Jiayi" sort="Zhong, Jiayi" uniqKey="Zhong J" first="Jiayi" last="Zhong">Jiayi Zhong</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Psychology, The School of Psychology and Cognitive Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Liu, Junsheng" sort="Liu, Junsheng" uniqKey="Liu J" first="Junsheng" last="Liu">Junsheng Liu</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Psychology, The School of Psychology and Cognitive Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Royal Society open science</title><idno type="ISSN">2054-5703</idno><imprint><date when="2020" type="published">2020</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">On 8 April 2020, the Chinese government lifted the lockdown and opened up public transportation in Wuhan, China, the epicentre of the COVID-19 pandemic. After 76 days in lockdown, Wuhan residents were allowed to travel outside of the city and go back to work. Yet, given that there is still no vaccine for the virus, this leaves many doubting whether life will indeed go back to normal. The aim of this research was to track longitudinal changes in motivation for self-isolating, life-structured, indicators of well-being and mental health after lockdown was lifted. We have recruited 462 participants in Wuhan, China, prior to lockdown lift between 3 and 7 April 2020 (Time 1), and have followed up with 292 returning participants between 18 and 22 April 2020 (Time 2), 284 between 6 and 10 May 2020 (Time 3), and 279 between 25 and 29 May 2020 (Time 4). This four-wave study used latent growth models to examine how Wuhan residents' psychological experiences change (if at all) within the first two months after lockdown was lifted. The Stage 1 manuscript associated with this submission received in-principle acceptance (IPA) on 2 June 2020. Following IPA, the accepted Stage 1 version of the manuscript was preregistered on the OSF at https://osf.io/g2t3b. This preregistration was performed prior to data analysis. Generally, our study found that: (i) a majority of people still continue to value self-isolation after lockdown was lifted; (ii) by the end of lockdown, people perceived gradual return to normality and restored structure of everyday life; (iii) the psychological well-being slightly improved after lockdown was lifted; (iv) people who used problem solving and help-seeking as coping strategies during lockdown had better well-being and mental health by the end of the lockdown; (v) those who experienced more disruptions in daily life during lockdown would display more indicators of psychological ill-being by the end of the lockdown.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="PubMed-not-MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">33047032</PMID><DateRevised><Year>2020</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>16</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Electronic-eCollection"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">2054-5703</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>7</Volume><Issue>9</Issue><PubDate><Year>2020</Year><Month>Sep</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Royal Society open science</Title><ISOAbbreviation>R Soc Open Sci</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>A COVID-19 descriptive study of life after lockdown in Wuhan, China.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>200705</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1098/rsos.200705</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText>On 8 April 2020, the Chinese government lifted the lockdown and opened up public transportation in Wuhan, China, the epicentre of the COVID-19 pandemic. After 76 days in lockdown, Wuhan residents were allowed to travel outside of the city and go back to work. Yet, given that there is still no vaccine for the virus, this leaves many doubting whether life will indeed go back to normal. The aim of this research was to track longitudinal changes in motivation for self-isolating, life-structured, indicators of well-being and mental health after lockdown was lifted. We have recruited 462 participants in Wuhan, China, prior to lockdown lift between 3 and 7 April 2020 (Time 1), and have followed up with 292 returning participants between 18 and 22 April 2020 (Time 2), 284 between 6 and 10 May 2020 (Time 3), and 279 between 25 and 29 May 2020 (Time 4). This four-wave study used latent growth models to examine how Wuhan residents' psychological experiences change (if at all) within the first two months after lockdown was lifted. The Stage 1 manuscript associated with this submission received in-principle acceptance (IPA) on 2 June 2020. Following IPA, the accepted Stage 1 version of the manuscript was preregistered on the OSF at https://osf.io/g2t3b. This preregistration was performed prior to data analysis. Generally, our study found that: (i) a majority of people still continue to value self-isolation after lockdown was lifted; (ii) by the end of lockdown, people perceived gradual return to normality and restored structure of everyday life; (iii) the psychological well-being slightly improved after lockdown was lifted; (iv) people who used problem solving and help-seeking as coping strategies during lockdown had better well-being and mental health by the end of the lockdown; (v) those who experienced more disruptions in daily life during lockdown would display more indicators of psychological ill-being by the end of the lockdown.</AbstractText><CopyrightInformation>© 2020 The Authors.</CopyrightInformation></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Zhou</LastName><ForeName>Tong</ForeName><Initials>T</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Psychology, The School of Psychology and Cognitive Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Nguyen</LastName><ForeName>Thuy-Vy Thi</ForeName><Initials>TT</Initials><Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0003-0777-4204</Identifier><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>University of Durham, Durham, UK.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Zhong</LastName><ForeName>Jiayi</ForeName><Initials>J</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Psychology, The School of Psychology and Cognitive Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Liu</LastName><ForeName>Junsheng</ForeName><Initials>J</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Psychology, The School of Psychology and Cognitive Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2020</Year><Month>09</Month><Day>30</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>England</Country><MedlineTA>R Soc Open Sci</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>101647528</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>2054-5703</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><KeywordList Owner="NOTNLM"><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">COVID-19</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">depression</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">loneliness</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">well-being</Keyword></KeywordList><CoiStatement>We declare we have no competing interests.</CoiStatement></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2020</Year><Month>04</Month><Day>25</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2020</Year><Month>08</Month><Day>24</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2020</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>13</Day><Hour>5</Hour><Minute>39</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2020</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>14</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2020</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>14</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>1</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>epublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">33047032</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1098/rsos.200705</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pii">rsos200705</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC7540789</ArticleId></ArticleIdList><ReferenceList><Reference><Citation>Psychol Methods. 2017 Sep;22(3):426-449</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">27709974</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 30;17(9):</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">32365812</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>J Cogn Dev. 2010;11(2):121-136</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21743795</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Lancet. 2020 Mar 7;395(10226):764-766</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">32105609</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>J Pers Soc Psychol. 1989 Nov;57(5):749-61</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">2810024</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Behav Res Methods. 2014 Jun;46(2):357-71</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">24234337</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Am Psychol. 2020 Oct;75(7):897-908</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">32567879</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Minerva Pediatr. 2020 Jun;72(3):226-235</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">32613821</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>PLoS One. 2020 Apr 16;15(4):e0231924</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">32298385</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Ann Epidemiol. 2014 Jan;24(1):75-7</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">24210708</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Front Psychol. 2015 Mar 24;6:272</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">25852596</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Lancet. 2020 Mar 14;395(10227):912-920</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">32112714</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>R Soc Open Sci. 2020 May 13;7(5):200458</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">32537230</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>J Pers Soc Psychol. 2000 Sep;79(3):367-84</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">10981840</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Epidemiol Health. 2016 Nov 5;38:e2016048</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">28196409</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>JAMA. 2020 Apr 14;323(14):1406-1407</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">32083643</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Lancet. 2020 Apr 18;395(10232):1305-1314</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">32247320</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Brain Behav Immun. 2020 Oct;89:587-593</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">32681866</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Psychosom Med. 1994 Jul-Aug;56(4):296-305</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">7972611</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>SAGE Open Med. 2013 Dec 02;1:2050312113514576</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">26770693</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>J Pers. 2006 Dec;74(6):1557-85</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17083658</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>J Pers Assess. 1984 Oct;48(5):525-30</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16367513</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>PLoS One. 2013 Dec 27;8(12):e84164</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">24386345</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2020 Jul;14(4):474-475</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">32246886</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Psychiatry Res. 2018 Dec;270:89-96</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">30245381</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Apr;7(4):e15-e16</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">32085839</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>J Abnorm Psychol. 2003 Nov;112(4):545-57</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">14674868</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Psychol Sci. 2004 Jan;15(1):8-13</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">14717825</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>J Anxiety Disord. 2020 Apr;71:102211</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">32179380</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Annu Rev Psychol. 1997;48:191-214</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">9046559</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Soc Sci Med. 1983;17(4):201-11</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">6844952</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>J Fam Psychol. 2002 Dec;16(4):381-90</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">12561283</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference></ReferenceList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Sante/explor/LockdownV1/Data/Main/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001287 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001287 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Sante
|area= LockdownV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:33047032
|texte= A COVID-19 descriptive study of life after lockdown in Wuhan, China.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:33047032" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a LockdownV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.38. |  |